Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in younger versus older adults with renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in younger versus older adults with renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

Purpose Our study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) between younger and older patients after adjusting for their background differences. We particularly assessed RAPN outcomes and safety in older patients. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 559 pat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of urology 2024-05, Vol.42 (1), p.326, Article 326
Hauptverfasser: Tomida, Ryotaro, Fukawa, Tomoya, Kusuhara, Yoshito, Hashimoto, Keisuke, Shiozaki, Keito, Izumi, Kazuyoshi, Ninomiya, Iku, Kadoriku, Fumiya, Izaki, Hirofumi, Naroda, Takushi, Okamoto, Kenjiro, Kawanishi, Yasuo, Kanayama, Hiro-omi, Takahashi, Masayuki
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Adult
Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Carcinoma, Renal Cell - surgery
Female
Humans
Kidney cancer
Kidney Neoplasms - surgery
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Nephrectomy
Nephrectomy - methods
Nephrology
Oncology
Original Article
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Propensity Score
Renal cell carcinoma
Retrospective Studies
Robotic surgery
Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
Surgical outcomes
Treatment Outcome
Urology
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Our study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) between younger and older patients after adjusting for their background differences. We particularly assessed RAPN outcomes and safety in older patients. Methods We retrospectively evaluated 559 patients clinically diagnosed with T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and treated with RAPN between 2013 and 2022 at five institutions in Japan. The patients were classified into two groups according to their age during surgery (younger group: 
ISSN:1433-8726
0724-4983
1433-8726
DOI:10.1007/s00345-024-04917-2