Food Sublingual Immunotherapy: Safety and Simplicity of a Real Food Updosing Protocol

Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using food extracts is safe and effective in desensitizing patients with food allergy, yet not often used in clinical practice. To propose a cost-effective, expedited SLIT protocol using real food. Patients with food allergy aged 5 to 50 years (median, 11 years) initi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of allergy and clinical immunology in practice (Cambridge, MA) MA), 2024-09, Vol.12 (9), p.2447-2453.e1
Hauptverfasser: Windom, Reed R., Seitz, Samantha, Ly, Jean B., Dunn, Neha, Fergeson, Jennifer, Windom, Hugh H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2453.e1
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2447
container_title The journal of allergy and clinical immunology in practice (Cambridge, MA)
container_volume 12
creator Windom, Reed R.
Seitz, Samantha
Ly, Jean B.
Dunn, Neha
Fergeson, Jennifer
Windom, Hugh H.
description Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using food extracts is safe and effective in desensitizing patients with food allergy, yet not often used in clinical practice. To propose a cost-effective, expedited SLIT protocol using real food. Patients with food allergy aged 5 to 50 years (median, 11 years) initiated food SLIT in a single-clinic setting. The daily maintenance dose was 4 to 11 mg protein in 0.1 to 0.5 mL volume, depending on the food. Some foods were available in liquid form at the local grocery (milk, egg white liquid, and cashew/walnut/sunflower/hazelnut milk), whereas others were prepared in the office using flour and 50% glycerin saline (peanut/sesame/wheat). The first cohort of 20 patients began dosing at a 1:1000 dilution, the next 30 patients at 1:100 dilution. An exercise challenge was performed in a subset of patients on maintenance dosing to evaluate the need for a predose or postdose rest period. The 1:1000 and 1:100 cohorts both completed day 1 without adverse reactions beyond itchy mouth. There were no systemic reactions requiring epinephrine throughout the study period and 88% reached their maintenance dose. Skin testing of 6-month-old peanut flour solution was not diminished from fresh solution and similar to food extract. Exercise challenge test results in 12 patients were negative. Allergen extract food SLIT as used in published trials has limitations of cost and multiple office visits. Inexpensive real food, at the same or slightly higher protein dose, was well tolerated in 4 updose visits, a minimum of a week apart. Unlike food oral immunotherapy, a predose or postdose rest period may not be necessary.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3056670553</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2213219824005191</els_id><sourcerecordid>3056670553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-cd154b36f248c35068b8d172bb99d69115bb3af6b9d6d4907eb18350c2ecfcf53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhgdRbKl9ARcySzcdT5LJXMSNFC-FgmLtOuQ2mjIzGZMZoW9valuXZpMc-P7_kC-KLhEkCFB2s0k23HQJBpwmQBOA_CQaY4zIDGNAp8c3KotRNPV-A-EUKIcUzqMRKXJa5iWMo_WjtSpeDaI27cfA63jRNENr-0_teLe9jVe80v025m2ATNPVRpow2irm8ZsO-G983SnrQz5-dba30tYX0VnFa6-nh3sS9jy8z59ny5enxfx-OZOY5P1MKkRTQbIKp4UkFLJCFArlWIiyVFmJEBWC8CoTYVJpCbkWqAicxFpWsqJkEl3veztnvwbte9YYL3Vd81bbwTMCNMtyoJQEFO9R6az3Tlesc6bhbssQsJ1RtmE7o2xnlAFlwWgIXR36B9Fo9Rc5-gvA3R7Q4ZffRjvmpdGt1Mo4LXumrPmv_wf72obD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3056670553</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Food Sublingual Immunotherapy: Safety and Simplicity of a Real Food Updosing Protocol</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Windom, Reed R. ; Seitz, Samantha ; Ly, Jean B. ; Dunn, Neha ; Fergeson, Jennifer ; Windom, Hugh H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Windom, Reed R. ; Seitz, Samantha ; Ly, Jean B. ; Dunn, Neha ; Fergeson, Jennifer ; Windom, Hugh H.</creatorcontrib><description>Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using food extracts is safe and effective in desensitizing patients with food allergy, yet not often used in clinical practice. To propose a cost-effective, expedited SLIT protocol using real food. Patients with food allergy aged 5 to 50 years (median, 11 years) initiated food SLIT in a single-clinic setting. The daily maintenance dose was 4 to 11 mg protein in 0.1 to 0.5 mL volume, depending on the food. Some foods were available in liquid form at the local grocery (milk, egg white liquid, and cashew/walnut/sunflower/hazelnut milk), whereas others were prepared in the office using flour and 50% glycerin saline (peanut/sesame/wheat). The first cohort of 20 patients began dosing at a 1:1000 dilution, the next 30 patients at 1:100 dilution. An exercise challenge was performed in a subset of patients on maintenance dosing to evaluate the need for a predose or postdose rest period. The 1:1000 and 1:100 cohorts both completed day 1 without adverse reactions beyond itchy mouth. There were no systemic reactions requiring epinephrine throughout the study period and 88% reached their maintenance dose. Skin testing of 6-month-old peanut flour solution was not diminished from fresh solution and similar to food extract. Exercise challenge test results in 12 patients were negative. Allergen extract food SLIT as used in published trials has limitations of cost and multiple office visits. Inexpensive real food, at the same or slightly higher protein dose, was well tolerated in 4 updose visits, a minimum of a week apart. Unlike food oral immunotherapy, a predose or postdose rest period may not be necessary.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2213-2198</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2213-2201</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2213-2201</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38759790</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Food allergy ; Food allergy treatment ; Food desensitization ; Sublingual immunotherapy</subject><ispartof>The journal of allergy and clinical immunology in practice (Cambridge, MA), 2024-09, Vol.12 (9), p.2447-2453.e1</ispartof><rights>2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma &amp; Immunology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma &amp; Immunology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-cd154b36f248c35068b8d172bb99d69115bb3af6b9d6d4907eb18350c2ecfcf53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38759790$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Windom, Reed R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seitz, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ly, Jean B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fergeson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windom, Hugh H.</creatorcontrib><title>Food Sublingual Immunotherapy: Safety and Simplicity of a Real Food Updosing Protocol</title><title>The journal of allergy and clinical immunology in practice (Cambridge, MA)</title><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract</addtitle><description>Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using food extracts is safe and effective in desensitizing patients with food allergy, yet not often used in clinical practice. To propose a cost-effective, expedited SLIT protocol using real food. Patients with food allergy aged 5 to 50 years (median, 11 years) initiated food SLIT in a single-clinic setting. The daily maintenance dose was 4 to 11 mg protein in 0.1 to 0.5 mL volume, depending on the food. Some foods were available in liquid form at the local grocery (milk, egg white liquid, and cashew/walnut/sunflower/hazelnut milk), whereas others were prepared in the office using flour and 50% glycerin saline (peanut/sesame/wheat). The first cohort of 20 patients began dosing at a 1:1000 dilution, the next 30 patients at 1:100 dilution. An exercise challenge was performed in a subset of patients on maintenance dosing to evaluate the need for a predose or postdose rest period. The 1:1000 and 1:100 cohorts both completed day 1 without adverse reactions beyond itchy mouth. There were no systemic reactions requiring epinephrine throughout the study period and 88% reached their maintenance dose. Skin testing of 6-month-old peanut flour solution was not diminished from fresh solution and similar to food extract. Exercise challenge test results in 12 patients were negative. Allergen extract food SLIT as used in published trials has limitations of cost and multiple office visits. Inexpensive real food, at the same or slightly higher protein dose, was well tolerated in 4 updose visits, a minimum of a week apart. Unlike food oral immunotherapy, a predose or postdose rest period may not be necessary.</description><subject>Food allergy</subject><subject>Food allergy treatment</subject><subject>Food desensitization</subject><subject>Sublingual immunotherapy</subject><issn>2213-2198</issn><issn>2213-2201</issn><issn>2213-2201</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhgdRbKl9ARcySzcdT5LJXMSNFC-FgmLtOuQ2mjIzGZMZoW9valuXZpMc-P7_kC-KLhEkCFB2s0k23HQJBpwmQBOA_CQaY4zIDGNAp8c3KotRNPV-A-EUKIcUzqMRKXJa5iWMo_WjtSpeDaI27cfA63jRNENr-0_teLe9jVe80v025m2ATNPVRpow2irm8ZsO-G983SnrQz5-dba30tYX0VnFa6-nh3sS9jy8z59ny5enxfx-OZOY5P1MKkRTQbIKp4UkFLJCFArlWIiyVFmJEBWC8CoTYVJpCbkWqAicxFpWsqJkEl3veztnvwbte9YYL3Vd81bbwTMCNMtyoJQEFO9R6az3Tlesc6bhbssQsJ1RtmE7o2xnlAFlwWgIXR36B9Fo9Rc5-gvA3R7Q4ZffRjvmpdGt1Mo4LXumrPmv_wf72obD</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Windom, Reed R.</creator><creator>Seitz, Samantha</creator><creator>Ly, Jean B.</creator><creator>Dunn, Neha</creator><creator>Fergeson, Jennifer</creator><creator>Windom, Hugh H.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Food Sublingual Immunotherapy: Safety and Simplicity of a Real Food Updosing Protocol</title><author>Windom, Reed R. ; Seitz, Samantha ; Ly, Jean B. ; Dunn, Neha ; Fergeson, Jennifer ; Windom, Hugh H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-cd154b36f248c35068b8d172bb99d69115bb3af6b9d6d4907eb18350c2ecfcf53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Food allergy</topic><topic>Food allergy treatment</topic><topic>Food desensitization</topic><topic>Sublingual immunotherapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Windom, Reed R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seitz, Samantha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ly, Jean B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunn, Neha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fergeson, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Windom, Hugh H.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of allergy and clinical immunology in practice (Cambridge, MA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Windom, Reed R.</au><au>Seitz, Samantha</au><au>Ly, Jean B.</au><au>Dunn, Neha</au><au>Fergeson, Jennifer</au><au>Windom, Hugh H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Food Sublingual Immunotherapy: Safety and Simplicity of a Real Food Updosing Protocol</atitle><jtitle>The journal of allergy and clinical immunology in practice (Cambridge, MA)</jtitle><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2447</spage><epage>2453.e1</epage><pages>2447-2453.e1</pages><issn>2213-2198</issn><issn>2213-2201</issn><eissn>2213-2201</eissn><abstract>Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) using food extracts is safe and effective in desensitizing patients with food allergy, yet not often used in clinical practice. To propose a cost-effective, expedited SLIT protocol using real food. Patients with food allergy aged 5 to 50 years (median, 11 years) initiated food SLIT in a single-clinic setting. The daily maintenance dose was 4 to 11 mg protein in 0.1 to 0.5 mL volume, depending on the food. Some foods were available in liquid form at the local grocery (milk, egg white liquid, and cashew/walnut/sunflower/hazelnut milk), whereas others were prepared in the office using flour and 50% glycerin saline (peanut/sesame/wheat). The first cohort of 20 patients began dosing at a 1:1000 dilution, the next 30 patients at 1:100 dilution. An exercise challenge was performed in a subset of patients on maintenance dosing to evaluate the need for a predose or postdose rest period. The 1:1000 and 1:100 cohorts both completed day 1 without adverse reactions beyond itchy mouth. There were no systemic reactions requiring epinephrine throughout the study period and 88% reached their maintenance dose. Skin testing of 6-month-old peanut flour solution was not diminished from fresh solution and similar to food extract. Exercise challenge test results in 12 patients were negative. Allergen extract food SLIT as used in published trials has limitations of cost and multiple office visits. Inexpensive real food, at the same or slightly higher protein dose, was well tolerated in 4 updose visits, a minimum of a week apart. Unlike food oral immunotherapy, a predose or postdose rest period may not be necessary.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38759790</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.007</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2213-2198
ispartof The journal of allergy and clinical immunology in practice (Cambridge, MA), 2024-09, Vol.12 (9), p.2447-2453.e1
issn 2213-2198
2213-2201
2213-2201
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3056670553
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Food allergy
Food allergy treatment
Food desensitization
Sublingual immunotherapy
title Food Sublingual Immunotherapy: Safety and Simplicity of a Real Food Updosing Protocol
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T15%3A55%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Food%20Sublingual%20Immunotherapy:%20Safety%20and%20Simplicity%20of%20a%20Real%20Food%20Updosing%20Protocol&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20allergy%20and%20clinical%20immunology%20in%20practice%20(Cambridge,%20MA)&rft.au=Windom,%20Reed%20R.&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2447&rft.epage=2453.e1&rft.pages=2447-2453.e1&rft.issn=2213-2198&rft.eissn=2213-2201&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaip.2024.05.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3056670553%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3056670553&rft_id=info:pmid/38759790&rft_els_id=S2213219824005191&rfr_iscdi=true