Pre‐ and postharvest chitosan coatings extend the physicochemical and bioactive qualities of minimally processed ‘Crimson Seedless’ grapes during cold storage
BACKGROUND Food marketers desire residue‐free fresh grapes although grapes have a short postharvest life. This study was performed to determine the influences of pre‐ and/or postharvest chitosan (Ch) coatings on postharvest quality of minimally processed (stem‐detached) organic ‘Crimson Seedless’ be...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the science of food and agriculture 2024-10, Vol.104 (13), p.7834-7842 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 7842 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 13 |
| container_start_page | 7834 |
| container_title | Journal of the science of food and agriculture |
| container_volume | 104 |
| creator | Sabir, Ferhan K Unal, Sevil Aydın, Suna Sabir, Ali |
| description | BACKGROUND
Food marketers desire residue‐free fresh grapes although grapes have a short postharvest life. This study was performed to determine the influences of pre‐ and/or postharvest chitosan (Ch) coatings on postharvest quality of minimally processed (stem‐detached) organic ‘Crimson Seedless’ berries. Berries were sorted as: (a) control (untreated berries); (b) preharvest Ch (dipping the clusters on the vine into 1% Ch 10 days before harvest at 20% soluble solid content (SSC)); (c) postharvest Ch (dipping the stem‐detached berries into 1% Ch); and (d) pre + postharvest Ch. Berries were stored in 12 × 15 cm rigid polypropylene cups for up to 42 days at 1.0 ± 0.5 °C.
RESULTS
Pre‐ and/or postharvest Ch coating reduced weight loss during storage. Pre‐ + postharvest Ch was the best treatment for restricting polygalacturonase (PG) activity, extending the visual quality, color features (L*, C and h°), skin rupture force, biochemical (SSC, titratable acidity, maturity index and pH) and bioactive (total phenol content, antioxidant activity) features. Pre‐ or postharvest Ch was also significantly effective in maintaining many quality features.
CONCLUSION
Pre‐ and/or postharvest 1% Ch coatings effectively maintained the quality of minimally processed grape berries of organically produced ‘Crimson Seedless’ grapes by delaying weight loss and PG activity and keeping the postharvest physical, biochemical and bioactive features for 42‐day cold storage at 1.0 ± 0.5 °C. The combined use of pre‐ and postharvest Ch found to be more effective than single treatment. Thus, pre‐ + postharvest 1% Ch coating could be recommended as an ecofriendly sustainable methodology for extending the postharvest quality of minimally processed fresh grapes. © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jsfa.13613 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3060382866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3114129773</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3523-432d467ecc3525f90cac095eaa4b9a0a7a375731ad4337af5bca9a9ff939dc63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuEzEUhi1ERUNhwwMgS2wQ0rT2eC7xsoooF1VqpXY_OrHPZBx5xlPb05JdHoEl7HmyPAlOU1iwYGX5nO_85_IT8oazU85YfrYOLZxyUXHxjMw4k3XGGGfPySwl86zkRX5MXoawZoxJWVUvyLGY15Kl-Iz8uva4236nMGg6uhA78PcYIlWdiS7AQJWDaIZVoPgtYoJih3TsNsEopzrsjQL7WLw0DlQ090jvJrAmGgzUtbQ3g-nB2g0dvVMYAmq62_5YeNMHN9AbRG1TdLf9SVcexlSkJ5_6pb5W0xCdhxW-Ikct2ICvn94Tcnvx8XbxObu8-vRlcX6ZKVHmIitErouqRrX_lq1kChSTJQIUSwkMahB1WQsOuhCihrZcKpAg21YKqVUlTsj7g2wa9W5KV2h6ExRaCwO6KTSCVUzM83m1R9_9g67d5Ic0XCM4L3gu61ok6sOBUt6F4LFtxrQ3-E3DWbO3rtlb1zxal-C3T5LTskf9F_3jVQL4AXgwFjf_kWq-3lycH0R_A4UgqnU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3114129773</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pre‐ and postharvest chitosan coatings extend the physicochemical and bioactive qualities of minimally processed ‘Crimson Seedless’ grapes during cold storage</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Sabir, Ferhan K ; Unal, Sevil ; Aydın, Suna ; Sabir, Ali</creator><creatorcontrib>Sabir, Ferhan K ; Unal, Sevil ; Aydın, Suna ; Sabir, Ali</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND
Food marketers desire residue‐free fresh grapes although grapes have a short postharvest life. This study was performed to determine the influences of pre‐ and/or postharvest chitosan (Ch) coatings on postharvest quality of minimally processed (stem‐detached) organic ‘Crimson Seedless’ berries. Berries were sorted as: (a) control (untreated berries); (b) preharvest Ch (dipping the clusters on the vine into 1% Ch 10 days before harvest at 20% soluble solid content (SSC)); (c) postharvest Ch (dipping the stem‐detached berries into 1% Ch); and (d) pre + postharvest Ch. Berries were stored in 12 × 15 cm rigid polypropylene cups for up to 42 days at 1.0 ± 0.5 °C.
RESULTS
Pre‐ and/or postharvest Ch coating reduced weight loss during storage. Pre‐ + postharvest Ch was the best treatment for restricting polygalacturonase (PG) activity, extending the visual quality, color features (L*, C and h°), skin rupture force, biochemical (SSC, titratable acidity, maturity index and pH) and bioactive (total phenol content, antioxidant activity) features. Pre‐ or postharvest Ch was also significantly effective in maintaining many quality features.
CONCLUSION
Pre‐ and/or postharvest 1% Ch coatings effectively maintained the quality of minimally processed grape berries of organically produced ‘Crimson Seedless’ grapes by delaying weight loss and PG activity and keeping the postharvest physical, biochemical and bioactive features for 42‐day cold storage at 1.0 ± 0.5 °C. The combined use of pre‐ and postharvest Ch found to be more effective than single treatment. Thus, pre‐ + postharvest 1% Ch coating could be recommended as an ecofriendly sustainable methodology for extending the postharvest quality of minimally processed fresh grapes. © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-5142</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0010</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0010</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.13613</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38790142</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Acidity ; Antioxidants - chemistry ; Berries ; bioactive compounds ; Biological activity ; Brittleness ; Chitosan ; Chitosan - chemistry ; Coatings ; Cold storage ; Cold Temperature ; Color ; Cryopreservation ; Dipping ; edible coating ; Food Handling - methods ; Food industry ; Food Preservation - instrumentation ; Food Preservation - methods ; Food Preservatives - chemistry ; Food Preservatives - pharmacology ; Food quality ; Food Storage ; Fruit - chemistry ; Fruit - growth & development ; Fruits ; Grapes ; minimal processing ; Phenols ; Polygalacturonase ; Polypropylene ; Post-harvest decay ; postharvest quality ; preharvest treatment ; Stems ; table grape ; Vitaceae ; Vitis - chemistry ; Vitis - growth & development ; Weight loss</subject><ispartof>Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2024-10, Vol.104 (13), p.7834-7842</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3523-432d467ecc3525f90cac095eaa4b9a0a7a375731ad4337af5bca9a9ff939dc63</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1596-9327</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjsfa.13613$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjsfa.13613$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38790142$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sabir, Ferhan K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unal, Sevil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydın, Suna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabir, Ali</creatorcontrib><title>Pre‐ and postharvest chitosan coatings extend the physicochemical and bioactive qualities of minimally processed ‘Crimson Seedless’ grapes during cold storage</title><title>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</title><addtitle>J Sci Food Agric</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND
Food marketers desire residue‐free fresh grapes although grapes have a short postharvest life. This study was performed to determine the influences of pre‐ and/or postharvest chitosan (Ch) coatings on postharvest quality of minimally processed (stem‐detached) organic ‘Crimson Seedless’ berries. Berries were sorted as: (a) control (untreated berries); (b) preharvest Ch (dipping the clusters on the vine into 1% Ch 10 days before harvest at 20% soluble solid content (SSC)); (c) postharvest Ch (dipping the stem‐detached berries into 1% Ch); and (d) pre + postharvest Ch. Berries were stored in 12 × 15 cm rigid polypropylene cups for up to 42 days at 1.0 ± 0.5 °C.
RESULTS
Pre‐ and/or postharvest Ch coating reduced weight loss during storage. Pre‐ + postharvest Ch was the best treatment for restricting polygalacturonase (PG) activity, extending the visual quality, color features (L*, C and h°), skin rupture force, biochemical (SSC, titratable acidity, maturity index and pH) and bioactive (total phenol content, antioxidant activity) features. Pre‐ or postharvest Ch was also significantly effective in maintaining many quality features.
CONCLUSION
Pre‐ and/or postharvest 1% Ch coatings effectively maintained the quality of minimally processed grape berries of organically produced ‘Crimson Seedless’ grapes by delaying weight loss and PG activity and keeping the postharvest physical, biochemical and bioactive features for 42‐day cold storage at 1.0 ± 0.5 °C. The combined use of pre‐ and postharvest Ch found to be more effective than single treatment. Thus, pre‐ + postharvest 1% Ch coating could be recommended as an ecofriendly sustainable methodology for extending the postharvest quality of minimally processed fresh grapes. © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</description><subject>Acidity</subject><subject>Antioxidants - chemistry</subject><subject>Berries</subject><subject>bioactive compounds</subject><subject>Biological activity</subject><subject>Brittleness</subject><subject>Chitosan</subject><subject>Chitosan - chemistry</subject><subject>Coatings</subject><subject>Cold storage</subject><subject>Cold Temperature</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Cryopreservation</subject><subject>Dipping</subject><subject>edible coating</subject><subject>Food Handling - methods</subject><subject>Food industry</subject><subject>Food Preservation - instrumentation</subject><subject>Food Preservation - methods</subject><subject>Food Preservatives - chemistry</subject><subject>Food Preservatives - pharmacology</subject><subject>Food quality</subject><subject>Food Storage</subject><subject>Fruit - chemistry</subject><subject>Fruit - growth & development</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Grapes</subject><subject>minimal processing</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Polygalacturonase</subject><subject>Polypropylene</subject><subject>Post-harvest decay</subject><subject>postharvest quality</subject><subject>preharvest treatment</subject><subject>Stems</subject><subject>table grape</subject><subject>Vitaceae</subject><subject>Vitis - chemistry</subject><subject>Vitis - growth & development</subject><subject>Weight loss</subject><issn>0022-5142</issn><issn>1097-0010</issn><issn>1097-0010</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctuEzEUhi1ERUNhwwMgS2wQ0rT2eC7xsoooF1VqpXY_OrHPZBx5xlPb05JdHoEl7HmyPAlOU1iwYGX5nO_85_IT8oazU85YfrYOLZxyUXHxjMw4k3XGGGfPySwl86zkRX5MXoawZoxJWVUvyLGY15Kl-Iz8uva4236nMGg6uhA78PcYIlWdiS7AQJWDaIZVoPgtYoJih3TsNsEopzrsjQL7WLw0DlQ090jvJrAmGgzUtbQ3g-nB2g0dvVMYAmq62_5YeNMHN9AbRG1TdLf9SVcexlSkJ5_6pb5W0xCdhxW-Ikct2ICvn94Tcnvx8XbxObu8-vRlcX6ZKVHmIitErouqRrX_lq1kChSTJQIUSwkMahB1WQsOuhCihrZcKpAg21YKqVUlTsj7g2wa9W5KV2h6ExRaCwO6KTSCVUzM83m1R9_9g67d5Ic0XCM4L3gu61ok6sOBUt6F4LFtxrQ3-E3DWbO3rtlb1zxal-C3T5LTskf9F_3jVQL4AXgwFjf_kWq-3lycH0R_A4UgqnU</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Sabir, Ferhan K</creator><creator>Unal, Sevil</creator><creator>Aydın, Suna</creator><creator>Sabir, Ali</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons, Limited</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1596-9327</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Pre‐ and postharvest chitosan coatings extend the physicochemical and bioactive qualities of minimally processed ‘Crimson Seedless’ grapes during cold storage</title><author>Sabir, Ferhan K ; Unal, Sevil ; Aydın, Suna ; Sabir, Ali</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3523-432d467ecc3525f90cac095eaa4b9a0a7a375731ad4337af5bca9a9ff939dc63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acidity</topic><topic>Antioxidants - chemistry</topic><topic>Berries</topic><topic>bioactive compounds</topic><topic>Biological activity</topic><topic>Brittleness</topic><topic>Chitosan</topic><topic>Chitosan - chemistry</topic><topic>Coatings</topic><topic>Cold storage</topic><topic>Cold Temperature</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Cryopreservation</topic><topic>Dipping</topic><topic>edible coating</topic><topic>Food Handling - methods</topic><topic>Food industry</topic><topic>Food Preservation - instrumentation</topic><topic>Food Preservation - methods</topic><topic>Food Preservatives - chemistry</topic><topic>Food Preservatives - pharmacology</topic><topic>Food quality</topic><topic>Food Storage</topic><topic>Fruit - chemistry</topic><topic>Fruit - growth & development</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Grapes</topic><topic>minimal processing</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Polygalacturonase</topic><topic>Polypropylene</topic><topic>Post-harvest decay</topic><topic>postharvest quality</topic><topic>preharvest treatment</topic><topic>Stems</topic><topic>table grape</topic><topic>Vitaceae</topic><topic>Vitis - chemistry</topic><topic>Vitis - growth & development</topic><topic>Weight loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sabir, Ferhan K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Unal, Sevil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aydın, Suna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabir, Ali</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sabir, Ferhan K</au><au>Unal, Sevil</au><au>Aydın, Suna</au><au>Sabir, Ali</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pre‐ and postharvest chitosan coatings extend the physicochemical and bioactive qualities of minimally processed ‘Crimson Seedless’ grapes during cold storage</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the science of food and agriculture</jtitle><addtitle>J Sci Food Agric</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>104</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>7834</spage><epage>7842</epage><pages>7834-7842</pages><issn>0022-5142</issn><issn>1097-0010</issn><eissn>1097-0010</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND
Food marketers desire residue‐free fresh grapes although grapes have a short postharvest life. This study was performed to determine the influences of pre‐ and/or postharvest chitosan (Ch) coatings on postharvest quality of minimally processed (stem‐detached) organic ‘Crimson Seedless’ berries. Berries were sorted as: (a) control (untreated berries); (b) preharvest Ch (dipping the clusters on the vine into 1% Ch 10 days before harvest at 20% soluble solid content (SSC)); (c) postharvest Ch (dipping the stem‐detached berries into 1% Ch); and (d) pre + postharvest Ch. Berries were stored in 12 × 15 cm rigid polypropylene cups for up to 42 days at 1.0 ± 0.5 °C.
RESULTS
Pre‐ and/or postharvest Ch coating reduced weight loss during storage. Pre‐ + postharvest Ch was the best treatment for restricting polygalacturonase (PG) activity, extending the visual quality, color features (L*, C and h°), skin rupture force, biochemical (SSC, titratable acidity, maturity index and pH) and bioactive (total phenol content, antioxidant activity) features. Pre‐ or postharvest Ch was also significantly effective in maintaining many quality features.
CONCLUSION
Pre‐ and/or postharvest 1% Ch coatings effectively maintained the quality of minimally processed grape berries of organically produced ‘Crimson Seedless’ grapes by delaying weight loss and PG activity and keeping the postharvest physical, biochemical and bioactive features for 42‐day cold storage at 1.0 ± 0.5 °C. The combined use of pre‐ and postharvest Ch found to be more effective than single treatment. Thus, pre‐ + postharvest 1% Ch coating could be recommended as an ecofriendly sustainable methodology for extending the postharvest quality of minimally processed fresh grapes. © 2024 The Author(s). Journal of The Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>38790142</pmid><doi>10.1002/jsfa.13613</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1596-9327</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-5142 |
| ispartof | Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2024-10, Vol.104 (13), p.7834-7842 |
| issn | 0022-5142 1097-0010 1097-0010 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3060382866 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
| subjects | Acidity Antioxidants - chemistry Berries bioactive compounds Biological activity Brittleness Chitosan Chitosan - chemistry Coatings Cold storage Cold Temperature Color Cryopreservation Dipping edible coating Food Handling - methods Food industry Food Preservation - instrumentation Food Preservation - methods Food Preservatives - chemistry Food Preservatives - pharmacology Food quality Food Storage Fruit - chemistry Fruit - growth & development Fruits Grapes minimal processing Phenols Polygalacturonase Polypropylene Post-harvest decay postharvest quality preharvest treatment Stems table grape Vitaceae Vitis - chemistry Vitis - growth & development Weight loss |
| title | Pre‐ and postharvest chitosan coatings extend the physicochemical and bioactive qualities of minimally processed ‘Crimson Seedless’ grapes during cold storage |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A58%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pre%E2%80%90%20and%20postharvest%20chitosan%20coatings%20extend%20the%20physicochemical%20and%20bioactive%20qualities%20of%20minimally%20processed%20%E2%80%98Crimson%20Seedless%E2%80%99%20grapes%20during%20cold%20storage&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20science%20of%20food%20and%20agriculture&rft.au=Sabir,%20Ferhan%20K&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=104&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=7834&rft.epage=7842&rft.pages=7834-7842&rft.issn=0022-5142&rft.eissn=1097-0010&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jsfa.13613&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3114129773%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3114129773&rft_id=info:pmid/38790142&rfr_iscdi=true |