Deep Learning‐Based Segmentation and Risk Stratification for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Transabdominal Ultrasound Imaging
Purpose To develop a deep neural network system for the automatic segmentation and risk stratification prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Methods A total of 980 ultrasound (US) images from 245 GIST patients were retrospectively collected. These images were randomly divided (6:2:2...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of ultrasound in medicine 2024-09, Vol.43 (9), p.1661-1672 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1672 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1661 |
container_title | Journal of ultrasound in medicine |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Zhuo, Minling Chen, Xing Guo, Jingjing Qian, Qingfu Xue, Ensheng Chen, Zhikui |
description | Purpose
To develop a deep neural network system for the automatic segmentation and risk stratification prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).
Methods
A total of 980 ultrasound (US) images from 245 GIST patients were retrospectively collected. These images were randomly divided (6:2:2) into a training set, a validation set, and an internal test set. Additionally, 188 US images from 47 prospective GIST patients were collected to evaluate the segmentation and diagnostic performance of the model. Five deep learning‐based segmentation networks, namely, UNet, FCN, DeepLabV3+, Swin Transformer, and SegNeXt, were employed, along with the ResNet 18 classification network, to select the most suitable network combination. The performance of the segmentation models was evaluated using metrics such as the intersection over union (IoU), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), recall, and precision. The classification performance was assessed based on accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Results
Among the compared models, SegNeXt‐ResNet18 exhibited the best segmentation and classification performance. On the internal test set, the proposed model achieved IoU, DSC, precision, and recall values of 82.1, 90.2, 91.7, and 88.8%, respectively. The accuracy and AUC for GIST risk prediction were 87.4 and 92.0%, respectively. On the external test set, the segmentation models exhibited IoU, DSC, precision, and recall values of 81.0, 89.5, 92.8, and 86.4%, respectively. The accuracy and AUC for GIST risk prediction were 86.7 and 92.5%, respectively.
Conclusion
This two‐stage SegNeXt‐ResNet18 model achieves automatic segmentation and risk stratification prediction for GISTs and demonstrates excellent segmentation and classification performance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jum.16489 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3063465747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3063465747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2159-3300c47d6fa532dc1d5cc2f035abc814deaffd3ef85ea6fb87689e955b3a3f623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1u1DAUhS0EokNhwQugLGGR1j9xfpZQSikahERn1tGNfT1yie3BTlR1V6kvwDPyJLhN6a6rIx19-u7VIeQto0eMUn58ObsjVldt94ysmJS07GomnpMV5U1bVrxrDsirlC4zSllTvSQHom05Z51ckdvPiPtijRC99bu_N38-QUJdXODOoZ9gssEX4HXx06ZfxcUUc2OsWnoTYnEGaYrB-gnTZD2Md0xwOTezCzEV1hebCD7BoIO7B7ZjtqQwZ-m5g12--pq8MDAmfPOQh2T75XRz8rVc_zg7P_m4LhVnsiuFoFRVja4NSMG1YloqxQ0VEgbVskojGKMFmlYi1GZom7rtsJNyECBMzcUheb949zH8nvPDvbNJ4TiCxzCnXtBaVLVsqiajHxZUxZBSRNPvo3UQr3tG-7vN-7x5f795Zt89aOfBoX4k_4-cgeMFuLIjXj9t6r9tvy_Kf1l1j9k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3063465747</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Deep Learning‐Based Segmentation and Risk Stratification for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Transabdominal Ultrasound Imaging</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Zhuo, Minling ; Chen, Xing ; Guo, Jingjing ; Qian, Qingfu ; Xue, Ensheng ; Chen, Zhikui</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhuo, Minling ; Chen, Xing ; Guo, Jingjing ; Qian, Qingfu ; Xue, Ensheng ; Chen, Zhikui</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To develop a deep neural network system for the automatic segmentation and risk stratification prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).
Methods
A total of 980 ultrasound (US) images from 245 GIST patients were retrospectively collected. These images were randomly divided (6:2:2) into a training set, a validation set, and an internal test set. Additionally, 188 US images from 47 prospective GIST patients were collected to evaluate the segmentation and diagnostic performance of the model. Five deep learning‐based segmentation networks, namely, UNet, FCN, DeepLabV3+, Swin Transformer, and SegNeXt, were employed, along with the ResNet 18 classification network, to select the most suitable network combination. The performance of the segmentation models was evaluated using metrics such as the intersection over union (IoU), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), recall, and precision. The classification performance was assessed based on accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Results
Among the compared models, SegNeXt‐ResNet18 exhibited the best segmentation and classification performance. On the internal test set, the proposed model achieved IoU, DSC, precision, and recall values of 82.1, 90.2, 91.7, and 88.8%, respectively. The accuracy and AUC for GIST risk prediction were 87.4 and 92.0%, respectively. On the external test set, the segmentation models exhibited IoU, DSC, precision, and recall values of 81.0, 89.5, 92.8, and 86.4%, respectively. The accuracy and AUC for GIST risk prediction were 86.7 and 92.5%, respectively.
Conclusion
This two‐stage SegNeXt‐ResNet18 model achieves automatic segmentation and risk stratification prediction for GISTs and demonstrates excellent segmentation and classification performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-4297</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1550-9613</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-9613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jum.16489</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38822195</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>deep learning ; gastrointestinal stromal tumor ; risk classification ; segmentation ; ultrasound image</subject><ispartof>Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2024-09, Vol.43 (9), p.1661-1672</ispartof><rights>2024 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2159-3300c47d6fa532dc1d5cc2f035abc814deaffd3ef85ea6fb87689e955b3a3f623</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8998-5437 ; 0000-0001-6941-9641</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjum.16489$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjum.16489$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38822195$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhuo, Minling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Jingjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Qingfu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Ensheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhikui</creatorcontrib><title>Deep Learning‐Based Segmentation and Risk Stratification for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Transabdominal Ultrasound Imaging</title><title>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</title><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><description>Purpose
To develop a deep neural network system for the automatic segmentation and risk stratification prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).
Methods
A total of 980 ultrasound (US) images from 245 GIST patients were retrospectively collected. These images were randomly divided (6:2:2) into a training set, a validation set, and an internal test set. Additionally, 188 US images from 47 prospective GIST patients were collected to evaluate the segmentation and diagnostic performance of the model. Five deep learning‐based segmentation networks, namely, UNet, FCN, DeepLabV3+, Swin Transformer, and SegNeXt, were employed, along with the ResNet 18 classification network, to select the most suitable network combination. The performance of the segmentation models was evaluated using metrics such as the intersection over union (IoU), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), recall, and precision. The classification performance was assessed based on accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Results
Among the compared models, SegNeXt‐ResNet18 exhibited the best segmentation and classification performance. On the internal test set, the proposed model achieved IoU, DSC, precision, and recall values of 82.1, 90.2, 91.7, and 88.8%, respectively. The accuracy and AUC for GIST risk prediction were 87.4 and 92.0%, respectively. On the external test set, the segmentation models exhibited IoU, DSC, precision, and recall values of 81.0, 89.5, 92.8, and 86.4%, respectively. The accuracy and AUC for GIST risk prediction were 86.7 and 92.5%, respectively.
Conclusion
This two‐stage SegNeXt‐ResNet18 model achieves automatic segmentation and risk stratification prediction for GISTs and demonstrates excellent segmentation and classification performance.</description><subject>deep learning</subject><subject>gastrointestinal stromal tumor</subject><subject>risk classification</subject><subject>segmentation</subject><subject>ultrasound image</subject><issn>0278-4297</issn><issn>1550-9613</issn><issn>1550-9613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1u1DAUhS0EokNhwQugLGGR1j9xfpZQSikahERn1tGNfT1yie3BTlR1V6kvwDPyJLhN6a6rIx19-u7VIeQto0eMUn58ObsjVldt94ysmJS07GomnpMV5U1bVrxrDsirlC4zSllTvSQHom05Z51ckdvPiPtijRC99bu_N38-QUJdXODOoZ9gssEX4HXx06ZfxcUUc2OsWnoTYnEGaYrB-gnTZD2Md0xwOTezCzEV1hebCD7BoIO7B7ZjtqQwZ-m5g12--pq8MDAmfPOQh2T75XRz8rVc_zg7P_m4LhVnsiuFoFRVja4NSMG1YloqxQ0VEgbVskojGKMFmlYi1GZom7rtsJNyECBMzcUheb949zH8nvPDvbNJ4TiCxzCnXtBaVLVsqiajHxZUxZBSRNPvo3UQr3tG-7vN-7x5f795Zt89aOfBoX4k_4-cgeMFuLIjXj9t6r9tvy_Kf1l1j9k</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Zhuo, Minling</creator><creator>Chen, Xing</creator><creator>Guo, Jingjing</creator><creator>Qian, Qingfu</creator><creator>Xue, Ensheng</creator><creator>Chen, Zhikui</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8998-5437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6941-9641</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Deep Learning‐Based Segmentation and Risk Stratification for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Transabdominal Ultrasound Imaging</title><author>Zhuo, Minling ; Chen, Xing ; Guo, Jingjing ; Qian, Qingfu ; Xue, Ensheng ; Chen, Zhikui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2159-3300c47d6fa532dc1d5cc2f035abc814deaffd3ef85ea6fb87689e955b3a3f623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>deep learning</topic><topic>gastrointestinal stromal tumor</topic><topic>risk classification</topic><topic>segmentation</topic><topic>ultrasound image</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhuo, Minling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Jingjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Qingfu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Ensheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhikui</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhuo, Minling</au><au>Chen, Xing</au><au>Guo, Jingjing</au><au>Qian, Qingfu</au><au>Xue, Ensheng</au><au>Chen, Zhikui</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Deep Learning‐Based Segmentation and Risk Stratification for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Transabdominal Ultrasound Imaging</atitle><jtitle>Journal of ultrasound in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Ultrasound Med</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1661</spage><epage>1672</epage><pages>1661-1672</pages><issn>0278-4297</issn><issn>1550-9613</issn><eissn>1550-9613</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To develop a deep neural network system for the automatic segmentation and risk stratification prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).
Methods
A total of 980 ultrasound (US) images from 245 GIST patients were retrospectively collected. These images were randomly divided (6:2:2) into a training set, a validation set, and an internal test set. Additionally, 188 US images from 47 prospective GIST patients were collected to evaluate the segmentation and diagnostic performance of the model. Five deep learning‐based segmentation networks, namely, UNet, FCN, DeepLabV3+, Swin Transformer, and SegNeXt, were employed, along with the ResNet 18 classification network, to select the most suitable network combination. The performance of the segmentation models was evaluated using metrics such as the intersection over union (IoU), Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), recall, and precision. The classification performance was assessed based on accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).
Results
Among the compared models, SegNeXt‐ResNet18 exhibited the best segmentation and classification performance. On the internal test set, the proposed model achieved IoU, DSC, precision, and recall values of 82.1, 90.2, 91.7, and 88.8%, respectively. The accuracy and AUC for GIST risk prediction were 87.4 and 92.0%, respectively. On the external test set, the segmentation models exhibited IoU, DSC, precision, and recall values of 81.0, 89.5, 92.8, and 86.4%, respectively. The accuracy and AUC for GIST risk prediction were 86.7 and 92.5%, respectively.
Conclusion
This two‐stage SegNeXt‐ResNet18 model achieves automatic segmentation and risk stratification prediction for GISTs and demonstrates excellent segmentation and classification performance.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>38822195</pmid><doi>10.1002/jum.16489</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8998-5437</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6941-9641</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-4297 |
ispartof | Journal of ultrasound in medicine, 2024-09, Vol.43 (9), p.1661-1672 |
issn | 0278-4297 1550-9613 1550-9613 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3063465747 |
source | Wiley Journals |
subjects | deep learning gastrointestinal stromal tumor risk classification segmentation ultrasound image |
title | Deep Learning‐Based Segmentation and Risk Stratification for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Transabdominal Ultrasound Imaging |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A49%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Deep%20Learning%E2%80%90Based%20Segmentation%20and%20Risk%20Stratification%20for%20Gastrointestinal%20Stromal%20Tumors%20in%20Transabdominal%20Ultrasound%20Imaging&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20ultrasound%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Zhuo,%20Minling&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1661&rft.epage=1672&rft.pages=1661-1672&rft.issn=0278-4297&rft.eissn=1550-9613&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jum.16489&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3063465747%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3063465747&rft_id=info:pmid/38822195&rfr_iscdi=true |