ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Female Breast Cancer Screening: 2023 Update
Early detection of breast cancer from regular screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Multiple different imaging modalities may be used to screen for breast cancer. Screening recommendations differ based on an individual’s risk of developing breast cancer. Numerous fac...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American College of Radiology 2024-06, Vol.21 (6), p.S126-S143 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S143 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | S126 |
container_title | Journal of the American College of Radiology |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Niell, Bethany L. Jochelson, Maxine S. Amir, Tali Brown, Ann Adamson, Megan Baron, Paul Bennett, Debbie L. Chetlen, Alison Dayaratna, Sandra Freer, Phoebe E. Ivansco, Lillian K. Klein, Katherine A. Malak, Sharp F. Mehta, Tejas S. Moy, Linda Neal, Colleen H. Newell, Mary S. Richman, Ilana B. Schonberg, Mara Small, William Ulaner, Gary A. Slanetz, Priscilla J. |
description | Early detection of breast cancer from regular screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Multiple different imaging modalities may be used to screen for breast cancer. Screening recommendations differ based on an individual’s risk of developing breast cancer. Numerous factors contribute to breast cancer risk, which is frequently divided into three major categories: average, intermediate, and high risk. For patients assigned female at birth with native breast tissue, mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are the recommended method for breast cancer screening in all risk categories. In addition to the recommendation of mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in high-risk patients, screening with breast MRI is recommended.
The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.019 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3063471604</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1546144024002606</els_id><sourcerecordid>3063471604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-9bdccfcb041711afbab51ffd4485def3f4e965ec34245b7762f8952006f0f713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNtKw0AQhhdRbK2-gBeSS28SZw85iTc1WA8UBK3g3bLZzEpKmtTdVPClfAifzA2tXno1M_D__8x8hJxSiCjQ5GIZLZW2EQMmImAR0HyPjGkcZyEX-ev-0IskpELAiBw5twRgaZplh2TEs4zxXNAxeZgWT8F0vbbd2taqxxadCwpb9-jH769ghivVYHBtUbk-KFSr0QbP2iK2dft2GfjlPHhZV956TA6Mahye7OqELGY3i-IunD_e3hfTeag5pH2Yl5XWRpcgaEqpMqUqY2pMJUQWV2i4EZgnMWoumIjLNE2YyfKYASQGTEr5hJxvY_3N7xt0vVzVTmPTqBa7jZMcEi5SmoDwUraVats5Z9FI_-RK2U9JQQ4I5VIOCOWAUAKTHqE3ne3yN-UKqz_LLzMvuNoK0D_5UaOVTtfowVS1Rd3Lqqv_y_8B7HSBoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3063471604</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Female Breast Cancer Screening: 2023 Update</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Niell, Bethany L. ; Jochelson, Maxine S. ; Amir, Tali ; Brown, Ann ; Adamson, Megan ; Baron, Paul ; Bennett, Debbie L. ; Chetlen, Alison ; Dayaratna, Sandra ; Freer, Phoebe E. ; Ivansco, Lillian K. ; Klein, Katherine A. ; Malak, Sharp F. ; Mehta, Tejas S. ; Moy, Linda ; Neal, Colleen H. ; Newell, Mary S. ; Richman, Ilana B. ; Schonberg, Mara ; Small, William ; Ulaner, Gary A. ; Slanetz, Priscilla J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Niell, Bethany L. ; Jochelson, Maxine S. ; Amir, Tali ; Brown, Ann ; Adamson, Megan ; Baron, Paul ; Bennett, Debbie L. ; Chetlen, Alison ; Dayaratna, Sandra ; Freer, Phoebe E. ; Ivansco, Lillian K. ; Klein, Katherine A. ; Malak, Sharp F. ; Mehta, Tejas S. ; Moy, Linda ; Neal, Colleen H. ; Newell, Mary S. ; Richman, Ilana B. ; Schonberg, Mara ; Small, William ; Ulaner, Gary A. ; Slanetz, Priscilla J. ; Expert Panel on Breast Imaging</creatorcontrib><description>Early detection of breast cancer from regular screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Multiple different imaging modalities may be used to screen for breast cancer. Screening recommendations differ based on an individual’s risk of developing breast cancer. Numerous factors contribute to breast cancer risk, which is frequently divided into three major categories: average, intermediate, and high risk. For patients assigned female at birth with native breast tissue, mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are the recommended method for breast cancer screening in all risk categories. In addition to the recommendation of mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in high-risk patients, screening with breast MRI is recommended.
The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1546-1440</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1558-349X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-349X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38823941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>appropriate use criteria ; Appropriateness Criteria ; AUC ; breast cancer ; breast cancer screening ; breast MRI ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; digital breast tomosynthesis ; Early Detection of Cancer - methods ; Evidence-Based Medicine ; Female ; female breast cancer screening ; Humans ; mammography ; Mammography - methods ; Mammography - standards ; Mass Screening - methods ; Risk Assessment ; Societies, Medical ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2024-06, Vol.21 (6), p.S126-S143</ispartof><rights>2024 American College of Radiology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-9bdccfcb041711afbab51ffd4485def3f4e965ec34245b7762f8952006f0f713</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1546144024002606$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38823941$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Niell, Bethany L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jochelson, Maxine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amir, Tali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Debbie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chetlen, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayaratna, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freer, Phoebe E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivansco, Lillian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malak, Sharp F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Tejas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moy, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Colleen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Mary S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richman, Ilana B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schonberg, Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulaner, Gary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slanetz, Priscilla J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Expert Panel on Breast Imaging</creatorcontrib><title>ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Female Breast Cancer Screening: 2023 Update</title><title>Journal of the American College of Radiology</title><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><description>Early detection of breast cancer from regular screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Multiple different imaging modalities may be used to screen for breast cancer. Screening recommendations differ based on an individual’s risk of developing breast cancer. Numerous factors contribute to breast cancer risk, which is frequently divided into three major categories: average, intermediate, and high risk. For patients assigned female at birth with native breast tissue, mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are the recommended method for breast cancer screening in all risk categories. In addition to the recommendation of mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in high-risk patients, screening with breast MRI is recommended.
The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.</description><subject>appropriate use criteria</subject><subject>Appropriateness Criteria</subject><subject>AUC</subject><subject>breast cancer</subject><subject>breast cancer screening</subject><subject>breast MRI</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>digital breast tomosynthesis</subject><subject>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Medicine</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>female breast cancer screening</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>mammography</subject><subject>Mammography - methods</subject><subject>Mammography - standards</subject><subject>Mass Screening - methods</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Societies, Medical</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1546-1440</issn><issn>1558-349X</issn><issn>1558-349X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kNtKw0AQhhdRbK2-gBeSS28SZw85iTc1WA8UBK3g3bLZzEpKmtTdVPClfAifzA2tXno1M_D__8x8hJxSiCjQ5GIZLZW2EQMmImAR0HyPjGkcZyEX-ev-0IskpELAiBw5twRgaZplh2TEs4zxXNAxeZgWT8F0vbbd2taqxxadCwpb9-jH769ghivVYHBtUbk-KFSr0QbP2iK2dft2GfjlPHhZV956TA6Mahye7OqELGY3i-IunD_e3hfTeag5pH2Yl5XWRpcgaEqpMqUqY2pMJUQWV2i4EZgnMWoumIjLNE2YyfKYASQGTEr5hJxvY_3N7xt0vVzVTmPTqBa7jZMcEi5SmoDwUraVats5Z9FI_-RK2U9JQQ4I5VIOCOWAUAKTHqE3ne3yN-UKqz_LLzMvuNoK0D_5UaOVTtfowVS1Rd3Lqqv_y_8B7HSBoQ</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Niell, Bethany L.</creator><creator>Jochelson, Maxine S.</creator><creator>Amir, Tali</creator><creator>Brown, Ann</creator><creator>Adamson, Megan</creator><creator>Baron, Paul</creator><creator>Bennett, Debbie L.</creator><creator>Chetlen, Alison</creator><creator>Dayaratna, Sandra</creator><creator>Freer, Phoebe E.</creator><creator>Ivansco, Lillian K.</creator><creator>Klein, Katherine A.</creator><creator>Malak, Sharp F.</creator><creator>Mehta, Tejas S.</creator><creator>Moy, Linda</creator><creator>Neal, Colleen H.</creator><creator>Newell, Mary S.</creator><creator>Richman, Ilana B.</creator><creator>Schonberg, Mara</creator><creator>Small, William</creator><creator>Ulaner, Gary A.</creator><creator>Slanetz, Priscilla J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Female Breast Cancer Screening: 2023 Update</title><author>Niell, Bethany L. ; Jochelson, Maxine S. ; Amir, Tali ; Brown, Ann ; Adamson, Megan ; Baron, Paul ; Bennett, Debbie L. ; Chetlen, Alison ; Dayaratna, Sandra ; Freer, Phoebe E. ; Ivansco, Lillian K. ; Klein, Katherine A. ; Malak, Sharp F. ; Mehta, Tejas S. ; Moy, Linda ; Neal, Colleen H. ; Newell, Mary S. ; Richman, Ilana B. ; Schonberg, Mara ; Small, William ; Ulaner, Gary A. ; Slanetz, Priscilla J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-9bdccfcb041711afbab51ffd4485def3f4e965ec34245b7762f8952006f0f713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>appropriate use criteria</topic><topic>Appropriateness Criteria</topic><topic>AUC</topic><topic>breast cancer</topic><topic>breast cancer screening</topic><topic>breast MRI</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>digital breast tomosynthesis</topic><topic>Early Detection of Cancer - methods</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Medicine</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>female breast cancer screening</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>mammography</topic><topic>Mammography - methods</topic><topic>Mammography - standards</topic><topic>Mass Screening - methods</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Societies, Medical</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Niell, Bethany L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jochelson, Maxine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amir, Tali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adamson, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baron, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Debbie L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chetlen, Alison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dayaratna, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freer, Phoebe E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivansco, Lillian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Katherine A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malak, Sharp F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mehta, Tejas S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moy, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neal, Colleen H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Newell, Mary S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richman, Ilana B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schonberg, Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Small, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulaner, Gary A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slanetz, Priscilla J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Expert Panel on Breast Imaging</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Niell, Bethany L.</au><au>Jochelson, Maxine S.</au><au>Amir, Tali</au><au>Brown, Ann</au><au>Adamson, Megan</au><au>Baron, Paul</au><au>Bennett, Debbie L.</au><au>Chetlen, Alison</au><au>Dayaratna, Sandra</au><au>Freer, Phoebe E.</au><au>Ivansco, Lillian K.</au><au>Klein, Katherine A.</au><au>Malak, Sharp F.</au><au>Mehta, Tejas S.</au><au>Moy, Linda</au><au>Neal, Colleen H.</au><au>Newell, Mary S.</au><au>Richman, Ilana B.</au><au>Schonberg, Mara</au><au>Small, William</au><au>Ulaner, Gary A.</au><au>Slanetz, Priscilla J.</au><aucorp>Expert Panel on Breast Imaging</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Female Breast Cancer Screening: 2023 Update</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American College of Radiology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Coll Radiol</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>S126</spage><epage>S143</epage><pages>S126-S143</pages><issn>1546-1440</issn><issn>1558-349X</issn><eissn>1558-349X</eissn><abstract>Early detection of breast cancer from regular screening substantially reduces breast cancer mortality and morbidity. Multiple different imaging modalities may be used to screen for breast cancer. Screening recommendations differ based on an individual’s risk of developing breast cancer. Numerous factors contribute to breast cancer risk, which is frequently divided into three major categories: average, intermediate, and high risk. For patients assigned female at birth with native breast tissue, mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis are the recommended method for breast cancer screening in all risk categories. In addition to the recommendation of mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in high-risk patients, screening with breast MRI is recommended.
The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38823941</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.019</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1546-1440 |
ispartof | Journal of the American College of Radiology, 2024-06, Vol.21 (6), p.S126-S143 |
issn | 1546-1440 1558-349X 1558-349X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3063471604 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | appropriate use criteria Appropriateness Criteria AUC breast cancer breast cancer screening breast MRI Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging digital breast tomosynthesis Early Detection of Cancer - methods Evidence-Based Medicine Female female breast cancer screening Humans mammography Mammography - methods Mammography - standards Mass Screening - methods Risk Assessment Societies, Medical United States |
title | ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Female Breast Cancer Screening: 2023 Update |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T21%3A03%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=ACR%20Appropriateness%20Criteria%C2%AE%20Female%20Breast%20Cancer%20Screening:%202023%20Update&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20College%20of%20Radiology&rft.au=Niell,%20Bethany%20L.&rft.aucorp=Expert%20Panel%20on%20Breast%20Imaging&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=S126&rft.epage=S143&rft.pages=S126-S143&rft.issn=1546-1440&rft.eissn=1558-349X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jacr.2024.02.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3063471604%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3063471604&rft_id=info:pmid/38823941&rft_els_id=S1546144024002606&rfr_iscdi=true |