Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease (LDD). Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials.gov, etc....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World neurosurgery 2024-08, Vol.188, p.199-210.e1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 210.e1 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 199 |
container_title | World neurosurgery |
container_volume | 188 |
creator | Guo, Tianci Ding, Fenfang Fu, Bifeng Yang, Zhenghui Yang, Yuhang Liu, Aifeng Wang, Ping |
description | To evaluate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease (LDD).
Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials.gov, etc. were searched from inception to October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) comparing ERAS program with traditional protocol of MIS-TLIF for LDD were included.
A total of 11 studies were included for final analysis. The pooled results of RCTs showed that compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could reduce the length of hospital stay, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications, decrease visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and improve patient satisfaction (P < 0.05). However, the pooled results of CSs revealed no statistical difference in the ODI score, fusion rate, operation time, and incidence of complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could effectively shorten the length of hospital stay, operation time, decrease intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of postoperative complications, promote postoperative pain relief, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction. This study confirmed the value of ERAS in MIS-TLIF surgery and provided evidence for the standardization of ERAS in the future. Considering that the pooled results of RCTs and CSs are not completely consistent, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these conclusions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.133 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3062532817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1878875024008969</els_id><sourcerecordid>3062532817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-780c13ba50eee6c30cd99e24c1536c958e424b43a87218d838ad2944b1025e563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEolXpC7BAXpZFgn_ixEFsomoKlaai6rRry3FuBo8Su9jOVHlDHgsP03aJN7Z1zz2-Pl-WfSS4IJhUX3bFk4W5oJiWBeYFYexNdkpELXJRV83b1zPHJ9l5CDucFiOlqNn77IQJQXCqnWZ_VsNgtNILUrZHGzVAXJAb0Mr-UlZDj-5Auz34BbVDBI82s98ebheru3bzGd16F512Y0CD8-hWRQM2BvRge_BbZ-wW3RhrJjWOC7q2exXMHtC9VzYkvZqMVSNaz1OnfCon_871C7qag3H25amvqEWbJUSYkrtO8-wNPP2b9gaiyttksQQTPmTvBjUGOH_ez7KHq9X95Y98_fP79WW7zjVldcxrgTVhneIYACrNsO6bBmipCWeVbriAkpZdyZSoKRG9YEL1tCnLjmDKgVfsLLs4-j5693uGEOVkgoZxVBbcHCTDFeWMClInKT1KtXcheBjko09Z-EUSLA8Q5U4eIMoDRIm5TBBT06dn_7mboH9teUGWBN-OAki_TFl4GXRKPbEyHnSUvTP_8_8LQZewjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3062532817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Guo, Tianci ; Ding, Fenfang ; Fu, Bifeng ; Yang, Zhenghui ; Yang, Yuhang ; Liu, Aifeng ; Wang, Ping</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Tianci ; Ding, Fenfang ; Fu, Bifeng ; Yang, Zhenghui ; Yang, Yuhang ; Liu, Aifeng ; Wang, Ping</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease (LDD).
Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials.gov, etc. were searched from inception to October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) comparing ERAS program with traditional protocol of MIS-TLIF for LDD were included.
A total of 11 studies were included for final analysis. The pooled results of RCTs showed that compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could reduce the length of hospital stay, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications, decrease visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and improve patient satisfaction (P < 0.05). However, the pooled results of CSs revealed no statistical difference in the ODI score, fusion rate, operation time, and incidence of complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could effectively shorten the length of hospital stay, operation time, decrease intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of postoperative complications, promote postoperative pain relief, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction. This study confirmed the value of ERAS in MIS-TLIF surgery and provided evidence for the standardization of ERAS in the future. Considering that the pooled results of RCTs and CSs are not completely consistent, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.133</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38810875</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Enhanced recovery after surgery ; Lumbar degenerative disease ; Meta-analysis ; Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2024-08, Vol.188, p.199-210.e1</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-780c13ba50eee6c30cd99e24c1536c958e424b43a87218d838ad2944b1025e563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.133$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38810875$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Tianci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Fenfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Bifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhenghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yuhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Aifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ping</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease (LDD).
Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials.gov, etc. were searched from inception to October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) comparing ERAS program with traditional protocol of MIS-TLIF for LDD were included.
A total of 11 studies were included for final analysis. The pooled results of RCTs showed that compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could reduce the length of hospital stay, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications, decrease visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and improve patient satisfaction (P < 0.05). However, the pooled results of CSs revealed no statistical difference in the ODI score, fusion rate, operation time, and incidence of complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could effectively shorten the length of hospital stay, operation time, decrease intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of postoperative complications, promote postoperative pain relief, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction. This study confirmed the value of ERAS in MIS-TLIF surgery and provided evidence for the standardization of ERAS in the future. Considering that the pooled results of RCTs and CSs are not completely consistent, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.</description><subject>Enhanced recovery after surgery</subject><subject>Lumbar degenerative disease</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEolXpC7BAXpZFgn_ixEFsomoKlaai6rRry3FuBo8Su9jOVHlDHgsP03aJN7Z1zz2-Pl-WfSS4IJhUX3bFk4W5oJiWBeYFYexNdkpELXJRV83b1zPHJ9l5CDucFiOlqNn77IQJQXCqnWZ_VsNgtNILUrZHGzVAXJAb0Mr-UlZDj-5Auz34BbVDBI82s98ebheru3bzGd16F512Y0CD8-hWRQM2BvRge_BbZ-wW3RhrJjWOC7q2exXMHtC9VzYkvZqMVSNaz1OnfCon_871C7qag3H25amvqEWbJUSYkrtO8-wNPP2b9gaiyttksQQTPmTvBjUGOH_ez7KHq9X95Y98_fP79WW7zjVldcxrgTVhneIYACrNsO6bBmipCWeVbriAkpZdyZSoKRG9YEL1tCnLjmDKgVfsLLs4-j5693uGEOVkgoZxVBbcHCTDFeWMClInKT1KtXcheBjko09Z-EUSLA8Q5U4eIMoDRIm5TBBT06dn_7mboH9teUGWBN-OAki_TFl4GXRKPbEyHnSUvTP_8_8LQZewjw</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Guo, Tianci</creator><creator>Ding, Fenfang</creator><creator>Fu, Bifeng</creator><creator>Yang, Zhenghui</creator><creator>Yang, Yuhang</creator><creator>Liu, Aifeng</creator><creator>Wang, Ping</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Guo, Tianci ; Ding, Fenfang ; Fu, Bifeng ; Yang, Zhenghui ; Yang, Yuhang ; Liu, Aifeng ; Wang, Ping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-780c13ba50eee6c30cd99e24c1536c958e424b43a87218d838ad2944b1025e563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Enhanced recovery after surgery</topic><topic>Lumbar degenerative disease</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Tianci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Fenfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Bifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhenghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yuhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Aifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ping</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Tianci</au><au>Ding, Fenfang</au><au>Fu, Bifeng</au><au>Yang, Zhenghui</au><au>Yang, Yuhang</au><au>Liu, Aifeng</au><au>Wang, Ping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>188</volume><spage>199</spage><epage>210.e1</epage><pages>199-210.e1</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease (LDD).
Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials.gov, etc. were searched from inception to October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) comparing ERAS program with traditional protocol of MIS-TLIF for LDD were included.
A total of 11 studies were included for final analysis. The pooled results of RCTs showed that compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could reduce the length of hospital stay, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications, decrease visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and improve patient satisfaction (P < 0.05). However, the pooled results of CSs revealed no statistical difference in the ODI score, fusion rate, operation time, and incidence of complications between the two groups (P > 0.05).
Compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could effectively shorten the length of hospital stay, operation time, decrease intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of postoperative complications, promote postoperative pain relief, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction. This study confirmed the value of ERAS in MIS-TLIF surgery and provided evidence for the standardization of ERAS in the future. Considering that the pooled results of RCTs and CSs are not completely consistent, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38810875</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.133</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1878-8750 |
ispartof | World neurosurgery, 2024-08, Vol.188, p.199-210.e1 |
issn | 1878-8750 1878-8769 1878-8769 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3062532817 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Enhanced recovery after surgery Lumbar degenerative disease Meta-analysis Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion Systematic review |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A57%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20Safety%20of%20Enhanced%20Recovery%20After%20Surgery%20(ERAS)%20Protocols%20for%20Patients%20Undergoing%20Minimally%20Invasive%20Transforaminal%20Lumbar%20Interbody%20Fusion%20Surgery:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Guo,%20Tianci&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=188&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=210.e1&rft.pages=199-210.e1&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.133&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3062532817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3062532817&rft_id=info:pmid/38810875&rft_els_id=S1878875024008969&rfr_iscdi=true |