The impact of a patient‐centred care pathway for patients treated with oral anticancer drugs: A multicentre pre−posttest study in Flanders
Rationale In the Collaborative Network To Take Responsibility for Oral Anticancer Therapy (CONTACT) project, an evidence‐based and patient‐centred care(PCC) pathway was implemented in 12 oncology departments in Flanders. The care pathway was developed in cocreation by an interdisciplinary project te...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 2024-10, Vol.30 (7), p.1196-1217 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1217 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1196 |
container_title | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Kenis, Ilyse Van Hecke, Ann Foulon, Veerle |
description | Rationale
In the Collaborative Network To Take Responsibility for Oral Anticancer Therapy (CONTACT) project, an evidence‐based and patient‐centred care(PCC) pathway was implemented in 12 oncology departments in Flanders. The care pathway was developed in cocreation by an interdisciplinary project team, and tailored to the local hospital context.
Aims and Objectives
In this study, the impact of the care pathways on quality of PCC and other patient outcomes was investigated.
Method
A pre−posttest study was performed in nine of the participating oncology departments. The primary outcome was quality of PCC. Furthermore, level of patient self‐management, medication adherence, satisfaction with information about the oral anticancer drug and quality of life were measured as secondary outcomes. Linear mixed models were used to investigate differences in outcomes between the pre‐ and posttest group.
Results
Quality of PCC, as well as all secondary outcomes improved after implementation of the care pathway. However, the changes in pre‐ and posttest scores were not significant. The overall quality of PCC increased from 3.72 to 3.88, measured on a five‐point Likert scale (p = 0.124).
Conclusion
This study showed small, however, no significant improvements in the quality of PCC and other patient outcomes. The lack of significant changes can be attributed to the complexity of the care pathway development, poor or unstable implementation of the care pathway and limited changes in follow‐up care. More insight in the actual implementation of the care pathway and potential contextual factors influencing its effect is needed to help understand the outcomes of this pre−posttest study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jep.14027 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3063460980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3063460980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2437-d42c4619307c0b346130da4f4822050a608a01716106622026eb7d2ada216aae3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kT1vFDEQhi0EIiFQ8AeQJZpQbDK2d-09uihKCCgSFKG25uxZbk_7he3V6TpKKoT4ifkl8eUSCiTczOj1o0cjvYy9FnAi8jtd03QiSpDmCTsUSleFNJV6utsrXQi5KA_YixjXAEJBZZ6zA1XXojZCHbJfNyvibT-hS3xsOPIJU0tDuv3x2-URyHOHgXbxaoNb3ozhEYk8f2PKxKZNKz4G7DgOqXU4OArch_lbfM_PeD93ObyX8SnQ7c8_0xhToph4TLPf8nbglx0OnkJ8yZ412EV69TCP2NfLi5vzq-L684eP52fXhZOlMoUvpSu1WCgwDpYqrwo8lk1ZSwkVoIYaQRihBWidI6lpabxEj1JoRFJH7HjvncL4fc6n2L6Njrp8Bo1ztAp0tsKihoy-_Qddj3MY8nVWCViAqSspMvVuT7kwxhiosVNoewxbK8DuSrK5JHtfUmbfPBjnZU_-L_nYSgZO98Cm7Wj7f5P9dPFlr7wDlTadZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3109078521</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The impact of a patient‐centred care pathway for patients treated with oral anticancer drugs: A multicentre pre−posttest study in Flanders</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Kenis, Ilyse ; Van Hecke, Ann ; Foulon, Veerle</creator><creatorcontrib>Kenis, Ilyse ; Van Hecke, Ann ; Foulon, Veerle</creatorcontrib><description>Rationale
In the Collaborative Network To Take Responsibility for Oral Anticancer Therapy (CONTACT) project, an evidence‐based and patient‐centred care(PCC) pathway was implemented in 12 oncology departments in Flanders. The care pathway was developed in cocreation by an interdisciplinary project team, and tailored to the local hospital context.
Aims and Objectives
In this study, the impact of the care pathways on quality of PCC and other patient outcomes was investigated.
Method
A pre−posttest study was performed in nine of the participating oncology departments. The primary outcome was quality of PCC. Furthermore, level of patient self‐management, medication adherence, satisfaction with information about the oral anticancer drug and quality of life were measured as secondary outcomes. Linear mixed models were used to investigate differences in outcomes between the pre‐ and posttest group.
Results
Quality of PCC, as well as all secondary outcomes improved after implementation of the care pathway. However, the changes in pre‐ and posttest scores were not significant. The overall quality of PCC increased from 3.72 to 3.88, measured on a five‐point Likert scale (p = 0.124).
Conclusion
This study showed small, however, no significant improvements in the quality of PCC and other patient outcomes. The lack of significant changes can be attributed to the complexity of the care pathway development, poor or unstable implementation of the care pathway and limited changes in follow‐up care. More insight in the actual implementation of the care pathway and potential contextual factors influencing its effect is needed to help understand the outcomes of this pre−posttest study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-1294</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2753</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jep.14027</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38818713</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cancer ; care pathway ; Clinical outcomes ; Oncology ; oral anticancer drugs ; patient‐centred care ; quality of healthcare</subject><ispartof>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2024-10, Vol.30 (7), p.1196-1217</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2437-d42c4619307c0b346130da4f4822050a608a01716106622026eb7d2ada216aae3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4053-3915 ; 0000-0003-3576-7159 ; 0000-0002-6049-145X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjep.14027$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjep.14027$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38818713$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kenis, Ilyse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hecke, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foulon, Veerle</creatorcontrib><title>The impact of a patient‐centred care pathway for patients treated with oral anticancer drugs: A multicentre pre−posttest study in Flanders</title><title>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</title><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><description>Rationale
In the Collaborative Network To Take Responsibility for Oral Anticancer Therapy (CONTACT) project, an evidence‐based and patient‐centred care(PCC) pathway was implemented in 12 oncology departments in Flanders. The care pathway was developed in cocreation by an interdisciplinary project team, and tailored to the local hospital context.
Aims and Objectives
In this study, the impact of the care pathways on quality of PCC and other patient outcomes was investigated.
Method
A pre−posttest study was performed in nine of the participating oncology departments. The primary outcome was quality of PCC. Furthermore, level of patient self‐management, medication adherence, satisfaction with information about the oral anticancer drug and quality of life were measured as secondary outcomes. Linear mixed models were used to investigate differences in outcomes between the pre‐ and posttest group.
Results
Quality of PCC, as well as all secondary outcomes improved after implementation of the care pathway. However, the changes in pre‐ and posttest scores were not significant. The overall quality of PCC increased from 3.72 to 3.88, measured on a five‐point Likert scale (p = 0.124).
Conclusion
This study showed small, however, no significant improvements in the quality of PCC and other patient outcomes. The lack of significant changes can be attributed to the complexity of the care pathway development, poor or unstable implementation of the care pathway and limited changes in follow‐up care. More insight in the actual implementation of the care pathway and potential contextual factors influencing its effect is needed to help understand the outcomes of this pre−posttest study.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>care pathway</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>oral anticancer drugs</subject><subject>patient‐centred care</subject><subject>quality of healthcare</subject><issn>1356-1294</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kT1vFDEQhi0EIiFQ8AeQJZpQbDK2d-09uihKCCgSFKG25uxZbk_7he3V6TpKKoT4ifkl8eUSCiTczOj1o0cjvYy9FnAi8jtd03QiSpDmCTsUSleFNJV6utsrXQi5KA_YixjXAEJBZZ6zA1XXojZCHbJfNyvibT-hS3xsOPIJU0tDuv3x2-URyHOHgXbxaoNb3ozhEYk8f2PKxKZNKz4G7DgOqXU4OArch_lbfM_PeD93ObyX8SnQ7c8_0xhToph4TLPf8nbglx0OnkJ8yZ412EV69TCP2NfLi5vzq-L684eP52fXhZOlMoUvpSu1WCgwDpYqrwo8lk1ZSwkVoIYaQRihBWidI6lpabxEj1JoRFJH7HjvncL4fc6n2L6Njrp8Bo1ztAp0tsKihoy-_Qddj3MY8nVWCViAqSspMvVuT7kwxhiosVNoewxbK8DuSrK5JHtfUmbfPBjnZU_-L_nYSgZO98Cm7Wj7f5P9dPFlr7wDlTadZw</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Kenis, Ilyse</creator><creator>Van Hecke, Ann</creator><creator>Foulon, Veerle</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4053-3915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-7159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6049-145X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>The impact of a patient‐centred care pathway for patients treated with oral anticancer drugs: A multicentre pre−posttest study in Flanders</title><author>Kenis, Ilyse ; Van Hecke, Ann ; Foulon, Veerle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2437-d42c4619307c0b346130da4f4822050a608a01716106622026eb7d2ada216aae3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>care pathway</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>oral anticancer drugs</topic><topic>patient‐centred care</topic><topic>quality of healthcare</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kenis, Ilyse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Hecke, Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foulon, Veerle</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kenis, Ilyse</au><au>Van Hecke, Ann</au><au>Foulon, Veerle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The impact of a patient‐centred care pathway for patients treated with oral anticancer drugs: A multicentre pre−posttest study in Flanders</atitle><jtitle>Journal of evaluation in clinical practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Eval Clin Pract</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1196</spage><epage>1217</epage><pages>1196-1217</pages><issn>1356-1294</issn><issn>1365-2753</issn><eissn>1365-2753</eissn><abstract>Rationale
In the Collaborative Network To Take Responsibility for Oral Anticancer Therapy (CONTACT) project, an evidence‐based and patient‐centred care(PCC) pathway was implemented in 12 oncology departments in Flanders. The care pathway was developed in cocreation by an interdisciplinary project team, and tailored to the local hospital context.
Aims and Objectives
In this study, the impact of the care pathways on quality of PCC and other patient outcomes was investigated.
Method
A pre−posttest study was performed in nine of the participating oncology departments. The primary outcome was quality of PCC. Furthermore, level of patient self‐management, medication adherence, satisfaction with information about the oral anticancer drug and quality of life were measured as secondary outcomes. Linear mixed models were used to investigate differences in outcomes between the pre‐ and posttest group.
Results
Quality of PCC, as well as all secondary outcomes improved after implementation of the care pathway. However, the changes in pre‐ and posttest scores were not significant. The overall quality of PCC increased from 3.72 to 3.88, measured on a five‐point Likert scale (p = 0.124).
Conclusion
This study showed small, however, no significant improvements in the quality of PCC and other patient outcomes. The lack of significant changes can be attributed to the complexity of the care pathway development, poor or unstable implementation of the care pathway and limited changes in follow‐up care. More insight in the actual implementation of the care pathway and potential contextual factors influencing its effect is needed to help understand the outcomes of this pre−posttest study.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38818713</pmid><doi>10.1111/jep.14027</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4053-3915</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3576-7159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6049-145X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1356-1294 |
ispartof | Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2024-10, Vol.30 (7), p.1196-1217 |
issn | 1356-1294 1365-2753 1365-2753 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3063460980 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Cancer care pathway Clinical outcomes Oncology oral anticancer drugs patient‐centred care quality of healthcare |
title | The impact of a patient‐centred care pathway for patients treated with oral anticancer drugs: A multicentre pre−posttest study in Flanders |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T06%3A49%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20impact%20of%20a%20patient%E2%80%90centred%20care%20pathway%20for%20patients%20treated%20with%20oral%20anticancer%20drugs:%20A%20multicentre%20pre%E2%88%92posttest%20study%20in%20Flanders&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20evaluation%20in%20clinical%20practice&rft.au=Kenis,%20Ilyse&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1196&rft.epage=1217&rft.pages=1196-1217&rft.issn=1356-1294&rft.eissn=1365-2753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jep.14027&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3063460980%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3109078521&rft_id=info:pmid/38818713&rfr_iscdi=true |