Interactive digital tools to support empowerment of people with cancer: a systematic literature review

Purpose To identify and synthesise interactive digital tools used to support the empowerment of people with cancer and the outcomes of these tools. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, Eric, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases in May 2023. I...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2024-06, Vol.32 (6), p.396, Article 396
Hauptverfasser: Tuominen, Leena, Leino-Kilpi, Helena, Poraharju, Jenna, Cabutto, Daniela, Carrion, Carme, Lehtiö, Leeni, Moretó, Sónia, Stolt, Minna, Sulosaari, Virpi, Virtanen, Heli
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To identify and synthesise interactive digital tools used to support the empowerment of people with cancer and the outcomes of these tools. Methods A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, Eric, Scopus, and PsycINFO databases in May 2023. Inclusion criteria were patient empowerment as an outcome supported by interactive digital tools expressed in study goal, methods or results, peer-reviewed studies published since 2010 in cancer care. Narrative synthesis was applied, and the quality of the studies was assessed following Joanna Briggs Institute checklists. Results Out of 1571 records screened, 39 studies published in 2011–2022 with RCT (17), single-arm trial (15), quasi-experimental (1), and qualitative designs (6) were included. A total of 30 interactive digital tools were identified to support empowerment (4) and related aspects, such as self-management (2), coping (4), patient activation (9), and self-efficacy (19). Significant positive effects were found on empowerment (1), self-management (1), coping (1), patient activation (2), and self-efficacy (10) . Patient experiences were positive. Interactivity occurred with the tool itself (22), peers (7), or nurses (7), physicians (2), psychologists, (2) or social workers (1). Conclusion Interactive digital tools have been developed extensively in recent years, varying in terms of content and methodology, favouring feasibility and pilot designs. In all of the tools, people with cancer are either active or recipients of information. The research evidence indicates positive outcomes for patient empowerment through interactive digital tools. Thus, even though promising, there still is need for further testing of the tools.
ISSN:0941-4355
1433-7339
1433-7339
DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-08545-9