Leadership factors for cardiopulmonary resuscitation for clinicians in‐hospital; behaviours, skills and strategies: A systematic review and synthesis without meta‐analysis

Aim To identify leadership factors for clinicians during in‐hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Design Systematic review with synthesis without meta‐analysis. Methods The review was guided by SWiM, assessed for quality using CASP and reported with PRISMA. Data Sources Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed, M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical nursing 2024-10, Vol.33 (10), p.3844-3853
Hauptverfasser: Jurd, Catherine, Barr, Jennieffer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3853
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3844
container_title Journal of clinical nursing
container_volume 33
creator Jurd, Catherine
Barr, Jennieffer
description Aim To identify leadership factors for clinicians during in‐hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Design Systematic review with synthesis without meta‐analysis. Methods The review was guided by SWiM, assessed for quality using CASP and reported with PRISMA. Data Sources Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed, Medline, Scopus and CINAHL (years of 2013–2023) and a manual reference list search of all included studies. Results A total of 60 papers were identified with three major themes of useful resuscitation leadership; ‘social skills’, ‘cognitive skills and behaviour’ and ‘leadership development skills’ were identified. Main factors included delegating effectively, while being situationally aware of team members' ability and progress during resuscitation, and being empathetic and supportive, yet ‘controlling the room’ using a hands‐off style. Shared decision‐making to reduce cognitive load for one leader was shown to improve effective teamwork. Findings were limited by heterogeneity of studies and inconsistently applied tools to measure leadership. Conclusion Traditional authoritarian leadership styles are not wanted by team members with preference for shared leadership and collaboration. Balancing this with the need for team members to see leaders in ‘control of the room’ brings new challenges for leaders and trainers of resuscitation. Implications for Nursing Profession All clinicians need effective leadership skills for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in‐hospital. Nurses provide first response and ongoing leadership for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Nurses typically display suitable skills that align with useful resuscitation leader factors. Impact What were the main findings? Collaboration rather than an authoritarian approach to leadership is preferred by team members. Nurses are suitable to ‘control the room’. Restricting resuscitation team size will manage disruptive behaviour of team members. Trial Registration PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022385630. Patient of Public Contribution No patient of public contribution.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jocn.17215
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3056663354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3056663354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3525-7e4d9510cc24fa92803f00583a4b17e5f98f237cc0b5e79b47dea02671b5eff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQxyMEokvhwgMgS1wQIsUfcbyBU7UqX1rRS--R40yIFycOHqer3HiEvgnvxJPgksKBA3Oxxv7pp_H8s-wpo2cs1euDN-MZU5zJe9mGiVLmXFF-P9vQquQ5o6U6yR4hHihlgnPxMDsRWyVVQekm-7EH3ULA3k6k0yb6gKTzgRgdWuun2Q1-1GEhAXBGY6OO1o8r4exojdUjEjv-_H7Te5zSu3tLGuj1tfVzwFcEv1rnkOixJRiDjvDFAr4h5wQXjDAknUnuawvHlVnG2ANaJEcbez9HMkDUya5H7ZZ0_zh70GmH8OTuPM2u3l1c7T7k-8v3H3fn-9wIyWWuoGgryagxvOh0xbdUdJTKrdBFwxTIrtp2XChjaCNBVU2hWtCUl4qlvuvEafZi1U7Bf5sBYz1YNOCcHsHPWAsqy7IUQhYJff4PekhfT-MmirEirbkSLFEvV8oEjxigq6dgh7TZmtH6NsX6NsX6d4oJfnannJsB2r_on9gSwFbgaB0s_1HVny53n1fpL4JJrj8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3114740931</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Leadership factors for cardiopulmonary resuscitation for clinicians in‐hospital; behaviours, skills and strategies: A systematic review and synthesis without meta‐analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Jurd, Catherine ; Barr, Jennieffer</creator><creatorcontrib>Jurd, Catherine ; Barr, Jennieffer</creatorcontrib><description>Aim To identify leadership factors for clinicians during in‐hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Design Systematic review with synthesis without meta‐analysis. Methods The review was guided by SWiM, assessed for quality using CASP and reported with PRISMA. Data Sources Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed, Medline, Scopus and CINAHL (years of 2013–2023) and a manual reference list search of all included studies. Results A total of 60 papers were identified with three major themes of useful resuscitation leadership; ‘social skills’, ‘cognitive skills and behaviour’ and ‘leadership development skills’ were identified. Main factors included delegating effectively, while being situationally aware of team members' ability and progress during resuscitation, and being empathetic and supportive, yet ‘controlling the room’ using a hands‐off style. Shared decision‐making to reduce cognitive load for one leader was shown to improve effective teamwork. Findings were limited by heterogeneity of studies and inconsistently applied tools to measure leadership. Conclusion Traditional authoritarian leadership styles are not wanted by team members with preference for shared leadership and collaboration. Balancing this with the need for team members to see leaders in ‘control of the room’ brings new challenges for leaders and trainers of resuscitation. Implications for Nursing Profession All clinicians need effective leadership skills for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in‐hospital. Nurses provide first response and ongoing leadership for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Nurses typically display suitable skills that align with useful resuscitation leader factors. Impact What were the main findings? Collaboration rather than an authoritarian approach to leadership is preferred by team members. Nurses are suitable to ‘control the room’. Restricting resuscitation team size will manage disruptive behaviour of team members. Trial Registration PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022385630. Patient of Public Contribution No patient of public contribution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-1067</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2702</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2702</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17215</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38757400</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Authoritarianism ; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation ; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cognitive ability ; Collaboration ; communications ; CPR ; decision‐making ; Emergency medical care ; Female ; health competencies ; hospitals ; Humans ; Leadership ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Nurses ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical nursing, 2024-10, Vol.33 (10), p.3844-3853</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3525-7e4d9510cc24fa92803f00583a4b17e5f98f237cc0b5e79b47dea02671b5eff3</cites><orcidid>0009-0008-5363-2593</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjocn.17215$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjocn.17215$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,1418,27929,27930,45579,45580</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38757400$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jurd, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barr, Jennieffer</creatorcontrib><title>Leadership factors for cardiopulmonary resuscitation for clinicians in‐hospital; behaviours, skills and strategies: A systematic review and synthesis without meta‐analysis</title><title>Journal of clinical nursing</title><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><description>Aim To identify leadership factors for clinicians during in‐hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Design Systematic review with synthesis without meta‐analysis. Methods The review was guided by SWiM, assessed for quality using CASP and reported with PRISMA. Data Sources Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed, Medline, Scopus and CINAHL (years of 2013–2023) and a manual reference list search of all included studies. Results A total of 60 papers were identified with three major themes of useful resuscitation leadership; ‘social skills’, ‘cognitive skills and behaviour’ and ‘leadership development skills’ were identified. Main factors included delegating effectively, while being situationally aware of team members' ability and progress during resuscitation, and being empathetic and supportive, yet ‘controlling the room’ using a hands‐off style. Shared decision‐making to reduce cognitive load for one leader was shown to improve effective teamwork. Findings were limited by heterogeneity of studies and inconsistently applied tools to measure leadership. Conclusion Traditional authoritarian leadership styles are not wanted by team members with preference for shared leadership and collaboration. Balancing this with the need for team members to see leaders in ‘control of the room’ brings new challenges for leaders and trainers of resuscitation. Implications for Nursing Profession All clinicians need effective leadership skills for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in‐hospital. Nurses provide first response and ongoing leadership for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Nurses typically display suitable skills that align with useful resuscitation leader factors. Impact What were the main findings? Collaboration rather than an authoritarian approach to leadership is preferred by team members. Nurses are suitable to ‘control the room’. Restricting resuscitation team size will manage disruptive behaviour of team members. Trial Registration PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022385630. Patient of Public Contribution No patient of public contribution.</description><subject>Authoritarianism</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>communications</subject><subject>CPR</subject><subject>decision‐making</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>health competencies</subject><subject>hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0962-1067</issn><issn>1365-2702</issn><issn>1365-2702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAQxyMEokvhwgMgS1wQIsUfcbyBU7UqX1rRS--R40yIFycOHqer3HiEvgnvxJPgksKBA3Oxxv7pp_H8s-wpo2cs1euDN-MZU5zJe9mGiVLmXFF-P9vQquQ5o6U6yR4hHihlgnPxMDsRWyVVQekm-7EH3ULA3k6k0yb6gKTzgRgdWuun2Q1-1GEhAXBGY6OO1o8r4exojdUjEjv-_H7Te5zSu3tLGuj1tfVzwFcEv1rnkOixJRiDjvDFAr4h5wQXjDAknUnuawvHlVnG2ANaJEcbez9HMkDUya5H7ZZ0_zh70GmH8OTuPM2u3l1c7T7k-8v3H3fn-9wIyWWuoGgryagxvOh0xbdUdJTKrdBFwxTIrtp2XChjaCNBVU2hWtCUl4qlvuvEafZi1U7Bf5sBYz1YNOCcHsHPWAsqy7IUQhYJff4PekhfT-MmirEirbkSLFEvV8oEjxigq6dgh7TZmtH6NsX6NsX6d4oJfnannJsB2r_on9gSwFbgaB0s_1HVny53n1fpL4JJrj8</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Jurd, Catherine</creator><creator>Barr, Jennieffer</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5363-2593</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Leadership factors for cardiopulmonary resuscitation for clinicians in‐hospital; behaviours, skills and strategies: A systematic review and synthesis without meta‐analysis</title><author>Jurd, Catherine ; Barr, Jennieffer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3525-7e4d9510cc24fa92803f00583a4b17e5f98f237cc0b5e79b47dea02671b5eff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Authoritarianism</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary resuscitation</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>communications</topic><topic>CPR</topic><topic>decision‐making</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>health competencies</topic><topic>hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jurd, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barr, Jennieffer</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jurd, Catherine</au><au>Barr, Jennieffer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Leadership factors for cardiopulmonary resuscitation for clinicians in‐hospital; behaviours, skills and strategies: A systematic review and synthesis without meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3844</spage><epage>3853</epage><pages>3844-3853</pages><issn>0962-1067</issn><issn>1365-2702</issn><eissn>1365-2702</eissn><abstract>Aim To identify leadership factors for clinicians during in‐hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Design Systematic review with synthesis without meta‐analysis. Methods The review was guided by SWiM, assessed for quality using CASP and reported with PRISMA. Data Sources Cochrane, EMBASE, PubMed, Medline, Scopus and CINAHL (years of 2013–2023) and a manual reference list search of all included studies. Results A total of 60 papers were identified with three major themes of useful resuscitation leadership; ‘social skills’, ‘cognitive skills and behaviour’ and ‘leadership development skills’ were identified. Main factors included delegating effectively, while being situationally aware of team members' ability and progress during resuscitation, and being empathetic and supportive, yet ‘controlling the room’ using a hands‐off style. Shared decision‐making to reduce cognitive load for one leader was shown to improve effective teamwork. Findings were limited by heterogeneity of studies and inconsistently applied tools to measure leadership. Conclusion Traditional authoritarian leadership styles are not wanted by team members with preference for shared leadership and collaboration. Balancing this with the need for team members to see leaders in ‘control of the room’ brings new challenges for leaders and trainers of resuscitation. Implications for Nursing Profession All clinicians need effective leadership skills for cardiopulmonary resuscitation in‐hospital. Nurses provide first response and ongoing leadership for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Nurses typically display suitable skills that align with useful resuscitation leader factors. Impact What were the main findings? Collaboration rather than an authoritarian approach to leadership is preferred by team members. Nurses are suitable to ‘control the room’. Restricting resuscitation team size will manage disruptive behaviour of team members. Trial Registration PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022385630. Patient of Public Contribution No patient of public contribution.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38757400</pmid><doi>10.1111/jocn.17215</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5363-2593</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0962-1067
ispartof Journal of clinical nursing, 2024-10, Vol.33 (10), p.3844-3853
issn 0962-1067
1365-2702
1365-2702
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3056663354
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Authoritarianism
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - methods
Clinical Competence - standards
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive ability
Collaboration
communications
CPR
decision‐making
Emergency medical care
Female
health competencies
hospitals
Humans
Leadership
Male
Medical personnel
Nurses
Systematic review
title Leadership factors for cardiopulmonary resuscitation for clinicians in‐hospital; behaviours, skills and strategies: A systematic review and synthesis without meta‐analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T06%3A37%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leadership%20factors%20for%20cardiopulmonary%20resuscitation%20for%20clinicians%20in%E2%80%90hospital;%20behaviours,%20skills%20and%20strategies:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20synthesis%20without%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20nursing&rft.au=Jurd,%20Catherine&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3844&rft.epage=3853&rft.pages=3844-3853&rft.issn=0962-1067&rft.eissn=1365-2702&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jocn.17215&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3056663354%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3114740931&rft_id=info:pmid/38757400&rfr_iscdi=true