Determinants and action paths of transboundary water pollution collaborative governance: A case study of the Yangtze River Basin, China

With rapid economic growth, the issue of water pollution has become increasingly prominent, and there is a consensus that river basin management systems and cross-regional management coordination mechanisms need improving. In this study, 171 transboundary sections of the Yangtze River Basin were mat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of environmental management 2024-06, Vol.360, p.121217-121217, Article 121217
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Feifei, Shu, Xinyi, Zhao, Xu, Guo, Meiwei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 121217
container_issue
container_start_page 121217
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 360
creator Zhao, Feifei
Shu, Xinyi
Zhao, Xu
Guo, Meiwei
description With rapid economic growth, the issue of water pollution has become increasingly prominent, and there is a consensus that river basin management systems and cross-regional management coordination mechanisms need improving. In this study, 171 transboundary sections of the Yangtze River Basin were matched with the data of 57 cities to construct panel data from 2015 to 2021. Based on the four-dimensional framework of environment–determination–process–resources, the dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method is used to identify the key influencing factors and action paths of water pollution collaborative governance effects. The results show that a single antecedent condition is not necessary to achieve efficient collaborative governance effects, and only the “number of collaborative governance” and “scale of collaboration” conditions played important roles. There are five paths that can achieve efficient collaborative governance effects: economy-oriented, ecology-oriented, technology-oriented, government-oriented, and all-oriented. Additionally, heterogeneous results show that the impact of the regional governance intention on efficient collaborative governance effect is limited in the middle and upstream sections of the Yangtze River Basin, while the downstream sections are more dependent on the basic condition of the basin. The results can help promote effective cross-regional collaboration in the Yangtze River Basin, provide scientific basis for regions to formulate targeted governance measures, and provide models for governance in other regions. •A four-dimensional framework is proposed to analyze transboundary water pollution collaborative governance.•Dynamic QCA method is employed to explore complex factor combinations influencing collaborative governance effectiveness.•Five distinct pathways are identified for effective water pollution collaborative governance.•Regional heterogeneity in collaborative governance is highlighted.•Theapproach and findings can serve as a reference for other regions facing similar transboundary water pollution challenges.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121217
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3060373998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479724012039</els_id><sourcerecordid>3060373998</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-e3a7b123e7e25158b02b8359a0d62bd126b9f724a1b25953646a161e56a04c3c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EomnhEVp5yaIT_DPjmekGtSl_UqVKCBasrGvPTeMoY6e2J6i8AK9dtwlskRfXi--eo3sOIaeczTnj6v16vka_G8HPBRP1nIvy2hdkxlnfVJ2S7CWZMcl4Vbd9e0SOU1ozxmSBXpMj2bVdV3M-I3-uMWMcnQefEwU_ULDZBU-3kFeJhiXNEXwyYfIDxAf6CwpOt2GzmZ4xW35gQoTsdkjvwg5jkbJ4QS-phYQ05Wl4eNZZIf0J_i7_RvqtwJFeQXL-nC5Wxf0NebWETcK3h3lCfnz6-H3xpbq5_fx1cXlTWVHLXKGE1nAhsUXR8KYzTJhONj2wQQkzcKFMv2xFDdyIpm-kqhVwxbFRwGorrTwh7_a62xjuJ0xZjy5ZLEd4DFPSkikmW9n3XUGbPWpjSCniUm-jG0sImjP91IFe60MH-qkDve-g7J0dLCYz4vBv62_oBfiwB7AcunMYdbIOS2iDi2izHoL7j8Uj_bSb4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3060373998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinants and action paths of transboundary water pollution collaborative governance: A case study of the Yangtze River Basin, China</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Zhao, Feifei ; Shu, Xinyi ; Zhao, Xu ; Guo, Meiwei</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Feifei ; Shu, Xinyi ; Zhao, Xu ; Guo, Meiwei</creatorcontrib><description>With rapid economic growth, the issue of water pollution has become increasingly prominent, and there is a consensus that river basin management systems and cross-regional management coordination mechanisms need improving. In this study, 171 transboundary sections of the Yangtze River Basin were matched with the data of 57 cities to construct panel data from 2015 to 2021. Based on the four-dimensional framework of environment–determination–process–resources, the dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method is used to identify the key influencing factors and action paths of water pollution collaborative governance effects. The results show that a single antecedent condition is not necessary to achieve efficient collaborative governance effects, and only the “number of collaborative governance” and “scale of collaboration” conditions played important roles. There are five paths that can achieve efficient collaborative governance effects: economy-oriented, ecology-oriented, technology-oriented, government-oriented, and all-oriented. Additionally, heterogeneous results show that the impact of the regional governance intention on efficient collaborative governance effect is limited in the middle and upstream sections of the Yangtze River Basin, while the downstream sections are more dependent on the basic condition of the basin. The results can help promote effective cross-regional collaboration in the Yangtze River Basin, provide scientific basis for regions to formulate targeted governance measures, and provide models for governance in other regions. •A four-dimensional framework is proposed to analyze transboundary water pollution collaborative governance.•Dynamic QCA method is employed to explore complex factor combinations influencing collaborative governance effectiveness.•Five distinct pathways are identified for effective water pollution collaborative governance.•Regional heterogeneity in collaborative governance is highlighted.•Theapproach and findings can serve as a reference for other regions facing similar transboundary water pollution challenges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121217</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38788411</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Action path ; China ; Collaborative governance ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) ; Rivers ; Transboundary water pollution governance ; Water Pollution - prevention &amp; control</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2024-06, Vol.360, p.121217-121217, Article 121217</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-e3a7b123e7e25158b02b8359a0d62bd126b9f724a1b25953646a161e56a04c3c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121217$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788411$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Feifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shu, Xinyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Meiwei</creatorcontrib><title>Determinants and action paths of transboundary water pollution collaborative governance: A case study of the Yangtze River Basin, China</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>With rapid economic growth, the issue of water pollution has become increasingly prominent, and there is a consensus that river basin management systems and cross-regional management coordination mechanisms need improving. In this study, 171 transboundary sections of the Yangtze River Basin were matched with the data of 57 cities to construct panel data from 2015 to 2021. Based on the four-dimensional framework of environment–determination–process–resources, the dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method is used to identify the key influencing factors and action paths of water pollution collaborative governance effects. The results show that a single antecedent condition is not necessary to achieve efficient collaborative governance effects, and only the “number of collaborative governance” and “scale of collaboration” conditions played important roles. There are five paths that can achieve efficient collaborative governance effects: economy-oriented, ecology-oriented, technology-oriented, government-oriented, and all-oriented. Additionally, heterogeneous results show that the impact of the regional governance intention on efficient collaborative governance effect is limited in the middle and upstream sections of the Yangtze River Basin, while the downstream sections are more dependent on the basic condition of the basin. The results can help promote effective cross-regional collaboration in the Yangtze River Basin, provide scientific basis for regions to formulate targeted governance measures, and provide models for governance in other regions. •A four-dimensional framework is proposed to analyze transboundary water pollution collaborative governance.•Dynamic QCA method is employed to explore complex factor combinations influencing collaborative governance effectiveness.•Five distinct pathways are identified for effective water pollution collaborative governance.•Regional heterogeneity in collaborative governance is highlighted.•Theapproach and findings can serve as a reference for other regions facing similar transboundary water pollution challenges.</description><subject>Action path</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Collaborative governance</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Transboundary water pollution governance</subject><subject>Water Pollution - prevention &amp; control</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1uEzEUhS0EomnhEVp5yaIT_DPjmekGtSl_UqVKCBasrGvPTeMoY6e2J6i8AK9dtwlskRfXi--eo3sOIaeczTnj6v16vka_G8HPBRP1nIvy2hdkxlnfVJ2S7CWZMcl4Vbd9e0SOU1ozxmSBXpMj2bVdV3M-I3-uMWMcnQefEwU_ULDZBU-3kFeJhiXNEXwyYfIDxAf6CwpOt2GzmZ4xW35gQoTsdkjvwg5jkbJ4QS-phYQ05Wl4eNZZIf0J_i7_RvqtwJFeQXL-nC5Wxf0NebWETcK3h3lCfnz6-H3xpbq5_fx1cXlTWVHLXKGE1nAhsUXR8KYzTJhONj2wQQkzcKFMv2xFDdyIpm-kqhVwxbFRwGorrTwh7_a62xjuJ0xZjy5ZLEd4DFPSkikmW9n3XUGbPWpjSCniUm-jG0sImjP91IFe60MH-qkDve-g7J0dLCYz4vBv62_oBfiwB7AcunMYdbIOS2iDi2izHoL7j8Uj_bSb4A</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Zhao, Feifei</creator><creator>Shu, Xinyi</creator><creator>Zhao, Xu</creator><creator>Guo, Meiwei</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Determinants and action paths of transboundary water pollution collaborative governance: A case study of the Yangtze River Basin, China</title><author>Zhao, Feifei ; Shu, Xinyi ; Zhao, Xu ; Guo, Meiwei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c243t-e3a7b123e7e25158b02b8359a0d62bd126b9f724a1b25953646a161e56a04c3c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Action path</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Collaborative governance</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Transboundary water pollution governance</topic><topic>Water Pollution - prevention &amp; control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Feifei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shu, Xinyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Meiwei</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Feifei</au><au>Shu, Xinyi</au><au>Zhao, Xu</au><au>Guo, Meiwei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinants and action paths of transboundary water pollution collaborative governance: A case study of the Yangtze River Basin, China</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>360</volume><spage>121217</spage><epage>121217</epage><pages>121217-121217</pages><artnum>121217</artnum><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><abstract>With rapid economic growth, the issue of water pollution has become increasingly prominent, and there is a consensus that river basin management systems and cross-regional management coordination mechanisms need improving. In this study, 171 transboundary sections of the Yangtze River Basin were matched with the data of 57 cities to construct panel data from 2015 to 2021. Based on the four-dimensional framework of environment–determination–process–resources, the dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) method is used to identify the key influencing factors and action paths of water pollution collaborative governance effects. The results show that a single antecedent condition is not necessary to achieve efficient collaborative governance effects, and only the “number of collaborative governance” and “scale of collaboration” conditions played important roles. There are five paths that can achieve efficient collaborative governance effects: economy-oriented, ecology-oriented, technology-oriented, government-oriented, and all-oriented. Additionally, heterogeneous results show that the impact of the regional governance intention on efficient collaborative governance effect is limited in the middle and upstream sections of the Yangtze River Basin, while the downstream sections are more dependent on the basic condition of the basin. The results can help promote effective cross-regional collaboration in the Yangtze River Basin, provide scientific basis for regions to formulate targeted governance measures, and provide models for governance in other regions. •A four-dimensional framework is proposed to analyze transboundary water pollution collaborative governance.•Dynamic QCA method is employed to explore complex factor combinations influencing collaborative governance effectiveness.•Five distinct pathways are identified for effective water pollution collaborative governance.•Regional heterogeneity in collaborative governance is highlighted.•Theapproach and findings can serve as a reference for other regions facing similar transboundary water pollution challenges.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38788411</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121217</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2024-06, Vol.360, p.121217-121217, Article 121217
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3060373998
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Action path
China
Collaborative governance
Conservation of Natural Resources
Dynamic qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)
Rivers
Transboundary water pollution governance
Water Pollution - prevention & control
title Determinants and action paths of transboundary water pollution collaborative governance: A case study of the Yangtze River Basin, China
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T11%3A05%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants%20and%20action%20paths%20of%20transboundary%20water%20pollution%20collaborative%20governance:%20A%20case%20study%20of%20the%20Yangtze%20River%20Basin,%20China&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Zhao,%20Feifei&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=360&rft.spage=121217&rft.epage=121217&rft.pages=121217-121217&rft.artnum=121217&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121217&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3060373998%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3060373998&rft_id=info:pmid/38788411&rft_els_id=S0301479724012039&rfr_iscdi=true