A tailored approach in cholesteatoma surgery

Purpose In recent years, new techniques have been added to cholesteatoma surgery, and established microsurgical approaches are being reconsidered. This study aims to present the importance of individualized decision-making for the selection of an intact canal wall (CWU) or canal wall down (CWD) surg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology 2024-10, Vol.281 (10), p.5189-5198
Hauptverfasser: Kostadinov, Filip, Schlegel-Wagner, Christoph, Linder, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 5198
container_issue 10
container_start_page 5189
container_title European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology
container_volume 281
creator Kostadinov, Filip
Schlegel-Wagner, Christoph
Linder, Thomas
description Purpose In recent years, new techniques have been added to cholesteatoma surgery, and established microsurgical approaches are being reconsidered. This study aims to present the importance of individualized decision-making for the selection of an intact canal wall (CWU) or canal wall down (CWD) surgical procedure for each patient. Methods Using the “ChOLE” classification we categorized 264 operations retrospectively. 162 CWU and 102 CWD surgeries were performed. We focus to determine why a CWD procedure was chosen quite frequently despite some low-stage cases. Furthermore, we evaluated recidivism and hearing outcomes. Results Smaller cholesteatomas (Ch-stage 1a, 1b & 2a) were found in 182 patients (70%), ossicular chain status feasible for straightforward reconstruction (O-stage 0, 1 & 2) was present in 186 patients (70%), minor complications due to the cholesteatoma (L-stage 1) were infrequent with 28 cases (11%) and a well-pneumatized mastoid was found in 144 cases (55%). Recidivism rates were low (7%) without any difference in both groups and a mean follow-up time of 4 years and 8 months. In primary surgeries there was a significant difference ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00405-024-08748-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3061782429</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3061782429</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-8d56abb4da7aaad7d945d8ea2bdd380a017dea5cf71fc1018fc76a7bd362e2b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EoqXwBxhQRgYM14_EzlghXlIlFpitG9uhqZKm2MnQf48hhZHpDveco3M-Qi4Z3DIAdRcBJOQUuKSgldQUjsicSSGpVLw4JnMohaJSKjUjZzFuACCXpTglM6E1lLxQc3KzzAZs2j54l-FuF3q066zZZnbdtz4OHoe-wyyO4cOH_Tk5qbGN_uJwF-T98eHt_pmuXp9e7pcrajnXA9UuL7CqpEOFiE65UuZOe-SVc0IDAlPOY25rxWrLgOnaqgJV5UTBPa-YWJDrKTf1-RxTDdM10fq2xa3vx2gEFExpLnmZpHyS2tDHGHxtdqHpMOwNA_NNyUyUTKJkfigZSKarQ_5Ydd79WX6xJIGYBDG9tmm62fRj2KbN_8V-ATDXcqs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3061782429</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A tailored approach in cholesteatoma surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Kostadinov, Filip ; Schlegel-Wagner, Christoph ; Linder, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Kostadinov, Filip ; Schlegel-Wagner, Christoph ; Linder, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose In recent years, new techniques have been added to cholesteatoma surgery, and established microsurgical approaches are being reconsidered. This study aims to present the importance of individualized decision-making for the selection of an intact canal wall (CWU) or canal wall down (CWD) surgical procedure for each patient. Methods Using the “ChOLE” classification we categorized 264 operations retrospectively. 162 CWU and 102 CWD surgeries were performed. We focus to determine why a CWD procedure was chosen quite frequently despite some low-stage cases. Furthermore, we evaluated recidivism and hearing outcomes. Results Smaller cholesteatomas (Ch-stage 1a, 1b &amp; 2a) were found in 182 patients (70%), ossicular chain status feasible for straightforward reconstruction (O-stage 0, 1 &amp; 2) was present in 186 patients (70%), minor complications due to the cholesteatoma (L-stage 1) were infrequent with 28 cases (11%) and a well-pneumatized mastoid was found in 144 cases (55%). Recidivism rates were low (7%) without any difference in both groups and a mean follow-up time of 4 years and 8 months. In primary surgeries there was a significant difference ( p  &lt; 0.05) in postoperative mean air-bone gap (ABG) between CWU (17dB) and CWD (27dB). Conclusion The main goals of cholesteatoma surgery remain the avoidance of recidivism and optimal hearing rehabilitation. We recommend a tailored approach in the treatment of cholesteatomas and not a dogmatic one. Surgeons should not hesitate to perform a CWD procedure if required. Performed correctly it results in a dry ear and CWD surgery should remain in the skill set of the otologic surgeon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0937-4477</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1434-4726</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-4726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00405-024-08748-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38809267</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Child ; Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear - surgery ; Clinical Decision-Making ; Female ; Head and Neck Surgery ; Humans ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Microsurgery - methods ; Middle Aged ; Neurosurgery ; Otologic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Otology ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2024-10, Vol.281 (10), p.5189-5198</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-8d56abb4da7aaad7d945d8ea2bdd380a017dea5cf71fc1018fc76a7bd362e2b13</cites><orcidid>0009-0000-5124-3174</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00405-024-08748-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00405-024-08748-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38809267$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kostadinov, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlegel-Wagner, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linder, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>A tailored approach in cholesteatoma surgery</title><title>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</title><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><description>Purpose In recent years, new techniques have been added to cholesteatoma surgery, and established microsurgical approaches are being reconsidered. This study aims to present the importance of individualized decision-making for the selection of an intact canal wall (CWU) or canal wall down (CWD) surgical procedure for each patient. Methods Using the “ChOLE” classification we categorized 264 operations retrospectively. 162 CWU and 102 CWD surgeries were performed. We focus to determine why a CWD procedure was chosen quite frequently despite some low-stage cases. Furthermore, we evaluated recidivism and hearing outcomes. Results Smaller cholesteatomas (Ch-stage 1a, 1b &amp; 2a) were found in 182 patients (70%), ossicular chain status feasible for straightforward reconstruction (O-stage 0, 1 &amp; 2) was present in 186 patients (70%), minor complications due to the cholesteatoma (L-stage 1) were infrequent with 28 cases (11%) and a well-pneumatized mastoid was found in 144 cases (55%). Recidivism rates were low (7%) without any difference in both groups and a mean follow-up time of 4 years and 8 months. In primary surgeries there was a significant difference ( p  &lt; 0.05) in postoperative mean air-bone gap (ABG) between CWU (17dB) and CWD (27dB). Conclusion The main goals of cholesteatoma surgery remain the avoidance of recidivism and optimal hearing rehabilitation. We recommend a tailored approach in the treatment of cholesteatomas and not a dogmatic one. Surgeons should not hesitate to perform a CWD procedure if required. Performed correctly it results in a dry ear and CWD surgery should remain in the skill set of the otologic surgeon.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear - surgery</subject><subject>Clinical Decision-Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Head and Neck Surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Microsurgery - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neurosurgery</subject><subject>Otologic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Otology</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0937-4477</issn><issn>1434-4726</issn><issn>1434-4726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kDtPwzAUhS0EoqXwBxhQRgYM14_EzlghXlIlFpitG9uhqZKm2MnQf48hhZHpDveco3M-Qi4Z3DIAdRcBJOQUuKSgldQUjsicSSGpVLw4JnMohaJSKjUjZzFuACCXpTglM6E1lLxQc3KzzAZs2j54l-FuF3q066zZZnbdtz4OHoe-wyyO4cOH_Tk5qbGN_uJwF-T98eHt_pmuXp9e7pcrajnXA9UuL7CqpEOFiE65UuZOe-SVc0IDAlPOY25rxWrLgOnaqgJV5UTBPa-YWJDrKTf1-RxTDdM10fq2xa3vx2gEFExpLnmZpHyS2tDHGHxtdqHpMOwNA_NNyUyUTKJkfigZSKarQ_5Ydd79WX6xJIGYBDG9tmm62fRj2KbN_8V-ATDXcqs</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Kostadinov, Filip</creator><creator>Schlegel-Wagner, Christoph</creator><creator>Linder, Thomas</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5124-3174</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>A tailored approach in cholesteatoma surgery</title><author>Kostadinov, Filip ; Schlegel-Wagner, Christoph ; Linder, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c228t-8d56abb4da7aaad7d945d8ea2bdd380a017dea5cf71fc1018fc76a7bd362e2b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear - surgery</topic><topic>Clinical Decision-Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Head and Neck Surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Microsurgery - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neurosurgery</topic><topic>Otologic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Otology</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kostadinov, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlegel-Wagner, Christoph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Linder, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kostadinov, Filip</au><au>Schlegel-Wagner, Christoph</au><au>Linder, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A tailored approach in cholesteatoma surgery</atitle><jtitle>European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology</jtitle><stitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</stitle><addtitle>Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>281</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>5189</spage><epage>5198</epage><pages>5189-5198</pages><issn>0937-4477</issn><issn>1434-4726</issn><eissn>1434-4726</eissn><abstract>Purpose In recent years, new techniques have been added to cholesteatoma surgery, and established microsurgical approaches are being reconsidered. This study aims to present the importance of individualized decision-making for the selection of an intact canal wall (CWU) or canal wall down (CWD) surgical procedure for each patient. Methods Using the “ChOLE” classification we categorized 264 operations retrospectively. 162 CWU and 102 CWD surgeries were performed. We focus to determine why a CWD procedure was chosen quite frequently despite some low-stage cases. Furthermore, we evaluated recidivism and hearing outcomes. Results Smaller cholesteatomas (Ch-stage 1a, 1b &amp; 2a) were found in 182 patients (70%), ossicular chain status feasible for straightforward reconstruction (O-stage 0, 1 &amp; 2) was present in 186 patients (70%), minor complications due to the cholesteatoma (L-stage 1) were infrequent with 28 cases (11%) and a well-pneumatized mastoid was found in 144 cases (55%). Recidivism rates were low (7%) without any difference in both groups and a mean follow-up time of 4 years and 8 months. In primary surgeries there was a significant difference ( p  &lt; 0.05) in postoperative mean air-bone gap (ABG) between CWU (17dB) and CWD (27dB). Conclusion The main goals of cholesteatoma surgery remain the avoidance of recidivism and optimal hearing rehabilitation. We recommend a tailored approach in the treatment of cholesteatomas and not a dogmatic one. Surgeons should not hesitate to perform a CWD procedure if required. Performed correctly it results in a dry ear and CWD surgery should remain in the skill set of the otologic surgeon.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>38809267</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00405-024-08748-0</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5124-3174</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0937-4477
ispartof European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology, 2024-10, Vol.281 (10), p.5189-5198
issn 0937-4477
1434-4726
1434-4726
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3061782429
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Child
Cholesteatoma, Middle Ear - surgery
Clinical Decision-Making
Female
Head and Neck Surgery
Humans
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Microsurgery - methods
Middle Aged
Neurosurgery
Otologic Surgical Procedures - methods
Otology
Otorhinolaryngology
Retrospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title A tailored approach in cholesteatoma surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T20%3A36%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20tailored%20approach%20in%20cholesteatoma%20surgery&rft.jtitle=European%20archives%20of%20oto-rhino-laryngology&rft.au=Kostadinov,%20Filip&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=281&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=5189&rft.epage=5198&rft.pages=5189-5198&rft.issn=0937-4477&rft.eissn=1434-4726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00405-024-08748-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3061782429%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3061782429&rft_id=info:pmid/38809267&rfr_iscdi=true