Augmentation mastopexy using the “double inner bra technique” (DIB) in post-bariatric surgery
Augmentation mastopexy has a 20-fold higher complication rate than primary augmentation. Performing augmentation mastopexy in post-bariatric patients poses an additional challenge owing to the reduced quality of the soft skin tissue. Therefore, it is technically complex and also fraught with complic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2024-06, Vol.93, p.246-253 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 253 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 246 |
container_title | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery |
container_volume | 93 |
creator | Motamedi, Melodi Gueven, Asim Isaev, Raya Allert, Sixtus |
description | Augmentation mastopexy has a 20-fold higher complication rate than primary augmentation. Performing augmentation mastopexy in post-bariatric patients poses an additional challenge owing to the reduced quality of the soft skin tissue. Therefore, it is technically complex and also fraught with complications. Implant dislocation, recurrent ptosis, wound healing problems with exposed implants, and the threat of implant loss are complications that must be prevented.
We present a case series study on our technique for stabilizing breast implants using the double inner bra technique (DIB) in which a laterobasal myofascial flap and an inferiorly based dermoglandular flap form a double inner bra for implant stabilization and protection.
Thirty-seven cases were operated on using this technique from December 2020 to June 2023. No hematomas (0%), seromas (0%), infections (0%), and implant losses (0%) were recorded. Moreover, none of the patients had implant malposition (0%). With regard to recurrent ptosis mammae or waterfall deformity, 7 cases (2.6%) showed early ptosis within the first 3 months, and the number of ptosis decreased over time. Furthermore, 5 (1.81%) patients showed ptosis mammae after 6–12 months. Implant defect or rupture has not yet occurred (0%).
The DIB is an easy-to-learn and versatile technique. It has low complication rates and can be used to achieve esthetically satisfactory mid- to long-term results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.04.061 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3053979221</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1748681524002511</els_id><sourcerecordid>3053979221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-3e4bfa65977cfe1613b79ef0f7bf9b9c223c6c1855d5c473932d8e008957e1283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OHDEQha0IFCYkF2AReTksevBPu-2W2BBCAGkkNrC2bHf14NH0T2x3xOw4SLjcnIRuDbBEKqlKqveeqj6ETihZUEKLs_XCrvu4YITlCzJWQb-gGVVSZUTw8mCcZa6yQlFxhL7FuCYk5zQXX9ERV5JxQckMmYth1UCbTPJdixsTU9fD0xYP0bcrnB4B757_V91gN4B920LANhicwD22_u8Au-cXPP99--t0XOK-iymzJniTgnc4DmEFYfsdHdZmE-HHWz9GD3-u7i9vsuXd9e3lxTJznMiUcchtbQpRSulqoAXlVpZQk1raurSlY4y7wlElRCVcLnnJWaWAEFUKCZQpfozm-9w-dONlMenGRwebjWmhG6LmExRZMkZHKdtLXehiDFDrPvjGhK2mRE9o9VpPaPWEVpOxisn08y1_sA1UH5Z3lqPgfC-A8ct_HoKOzkProPIBXNJV5z_LfwVE1Ixt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3053979221</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Augmentation mastopexy using the “double inner bra technique” (DIB) in post-bariatric surgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Motamedi, Melodi ; Gueven, Asim ; Isaev, Raya ; Allert, Sixtus</creator><creatorcontrib>Motamedi, Melodi ; Gueven, Asim ; Isaev, Raya ; Allert, Sixtus</creatorcontrib><description>Augmentation mastopexy has a 20-fold higher complication rate than primary augmentation. Performing augmentation mastopexy in post-bariatric patients poses an additional challenge owing to the reduced quality of the soft skin tissue. Therefore, it is technically complex and also fraught with complications. Implant dislocation, recurrent ptosis, wound healing problems with exposed implants, and the threat of implant loss are complications that must be prevented.
We present a case series study on our technique for stabilizing breast implants using the double inner bra technique (DIB) in which a laterobasal myofascial flap and an inferiorly based dermoglandular flap form a double inner bra for implant stabilization and protection.
Thirty-seven cases were operated on using this technique from December 2020 to June 2023. No hematomas (0%), seromas (0%), infections (0%), and implant losses (0%) were recorded. Moreover, none of the patients had implant malposition (0%). With regard to recurrent ptosis mammae or waterfall deformity, 7 cases (2.6%) showed early ptosis within the first 3 months, and the number of ptosis decreased over time. Furthermore, 5 (1.81%) patients showed ptosis mammae after 6–12 months. Implant defect or rupture has not yet occurred (0%).
The DIB is an easy-to-learn and versatile technique. It has low complication rates and can be used to achieve esthetically satisfactory mid- to long-term results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-6815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-0539</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.04.061</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38723510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Augmentation ; Augmentation mastopexy ; Bariatric Surgery - adverse effects ; Bariatric Surgery - methods ; Breast Implantation - adverse effects ; Breast Implantation - methods ; Breast Implants ; Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty - adverse effects ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Massive weight loss ; Mastopexy ; Middle Aged ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Surgical Flaps</subject><ispartof>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2024-06, Vol.93, p.246-253</ispartof><rights>2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-3e4bfa65977cfe1613b79ef0f7bf9b9c223c6c1855d5c473932d8e008957e1283</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0654-889X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.04.061$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38723510$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Motamedi, Melodi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueven, Asim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaev, Raya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allert, Sixtus</creatorcontrib><title>Augmentation mastopexy using the “double inner bra technique” (DIB) in post-bariatric surgery</title><title>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</title><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><description>Augmentation mastopexy has a 20-fold higher complication rate than primary augmentation. Performing augmentation mastopexy in post-bariatric patients poses an additional challenge owing to the reduced quality of the soft skin tissue. Therefore, it is technically complex and also fraught with complications. Implant dislocation, recurrent ptosis, wound healing problems with exposed implants, and the threat of implant loss are complications that must be prevented.
We present a case series study on our technique for stabilizing breast implants using the double inner bra technique (DIB) in which a laterobasal myofascial flap and an inferiorly based dermoglandular flap form a double inner bra for implant stabilization and protection.
Thirty-seven cases were operated on using this technique from December 2020 to June 2023. No hematomas (0%), seromas (0%), infections (0%), and implant losses (0%) were recorded. Moreover, none of the patients had implant malposition (0%). With regard to recurrent ptosis mammae or waterfall deformity, 7 cases (2.6%) showed early ptosis within the first 3 months, and the number of ptosis decreased over time. Furthermore, 5 (1.81%) patients showed ptosis mammae after 6–12 months. Implant defect or rupture has not yet occurred (0%).
The DIB is an easy-to-learn and versatile technique. It has low complication rates and can be used to achieve esthetically satisfactory mid- to long-term results.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Augmentation</subject><subject>Augmentation mastopexy</subject><subject>Bariatric Surgery - adverse effects</subject><subject>Bariatric Surgery - methods</subject><subject>Breast Implantation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Breast Implantation - methods</subject><subject>Breast Implants</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - adverse effects</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Massive weight loss</subject><subject>Mastopexy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><issn>1748-6815</issn><issn>1878-0539</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OHDEQha0IFCYkF2AReTksevBPu-2W2BBCAGkkNrC2bHf14NH0T2x3xOw4SLjcnIRuDbBEKqlKqveeqj6ETihZUEKLs_XCrvu4YITlCzJWQb-gGVVSZUTw8mCcZa6yQlFxhL7FuCYk5zQXX9ERV5JxQckMmYth1UCbTPJdixsTU9fD0xYP0bcrnB4B757_V91gN4B920LANhicwD22_u8Au-cXPP99--t0XOK-iymzJniTgnc4DmEFYfsdHdZmE-HHWz9GD3-u7i9vsuXd9e3lxTJznMiUcchtbQpRSulqoAXlVpZQk1raurSlY4y7wlElRCVcLnnJWaWAEFUKCZQpfozm-9w-dONlMenGRwebjWmhG6LmExRZMkZHKdtLXehiDFDrPvjGhK2mRE9o9VpPaPWEVpOxisn08y1_sA1UH5Z3lqPgfC-A8ct_HoKOzkProPIBXNJV5z_LfwVE1Ixt</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Motamedi, Melodi</creator><creator>Gueven, Asim</creator><creator>Isaev, Raya</creator><creator>Allert, Sixtus</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0654-889X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Augmentation mastopexy using the “double inner bra technique” (DIB) in post-bariatric surgery</title><author>Motamedi, Melodi ; Gueven, Asim ; Isaev, Raya ; Allert, Sixtus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-3e4bfa65977cfe1613b79ef0f7bf9b9c223c6c1855d5c473932d8e008957e1283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Augmentation</topic><topic>Augmentation mastopexy</topic><topic>Bariatric Surgery - adverse effects</topic><topic>Bariatric Surgery - methods</topic><topic>Breast Implantation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Breast Implantation - methods</topic><topic>Breast Implants</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - adverse effects</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Massive weight loss</topic><topic>Mastopexy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Motamedi, Melodi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueven, Asim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isaev, Raya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allert, Sixtus</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Motamedi, Melodi</au><au>Gueven, Asim</au><au>Isaev, Raya</au><au>Allert, Sixtus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Augmentation mastopexy using the “double inner bra technique” (DIB) in post-bariatric surgery</atitle><jtitle>Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>93</volume><spage>246</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>246-253</pages><issn>1748-6815</issn><eissn>1878-0539</eissn><abstract>Augmentation mastopexy has a 20-fold higher complication rate than primary augmentation. Performing augmentation mastopexy in post-bariatric patients poses an additional challenge owing to the reduced quality of the soft skin tissue. Therefore, it is technically complex and also fraught with complications. Implant dislocation, recurrent ptosis, wound healing problems with exposed implants, and the threat of implant loss are complications that must be prevented.
We present a case series study on our technique for stabilizing breast implants using the double inner bra technique (DIB) in which a laterobasal myofascial flap and an inferiorly based dermoglandular flap form a double inner bra for implant stabilization and protection.
Thirty-seven cases were operated on using this technique from December 2020 to June 2023. No hematomas (0%), seromas (0%), infections (0%), and implant losses (0%) were recorded. Moreover, none of the patients had implant malposition (0%). With regard to recurrent ptosis mammae or waterfall deformity, 7 cases (2.6%) showed early ptosis within the first 3 months, and the number of ptosis decreased over time. Furthermore, 5 (1.81%) patients showed ptosis mammae after 6–12 months. Implant defect or rupture has not yet occurred (0%).
The DIB is an easy-to-learn and versatile technique. It has low complication rates and can be used to achieve esthetically satisfactory mid- to long-term results.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38723510</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bjps.2024.04.061</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0654-889X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1748-6815 |
ispartof | Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery, 2024-06, Vol.93, p.246-253 |
issn | 1748-6815 1878-0539 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3053979221 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Augmentation Augmentation mastopexy Bariatric Surgery - adverse effects Bariatric Surgery - methods Breast Implantation - adverse effects Breast Implantation - methods Breast Implants Female Humans Mammaplasty - adverse effects Mammaplasty - methods Massive weight loss Mastopexy Middle Aged Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative Complications - surgery Surgical Flaps |
title | Augmentation mastopexy using the “double inner bra technique” (DIB) in post-bariatric surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A40%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Augmentation%20mastopexy%20using%20the%20%E2%80%9Cdouble%20inner%20bra%20technique%E2%80%9D%20(DIB)%20in%20post-bariatric%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20plastic,%20reconstructive%20&%20aesthetic%20surgery&rft.au=Motamedi,%20Melodi&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=93&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=246-253&rft.issn=1748-6815&rft.eissn=1878-0539&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bjps.2024.04.061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3053979221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3053979221&rft_id=info:pmid/38723510&rft_els_id=S1748681524002511&rfr_iscdi=true |