Prediction of Failure to Progress after Labor Induction: A Multivariable Model Using Pelvic Ultrasound and Clinical Data

Labor induction is one of the leading causes of obstetric admission. This study aimed to create a simple model for predicting failure to progress after labor induction using pelvic ultrasound and clinical data. A group of 387 singleton pregnant women at term with unruptured amniotic membranes admitt...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of personalized medicine 2024-05, Vol.14 (5), p.502
Hauptverfasser: Novillo-Del Álamo, Blanca, Martínez-Varea, Alicia, Satorres-Pérez, Elena, Nieto-Tous, Mar, Modrego-Pardo, Fernando, Padilla-Prieto, Carmen, García-Florenciano, María Victoria, Bello-Martínez de Velasco, Silvia, Morales-Roselló, José
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Labor induction is one of the leading causes of obstetric admission. This study aimed to create a simple model for predicting failure to progress after labor induction using pelvic ultrasound and clinical data. A group of 387 singleton pregnant women at term with unruptured amniotic membranes admitted for labor induction were included in an observational prospective study. Clinical and ultrasonographic variables were collected at admission prior to the onset of contractions, and labor data were collected after delivery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was applied to create several models to predict cesarean section due to failure to progress. Afterward, the most accurate and reproducible model was selected according to the lowest Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) with a high area under the curve (AUC). Plausible parameters for explaining failure to progress were initially obtained from univariable analysis. With them, several multivariable analyses were evaluated. Those parameters with the highest reproducibility included maternal age ( < 0.05), parity ( < 0.0001), fetal gender ( < 0.05), EFW centile ( < 0.01), cervical length ( < 0.01), and posterior occiput position ( < 0.001), but the angle of descent was disregarded. This model obtained an AIC of 318.3 and an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.76-0.86, < 0.0001) with detection rates of 24% and 37% for FPRs of 5% and 10%. A simplified clinical and sonographic model may guide the management of pregnancies undergoing labor induction, favoring individualized patient management.
ISSN:2075-4426
2075-4426
DOI:10.3390/jpm14050502