Contemporary trends and outcomes after liver transplantation and resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Liver transplantation (LT) has been shown to be superior to resection in highly selected patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), yet has traditionally been contraindicated for intrahepatic CCA (iCCA). Herein, we aimed to examine contemporary trends and outcomes for surgical resection and L...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2024-05, Vol.28 (5), p.738-745
Hauptverfasser: Howell, Thomas Clark, Rhodin, Kristen E., Shaw, Brian, Bao, Jiayin, Kanu, Elishama, Masoud, Sabran, Bartholomew, Alex J., Gao, Qimeng, Anwar, Imran J., Ladowski, Joseph M., Nussbaum, Daniel P., Blazer, Dan G., Zani, Sabino, Allen, Peter J., Barbas, Andrew S., Lidsky, Michael E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 745
container_issue 5
container_start_page 738
container_title Journal of gastrointestinal surgery
container_volume 28
creator Howell, Thomas Clark
Rhodin, Kristen E.
Shaw, Brian
Bao, Jiayin
Kanu, Elishama
Masoud, Sabran
Bartholomew, Alex J.
Gao, Qimeng
Anwar, Imran J.
Ladowski, Joseph M.
Nussbaum, Daniel P.
Blazer, Dan G.
Zani, Sabino
Allen, Peter J.
Barbas, Andrew S.
Lidsky, Michael E.
description Liver transplantation (LT) has been shown to be superior to resection in highly selected patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), yet has traditionally been contraindicated for intrahepatic CCA (iCCA). Herein, we aimed to examine contemporary trends and outcomes for surgical resection and LT for iCCA. The National Cancer Database was queried for patients presenting with stage I-III iCCA between 2010 and 2018 who underwent resection or LT. Overall survival (OS) was compared with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards methods stratified by management. Secondary analysis of patients undergoing transplant for CCA was performed with the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Of 2565 patients, 2412 (94.0%) underwent resection and 153 (5.96%) LT of whom 84 (54.9%) received neoadjuvant therapy. Utilization of LT remained between 3.9% and 7.8% annually. Unadjusted 5-year OS was higher for LT than resection (59.8% vs 39.9%, P = .0067), yet adjusted analysis revealed no significant difference in mortality (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.66-1.27; P = .58). On secondary analysis including 437 patients with all subtypes of CCA, unadjusted 5-year OS was higher for non-CCA indications (79% vs 52%-54%, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.02.029
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3050940956</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1091255X24003378</els_id><sourcerecordid>3050940956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-798a88db36a0b1664e396d818d0174df020ea10366e9838ac0b7cf33cd1f0d413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1LBCEQwCWKvv-DiH3sZa9R91z3JYijLwh6KehNPJ0tj1vd1A3677OuegwGdfA3jvMj5ITCjAIV56vZi05pijMGrJkBK9FtkX0qW143gontcoaO1mw-f94jBymtAGgLVO6SPS5baBjIfeIXwWccxhB1_KhyRG9Tpb2twpRNGLAkfcZYrd17WXPUPo1r7bPOLvhvMGJC8531IVbOF-YVx3JvKvMaCvvigtHROB8GfUR2er1OePyzH5Kn66vHxW19_3Bzt7i8rw0XLNdtJ7WUdsmFhiUVokHeCSuptGWExvbAADUFLgR2kkttYNmannNjaQ-2ofyQnG3eHWN4mzBlNbhkcF2-g2FKisMcuga6uShos0FNDClF7NUY3VBsKArqy7RaqY1p9WVaASvRlbLTnw7TckD7V_SrtgAXGwDLnO8Oo0rGoTdoXSzClA3u_w6fzkuUIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3050940956</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contemporary trends and outcomes after liver transplantation and resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Howell, Thomas Clark ; Rhodin, Kristen E. ; Shaw, Brian ; Bao, Jiayin ; Kanu, Elishama ; Masoud, Sabran ; Bartholomew, Alex J. ; Gao, Qimeng ; Anwar, Imran J. ; Ladowski, Joseph M. ; Nussbaum, Daniel P. ; Blazer, Dan G. ; Zani, Sabino ; Allen, Peter J. ; Barbas, Andrew S. ; Lidsky, Michael E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Howell, Thomas Clark ; Rhodin, Kristen E. ; Shaw, Brian ; Bao, Jiayin ; Kanu, Elishama ; Masoud, Sabran ; Bartholomew, Alex J. ; Gao, Qimeng ; Anwar, Imran J. ; Ladowski, Joseph M. ; Nussbaum, Daniel P. ; Blazer, Dan G. ; Zani, Sabino ; Allen, Peter J. ; Barbas, Andrew S. ; Lidsky, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><description>Liver transplantation (LT) has been shown to be superior to resection in highly selected patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), yet has traditionally been contraindicated for intrahepatic CCA (iCCA). Herein, we aimed to examine contemporary trends and outcomes for surgical resection and LT for iCCA. The National Cancer Database was queried for patients presenting with stage I-III iCCA between 2010 and 2018 who underwent resection or LT. Overall survival (OS) was compared with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards methods stratified by management. Secondary analysis of patients undergoing transplant for CCA was performed with the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Of 2565 patients, 2412 (94.0%) underwent resection and 153 (5.96%) LT of whom 84 (54.9%) received neoadjuvant therapy. Utilization of LT remained between 3.9% and 7.8% annually. Unadjusted 5-year OS was higher for LT than resection (59.8% vs 39.9%, P = .0067), yet adjusted analysis revealed no significant difference in mortality (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.66-1.27; P = .58). On secondary analysis including 437 patients with all subtypes of CCA, unadjusted 5-year OS was higher for non-CCA indications (79% vs 52%-54%, P &lt; .001). Utilization of LT for iCCA remains low and many cases are likely incidental. Although partial hepatectomy remains the standard of care for patients with resectable disease, our findings suggest that highly selected patients with unresectable iCCA may achieve favorable outcomes after LT. Granular, prospective data are needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from transplant and allocate scarce liver grafts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1091-255X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4626</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.02.029</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38704208</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Bile Duct Neoplasms - mortality ; Bile Duct Neoplasms - pathology ; Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery ; Cholangiocarcinoma - mortality ; Cholangiocarcinoma - pathology ; Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; Hepatectomy ; Humans ; Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma ; Kaplan-Meier Estimate ; Liver transplantation ; Liver Transplantation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoadjuvant Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Neoplasm Staging ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Retrospective Studies ; Survival Rate ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2024-05, Vol.28 (5), p.738-745</ispartof><rights>2024 Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-798a88db36a0b1664e396d818d0174df020ea10366e9838ac0b7cf33cd1f0d413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-798a88db36a0b1664e396d818d0174df020ea10366e9838ac0b7cf33cd1f0d413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38704208$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Howell, Thomas Clark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodin, Kristen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Jiayin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanu, Elishama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masoud, Sabran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartholomew, Alex J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Qimeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anwar, Imran J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladowski, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nussbaum, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blazer, Dan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zani, Sabino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbas, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lidsky, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><title>Contemporary trends and outcomes after liver transplantation and resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</title><title>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</title><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><description>Liver transplantation (LT) has been shown to be superior to resection in highly selected patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), yet has traditionally been contraindicated for intrahepatic CCA (iCCA). Herein, we aimed to examine contemporary trends and outcomes for surgical resection and LT for iCCA. The National Cancer Database was queried for patients presenting with stage I-III iCCA between 2010 and 2018 who underwent resection or LT. Overall survival (OS) was compared with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards methods stratified by management. Secondary analysis of patients undergoing transplant for CCA was performed with the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Of 2565 patients, 2412 (94.0%) underwent resection and 153 (5.96%) LT of whom 84 (54.9%) received neoadjuvant therapy. Utilization of LT remained between 3.9% and 7.8% annually. Unadjusted 5-year OS was higher for LT than resection (59.8% vs 39.9%, P = .0067), yet adjusted analysis revealed no significant difference in mortality (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.66-1.27; P = .58). On secondary analysis including 437 patients with all subtypes of CCA, unadjusted 5-year OS was higher for non-CCA indications (79% vs 52%-54%, P &lt; .001). Utilization of LT for iCCA remains low and many cases are likely incidental. Although partial hepatectomy remains the standard of care for patients with resectable disease, our findings suggest that highly selected patients with unresectable iCCA may achieve favorable outcomes after LT. Granular, prospective data are needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from transplant and allocate scarce liver grafts.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bile Duct Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Bile Duct Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma - mortality</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma - pathology</subject><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatectomy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</subject><subject>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</subject><subject>Liver transplantation</subject><subject>Liver Transplantation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Proportional Hazards Models</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1091-255X</issn><issn>1873-4626</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kN1LBCEQwCWKvv-DiH3sZa9R91z3JYijLwh6KehNPJ0tj1vd1A3677OuegwGdfA3jvMj5ITCjAIV56vZi05pijMGrJkBK9FtkX0qW143gontcoaO1mw-f94jBymtAGgLVO6SPS5baBjIfeIXwWccxhB1_KhyRG9Tpb2twpRNGLAkfcZYrd17WXPUPo1r7bPOLvhvMGJC8531IVbOF-YVx3JvKvMaCvvigtHROB8GfUR2er1OePyzH5Kn66vHxW19_3Bzt7i8rw0XLNdtJ7WUdsmFhiUVokHeCSuptGWExvbAADUFLgR2kkttYNmannNjaQ-2ofyQnG3eHWN4mzBlNbhkcF2-g2FKisMcuga6uShos0FNDClF7NUY3VBsKArqy7RaqY1p9WVaASvRlbLTnw7TckD7V_SrtgAXGwDLnO8Oo0rGoTdoXSzClA3u_w6fzkuUIQ</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Howell, Thomas Clark</creator><creator>Rhodin, Kristen E.</creator><creator>Shaw, Brian</creator><creator>Bao, Jiayin</creator><creator>Kanu, Elishama</creator><creator>Masoud, Sabran</creator><creator>Bartholomew, Alex J.</creator><creator>Gao, Qimeng</creator><creator>Anwar, Imran J.</creator><creator>Ladowski, Joseph M.</creator><creator>Nussbaum, Daniel P.</creator><creator>Blazer, Dan G.</creator><creator>Zani, Sabino</creator><creator>Allen, Peter J.</creator><creator>Barbas, Andrew S.</creator><creator>Lidsky, Michael E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Contemporary trends and outcomes after liver transplantation and resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</title><author>Howell, Thomas Clark ; Rhodin, Kristen E. ; Shaw, Brian ; Bao, Jiayin ; Kanu, Elishama ; Masoud, Sabran ; Bartholomew, Alex J. ; Gao, Qimeng ; Anwar, Imran J. ; Ladowski, Joseph M. ; Nussbaum, Daniel P. ; Blazer, Dan G. ; Zani, Sabino ; Allen, Peter J. ; Barbas, Andrew S. ; Lidsky, Michael E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-798a88db36a0b1664e396d818d0174df020ea10366e9838ac0b7cf33cd1f0d413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bile Duct Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Bile Duct Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma - mortality</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma - pathology</topic><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatectomy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</topic><topic>Kaplan-Meier Estimate</topic><topic>Liver transplantation</topic><topic>Liver Transplantation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Proportional Hazards Models</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Howell, Thomas Clark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhodin, Kristen E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bao, Jiayin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanu, Elishama</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masoud, Sabran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bartholomew, Alex J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Qimeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anwar, Imran J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladowski, Joseph M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nussbaum, Daniel P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blazer, Dan G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zani, Sabino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbas, Andrew S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lidsky, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Howell, Thomas Clark</au><au>Rhodin, Kristen E.</au><au>Shaw, Brian</au><au>Bao, Jiayin</au><au>Kanu, Elishama</au><au>Masoud, Sabran</au><au>Bartholomew, Alex J.</au><au>Gao, Qimeng</au><au>Anwar, Imran J.</au><au>Ladowski, Joseph M.</au><au>Nussbaum, Daniel P.</au><au>Blazer, Dan G.</au><au>Zani, Sabino</au><au>Allen, Peter J.</au><au>Barbas, Andrew S.</au><au>Lidsky, Michael E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contemporary trends and outcomes after liver transplantation and resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma</atitle><jtitle>Journal of gastrointestinal surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Gastrointest Surg</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>738</spage><epage>745</epage><pages>738-745</pages><issn>1091-255X</issn><eissn>1873-4626</eissn><abstract>Liver transplantation (LT) has been shown to be superior to resection in highly selected patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), yet has traditionally been contraindicated for intrahepatic CCA (iCCA). Herein, we aimed to examine contemporary trends and outcomes for surgical resection and LT for iCCA. The National Cancer Database was queried for patients presenting with stage I-III iCCA between 2010 and 2018 who underwent resection or LT. Overall survival (OS) was compared with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards methods stratified by management. Secondary analysis of patients undergoing transplant for CCA was performed with the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Of 2565 patients, 2412 (94.0%) underwent resection and 153 (5.96%) LT of whom 84 (54.9%) received neoadjuvant therapy. Utilization of LT remained between 3.9% and 7.8% annually. Unadjusted 5-year OS was higher for LT than resection (59.8% vs 39.9%, P = .0067), yet adjusted analysis revealed no significant difference in mortality (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.66-1.27; P = .58). On secondary analysis including 437 patients with all subtypes of CCA, unadjusted 5-year OS was higher for non-CCA indications (79% vs 52%-54%, P &lt; .001). Utilization of LT for iCCA remains low and many cases are likely incidental. Although partial hepatectomy remains the standard of care for patients with resectable disease, our findings suggest that highly selected patients with unresectable iCCA may achieve favorable outcomes after LT. Granular, prospective data are needed to identify patients most likely to benefit from transplant and allocate scarce liver grafts.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38704208</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.gassur.2024.02.029</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1091-255X
ispartof Journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2024-05, Vol.28 (5), p.738-745
issn 1091-255X
1873-4626
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3050940956
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Aged
Bile Duct Neoplasms - mortality
Bile Duct Neoplasms - pathology
Bile Duct Neoplasms - surgery
Cholangiocarcinoma - mortality
Cholangiocarcinoma - pathology
Cholangiocarcinoma - surgery
Databases, Factual
Female
Hepatectomy
Humans
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Liver transplantation
Liver Transplantation - statistics & numerical data
Male
Middle Aged
Neoadjuvant Therapy - statistics & numerical data
Neoplasm Staging
Proportional Hazards Models
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
Treatment Outcome
title Contemporary trends and outcomes after liver transplantation and resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T10%3A10%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contemporary%20trends%20and%20outcomes%20after%20liver%20transplantation%20and%20resection%20for%20intrahepatic%20cholangiocarcinoma&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20gastrointestinal%20surgery&rft.au=Howell,%20Thomas%20Clark&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=738&rft.epage=745&rft.pages=738-745&rft.issn=1091-255X&rft.eissn=1873-4626&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.02.029&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3050940956%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3050940956&rft_id=info:pmid/38704208&rft_els_id=S1091255X24003378&rfr_iscdi=true