The CATFISH study: An evaluation of a water fluoridation program in Cumbria, UK

Objectives The objective was to assess the effectiveness of a Water Fluoridation program on a contemporary population of children. Methods The study used a longitudinal prospective cohort design. In Cumbria, England, two groups of children were recruited and observed over a period of 5–6 years. The...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 2024-08, Vol.52 (4), p.590-600
Hauptverfasser: Goodwin, Michaela, Walsh, Tanya, Whittaker, William, Emsley, Richard, Kelly, Michael P., Sutton, Matt, Tickle, Martin, Pretty, Iain A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 600
container_issue 4
container_start_page 590
container_title Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
container_volume 52
creator Goodwin, Michaela
Walsh, Tanya
Whittaker, William
Emsley, Richard
Kelly, Michael P.
Sutton, Matt
Tickle, Martin
Pretty, Iain A.
description Objectives The objective was to assess the effectiveness of a Water Fluoridation program on a contemporary population of children. Methods The study used a longitudinal prospective cohort design. In Cumbria, England, two groups of children were recruited and observed over a period of 5–6 years. The Birth Cohort consisted of families recruited from two hospitals in Cumbria where children were conceived after water fluoridation was reintroduced. The systemic and topical effects of community water fluoridation were evaluated in the Birth Cohort. The Older Cohort were approximately 5 years old and recruited from primary schools in Cumbria, shortly after water fluoridation was reintroduced. The predominantly topical effects of fluoridated water were evaluated in the Older Cohort. The primary outcome was the proportion of children with clinical evidence of caries experience in their primary (Birth Cohort) or permanent teeth (Older Cohort). Unadjusted and adjusted regression models were used for analysis. Results The final clinical examinations for the Birth Cohort involved 1444 participants (mean age 4.8 years), where 17.4% of children in the intervention group were found to have caries experience, compared to 21.4% in the control group. A beneficial effect of water fluoridation was observed adjusting for deprivation (a socioeconomic measure), sex, and age, (adjusted odds ratio 0.74 95% CI 0.55 to 0.98). The final Older Cohort clinical examinations involved 1192 participants (mean age 10.8 years) where 19.1% of children in the intervention group were found to have caries experience compared to 21.9% in the control group (adjusted odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.09). For both the Birth Cohort and Older Cohort there was evidence of a beneficial effect on dmft/DMFT count (IRR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44, 0.86) and (IRR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52, 0.93) respectively. No conclusive proof was found to indicate that the effectiveness of water fluoridation differed across area deprivation quintiles. Conclusions In the contemporary context of lower caries levels and widespread use of fluoride toothpaste, the impact of water fluoridation on the prevalence of caries was smaller than previous studies have reported. It is important to consider the clinical importance of the absolute reduction in caries prevalence against the use of other dental caries preventive measures.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cdoe.12967
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3056664031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3074763778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3527-1f8071331577e132f0a84a5ba8e52181a79b7bd2fbd62de29b04b66b52d80a0e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E1LwzAYB_AgipvTix9AAl5E7MxLk3TeRt2cONjB7VySNtWOvsykcezbm9npwYO5PBB-_HmePwCXGA2xf_dp1ughJiMujkAfc4QCxEh0DPqIIhwwznEPnFm7RggLyvkp6NFIMME57YPF8l3DeLycPr_OoG1dtnuA4xrqT1k62RZNDZscSriVrTYwL11jiqz735jmzcgKFjWMXaVMIe_g6uUcnOSytPriMAdgNZ0s41kwXzw9x-N5kFJGRIDzCAlMKWZCaExJjmQUSqZkpBnBEZZipITKSK4yTjJNRgqFinPFSBYhiTQdgJsu16_x4bRtk6qwqS5LWevG2YQifzcPEcWeXv-h68aZ2m_nlQgFp0JEXt12KjWNtUbnycYUlTS7BKNkX3Oyrzn5rtnjq0OkU5XOfulPrx7gDmyLUu_-iUrix8WkC_0CMA-EiA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3074763778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The CATFISH study: An evaluation of a water fluoridation program in Cumbria, UK</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Goodwin, Michaela ; Walsh, Tanya ; Whittaker, William ; Emsley, Richard ; Kelly, Michael P. ; Sutton, Matt ; Tickle, Martin ; Pretty, Iain A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Michaela ; Walsh, Tanya ; Whittaker, William ; Emsley, Richard ; Kelly, Michael P. ; Sutton, Matt ; Tickle, Martin ; Pretty, Iain A.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The objective was to assess the effectiveness of a Water Fluoridation program on a contemporary population of children. Methods The study used a longitudinal prospective cohort design. In Cumbria, England, two groups of children were recruited and observed over a period of 5–6 years. The Birth Cohort consisted of families recruited from two hospitals in Cumbria where children were conceived after water fluoridation was reintroduced. The systemic and topical effects of community water fluoridation were evaluated in the Birth Cohort. The Older Cohort were approximately 5 years old and recruited from primary schools in Cumbria, shortly after water fluoridation was reintroduced. The predominantly topical effects of fluoridated water were evaluated in the Older Cohort. The primary outcome was the proportion of children with clinical evidence of caries experience in their primary (Birth Cohort) or permanent teeth (Older Cohort). Unadjusted and adjusted regression models were used for analysis. Results The final clinical examinations for the Birth Cohort involved 1444 participants (mean age 4.8 years), where 17.4% of children in the intervention group were found to have caries experience, compared to 21.4% in the control group. A beneficial effect of water fluoridation was observed adjusting for deprivation (a socioeconomic measure), sex, and age, (adjusted odds ratio 0.74 95% CI 0.55 to 0.98). The final Older Cohort clinical examinations involved 1192 participants (mean age 10.8 years) where 19.1% of children in the intervention group were found to have caries experience compared to 21.9% in the control group (adjusted odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.09). For both the Birth Cohort and Older Cohort there was evidence of a beneficial effect on dmft/DMFT count (IRR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44, 0.86) and (IRR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52, 0.93) respectively. No conclusive proof was found to indicate that the effectiveness of water fluoridation differed across area deprivation quintiles. Conclusions In the contemporary context of lower caries levels and widespread use of fluoride toothpaste, the impact of water fluoridation on the prevalence of caries was smaller than previous studies have reported. It is important to consider the clinical importance of the absolute reduction in caries prevalence against the use of other dental caries preventive measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-5661</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0528</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12967</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38757663</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Child ; Child, Preschool ; Children ; Clinical outcomes ; Dental caries ; Dental Caries - epidemiology ; Dental Caries - prevention &amp; control ; England - epidemiology ; Female ; Fluoridation ; Fluoridation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; health status disparities ; Humans ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Population studies ; Program Evaluation ; Prospective Studies ; Public Health ; Public Health Dentistry ; Regression analysis ; Sex ratio</subject><ispartof>Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 2024-08, Vol.52 (4), p.590-600</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3527-1f8071331577e132f0a84a5ba8e52181a79b7bd2fbd62de29b04b66b52d80a0e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0375-3118 ; 0000-0002-6635-2127 ; 0000-0001-7003-8854 ; 0000-0001-5348-5441 ; 0000-0002-1218-675X ; 0000-0003-2530-0360 ; 0000-0002-2029-5841 ; 0000-0001-6298-4189</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcdoe.12967$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcdoe.12967$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38757663$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emsley, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tickle, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pretty, Iain A.</creatorcontrib><title>The CATFISH study: An evaluation of a water fluoridation program in Cumbria, UK</title><title>Community dentistry and oral epidemiology</title><addtitle>Community Dent Oral Epidemiol</addtitle><description>Objectives The objective was to assess the effectiveness of a Water Fluoridation program on a contemporary population of children. Methods The study used a longitudinal prospective cohort design. In Cumbria, England, two groups of children were recruited and observed over a period of 5–6 years. The Birth Cohort consisted of families recruited from two hospitals in Cumbria where children were conceived after water fluoridation was reintroduced. The systemic and topical effects of community water fluoridation were evaluated in the Birth Cohort. The Older Cohort were approximately 5 years old and recruited from primary schools in Cumbria, shortly after water fluoridation was reintroduced. The predominantly topical effects of fluoridated water were evaluated in the Older Cohort. The primary outcome was the proportion of children with clinical evidence of caries experience in their primary (Birth Cohort) or permanent teeth (Older Cohort). Unadjusted and adjusted regression models were used for analysis. Results The final clinical examinations for the Birth Cohort involved 1444 participants (mean age 4.8 years), where 17.4% of children in the intervention group were found to have caries experience, compared to 21.4% in the control group. A beneficial effect of water fluoridation was observed adjusting for deprivation (a socioeconomic measure), sex, and age, (adjusted odds ratio 0.74 95% CI 0.55 to 0.98). The final Older Cohort clinical examinations involved 1192 participants (mean age 10.8 years) where 19.1% of children in the intervention group were found to have caries experience compared to 21.9% in the control group (adjusted odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.09). For both the Birth Cohort and Older Cohort there was evidence of a beneficial effect on dmft/DMFT count (IRR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44, 0.86) and (IRR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52, 0.93) respectively. No conclusive proof was found to indicate that the effectiveness of water fluoridation differed across area deprivation quintiles. Conclusions In the contemporary context of lower caries levels and widespread use of fluoride toothpaste, the impact of water fluoridation on the prevalence of caries was smaller than previous studies have reported. It is important to consider the clinical importance of the absolute reduction in caries prevalence against the use of other dental caries preventive measures.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Dental caries</subject><subject>Dental Caries - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dental Caries - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>England - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluoridation</subject><subject>Fluoridation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>health status disparities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Public Health</subject><subject>Public Health Dentistry</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Sex ratio</subject><issn>0301-5661</issn><issn>1600-0528</issn><issn>1600-0528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90E1LwzAYB_AgipvTix9AAl5E7MxLk3TeRt2cONjB7VySNtWOvsykcezbm9npwYO5PBB-_HmePwCXGA2xf_dp1ughJiMujkAfc4QCxEh0DPqIIhwwznEPnFm7RggLyvkp6NFIMME57YPF8l3DeLycPr_OoG1dtnuA4xrqT1k62RZNDZscSriVrTYwL11jiqz735jmzcgKFjWMXaVMIe_g6uUcnOSytPriMAdgNZ0s41kwXzw9x-N5kFJGRIDzCAlMKWZCaExJjmQUSqZkpBnBEZZipITKSK4yTjJNRgqFinPFSBYhiTQdgJsu16_x4bRtk6qwqS5LWevG2YQifzcPEcWeXv-h68aZ2m_nlQgFp0JEXt12KjWNtUbnycYUlTS7BKNkX3Oyrzn5rtnjq0OkU5XOfulPrx7gDmyLUu_-iUrix8WkC_0CMA-EiA</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Goodwin, Michaela</creator><creator>Walsh, Tanya</creator><creator>Whittaker, William</creator><creator>Emsley, Richard</creator><creator>Kelly, Michael P.</creator><creator>Sutton, Matt</creator><creator>Tickle, Martin</creator><creator>Pretty, Iain A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0375-3118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6635-2127</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7003-8854</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5348-5441</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-675X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2530-0360</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2029-5841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6298-4189</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>The CATFISH study: An evaluation of a water fluoridation program in Cumbria, UK</title><author>Goodwin, Michaela ; Walsh, Tanya ; Whittaker, William ; Emsley, Richard ; Kelly, Michael P. ; Sutton, Matt ; Tickle, Martin ; Pretty, Iain A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3527-1f8071331577e132f0a84a5ba8e52181a79b7bd2fbd62de29b04b66b52d80a0e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Dental caries</topic><topic>Dental Caries - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dental Caries - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>England - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluoridation</topic><topic>Fluoridation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>health status disparities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Public Health</topic><topic>Public Health Dentistry</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Sex ratio</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goodwin, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Tanya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whittaker, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emsley, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Michael P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sutton, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tickle, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pretty, Iain A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Community dentistry and oral epidemiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goodwin, Michaela</au><au>Walsh, Tanya</au><au>Whittaker, William</au><au>Emsley, Richard</au><au>Kelly, Michael P.</au><au>Sutton, Matt</au><au>Tickle, Martin</au><au>Pretty, Iain A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The CATFISH study: An evaluation of a water fluoridation program in Cumbria, UK</atitle><jtitle>Community dentistry and oral epidemiology</jtitle><addtitle>Community Dent Oral Epidemiol</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>590</spage><epage>600</epage><pages>590-600</pages><issn>0301-5661</issn><issn>1600-0528</issn><eissn>1600-0528</eissn><abstract>Objectives The objective was to assess the effectiveness of a Water Fluoridation program on a contemporary population of children. Methods The study used a longitudinal prospective cohort design. In Cumbria, England, two groups of children were recruited and observed over a period of 5–6 years. The Birth Cohort consisted of families recruited from two hospitals in Cumbria where children were conceived after water fluoridation was reintroduced. The systemic and topical effects of community water fluoridation were evaluated in the Birth Cohort. The Older Cohort were approximately 5 years old and recruited from primary schools in Cumbria, shortly after water fluoridation was reintroduced. The predominantly topical effects of fluoridated water were evaluated in the Older Cohort. The primary outcome was the proportion of children with clinical evidence of caries experience in their primary (Birth Cohort) or permanent teeth (Older Cohort). Unadjusted and adjusted regression models were used for analysis. Results The final clinical examinations for the Birth Cohort involved 1444 participants (mean age 4.8 years), where 17.4% of children in the intervention group were found to have caries experience, compared to 21.4% in the control group. A beneficial effect of water fluoridation was observed adjusting for deprivation (a socioeconomic measure), sex, and age, (adjusted odds ratio 0.74 95% CI 0.55 to 0.98). The final Older Cohort clinical examinations involved 1192 participants (mean age 10.8 years) where 19.1% of children in the intervention group were found to have caries experience compared to 21.9% in the control group (adjusted odds ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.58 to 1.09). For both the Birth Cohort and Older Cohort there was evidence of a beneficial effect on dmft/DMFT count (IRR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44, 0.86) and (IRR 0.69, 95% CI 0.52, 0.93) respectively. No conclusive proof was found to indicate that the effectiveness of water fluoridation differed across area deprivation quintiles. Conclusions In the contemporary context of lower caries levels and widespread use of fluoride toothpaste, the impact of water fluoridation on the prevalence of caries was smaller than previous studies have reported. It is important to consider the clinical importance of the absolute reduction in caries prevalence against the use of other dental caries preventive measures.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>38757663</pmid><doi>10.1111/cdoe.12967</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0375-3118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6635-2127</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7003-8854</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5348-5441</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-675X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2530-0360</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2029-5841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6298-4189</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-5661
ispartof Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 2024-08, Vol.52 (4), p.590-600
issn 0301-5661
1600-0528
1600-0528
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3056664031
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Child
Child, Preschool
Children
Clinical outcomes
Dental caries
Dental Caries - epidemiology
Dental Caries - prevention & control
England - epidemiology
Female
Fluoridation
Fluoridation - statistics & numerical data
health status disparities
Humans
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Population studies
Program Evaluation
Prospective Studies
Public Health
Public Health Dentistry
Regression analysis
Sex ratio
title The CATFISH study: An evaluation of a water fluoridation program in Cumbria, UK
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T18%3A19%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20CATFISH%20study:%20An%20evaluation%20of%20a%20water%20fluoridation%20program%20in%20Cumbria,%20UK&rft.jtitle=Community%20dentistry%20and%20oral%20epidemiology&rft.au=Goodwin,%20Michaela&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=590&rft.epage=600&rft.pages=590-600&rft.issn=0301-5661&rft.eissn=1600-0528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cdoe.12967&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3074763778%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3074763778&rft_id=info:pmid/38757663&rfr_iscdi=true