Discomfort/pain due to peri‐implant probing at titanium and zirconium implants: A cross‐sectional study
Objective This study was designed to compare discomfort/pain after periodontal and peri‐implant probing in patients with titanium compared with zirconium implants. Methods One examiner recruited and examined 70 patients, each of whom had a dental implant with a contralateral tooth; 37 patients had t...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2024-09, Vol.35 (9), p.1081-1090 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1090 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1081 |
| container_title | Clinical oral implants research |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Bussmeyer, Florian Saminsky, Michael Eickholz, Peter |
| description | Objective
This study was designed to compare discomfort/pain after periodontal and peri‐implant probing in patients with titanium compared with zirconium implants.
Methods
One examiner recruited and examined 70 patients, each of whom had a dental implant with a contralateral tooth; 37 patients had titanium implants of various types and 33 patients had zirconium implants; one implant was analyzed for each patient. Periodontal and peri‐implant probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were assessed. Immediately after probing, patients rated their discomfort/pain with a visual analog scale (VAS). The emergence profiles of implant crowns were assessed on periapical radiographs of the implants.
Results
Seventy patients with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 42–65 years), including 43 females and 16 current smokers, were examined. The mean PPD and bleeding on probing (BOP) were higher around implants than around teeth (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/clr.14298 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3060749493</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3111091943</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2788-d1e24346943c24ff2f3c1da1d5b7375bfc59206eb4589f92c3f419a404772c433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctqHDEQRYVJ8IzHXvgHgiCbeNEzpZb6oeyG8RMGAiFeN2q1FDTpbnUkNWG88if4G_0l0TzsRSC1KQpOXW7VReiSwJzEWsjWzQlLeXmCpiQHSCAD8gFNgUOWFCQnE3Tm_QYAcl7yUzShZQlxsZyiX9fGS9tp68JiEKbHzahwsHhQzrw-v5huaEUf8OBsbfqfWAQcTBC9GTss-gY_GSftfjqS_iteYums93HbKxmM7UWLfRib7Tn6qEXr1cWxz9Dj7c2P1X2y_nb3sFquE5kWZZk0RKWMspwzKlOmdaqpJI0gTVYXtMhqLTOeQq5qlpVc81RSzQgXDFhRpJJROkNfDrrR9e9R-VB18UjVRn_Kjr6ikEPBOOM79PM_6MaOLjqOVHwQcML3glcHan-YU7oanOmE21YEql0CVUyg2icQ2U9HxbHuVPNOvr08AosD8Me0avt_pWq1_n6Q_AvELpGY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3111091943</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Discomfort/pain due to peri‐implant probing at titanium and zirconium implants: A cross‐sectional study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Bussmeyer, Florian ; Saminsky, Michael ; Eickholz, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Bussmeyer, Florian ; Saminsky, Michael ; Eickholz, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
This study was designed to compare discomfort/pain after periodontal and peri‐implant probing in patients with titanium compared with zirconium implants.
Methods
One examiner recruited and examined 70 patients, each of whom had a dental implant with a contralateral tooth; 37 patients had titanium implants of various types and 33 patients had zirconium implants; one implant was analyzed for each patient. Periodontal and peri‐implant probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were assessed. Immediately after probing, patients rated their discomfort/pain with a visual analog scale (VAS). The emergence profiles of implant crowns were assessed on periapical radiographs of the implants.
Results
Seventy patients with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 42–65 years), including 43 females and 16 current smokers, were examined. The mean PPD and bleeding on probing (BOP) were higher around implants than around teeth (p < .001). CAL and suppuration were well‐balanced between implants and teeth. Peri‐implant probing caused significantly more discomfort/pain than periodontal probing [median VAS score: 12.5 (IQR 4–22) vs. 9 (2–15); p < .001]. Logistic regression revealed that discomfort/pain after peri‐implant probing was less intense in patients who had taken analgesic medication (p = .021) and around titanium implants (p = .037).
Conclusions
Peri‐implant probing caused significantly more discomfort/pain than periodontal probing. Patients who had taken analgesic medication experienced less discomfort and pain with peri‐implant probing than those who had not; furthermore, titanium implants were associated with less pain than zirconium implants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.14298</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38801118</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Analgesics ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Dental implants ; Dental Implants - adverse effects ; Dental prosthetics ; Discomfort ; discomfort/pain ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pain ; Pain - etiology ; Pain Measurement ; periodontal probing ; peri‐implant probing ; Surgical implants ; Teeth ; Titanium ; Transplants & implants ; Zirconium</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2024-09, Vol.35 (9), p.1081-1090</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Clinical Oral Implants Research published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2788-d1e24346943c24ff2f3c1da1d5b7375bfc59206eb4589f92c3f419a404772c433</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6858-3335 ; 0000-0002-1655-8055</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.14298$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.14298$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38801118$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bussmeyer, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saminsky, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eickholz, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Discomfort/pain due to peri‐implant probing at titanium and zirconium implants: A cross‐sectional study</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Objective
This study was designed to compare discomfort/pain after periodontal and peri‐implant probing in patients with titanium compared with zirconium implants.
Methods
One examiner recruited and examined 70 patients, each of whom had a dental implant with a contralateral tooth; 37 patients had titanium implants of various types and 33 patients had zirconium implants; one implant was analyzed for each patient. Periodontal and peri‐implant probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were assessed. Immediately after probing, patients rated their discomfort/pain with a visual analog scale (VAS). The emergence profiles of implant crowns were assessed on periapical radiographs of the implants.
Results
Seventy patients with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 42–65 years), including 43 females and 16 current smokers, were examined. The mean PPD and bleeding on probing (BOP) were higher around implants than around teeth (p < .001). CAL and suppuration were well‐balanced between implants and teeth. Peri‐implant probing caused significantly more discomfort/pain than periodontal probing [median VAS score: 12.5 (IQR 4–22) vs. 9 (2–15); p < .001]. Logistic regression revealed that discomfort/pain after peri‐implant probing was less intense in patients who had taken analgesic medication (p = .021) and around titanium implants (p = .037).
Conclusions
Peri‐implant probing caused significantly more discomfort/pain than periodontal probing. Patients who had taken analgesic medication experienced less discomfort and pain with peri‐implant probing than those who had not; furthermore, titanium implants were associated with less pain than zirconium implants.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Dental implants</subject><subject>Dental Implants - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dental prosthetics</subject><subject>Discomfort</subject><subject>discomfort/pain</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Pain Measurement</subject><subject>periodontal probing</subject><subject>peri‐implant probing</subject><subject>Surgical implants</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><subject>Titanium</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Zirconium</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctqHDEQRYVJ8IzHXvgHgiCbeNEzpZb6oeyG8RMGAiFeN2q1FDTpbnUkNWG88if4G_0l0TzsRSC1KQpOXW7VReiSwJzEWsjWzQlLeXmCpiQHSCAD8gFNgUOWFCQnE3Tm_QYAcl7yUzShZQlxsZyiX9fGS9tp68JiEKbHzahwsHhQzrw-v5huaEUf8OBsbfqfWAQcTBC9GTss-gY_GSftfjqS_iteYums93HbKxmM7UWLfRib7Tn6qEXr1cWxz9Dj7c2P1X2y_nb3sFquE5kWZZk0RKWMspwzKlOmdaqpJI0gTVYXtMhqLTOeQq5qlpVc81RSzQgXDFhRpJJROkNfDrrR9e9R-VB18UjVRn_Kjr6ikEPBOOM79PM_6MaOLjqOVHwQcML3glcHan-YU7oanOmE21YEql0CVUyg2icQ2U9HxbHuVPNOvr08AosD8Me0avt_pWq1_n6Q_AvELpGY</recordid><startdate>202409</startdate><enddate>202409</enddate><creator>Bussmeyer, Florian</creator><creator>Saminsky, Michael</creator><creator>Eickholz, Peter</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6858-3335</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1655-8055</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202409</creationdate><title>Discomfort/pain due to peri‐implant probing at titanium and zirconium implants: A cross‐sectional study</title><author>Bussmeyer, Florian ; Saminsky, Michael ; Eickholz, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2788-d1e24346943c24ff2f3c1da1d5b7375bfc59206eb4589f92c3f419a404772c433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Dental implants</topic><topic>Dental Implants - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dental prosthetics</topic><topic>Discomfort</topic><topic>discomfort/pain</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Pain Measurement</topic><topic>periodontal probing</topic><topic>peri‐implant probing</topic><topic>Surgical implants</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><topic>Titanium</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Zirconium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bussmeyer, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saminsky, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eickholz, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bussmeyer, Florian</au><au>Saminsky, Michael</au><au>Eickholz, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Discomfort/pain due to peri‐implant probing at titanium and zirconium implants: A cross‐sectional study</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2024-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1081</spage><epage>1090</epage><pages>1081-1090</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objective
This study was designed to compare discomfort/pain after periodontal and peri‐implant probing in patients with titanium compared with zirconium implants.
Methods
One examiner recruited and examined 70 patients, each of whom had a dental implant with a contralateral tooth; 37 patients had titanium implants of various types and 33 patients had zirconium implants; one implant was analyzed for each patient. Periodontal and peri‐implant probing pocket depth (PPD) and clinical attachment level (CAL) were assessed. Immediately after probing, patients rated their discomfort/pain with a visual analog scale (VAS). The emergence profiles of implant crowns were assessed on periapical radiographs of the implants.
Results
Seventy patients with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 42–65 years), including 43 females and 16 current smokers, were examined. The mean PPD and bleeding on probing (BOP) were higher around implants than around teeth (p < .001). CAL and suppuration were well‐balanced between implants and teeth. Peri‐implant probing caused significantly more discomfort/pain than periodontal probing [median VAS score: 12.5 (IQR 4–22) vs. 9 (2–15); p < .001]. Logistic regression revealed that discomfort/pain after peri‐implant probing was less intense in patients who had taken analgesic medication (p = .021) and around titanium implants (p = .037).
Conclusions
Peri‐implant probing caused significantly more discomfort/pain than periodontal probing. Patients who had taken analgesic medication experienced less discomfort and pain with peri‐implant probing than those who had not; furthermore, titanium implants were associated with less pain than zirconium implants.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38801118</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.14298</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6858-3335</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1655-8055</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0905-7161 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral implants research, 2024-09, Vol.35 (9), p.1081-1090 |
| issn | 0905-7161 1600-0501 1600-0501 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3060749493 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Adult Aged Analgesics Cross-Sectional Studies Dental implants Dental Implants - adverse effects Dental prosthetics Discomfort discomfort/pain Female Humans Male Middle Aged Pain Pain - etiology Pain Measurement periodontal probing peri‐implant probing Surgical implants Teeth Titanium Transplants & implants Zirconium |
| title | Discomfort/pain due to peri‐implant probing at titanium and zirconium implants: A cross‐sectional study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A31%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Discomfort/pain%20due%20to%20peri%E2%80%90implant%20probing%20at%20titanium%20and%20zirconium%20implants:%20A%20cross%E2%80%90sectional%20study&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Bussmeyer,%20Florian&rft.date=2024-09&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1081&rft.epage=1090&rft.pages=1081-1090&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.14298&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3111091943%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3111091943&rft_id=info:pmid/38801118&rfr_iscdi=true |