Are routine chest radiographs still indicated after central line insertion? A scoping review

Introduction: Central venous catheters are increasingly inserted using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) guidance. Following insertion, it is still common to request a confirmatory chest radiograph for subclavian and internal jugular lines, at least outside of the operating theater. This scoping revi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the Intensive Care Society 2024-05, Vol.25 (2), p.190-207
Hauptverfasser: Brindley, P. G., Deschamps, J., Milovanovic, L., Buchanan, B. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 207
container_issue 2
container_start_page 190
container_title Journal of the Intensive Care Society
container_volume 25
creator Brindley, P. G.
Deschamps, J.
Milovanovic, L.
Buchanan, B. M.
description Introduction: Central venous catheters are increasingly inserted using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) guidance. Following insertion, it is still common to request a confirmatory chest radiograph for subclavian and internal jugular lines, at least outside of the operating theater. This scoping review addresses: (i) the justification for routine post-insertion radiographs, (ii) whether it would better to use post-insertion POCUS instead, and (iii) the perceived barriers to change. Methods: We searched the electronic databases, Ovid MEDLINE (1946-) and Ovid EMBASE (1974-), using the MESH terms (“Echography” OR “Ultrasonography” OR “Ultrasound”) AND “Central Venous Catheter” up until February 2023. We also searched clinical practice guidelines, and targeted literature, including cited and citing articles. We included adults (⩾18 years) and English and French language publications. We included randomized control trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, systematic reviews, and surveys. Results: Four thousand seventy-one articles were screened, 117 full-text articles accessed, and 41 retained. Thirteen examined cardiac/vascular methods; 5 examined isolated contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; 7 examined isolated rapid atrial swirl sign; and 13 examined combined/integrated methods. In addition, three systematic reviews/meta-analyses and one survey addressed barriers to POCUS adoption. Discussion: We believe that the literature supports retiring the routine post-central line chest radiograph. This is not only because POCUS has made line insertion safer, but because POCUS performs at least as well, and is associated with less radiation, lower cost, time savings, and greater accuracy. There has been less written about perceived barriers to change, but the literature shows that these concerns- which include upfront costs, time-to-train, medicolegal concerns and habit- can be challenged and hence overcome.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/17511437241227739
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3054431267</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_17511437241227739</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3054431267</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-77c5fd121f7076fb86ca0fb450cf5eec2daa6f659d5f9f96fb1b10f75889cbba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAcxYMobuj-AC-So5fOpGmS9iRj-AsGXhQ8CCVNv9kyuqQmreJ_b8umF8Hv5R2-n_fgPYQuKJlTKuU1lZzSjMk0o2kqJSuO0DQlXCZMkNdjNB3_yQhM0CzGLRlOUCby_BRNWC6ZZCSfordFABx831kHWG8gdjio2vp1UO0m4tjZpsHW1VarDmqsTAcBa3BdUA1uRpN1EUJnvbvBCxy1b61b4wAfFj7P0YlRTYTZQc_Qy93t8_IhWT3dPy4Xq0QzxrtESs1NTVNqJJHCVLnQipgq40QbDqDTWilhBC9qbgpTDAStKDGS53mhq0qxM3S1z22Df--HDuXORg1Noxz4PpaM8CxjNBVyQOke1cHHGMCUbbA7Fb5KSspx1_LProPn8hDfVzuofx0_Kw7AfA9EtYZy6_vghrr_JH4DzO6BMQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3054431267</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are routine chest radiographs still indicated after central line insertion? A scoping review</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Brindley, P. G. ; Deschamps, J. ; Milovanovic, L. ; Buchanan, B. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brindley, P. G. ; Deschamps, J. ; Milovanovic, L. ; Buchanan, B. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Central venous catheters are increasingly inserted using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) guidance. Following insertion, it is still common to request a confirmatory chest radiograph for subclavian and internal jugular lines, at least outside of the operating theater. This scoping review addresses: (i) the justification for routine post-insertion radiographs, (ii) whether it would better to use post-insertion POCUS instead, and (iii) the perceived barriers to change. Methods: We searched the electronic databases, Ovid MEDLINE (1946-) and Ovid EMBASE (1974-), using the MESH terms (“Echography” OR “Ultrasonography” OR “Ultrasound”) AND “Central Venous Catheter” up until February 2023. We also searched clinical practice guidelines, and targeted literature, including cited and citing articles. We included adults (⩾18 years) and English and French language publications. We included randomized control trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, systematic reviews, and surveys. Results: Four thousand seventy-one articles were screened, 117 full-text articles accessed, and 41 retained. Thirteen examined cardiac/vascular methods; 5 examined isolated contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; 7 examined isolated rapid atrial swirl sign; and 13 examined combined/integrated methods. In addition, three systematic reviews/meta-analyses and one survey addressed barriers to POCUS adoption. Discussion: We believe that the literature supports retiring the routine post-central line chest radiograph. This is not only because POCUS has made line insertion safer, but because POCUS performs at least as well, and is associated with less radiation, lower cost, time savings, and greater accuracy. There has been less written about perceived barriers to change, but the literature shows that these concerns- which include upfront costs, time-to-train, medicolegal concerns and habit- can be challenged and hence overcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1751-1437</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2057-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/17511437241227739</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38737308</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2024-05, Vol.25 (2), p.190-207</ispartof><rights>The Intensive Care Society 2024</rights><rights>The Intensive Care Society 2024.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-77c5fd121f7076fb86ca0fb450cf5eec2daa6f659d5f9f96fb1b10f75889cbba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7585-3591</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/17511437241227739$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17511437241227739$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38737308$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brindley, P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deschamps, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milovanovic, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, B. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Are routine chest radiographs still indicated after central line insertion? A scoping review</title><title>Journal of the Intensive Care Society</title><addtitle>J Intensive Care Soc</addtitle><description>Introduction: Central venous catheters are increasingly inserted using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) guidance. Following insertion, it is still common to request a confirmatory chest radiograph for subclavian and internal jugular lines, at least outside of the operating theater. This scoping review addresses: (i) the justification for routine post-insertion radiographs, (ii) whether it would better to use post-insertion POCUS instead, and (iii) the perceived barriers to change. Methods: We searched the electronic databases, Ovid MEDLINE (1946-) and Ovid EMBASE (1974-), using the MESH terms (“Echography” OR “Ultrasonography” OR “Ultrasound”) AND “Central Venous Catheter” up until February 2023. We also searched clinical practice guidelines, and targeted literature, including cited and citing articles. We included adults (⩾18 years) and English and French language publications. We included randomized control trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, systematic reviews, and surveys. Results: Four thousand seventy-one articles were screened, 117 full-text articles accessed, and 41 retained. Thirteen examined cardiac/vascular methods; 5 examined isolated contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; 7 examined isolated rapid atrial swirl sign; and 13 examined combined/integrated methods. In addition, three systematic reviews/meta-analyses and one survey addressed barriers to POCUS adoption. Discussion: We believe that the literature supports retiring the routine post-central line chest radiograph. This is not only because POCUS has made line insertion safer, but because POCUS performs at least as well, and is associated with less radiation, lower cost, time savings, and greater accuracy. There has been less written about perceived barriers to change, but the literature shows that these concerns- which include upfront costs, time-to-train, medicolegal concerns and habit- can be challenged and hence overcome.</description><issn>1751-1437</issn><issn>2057-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAcxYMobuj-AC-So5fOpGmS9iRj-AsGXhQ8CCVNv9kyuqQmreJ_b8umF8Hv5R2-n_fgPYQuKJlTKuU1lZzSjMk0o2kqJSuO0DQlXCZMkNdjNB3_yQhM0CzGLRlOUCby_BRNWC6ZZCSfordFABx831kHWG8gdjio2vp1UO0m4tjZpsHW1VarDmqsTAcBa3BdUA1uRpN1EUJnvbvBCxy1b61b4wAfFj7P0YlRTYTZQc_Qy93t8_IhWT3dPy4Xq0QzxrtESs1NTVNqJJHCVLnQipgq40QbDqDTWilhBC9qbgpTDAStKDGS53mhq0qxM3S1z22Df--HDuXORg1Noxz4PpaM8CxjNBVyQOke1cHHGMCUbbA7Fb5KSspx1_LProPn8hDfVzuofx0_Kw7AfA9EtYZy6_vghrr_JH4DzO6BMQ</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Brindley, P. G.</creator><creator>Deschamps, J.</creator><creator>Milovanovic, L.</creator><creator>Buchanan, B. M.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7585-3591</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Are routine chest radiographs still indicated after central line insertion? A scoping review</title><author>Brindley, P. G. ; Deschamps, J. ; Milovanovic, L. ; Buchanan, B. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-77c5fd121f7076fb86ca0fb450cf5eec2daa6f659d5f9f96fb1b10f75889cbba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brindley, P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deschamps, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milovanovic, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchanan, B. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Intensive Care Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brindley, P. G.</au><au>Deschamps, J.</au><au>Milovanovic, L.</au><au>Buchanan, B. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are routine chest radiographs still indicated after central line insertion? A scoping review</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Intensive Care Society</jtitle><addtitle>J Intensive Care Soc</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>190</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>190-207</pages><issn>1751-1437</issn><eissn>2057-360X</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Central venous catheters are increasingly inserted using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) guidance. Following insertion, it is still common to request a confirmatory chest radiograph for subclavian and internal jugular lines, at least outside of the operating theater. This scoping review addresses: (i) the justification for routine post-insertion radiographs, (ii) whether it would better to use post-insertion POCUS instead, and (iii) the perceived barriers to change. Methods: We searched the electronic databases, Ovid MEDLINE (1946-) and Ovid EMBASE (1974-), using the MESH terms (“Echography” OR “Ultrasonography” OR “Ultrasound”) AND “Central Venous Catheter” up until February 2023. We also searched clinical practice guidelines, and targeted literature, including cited and citing articles. We included adults (⩾18 years) and English and French language publications. We included randomized control trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, systematic reviews, and surveys. Results: Four thousand seventy-one articles were screened, 117 full-text articles accessed, and 41 retained. Thirteen examined cardiac/vascular methods; 5 examined isolated contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; 7 examined isolated rapid atrial swirl sign; and 13 examined combined/integrated methods. In addition, three systematic reviews/meta-analyses and one survey addressed barriers to POCUS adoption. Discussion: We believe that the literature supports retiring the routine post-central line chest radiograph. This is not only because POCUS has made line insertion safer, but because POCUS performs at least as well, and is associated with less radiation, lower cost, time savings, and greater accuracy. There has been less written about perceived barriers to change, but the literature shows that these concerns- which include upfront costs, time-to-train, medicolegal concerns and habit- can be challenged and hence overcome.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>38737308</pmid><doi>10.1177/17511437241227739</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7585-3591</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1751-1437
ispartof Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 2024-05, Vol.25 (2), p.190-207
issn 1751-1437
2057-360X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3054431267
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; SAGE Complete; PubMed Central
title Are routine chest radiographs still indicated after central line insertion? A scoping review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T12%3A33%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20routine%20chest%20radiographs%20still%20indicated%20after%20central%20line%20insertion?%20A%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Intensive%20Care%20Society&rft.au=Brindley,%20P.%20G.&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=190&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=190-207&rft.issn=1751-1437&rft.eissn=2057-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/17511437241227739&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3054431267%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3054431267&rft_id=info:pmid/38737308&rft_sage_id=10.1177_17511437241227739&rfr_iscdi=true