Physiological variables for the objective detection of nerve block failure in dogs

To identify physiological variables for objectively detecting nociception indicative of intraoperative peripheral nerve block failure. A double-blinded randomized clinical study. A sample of 14 male (40.8 ± 12 kg; mean ± standard deviation) and 16 female (34.3 ± 11.4 kg) client-owned dogs. Dogs were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia 2024-07, Vol.51 (4), p.343-353
Hauptverfasser: Basson, Etienne P., Kadwa, Abdur R., Blignaut, Christiaan J., Zeiler, Gareth E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 353
container_issue 4
container_start_page 343
container_title Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia
container_volume 51
creator Basson, Etienne P.
Kadwa, Abdur R.
Blignaut, Christiaan J.
Zeiler, Gareth E.
description To identify physiological variables for objectively detecting nociception indicative of intraoperative peripheral nerve block failure. A double-blinded randomized clinical study. A sample of 14 male (40.8 ± 12 kg; mean ± standard deviation) and 16 female (34.3 ± 11.4 kg) client-owned dogs. Dogs were randomly assigned to one of three groups for psoas compartment and proximal sciatic nerve blocks (0.2 mL kg–1 per site): guided bupivacaine (GBB), or saline (GSB) block or a blind bupivacaine block (BBB). Guided blocks were performed using an ultrasound-peripheral nerve locator combination. Premedication consisted of medetomidine 0.01 mg kg–1 and morphine 0.3 mg kg–1. General anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was used to compare actual values and change in values of physiological variables between GSB and GBB. The Youden index and associated criterion for each physiological variable were used to determine an objective measure for nociception. Fisher’s exact t test, McNemar’s test and Cohen’s kappa statistical analysis were used to determine association, differences and inter-score reliability between the objective and subjective scoring for BBB. Cardiovascular variables had good discriminating ability to identify a nociceptive response (p < 0.01). The Youden indices for mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressure were most reliable in detecting nociception. The highest sensitivity was that of ΔMAP (100%) with good agreement between the subjective and objective scores of Δheart rate or systolic arterial pressure (SAP). The use of ΔMAP, ΔSAP, ΔDAP had the best ability in indicating peripheral nerve block failure (p < 0.001). Blood pressure values can detect a response to surgical stimulus in adequately anaesthetized dogs. The use of ΔMAP, ΔSAP or ΔDAP may be considered as objective measures to detect nerve block failure.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.vaa.2024.03.010
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3058639088</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1467298724000424</els_id><sourcerecordid>3058639088</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-23896ffe124180918dc5881da4b3877a980c44f9ff726bdc4c9476057eebcd883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAFyQj1wS7MRJbHFCFX9SJRCCs-XY69YljYudVurbk9DCkdOOVrOzux9Cl5SklNDyZplulUozkrGU5Cmh5AiNKSurJBOiOP7TvBqhsxiXhNBKFOQUjXJeVRkv2Bi9vS520fnGz51WDd6q4FTdQMTWB9wtAPt6CbpzW8AGukH5FnuLWwh9q268_sRWuWYTALsWGz-P5-jEqibCxaFO0MfD_fv0KZm9PD5P72aJzknRJVnORWkt0IxRTgTlRhecU6NYPZynBCeaMSusrbKyNpppwaqSFBVArQ3n-QRd73PXwX9tIHZy5aKGplEt-E2U_RZe5oL8WOneqoOPMYCV6-BWKuwkJXJAKZeyRykHlJLkskfZz1wd4jf1CszfxC-73nC7N0D_5NZBkFE7aDUYF3pQ0nj3T_w3CmqEIg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3058639088</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Physiological variables for the objective detection of nerve block failure in dogs</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Basson, Etienne P. ; Kadwa, Abdur R. ; Blignaut, Christiaan J. ; Zeiler, Gareth E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Basson, Etienne P. ; Kadwa, Abdur R. ; Blignaut, Christiaan J. ; Zeiler, Gareth E.</creatorcontrib><description>To identify physiological variables for objectively detecting nociception indicative of intraoperative peripheral nerve block failure. A double-blinded randomized clinical study. A sample of 14 male (40.8 ± 12 kg; mean ± standard deviation) and 16 female (34.3 ± 11.4 kg) client-owned dogs. Dogs were randomly assigned to one of three groups for psoas compartment and proximal sciatic nerve blocks (0.2 mL kg–1 per site): guided bupivacaine (GBB), or saline (GSB) block or a blind bupivacaine block (BBB). Guided blocks were performed using an ultrasound-peripheral nerve locator combination. Premedication consisted of medetomidine 0.01 mg kg–1 and morphine 0.3 mg kg–1. General anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was used to compare actual values and change in values of physiological variables between GSB and GBB. The Youden index and associated criterion for each physiological variable were used to determine an objective measure for nociception. Fisher’s exact t test, McNemar’s test and Cohen’s kappa statistical analysis were used to determine association, differences and inter-score reliability between the objective and subjective scoring for BBB. Cardiovascular variables had good discriminating ability to identify a nociceptive response (p &lt; 0.01). The Youden indices for mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressure were most reliable in detecting nociception. The highest sensitivity was that of ΔMAP (100%) with good agreement between the subjective and objective scores of Δheart rate or systolic arterial pressure (SAP). The use of ΔMAP, ΔSAP, ΔDAP had the best ability in indicating peripheral nerve block failure (p &lt; 0.001). Blood pressure values can detect a response to surgical stimulus in adequately anaesthetized dogs. The use of ΔMAP, ΔSAP or ΔDAP may be considered as objective measures to detect nerve block failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-2987</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1467-2995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-2995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaa.2024.03.010</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38772854</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>analgesia ; Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage ; Anesthetics, Local - pharmacology ; Animals ; Bupivacaine - administration &amp; dosage ; Bupivacaine - pharmacology ; Dogs ; Double-Blind Method ; failure ; Female ; intraoperative nociception ; Male ; nerve block ; Nerve Block - methods ; Nerve Block - veterinary ; physiological variables ; Treatment Failure</subject><ispartof>Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia, 2024-07, Vol.51 (4), p.343-353</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-23896ffe124180918dc5881da4b3877a980c44f9ff726bdc4c9476057eebcd883</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1967-0461 ; 0000-0002-5955-2067</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38772854$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Basson, Etienne P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadwa, Abdur R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blignaut, Christiaan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeiler, Gareth E.</creatorcontrib><title>Physiological variables for the objective detection of nerve block failure in dogs</title><title>Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia</title><addtitle>Vet Anaesth Analg</addtitle><description>To identify physiological variables for objectively detecting nociception indicative of intraoperative peripheral nerve block failure. A double-blinded randomized clinical study. A sample of 14 male (40.8 ± 12 kg; mean ± standard deviation) and 16 female (34.3 ± 11.4 kg) client-owned dogs. Dogs were randomly assigned to one of three groups for psoas compartment and proximal sciatic nerve blocks (0.2 mL kg–1 per site): guided bupivacaine (GBB), or saline (GSB) block or a blind bupivacaine block (BBB). Guided blocks were performed using an ultrasound-peripheral nerve locator combination. Premedication consisted of medetomidine 0.01 mg kg–1 and morphine 0.3 mg kg–1. General anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was used to compare actual values and change in values of physiological variables between GSB and GBB. The Youden index and associated criterion for each physiological variable were used to determine an objective measure for nociception. Fisher’s exact t test, McNemar’s test and Cohen’s kappa statistical analysis were used to determine association, differences and inter-score reliability between the objective and subjective scoring for BBB. Cardiovascular variables had good discriminating ability to identify a nociceptive response (p &lt; 0.01). The Youden indices for mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressure were most reliable in detecting nociception. The highest sensitivity was that of ΔMAP (100%) with good agreement between the subjective and objective scores of Δheart rate or systolic arterial pressure (SAP). The use of ΔMAP, ΔSAP, ΔDAP had the best ability in indicating peripheral nerve block failure (p &lt; 0.001). Blood pressure values can detect a response to surgical stimulus in adequately anaesthetized dogs. The use of ΔMAP, ΔSAP or ΔDAP may be considered as objective measures to detect nerve block failure.</description><subject>analgesia</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anesthetics, Local - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bupivacaine - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Bupivacaine - pharmacology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>intraoperative nociception</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>nerve block</subject><subject>Nerve Block - methods</subject><subject>Nerve Block - veterinary</subject><subject>physiological variables</subject><subject>Treatment Failure</subject><issn>1467-2987</issn><issn>1467-2995</issn><issn>1467-2995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EoqXwAFyQj1wS7MRJbHFCFX9SJRCCs-XY69YljYudVurbk9DCkdOOVrOzux9Cl5SklNDyZplulUozkrGU5Cmh5AiNKSurJBOiOP7TvBqhsxiXhNBKFOQUjXJeVRkv2Bi9vS520fnGz51WDd6q4FTdQMTWB9wtAPt6CbpzW8AGukH5FnuLWwh9q268_sRWuWYTALsWGz-P5-jEqibCxaFO0MfD_fv0KZm9PD5P72aJzknRJVnORWkt0IxRTgTlRhecU6NYPZynBCeaMSusrbKyNpppwaqSFBVArQ3n-QRd73PXwX9tIHZy5aKGplEt-E2U_RZe5oL8WOneqoOPMYCV6-BWKuwkJXJAKZeyRykHlJLkskfZz1wd4jf1CszfxC-73nC7N0D_5NZBkFE7aDUYF3pQ0nj3T_w3CmqEIg</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Basson, Etienne P.</creator><creator>Kadwa, Abdur R.</creator><creator>Blignaut, Christiaan J.</creator><creator>Zeiler, Gareth E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1967-0461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5955-2067</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Physiological variables for the objective detection of nerve block failure in dogs</title><author>Basson, Etienne P. ; Kadwa, Abdur R. ; Blignaut, Christiaan J. ; Zeiler, Gareth E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-23896ffe124180918dc5881da4b3877a980c44f9ff726bdc4c9476057eebcd883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>analgesia</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anesthetics, Local - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bupivacaine - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Bupivacaine - pharmacology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>intraoperative nociception</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>nerve block</topic><topic>Nerve Block - methods</topic><topic>Nerve Block - veterinary</topic><topic>physiological variables</topic><topic>Treatment Failure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Basson, Etienne P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kadwa, Abdur R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blignaut, Christiaan J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeiler, Gareth E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Basson, Etienne P.</au><au>Kadwa, Abdur R.</au><au>Blignaut, Christiaan J.</au><au>Zeiler, Gareth E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Physiological variables for the objective detection of nerve block failure in dogs</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Anaesth Analg</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>353</epage><pages>343-353</pages><issn>1467-2987</issn><issn>1467-2995</issn><eissn>1467-2995</eissn><abstract>To identify physiological variables for objectively detecting nociception indicative of intraoperative peripheral nerve block failure. A double-blinded randomized clinical study. A sample of 14 male (40.8 ± 12 kg; mean ± standard deviation) and 16 female (34.3 ± 11.4 kg) client-owned dogs. Dogs were randomly assigned to one of three groups for psoas compartment and proximal sciatic nerve blocks (0.2 mL kg–1 per site): guided bupivacaine (GBB), or saline (GSB) block or a blind bupivacaine block (BBB). Guided blocks were performed using an ultrasound-peripheral nerve locator combination. Premedication consisted of medetomidine 0.01 mg kg–1 and morphine 0.3 mg kg–1. General anaesthesia was induced with propofol and maintained with isoflurane in oxygen. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis was used to compare actual values and change in values of physiological variables between GSB and GBB. The Youden index and associated criterion for each physiological variable were used to determine an objective measure for nociception. Fisher’s exact t test, McNemar’s test and Cohen’s kappa statistical analysis were used to determine association, differences and inter-score reliability between the objective and subjective scoring for BBB. Cardiovascular variables had good discriminating ability to identify a nociceptive response (p &lt; 0.01). The Youden indices for mean (MAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressure were most reliable in detecting nociception. The highest sensitivity was that of ΔMAP (100%) with good agreement between the subjective and objective scores of Δheart rate or systolic arterial pressure (SAP). The use of ΔMAP, ΔSAP, ΔDAP had the best ability in indicating peripheral nerve block failure (p &lt; 0.001). Blood pressure values can detect a response to surgical stimulus in adequately anaesthetized dogs. The use of ΔMAP, ΔSAP or ΔDAP may be considered as objective measures to detect nerve block failure.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38772854</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaa.2024.03.010</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1967-0461</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5955-2067</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1467-2987
ispartof Veterinary anaesthesia and analgesia, 2024-07, Vol.51 (4), p.343-353
issn 1467-2987
1467-2995
1467-2995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3058639088
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects analgesia
Anesthetics, Local - administration & dosage
Anesthetics, Local - pharmacology
Animals
Bupivacaine - administration & dosage
Bupivacaine - pharmacology
Dogs
Double-Blind Method
failure
Female
intraoperative nociception
Male
nerve block
Nerve Block - methods
Nerve Block - veterinary
physiological variables
Treatment Failure
title Physiological variables for the objective detection of nerve block failure in dogs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A30%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Physiological%20variables%20for%20the%20objective%20detection%20of%20nerve%20block%20failure%20in%20dogs&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20anaesthesia%20and%20analgesia&rft.au=Basson,%20Etienne%20P.&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=353&rft.pages=343-353&rft.issn=1467-2987&rft.eissn=1467-2995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaa.2024.03.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3058639088%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3058639088&rft_id=info:pmid/38772854&rft_els_id=S1467298724000424&rfr_iscdi=true