Timing of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy for outcome prediction in congenital diaphragmatic hernia

Purpose To evaluate the impact of the timing of MRI on the prediction of survival and morbidity in patients with CDH, and whether serial measurements have a beneficial value. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in two perinatal centers, in Germany and Italy. It included 354 patient...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2024-08, Vol.310 (2), p.873-881
Hauptverfasser: Dütemeyer, Vivien, Cannie, Mieke M., Schaible, Thomas, Weis, Meike, Persico, Nicola, Borzani, Irene, Badr, Dominique A., Jani, Jacques C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 881
container_issue 2
container_start_page 873
container_title Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
container_volume 310
creator Dütemeyer, Vivien
Cannie, Mieke M.
Schaible, Thomas
Weis, Meike
Persico, Nicola
Borzani, Irene
Badr, Dominique A.
Jani, Jacques C.
description Purpose To evaluate the impact of the timing of MRI on the prediction of survival and morbidity in patients with CDH, and whether serial measurements have a beneficial value. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in two perinatal centers, in Germany and Italy. It included 354 patients with isolated CDH having at least one fetal MRI. The severity was assessed with the observed-to-expected total fetal lung volume (o/e TFLV) measured by two experienced double-blinded operators. The cohort was divided into three groups according to the gestational age (GA) at which the MRI was performed ( 32 weeks’ gestation [WG]). The accuracy for the prediction of survival at discharge and morbidity was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Multiple logistic regression analyses and propensity score matching examined the population for balance. The effect of repeated MRI was evaluated in ninety-seven cases. Results There were no significant differences in the prediction of survival when the o/e TFLV was measured before 27, between 27 and 32, and after 32 WG (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.77, 0.79, and 0.77, respectively). After adjustment for confounding factors, it was seen, that GA at MRI was not associated with survival at discharge, but the risk of mortality was higher with an intrathoracic liver position (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.12–0.78), lower GA at birth (aOR 1.48, 95%CI 1.24–1.78) and lower o/e TFLV (aOR 1.13, 95%CI 1.06–1.20). ROC curves showed comparable prediction accuracy for the different timepoints in pregnancy for pulmonary hypertension, the need of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and feeding aids. Serial measurements revealed no difference in change rate of the o/e TFLV according to survival. Conclusion The timing of MRI does not affect the prediction of survival rate or morbidity as the o/e TFLV does not change during pregnancy. Clinicians could choose any gestational age starting mid second trimester for the assessment of severity and counseling.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00404-024-07545-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3060375673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3082449771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-7d5a6c13ab28643f98a96a7190ea5b8ca6dfe920055127a1c6ac15fa73efc3e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUhS1UBBT4AyxQpG66SfEjfmSJEH1ISGxgbd1xbjIeJvbUThb8-zoMlIpFF5btc797bN1DyAWj3xil-ipT2tCmprwsLRtZmwNywhrBy5WxT_-cj8nnnDeUMm6MOiLHwmjDteIn5OnBjz4MVeyrEYaAk3dVwhwDBIeVL9pS9aHaJRwW8bnqY6riPLk44qJ23k0-hoVxMQwY_ATbqvOwWycYRlgc15iChzNy2MM24_nrfkoev98-3Pys7-5__Lq5vqsdl2qqdSdBOSZgxY1qRN8aaBVo1lIEuTIOVNdjyymVknENzClwTPagBfZOoBCn5Oved5fi7xnzZEefHW63EDDO2QqqqNBS6QX98gHdxDmF8rtCGd40rdasUHxPuRRzTtjbXSqjSc-WUbtEYfdR2BKFfYnCmtJ0-Wo9r0bs_ra8zb4AYg_kUiqDS-9v_8f2Dw-tlS4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3082449771</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Timing of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy for outcome prediction in congenital diaphragmatic hernia</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Dütemeyer, Vivien ; Cannie, Mieke M. ; Schaible, Thomas ; Weis, Meike ; Persico, Nicola ; Borzani, Irene ; Badr, Dominique A. ; Jani, Jacques C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dütemeyer, Vivien ; Cannie, Mieke M. ; Schaible, Thomas ; Weis, Meike ; Persico, Nicola ; Borzani, Irene ; Badr, Dominique A. ; Jani, Jacques C.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To evaluate the impact of the timing of MRI on the prediction of survival and morbidity in patients with CDH, and whether serial measurements have a beneficial value. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in two perinatal centers, in Germany and Italy. It included 354 patients with isolated CDH having at least one fetal MRI. The severity was assessed with the observed-to-expected total fetal lung volume (o/e TFLV) measured by two experienced double-blinded operators. The cohort was divided into three groups according to the gestational age (GA) at which the MRI was performed (&lt; 27, 27–32, and  &gt; 32 weeks’ gestation [WG]). The accuracy for the prediction of survival at discharge and morbidity was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Multiple logistic regression analyses and propensity score matching examined the population for balance. The effect of repeated MRI was evaluated in ninety-seven cases. Results There were no significant differences in the prediction of survival when the o/e TFLV was measured before 27, between 27 and 32, and after 32 WG (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.77, 0.79, and 0.77, respectively). After adjustment for confounding factors, it was seen, that GA at MRI was not associated with survival at discharge, but the risk of mortality was higher with an intrathoracic liver position (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.12–0.78), lower GA at birth (aOR 1.48, 95%CI 1.24–1.78) and lower o/e TFLV (aOR 1.13, 95%CI 1.06–1.20). ROC curves showed comparable prediction accuracy for the different timepoints in pregnancy for pulmonary hypertension, the need of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and feeding aids. Serial measurements revealed no difference in change rate of the o/e TFLV according to survival. Conclusion The timing of MRI does not affect the prediction of survival rate or morbidity as the o/e TFLV does not change during pregnancy. Clinicians could choose any gestational age starting mid second trimester for the assessment of severity and counseling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-0711</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0932-0067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07545-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38782762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Endocrinology ; Gestational age ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Maternal-Fetal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Morbidity ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Pregnancy</subject><ispartof>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024-08, Vol.310 (2), p.873-881</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-7d5a6c13ab28643f98a96a7190ea5b8ca6dfe920055127a1c6ac15fa73efc3e33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2252-342X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-024-07545-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00404-024-07545-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38782762$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dütemeyer, Vivien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannie, Mieke M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaible, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weis, Meike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persico, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borzani, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badr, Dominique A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jani, Jacques C.</creatorcontrib><title>Timing of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy for outcome prediction in congenital diaphragmatic hernia</title><title>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Purpose To evaluate the impact of the timing of MRI on the prediction of survival and morbidity in patients with CDH, and whether serial measurements have a beneficial value. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in two perinatal centers, in Germany and Italy. It included 354 patients with isolated CDH having at least one fetal MRI. The severity was assessed with the observed-to-expected total fetal lung volume (o/e TFLV) measured by two experienced double-blinded operators. The cohort was divided into three groups according to the gestational age (GA) at which the MRI was performed (&lt; 27, 27–32, and  &gt; 32 weeks’ gestation [WG]). The accuracy for the prediction of survival at discharge and morbidity was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Multiple logistic regression analyses and propensity score matching examined the population for balance. The effect of repeated MRI was evaluated in ninety-seven cases. Results There were no significant differences in the prediction of survival when the o/e TFLV was measured before 27, between 27 and 32, and after 32 WG (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.77, 0.79, and 0.77, respectively). After adjustment for confounding factors, it was seen, that GA at MRI was not associated with survival at discharge, but the risk of mortality was higher with an intrathoracic liver position (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.12–0.78), lower GA at birth (aOR 1.48, 95%CI 1.24–1.78) and lower o/e TFLV (aOR 1.13, 95%CI 1.06–1.20). ROC curves showed comparable prediction accuracy for the different timepoints in pregnancy for pulmonary hypertension, the need of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and feeding aids. Serial measurements revealed no difference in change rate of the o/e TFLV according to survival. Conclusion The timing of MRI does not affect the prediction of survival rate or morbidity as the o/e TFLV does not change during pregnancy. Clinicians could choose any gestational age starting mid second trimester for the assessment of severity and counseling.</description><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Gestational age</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Maternal-Fetal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><issn>1432-0711</issn><issn>0932-0067</issn><issn>1432-0711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUhS1UBBT4AyxQpG66SfEjfmSJEH1ISGxgbd1xbjIeJvbUThb8-zoMlIpFF5btc797bN1DyAWj3xil-ipT2tCmprwsLRtZmwNywhrBy5WxT_-cj8nnnDeUMm6MOiLHwmjDteIn5OnBjz4MVeyrEYaAk3dVwhwDBIeVL9pS9aHaJRwW8bnqY6riPLk44qJ23k0-hoVxMQwY_ATbqvOwWycYRlgc15iChzNy2MM24_nrfkoev98-3Pys7-5__Lq5vqsdl2qqdSdBOSZgxY1qRN8aaBVo1lIEuTIOVNdjyymVknENzClwTPagBfZOoBCn5Oved5fi7xnzZEefHW63EDDO2QqqqNBS6QX98gHdxDmF8rtCGd40rdasUHxPuRRzTtjbXSqjSc-WUbtEYfdR2BKFfYnCmtJ0-Wo9r0bs_ra8zb4AYg_kUiqDS-9v_8f2Dw-tlS4</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Dütemeyer, Vivien</creator><creator>Cannie, Mieke M.</creator><creator>Schaible, Thomas</creator><creator>Weis, Meike</creator><creator>Persico, Nicola</creator><creator>Borzani, Irene</creator><creator>Badr, Dominique A.</creator><creator>Jani, Jacques C.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2252-342X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Timing of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy for outcome prediction in congenital diaphragmatic hernia</title><author>Dütemeyer, Vivien ; Cannie, Mieke M. ; Schaible, Thomas ; Weis, Meike ; Persico, Nicola ; Borzani, Irene ; Badr, Dominique A. ; Jani, Jacques C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-7d5a6c13ab28643f98a96a7190ea5b8ca6dfe920055127a1c6ac15fa73efc3e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Gestational age</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Maternal-Fetal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dütemeyer, Vivien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannie, Mieke M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaible, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weis, Meike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persico, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borzani, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badr, Dominique A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jani, Jacques C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dütemeyer, Vivien</au><au>Cannie, Mieke M.</au><au>Schaible, Thomas</au><au>Weis, Meike</au><au>Persico, Nicola</au><au>Borzani, Irene</au><au>Badr, Dominique A.</au><au>Jani, Jacques C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Timing of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy for outcome prediction in congenital diaphragmatic hernia</atitle><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><stitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</stitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>310</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>873</spage><epage>881</epage><pages>873-881</pages><issn>1432-0711</issn><issn>0932-0067</issn><eissn>1432-0711</eissn><abstract>Purpose To evaluate the impact of the timing of MRI on the prediction of survival and morbidity in patients with CDH, and whether serial measurements have a beneficial value. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in two perinatal centers, in Germany and Italy. It included 354 patients with isolated CDH having at least one fetal MRI. The severity was assessed with the observed-to-expected total fetal lung volume (o/e TFLV) measured by two experienced double-blinded operators. The cohort was divided into three groups according to the gestational age (GA) at which the MRI was performed (&lt; 27, 27–32, and  &gt; 32 weeks’ gestation [WG]). The accuracy for the prediction of survival at discharge and morbidity was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Multiple logistic regression analyses and propensity score matching examined the population for balance. The effect of repeated MRI was evaluated in ninety-seven cases. Results There were no significant differences in the prediction of survival when the o/e TFLV was measured before 27, between 27 and 32, and after 32 WG (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.77, 0.79, and 0.77, respectively). After adjustment for confounding factors, it was seen, that GA at MRI was not associated with survival at discharge, but the risk of mortality was higher with an intrathoracic liver position (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.12–0.78), lower GA at birth (aOR 1.48, 95%CI 1.24–1.78) and lower o/e TFLV (aOR 1.13, 95%CI 1.06–1.20). ROC curves showed comparable prediction accuracy for the different timepoints in pregnancy for pulmonary hypertension, the need of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and feeding aids. Serial measurements revealed no difference in change rate of the o/e TFLV according to survival. Conclusion The timing of MRI does not affect the prediction of survival rate or morbidity as the o/e TFLV does not change during pregnancy. Clinicians could choose any gestational age starting mid second trimester for the assessment of severity and counseling.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>38782762</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00404-024-07545-8</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2252-342X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-0711
ispartof Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024-08, Vol.310 (2), p.873-881
issn 1432-0711
0932-0067
1432-0711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3060375673
source SpringerLink (Online service)
subjects Endocrinology
Gestational age
Gynecology
Human Genetics
Magnetic resonance imaging
Maternal-Fetal Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Morbidity
Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery
Pregnancy
title Timing of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy for outcome prediction in congenital diaphragmatic hernia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A01%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Timing%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20in%20pregnancy%20for%20outcome%20prediction%20in%20congenital%20diaphragmatic%20hernia&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=D%C3%BCtemeyer,%20Vivien&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=310&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=873&rft.epage=881&rft.pages=873-881&rft.issn=1432-0711&rft.eissn=1432-0711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00404-024-07545-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3082449771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3082449771&rft_id=info:pmid/38782762&rfr_iscdi=true