Timing of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy for outcome prediction in congenital diaphragmatic hernia
Purpose To evaluate the impact of the timing of MRI on the prediction of survival and morbidity in patients with CDH, and whether serial measurements have a beneficial value. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted in two perinatal centers, in Germany and Italy. It included 354 patient...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2024-08, Vol.310 (2), p.873-881 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 881 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 873 |
container_title | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics |
container_volume | 310 |
creator | Dütemeyer, Vivien Cannie, Mieke M. Schaible, Thomas Weis, Meike Persico, Nicola Borzani, Irene Badr, Dominique A. Jani, Jacques C. |
description | Purpose
To evaluate the impact of the timing of MRI on the prediction of survival and morbidity in patients with CDH, and whether serial measurements have a beneficial value.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study was conducted in two perinatal centers, in Germany and Italy. It included 354 patients with isolated CDH having at least one fetal MRI. The severity was assessed with the observed-to-expected total fetal lung volume (o/e TFLV) measured by two experienced double-blinded operators. The cohort was divided into three groups according to the gestational age (GA) at which the MRI was performed ( 32 weeks’ gestation [WG]). The accuracy for the prediction of survival at discharge and morbidity was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Multiple logistic regression analyses and propensity score matching examined the population for balance. The effect of repeated MRI was evaluated in ninety-seven cases.
Results
There were no significant differences in the prediction of survival when the o/e TFLV was measured before 27, between 27 and 32, and after 32 WG (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.77, 0.79, and 0.77, respectively). After adjustment for confounding factors, it was seen, that GA at MRI was not associated with survival at discharge, but the risk of mortality was higher with an intrathoracic liver position (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.12–0.78), lower GA at birth (aOR 1.48, 95%CI 1.24–1.78) and lower o/e TFLV (aOR 1.13, 95%CI 1.06–1.20). ROC curves showed comparable prediction accuracy for the different timepoints in pregnancy for pulmonary hypertension, the need of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and feeding aids. Serial measurements revealed no difference in change rate of the o/e TFLV according to survival.
Conclusion
The timing of MRI does not affect the prediction of survival rate or morbidity as the o/e TFLV does not change during pregnancy. Clinicians could choose any gestational age starting mid second trimester for the assessment of severity and counseling. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00404-024-07545-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3060375673</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3082449771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-7d5a6c13ab28643f98a96a7190ea5b8ca6dfe920055127a1c6ac15fa73efc3e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUhS1UBBT4AyxQpG66SfEjfmSJEH1ISGxgbd1xbjIeJvbUThb8-zoMlIpFF5btc797bN1DyAWj3xil-ipT2tCmprwsLRtZmwNywhrBy5WxT_-cj8nnnDeUMm6MOiLHwmjDteIn5OnBjz4MVeyrEYaAk3dVwhwDBIeVL9pS9aHaJRwW8bnqY6riPLk44qJ23k0-hoVxMQwY_ATbqvOwWycYRlgc15iChzNy2MM24_nrfkoev98-3Pys7-5__Lq5vqsdl2qqdSdBOSZgxY1qRN8aaBVo1lIEuTIOVNdjyymVknENzClwTPagBfZOoBCn5Oved5fi7xnzZEefHW63EDDO2QqqqNBS6QX98gHdxDmF8rtCGd40rdasUHxPuRRzTtjbXSqjSc-WUbtEYfdR2BKFfYnCmtJ0-Wo9r0bs_ra8zb4AYg_kUiqDS-9v_8f2Dw-tlS4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3082449771</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Timing of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy for outcome prediction in congenital diaphragmatic hernia</title><source>SpringerLink (Online service)</source><creator>Dütemeyer, Vivien ; Cannie, Mieke M. ; Schaible, Thomas ; Weis, Meike ; Persico, Nicola ; Borzani, Irene ; Badr, Dominique A. ; Jani, Jacques C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dütemeyer, Vivien ; Cannie, Mieke M. ; Schaible, Thomas ; Weis, Meike ; Persico, Nicola ; Borzani, Irene ; Badr, Dominique A. ; Jani, Jacques C.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To evaluate the impact of the timing of MRI on the prediction of survival and morbidity in patients with CDH, and whether serial measurements have a beneficial value.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study was conducted in two perinatal centers, in Germany and Italy. It included 354 patients with isolated CDH having at least one fetal MRI. The severity was assessed with the observed-to-expected total fetal lung volume (o/e TFLV) measured by two experienced double-blinded operators. The cohort was divided into three groups according to the gestational age (GA) at which the MRI was performed (< 27, 27–32, and > 32 weeks’ gestation [WG]). The accuracy for the prediction of survival at discharge and morbidity was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Multiple logistic regression analyses and propensity score matching examined the population for balance. The effect of repeated MRI was evaluated in ninety-seven cases.
Results
There were no significant differences in the prediction of survival when the o/e TFLV was measured before 27, between 27 and 32, and after 32 WG (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.77, 0.79, and 0.77, respectively). After adjustment for confounding factors, it was seen, that GA at MRI was not associated with survival at discharge, but the risk of mortality was higher with an intrathoracic liver position (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.12–0.78), lower GA at birth (aOR 1.48, 95%CI 1.24–1.78) and lower o/e TFLV (aOR 1.13, 95%CI 1.06–1.20). ROC curves showed comparable prediction accuracy for the different timepoints in pregnancy for pulmonary hypertension, the need of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and feeding aids. Serial measurements revealed no difference in change rate of the o/e TFLV according to survival.
Conclusion
The timing of MRI does not affect the prediction of survival rate or morbidity as the o/e TFLV does not change during pregnancy. Clinicians could choose any gestational age starting mid second trimester for the assessment of severity and counseling.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-0711</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0932-0067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-0711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00404-024-07545-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38782762</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Endocrinology ; Gestational age ; Gynecology ; Human Genetics ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Maternal-Fetal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Morbidity ; Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery ; Pregnancy</subject><ispartof>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024-08, Vol.310 (2), p.873-881</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-7d5a6c13ab28643f98a96a7190ea5b8ca6dfe920055127a1c6ac15fa73efc3e33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2252-342X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00404-024-07545-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00404-024-07545-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38782762$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dütemeyer, Vivien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannie, Mieke M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaible, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weis, Meike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persico, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borzani, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badr, Dominique A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jani, Jacques C.</creatorcontrib><title>Timing of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy for outcome prediction in congenital diaphragmatic hernia</title><title>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</title><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><description>Purpose
To evaluate the impact of the timing of MRI on the prediction of survival and morbidity in patients with CDH, and whether serial measurements have a beneficial value.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study was conducted in two perinatal centers, in Germany and Italy. It included 354 patients with isolated CDH having at least one fetal MRI. The severity was assessed with the observed-to-expected total fetal lung volume (o/e TFLV) measured by two experienced double-blinded operators. The cohort was divided into three groups according to the gestational age (GA) at which the MRI was performed (< 27, 27–32, and > 32 weeks’ gestation [WG]). The accuracy for the prediction of survival at discharge and morbidity was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Multiple logistic regression analyses and propensity score matching examined the population for balance. The effect of repeated MRI was evaluated in ninety-seven cases.
Results
There were no significant differences in the prediction of survival when the o/e TFLV was measured before 27, between 27 and 32, and after 32 WG (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.77, 0.79, and 0.77, respectively). After adjustment for confounding factors, it was seen, that GA at MRI was not associated with survival at discharge, but the risk of mortality was higher with an intrathoracic liver position (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.12–0.78), lower GA at birth (aOR 1.48, 95%CI 1.24–1.78) and lower o/e TFLV (aOR 1.13, 95%CI 1.06–1.20). ROC curves showed comparable prediction accuracy for the different timepoints in pregnancy for pulmonary hypertension, the need of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and feeding aids. Serial measurements revealed no difference in change rate of the o/e TFLV according to survival.
Conclusion
The timing of MRI does not affect the prediction of survival rate or morbidity as the o/e TFLV does not change during pregnancy. Clinicians could choose any gestational age starting mid second trimester for the assessment of severity and counseling.</description><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Gestational age</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Human Genetics</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Maternal-Fetal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><issn>1432-0711</issn><issn>0932-0067</issn><issn>1432-0711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtP3DAUhS1UBBT4AyxQpG66SfEjfmSJEH1ISGxgbd1xbjIeJvbUThb8-zoMlIpFF5btc797bN1DyAWj3xil-ipT2tCmprwsLRtZmwNywhrBy5WxT_-cj8nnnDeUMm6MOiLHwmjDteIn5OnBjz4MVeyrEYaAk3dVwhwDBIeVL9pS9aHaJRwW8bnqY6riPLk44qJ23k0-hoVxMQwY_ATbqvOwWycYRlgc15iChzNy2MM24_nrfkoev98-3Pys7-5__Lq5vqsdl2qqdSdBOSZgxY1qRN8aaBVo1lIEuTIOVNdjyymVknENzClwTPagBfZOoBCn5Oved5fi7xnzZEefHW63EDDO2QqqqNBS6QX98gHdxDmF8rtCGd40rdasUHxPuRRzTtjbXSqjSc-WUbtEYfdR2BKFfYnCmtJ0-Wo9r0bs_ra8zb4AYg_kUiqDS-9v_8f2Dw-tlS4</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Dütemeyer, Vivien</creator><creator>Cannie, Mieke M.</creator><creator>Schaible, Thomas</creator><creator>Weis, Meike</creator><creator>Persico, Nicola</creator><creator>Borzani, Irene</creator><creator>Badr, Dominique A.</creator><creator>Jani, Jacques C.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2252-342X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Timing of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy for outcome prediction in congenital diaphragmatic hernia</title><author>Dütemeyer, Vivien ; Cannie, Mieke M. ; Schaible, Thomas ; Weis, Meike ; Persico, Nicola ; Borzani, Irene ; Badr, Dominique A. ; Jani, Jacques C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-7d5a6c13ab28643f98a96a7190ea5b8ca6dfe920055127a1c6ac15fa73efc3e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Gestational age</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Human Genetics</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Maternal-Fetal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dütemeyer, Vivien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cannie, Mieke M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schaible, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weis, Meike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persico, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borzani, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Badr, Dominique A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jani, Jacques C.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dütemeyer, Vivien</au><au>Cannie, Mieke M.</au><au>Schaible, Thomas</au><au>Weis, Meike</au><au>Persico, Nicola</au><au>Borzani, Irene</au><au>Badr, Dominique A.</au><au>Jani, Jacques C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Timing of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy for outcome prediction in congenital diaphragmatic hernia</atitle><jtitle>Archives of gynecology and obstetrics</jtitle><stitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</stitle><addtitle>Arch Gynecol Obstet</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>310</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>873</spage><epage>881</epage><pages>873-881</pages><issn>1432-0711</issn><issn>0932-0067</issn><eissn>1432-0711</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To evaluate the impact of the timing of MRI on the prediction of survival and morbidity in patients with CDH, and whether serial measurements have a beneficial value.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study was conducted in two perinatal centers, in Germany and Italy. It included 354 patients with isolated CDH having at least one fetal MRI. The severity was assessed with the observed-to-expected total fetal lung volume (o/e TFLV) measured by two experienced double-blinded operators. The cohort was divided into three groups according to the gestational age (GA) at which the MRI was performed (< 27, 27–32, and > 32 weeks’ gestation [WG]). The accuracy for the prediction of survival at discharge and morbidity was analyzed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Multiple logistic regression analyses and propensity score matching examined the population for balance. The effect of repeated MRI was evaluated in ninety-seven cases.
Results
There were no significant differences in the prediction of survival when the o/e TFLV was measured before 27, between 27 and 32, and after 32 WG (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.77, 0.79, and 0.77, respectively). After adjustment for confounding factors, it was seen, that GA at MRI was not associated with survival at discharge, but the risk of mortality was higher with an intrathoracic liver position (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.30, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.12–0.78), lower GA at birth (aOR 1.48, 95%CI 1.24–1.78) and lower o/e TFLV (aOR 1.13, 95%CI 1.06–1.20). ROC curves showed comparable prediction accuracy for the different timepoints in pregnancy for pulmonary hypertension, the need of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and feeding aids. Serial measurements revealed no difference in change rate of the o/e TFLV according to survival.
Conclusion
The timing of MRI does not affect the prediction of survival rate or morbidity as the o/e TFLV does not change during pregnancy. Clinicians could choose any gestational age starting mid second trimester for the assessment of severity and counseling.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>38782762</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00404-024-07545-8</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2252-342X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1432-0711 |
ispartof | Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2024-08, Vol.310 (2), p.873-881 |
issn | 1432-0711 0932-0067 1432-0711 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3060375673 |
source | SpringerLink (Online service) |
subjects | Endocrinology Gestational age Gynecology Human Genetics Magnetic resonance imaging Maternal-Fetal Medicine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Morbidity Obstetrics/Perinatology/Midwifery Pregnancy |
title | Timing of magnetic resonance imaging in pregnancy for outcome prediction in congenital diaphragmatic hernia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T19%3A01%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Timing%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging%20in%20pregnancy%20for%20outcome%20prediction%20in%20congenital%20diaphragmatic%20hernia&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20gynecology%20and%20obstetrics&rft.au=D%C3%BCtemeyer,%20Vivien&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=310&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=873&rft.epage=881&rft.pages=873-881&rft.issn=1432-0711&rft.eissn=1432-0711&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00404-024-07545-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3082449771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3082449771&rft_id=info:pmid/38782762&rfr_iscdi=true |