Food Sublingual Immunotherapy: Safety and Simplicity of a Real Food Updosing Protocol
Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using food extracts is safe and effective in desensitizing patients with food allergy, yet not often used in clinical practice. To propose a cost-effective, expedited SLIT protocol using real food. Patients with food allergy aged 5 to 50 years (median, 11 years) initi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of allergy and clinical immunology in practice (Cambridge, MA) MA), 2024-09, Vol.12 (9), p.2447-2453.e1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2453.e1 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2447 |
container_title | The journal of allergy and clinical immunology in practice (Cambridge, MA) |
container_volume | 12 |
creator | Windom, Reed R. Seitz, Samantha Ly, Jean B. Dunn, Neha Fergeson, Jennifer Windom, Hugh H. |
description | Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using food extracts is safe and effective in desensitizing patients with food allergy, yet not often used in clinical practice.
To propose a cost-effective, expedited SLIT protocol using real food.
Patients with food allergy aged 5 to 50 years (median, 11 years) initiated food SLIT in a single-clinic setting. The daily maintenance dose was 4 to 11 mg protein in 0.1 to 0.5 mL volume, depending on the food. Some foods were available in liquid form at the local grocery (milk, egg white liquid, and cashew/walnut/sunflower/hazelnut milk), whereas others were prepared in the office using flour and 50% glycerin saline (peanut/sesame/wheat). The first cohort of 20 patients began dosing at a 1:1000 dilution, the next 30 patients at 1:100 dilution. An exercise challenge was performed in a subset of patients on maintenance dosing to evaluate the need for a predose or postdose rest period.
The 1:1000 and 1:100 cohorts both completed day 1 without adverse reactions beyond itchy mouth. There were no systemic reactions requiring epinephrine throughout the study period and 88% reached their maintenance dose. Skin testing of 6-month-old peanut flour solution was not diminished from fresh solution and similar to food extract. Exercise challenge test results in 12 patients were negative.
Allergen extract food SLIT as used in published trials has limitations of cost and multiple office visits. Inexpensive real food, at the same or slightly higher protein dose, was well tolerated in 4 updose visits, a minimum of a week apart. Unlike food oral immunotherapy, a predose or postdose rest period may not be necessary. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3056670553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2213219824005191</els_id><sourcerecordid>3056670553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-cd154b36f248c35068b8d172bb99d69115bb3af6b9d6d4907eb18350c2ecfcf53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhgdRbKl9ARcySzcdT5LJXMSNFC-FgmLtOuQ2mjIzGZMZoW9valuXZpMc-P7_kC-KLhEkCFB2s0k23HQJBpwmQBOA_CQaY4zIDGNAp8c3KotRNPV-A-EUKIcUzqMRKXJa5iWMo_WjtSpeDaI27cfA63jRNENr-0_teLe9jVe80v025m2ATNPVRpow2irm8ZsO-G983SnrQz5-dba30tYX0VnFa6-nh3sS9jy8z59ny5enxfx-OZOY5P1MKkRTQbIKp4UkFLJCFArlWIiyVFmJEBWC8CoTYVJpCbkWqAicxFpWsqJkEl3veztnvwbte9YYL3Vd81bbwTMCNMtyoJQEFO9R6az3Tlesc6bhbssQsJ1RtmE7o2xnlAFlwWgIXR36B9Fo9Rc5-gvA3R7Q4ZffRjvmpdGt1Mo4LXumrPmv_wf72obD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3056670553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Food Sublingual Immunotherapy: Safety and Simplicity of a Real Food Updosing Protocol</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Windom, Reed R. ; Seitz, Samantha ; Ly, Jean B. ; Dunn, Neha ; Fergeson, Jennifer ; Windom, Hugh H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Windom, Reed R. ; Seitz, Samantha ; Ly, Jean B. ; Dunn, Neha ; Fergeson, Jennifer ; Windom, Hugh H.</creatorcontrib><description>Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using food extracts is safe and effective in desensitizing patients with food allergy, yet not often used in clinical practice.
To propose a cost-effective, expedited SLIT protocol using real food.
Patients with food allergy aged 5 to 50 years (median, 11 years) initiated food SLIT in a single-clinic setting. The daily maintenance dose was 4 to 11 mg protein in 0.1 to 0.5 mL volume, depending on the food. Some foods were available in liquid form at the local grocery (milk, egg white liquid, and cashew/walnut/sunflower/hazelnut milk), whereas others were prepared in the office using flour and 50% glycerin saline (peanut/sesame/wheat). The first cohort of 20 patients began dosing at a 1:1000 dilution, the next 30 patients at 1:100 dilution. An exercise challenge was performed in a subset of patients on maintenance dosing to evaluate the need for a predose or postdose rest period.
The 1:1000 and 1:100 cohorts both completed day 1 without adverse reactions beyond itchy mouth. There were no systemic reactions requiring epinephrine throughout the study period and 88% reached their maintenance dose. Skin testing of 6-month-old peanut flour solution was not diminished from fresh solution and similar to food extract. Exercise challenge test results in 12 patients were negative.
Allergen extract food SLIT as used in published trials has limitations of cost and multiple office visits. Inexpensive real food, at the same or slightly higher protein dose, was well tolerated in 4 updose visits, a minimum of a week apart. Unlike food oral immunotherapy, a predose or postdose rest period may not be necessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2213-2198</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2213-2201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2213-2201</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38759790</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Food allergy ; Food allergy treatment ; Food desensitization ; Sublingual immunotherapy</subject><ispartof>The journal of allergy and clinical immunology in practice (Cambridge, MA), 2024-09, Vol.12 (9), p.2447-2453.e1</ispartof><rights>2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-cd154b36f248c35068b8d172bb99d69115bb3af6b9d6d4907eb18350c2ecfcf53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38759790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Windom, Reed R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seitz, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ly, Jean B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fergeson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windom, Hugh H.</creatorcontrib><title>Food Sublingual Immunotherapy: Safety and Simplicity of a Real Food Updosing Protocol</title><title>The journal of allergy and clinical immunology in practice (Cambridge, MA)</title><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract</addtitle><description>Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using food extracts is safe and effective in desensitizing patients with food allergy, yet not often used in clinical practice.
To propose a cost-effective, expedited SLIT protocol using real food.
Patients with food allergy aged 5 to 50 years (median, 11 years) initiated food SLIT in a single-clinic setting. The daily maintenance dose was 4 to 11 mg protein in 0.1 to 0.5 mL volume, depending on the food. Some foods were available in liquid form at the local grocery (milk, egg white liquid, and cashew/walnut/sunflower/hazelnut milk), whereas others were prepared in the office using flour and 50% glycerin saline (peanut/sesame/wheat). The first cohort of 20 patients began dosing at a 1:1000 dilution, the next 30 patients at 1:100 dilution. An exercise challenge was performed in a subset of patients on maintenance dosing to evaluate the need for a predose or postdose rest period.
The 1:1000 and 1:100 cohorts both completed day 1 without adverse reactions beyond itchy mouth. There were no systemic reactions requiring epinephrine throughout the study period and 88% reached their maintenance dose. Skin testing of 6-month-old peanut flour solution was not diminished from fresh solution and similar to food extract. Exercise challenge test results in 12 patients were negative.
Allergen extract food SLIT as used in published trials has limitations of cost and multiple office visits. Inexpensive real food, at the same or slightly higher protein dose, was well tolerated in 4 updose visits, a minimum of a week apart. Unlike food oral immunotherapy, a predose or postdose rest period may not be necessary.</description><subject>Food allergy</subject><subject>Food allergy treatment</subject><subject>Food desensitization</subject><subject>Sublingual immunotherapy</subject><issn>2213-2198</issn><issn>2213-2201</issn><issn>2213-2201</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhgdRbKl9ARcySzcdT5LJXMSNFC-FgmLtOuQ2mjIzGZMZoW9valuXZpMc-P7_kC-KLhEkCFB2s0k23HQJBpwmQBOA_CQaY4zIDGNAp8c3KotRNPV-A-EUKIcUzqMRKXJa5iWMo_WjtSpeDaI27cfA63jRNENr-0_teLe9jVe80v025m2ATNPVRpow2irm8ZsO-G983SnrQz5-dba30tYX0VnFa6-nh3sS9jy8z59ny5enxfx-OZOY5P1MKkRTQbIKp4UkFLJCFArlWIiyVFmJEBWC8CoTYVJpCbkWqAicxFpWsqJkEl3veztnvwbte9YYL3Vd81bbwTMCNMtyoJQEFO9R6az3Tlesc6bhbssQsJ1RtmE7o2xnlAFlwWgIXR36B9Fo9Rc5-gvA3R7Q4ZffRjvmpdGt1Mo4LXumrPmv_wf72obD</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Windom, Reed R.</creator><creator>Seitz, Samantha</creator><creator>Ly, Jean B.</creator><creator>Dunn, Neha</creator><creator>Fergeson, Jennifer</creator><creator>Windom, Hugh H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Food Sublingual Immunotherapy: Safety and Simplicity of a Real Food Updosing Protocol</title><author>Windom, Reed R. ; Seitz, Samantha ; Ly, Jean B. ; Dunn, Neha ; Fergeson, Jennifer ; Windom, Hugh H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-cd154b36f248c35068b8d172bb99d69115bb3af6b9d6d4907eb18350c2ecfcf53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Food allergy</topic><topic>Food allergy treatment</topic><topic>Food desensitization</topic><topic>Sublingual immunotherapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Windom, Reed R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seitz, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ly, Jean B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fergeson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windom, Hugh H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of allergy and clinical immunology in practice (Cambridge, MA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Windom, Reed R.</au><au>Seitz, Samantha</au><au>Ly, Jean B.</au><au>Dunn, Neha</au><au>Fergeson, Jennifer</au><au>Windom, Hugh H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Food Sublingual Immunotherapy: Safety and Simplicity of a Real Food Updosing Protocol</atitle><jtitle>The journal of allergy and clinical immunology in practice (Cambridge, MA)</jtitle><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2447</spage><epage>2453.e1</epage><pages>2447-2453.e1</pages><issn>2213-2198</issn><issn>2213-2201</issn><eissn>2213-2201</eissn><abstract>Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using food extracts is safe and effective in desensitizing patients with food allergy, yet not often used in clinical practice.
To propose a cost-effective, expedited SLIT protocol using real food.
Patients with food allergy aged 5 to 50 years (median, 11 years) initiated food SLIT in a single-clinic setting. The daily maintenance dose was 4 to 11 mg protein in 0.1 to 0.5 mL volume, depending on the food. Some foods were available in liquid form at the local grocery (milk, egg white liquid, and cashew/walnut/sunflower/hazelnut milk), whereas others were prepared in the office using flour and 50% glycerin saline (peanut/sesame/wheat). The first cohort of 20 patients began dosing at a 1:1000 dilution, the next 30 patients at 1:100 dilution. An exercise challenge was performed in a subset of patients on maintenance dosing to evaluate the need for a predose or postdose rest period.
The 1:1000 and 1:100 cohorts both completed day 1 without adverse reactions beyond itchy mouth. There were no systemic reactions requiring epinephrine throughout the study period and 88% reached their maintenance dose. Skin testing of 6-month-old peanut flour solution was not diminished from fresh solution and similar to food extract. Exercise challenge test results in 12 patients were negative.
Allergen extract food SLIT as used in published trials has limitations of cost and multiple office visits. Inexpensive real food, at the same or slightly higher protein dose, was well tolerated in 4 updose visits, a minimum of a week apart. Unlike food oral immunotherapy, a predose or postdose rest period may not be necessary.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38759790</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.007</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2213-2198 |
ispartof | The journal of allergy and clinical immunology in practice (Cambridge, MA), 2024-09, Vol.12 (9), p.2447-2453.e1 |
issn | 2213-2198 2213-2201 2213-2201 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3056670553 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Food allergy Food allergy treatment Food desensitization Sublingual immunotherapy |
title | Food Sublingual Immunotherapy: Safety and Simplicity of a Real Food Updosing Protocol |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T15%3A55%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Food%20Sublingual%20Immunotherapy:%20Safety%20and%20Simplicity%20of%20a%20Real%20Food%20Updosing%20Protocol&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20allergy%20and%20clinical%20immunology%20in%20practice%20(Cambridge,%20MA)&rft.au=Windom,%20Reed%20R.&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2447&rft.epage=2453.e1&rft.pages=2447-2453.e1&rft.issn=2213-2198&rft.eissn=2213-2201&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3056670553%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3056670553&rft_id=info:pmid/38759790&rft_els_id=S2213219824005191&rfr_iscdi=true |