Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease (LDD). Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials.gov, etc....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World neurosurgery 2024-08, Vol.188, p.199-210.e1
Hauptverfasser: Guo, Tianci, Ding, Fenfang, Fu, Bifeng, Yang, Zhenghui, Yang, Yuhang, Liu, Aifeng, Wang, Ping
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 210.e1
container_issue
container_start_page 199
container_title World neurosurgery
container_volume 188
creator Guo, Tianci
Ding, Fenfang
Fu, Bifeng
Yang, Zhenghui
Yang, Yuhang
Liu, Aifeng
Wang, Ping
description To evaluate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease (LDD). Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials.gov, etc. were searched from inception to October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) comparing ERAS program with traditional protocol of MIS-TLIF for LDD were included. A total of 11 studies were included for final analysis. The pooled results of RCTs showed that compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could reduce the length of hospital stay, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications, decrease visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and improve patient satisfaction (P < 0.05). However, the pooled results of CSs revealed no statistical difference in the ODI score, fusion rate, operation time, and incidence of complications between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could effectively shorten the length of hospital stay, operation time, decrease intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of postoperative complications, promote postoperative pain relief, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction. This study confirmed the value of ERAS in MIS-TLIF surgery and provided evidence for the standardization of ERAS in the future. Considering that the pooled results of RCTs and CSs are not completely consistent, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.133
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3062532817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1878875024008969</els_id><sourcerecordid>3062532817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-780c13ba50eee6c30cd99e24c1536c958e424b43a87218d838ad2944b1025e563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEolXpC7BAXpZFgn_ixEFsomoKlaai6rRry3FuBo8Su9jOVHlDHgsP03aJN7Z1zz2-Pl-WfSS4IJhUX3bFk4W5oJiWBeYFYexNdkpELXJRV83b1zPHJ9l5CDucFiOlqNn77IQJQXCqnWZ_VsNgtNILUrZHGzVAXJAb0Mr-UlZDj-5Auz34BbVDBI82s98ebheru3bzGd16F512Y0CD8-hWRQM2BvRge_BbZ-wW3RhrJjWOC7q2exXMHtC9VzYkvZqMVSNaz1OnfCon_871C7qag3H25amvqEWbJUSYkrtO8-wNPP2b9gaiyttksQQTPmTvBjUGOH_ez7KHq9X95Y98_fP79WW7zjVldcxrgTVhneIYACrNsO6bBmipCWeVbriAkpZdyZSoKRG9YEL1tCnLjmDKgVfsLLs4-j5693uGEOVkgoZxVBbcHCTDFeWMClInKT1KtXcheBjko09Z-EUSLA8Q5U4eIMoDRIm5TBBT06dn_7mboH9teUGWBN-OAki_TFl4GXRKPbEyHnSUvTP_8_8LQZewjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3062532817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Guo, Tianci ; Ding, Fenfang ; Fu, Bifeng ; Yang, Zhenghui ; Yang, Yuhang ; Liu, Aifeng ; Wang, Ping</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Tianci ; Ding, Fenfang ; Fu, Bifeng ; Yang, Zhenghui ; Yang, Yuhang ; Liu, Aifeng ; Wang, Ping</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease (LDD). Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials.gov, etc. were searched from inception to October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) comparing ERAS program with traditional protocol of MIS-TLIF for LDD were included. A total of 11 studies were included for final analysis. The pooled results of RCTs showed that compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could reduce the length of hospital stay, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications, decrease visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and improve patient satisfaction (P &lt; 0.05). However, the pooled results of CSs revealed no statistical difference in the ODI score, fusion rate, operation time, and incidence of complications between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). Compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could effectively shorten the length of hospital stay, operation time, decrease intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of postoperative complications, promote postoperative pain relief, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction. This study confirmed the value of ERAS in MIS-TLIF surgery and provided evidence for the standardization of ERAS in the future. Considering that the pooled results of RCTs and CSs are not completely consistent, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8750</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-8769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.133</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38810875</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Enhanced recovery after surgery ; Lumbar degenerative disease ; Meta-analysis ; Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>World neurosurgery, 2024-08, Vol.188, p.199-210.e1</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-780c13ba50eee6c30cd99e24c1536c958e424b43a87218d838ad2944b1025e563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.133$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38810875$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Tianci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Fenfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Bifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhenghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yuhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Aifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ping</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>World neurosurgery</title><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><description>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease (LDD). Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials.gov, etc. were searched from inception to October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) comparing ERAS program with traditional protocol of MIS-TLIF for LDD were included. A total of 11 studies were included for final analysis. The pooled results of RCTs showed that compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could reduce the length of hospital stay, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications, decrease visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and improve patient satisfaction (P &lt; 0.05). However, the pooled results of CSs revealed no statistical difference in the ODI score, fusion rate, operation time, and incidence of complications between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). Compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could effectively shorten the length of hospital stay, operation time, decrease intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of postoperative complications, promote postoperative pain relief, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction. This study confirmed the value of ERAS in MIS-TLIF surgery and provided evidence for the standardization of ERAS in the future. Considering that the pooled results of RCTs and CSs are not completely consistent, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.</description><subject>Enhanced recovery after surgery</subject><subject>Lumbar degenerative disease</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEolXpC7BAXpZFgn_ixEFsomoKlaai6rRry3FuBo8Su9jOVHlDHgsP03aJN7Z1zz2-Pl-WfSS4IJhUX3bFk4W5oJiWBeYFYexNdkpELXJRV83b1zPHJ9l5CDucFiOlqNn77IQJQXCqnWZ_VsNgtNILUrZHGzVAXJAb0Mr-UlZDj-5Auz34BbVDBI82s98ebheru3bzGd16F512Y0CD8-hWRQM2BvRge_BbZ-wW3RhrJjWOC7q2exXMHtC9VzYkvZqMVSNaz1OnfCon_871C7qag3H25amvqEWbJUSYkrtO8-wNPP2b9gaiyttksQQTPmTvBjUGOH_ez7KHq9X95Y98_fP79WW7zjVldcxrgTVhneIYACrNsO6bBmipCWeVbriAkpZdyZSoKRG9YEL1tCnLjmDKgVfsLLs4-j5693uGEOVkgoZxVBbcHCTDFeWMClInKT1KtXcheBjko09Z-EUSLA8Q5U4eIMoDRIm5TBBT06dn_7mboH9teUGWBN-OAki_TFl4GXRKPbEyHnSUvTP_8_8LQZewjw</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Guo, Tianci</creator><creator>Ding, Fenfang</creator><creator>Fu, Bifeng</creator><creator>Yang, Zhenghui</creator><creator>Yang, Yuhang</creator><creator>Liu, Aifeng</creator><creator>Wang, Ping</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Guo, Tianci ; Ding, Fenfang ; Fu, Bifeng ; Yang, Zhenghui ; Yang, Yuhang ; Liu, Aifeng ; Wang, Ping</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-780c13ba50eee6c30cd99e24c1536c958e424b43a87218d838ad2944b1025e563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Enhanced recovery after surgery</topic><topic>Lumbar degenerative disease</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Tianci</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ding, Fenfang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Bifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Zhenghui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yuhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Aifeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ping</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Tianci</au><au>Ding, Fenfang</au><au>Fu, Bifeng</au><au>Yang, Zhenghui</au><au>Yang, Yuhang</au><au>Liu, Aifeng</au><au>Wang, Ping</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>World neurosurgery</jtitle><addtitle>World Neurosurg</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>188</volume><spage>199</spage><epage>210.e1</epage><pages>199-210.e1</pages><issn>1878-8750</issn><issn>1878-8769</issn><eissn>1878-8769</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) for lumbar degenerative disease (LDD). Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinical Trials.gov, etc. were searched from inception to October 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) comparing ERAS program with traditional protocol of MIS-TLIF for LDD were included. A total of 11 studies were included for final analysis. The pooled results of RCTs showed that compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could reduce the length of hospital stay, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and incidence of postoperative complications, decrease visual analog scale and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and improve patient satisfaction (P &lt; 0.05). However, the pooled results of CSs revealed no statistical difference in the ODI score, fusion rate, operation time, and incidence of complications between the two groups (P &gt; 0.05). Compared with MIS-TLIF, the ERAS program used in MIS-TLIF could effectively shorten the length of hospital stay, operation time, decrease intraoperative blood loss, and incidence of postoperative complications, promote postoperative pain relief, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction. This study confirmed the value of ERAS in MIS-TLIF surgery and provided evidence for the standardization of ERAS in the future. Considering that the pooled results of RCTs and CSs are not completely consistent, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these conclusions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38810875</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.133</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1878-8750
ispartof World neurosurgery, 2024-08, Vol.188, p.199-210.e1
issn 1878-8750
1878-8769
1878-8769
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3062532817
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Enhanced recovery after surgery
Lumbar degenerative disease
Meta-analysis
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Systematic review
title Efficacy and Safety of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols for Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A57%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20Safety%20of%20Enhanced%20Recovery%20After%20Surgery%20(ERAS)%20Protocols%20for%20Patients%20Undergoing%20Minimally%20Invasive%20Transforaminal%20Lumbar%20Interbody%20Fusion%20Surgery:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=World%20neurosurgery&rft.au=Guo,%20Tianci&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=188&rft.spage=199&rft.epage=210.e1&rft.pages=199-210.e1&rft.issn=1878-8750&rft.eissn=1878-8769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.05.133&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3062532817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3062532817&rft_id=info:pmid/38810875&rft_els_id=S1878875024008969&rfr_iscdi=true