Dorsal calcaneal wedge removal in zadek osteotomy: A cadaveric study

Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) is a common pathology with multiple surgical interventions available for treatment. The Zadek, dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy (ZO) has been demonstrated to be effective treatment of IAT. There have been various recommendations in the literature as to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foot and ankle surgery 2024-08, Vol.30 (6), p.516-519
Hauptverfasser: Kaplan, Jonathan R.M., Hall, SarahRose, Kumar, Padam, DiTommaso, Rita M., Giles, Stephanie S., Gonzalez, Tyler A., Haupt, Edward
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 519
container_issue 6
container_start_page 516
container_title Foot and ankle surgery
container_volume 30
creator Kaplan, Jonathan R.M.
Hall, SarahRose
Kumar, Padam
DiTommaso, Rita M.
Giles, Stephanie S.
Gonzalez, Tyler A.
Haupt, Edward
description Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) is a common pathology with multiple surgical interventions available for treatment. The Zadek, dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy (ZO) has been demonstrated to be effective treatment of IAT. There have been various recommendations in the literature as to what measurement of wedge removal should be considered ideal to produce greatest postoperative range of motion (ROM), thus postoperative biomechanical potential. Accordingly, the purpose of this cadaveric study was to assess the range of motion achieved after various measurements of wedge removal by ZO. The ZO was performed on six cadaveric specimens. A 7.5 mm and 15 mm wedge osteotomy was marked and sequentially completed on each specimen. Lateral fluoroscopic imaging was utilized to take preoperative and postoperative ROM measurements for each osteotomy. Dorsiflexion (DF) and plantarflexion (PF) ROM arcs were measured for each wedge size and compared by t-test. Effect sizes were calculated by Cohen’s d analysis. Maximal DF was 110.87 ± 12.97 deg in the pre-osteotomy state. Removal of a 7.5 mm wedge improved DF by 8 deg to a mean 102.93 ± 13.81 deg (p = 0.08). Removal of a 15 mm wedge improved DF by 16 deg to a mean 95.96 ± 11.41 deg (p = 0.003). Cohen’s d and effect size calculation demonstrated a 7.5 mm wedge to have a small effect on DF, while a 15 mm wedge had a medium effect (0.29, 0.52 respectively). Maximal PF did not change significantly amongst the pre-osteotomy, 7.5 mm wedge, or 15 mm wedge positions. ICC was 0.96. Based on the results presented in this study, removal of a 15 mm wedge with ZO yields significant and greater improvement in ROM than a 7.5 mm wedge. We hope the current study will better inform preoperative planning for ZO. Prospective Cadaver Study. V.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fas.2024.04.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3050176041</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S126877312400078X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3050176041</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-89d3f875830559ddb1e14fc338124868e01744b85712c8f99ab16a918ca076f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwA7igHrm0OG3aJnCaNr6kSVzgHKWJizraZSTt0Pj1ZNrgiGQptvT4kfMSckkhoUCLm2VSK5-kkLIEQgE7ImPKCohFztlx6NOCx2WZ0RE5834JAKWA7JSMMl6IVHA6JvO5dV61kVatVisM3Read4wcdnYTpmYVfSuDH5H1PdredtvbaBpoozboGh35fjDbc3JSq9bjxeGdkLeH-9fZU7x4eXyeTRexziDvYy5MVvMy52HKhTEVRcpqnWWcpowXHIGWjFU8L2mqeS2EqmihBOVaQVnUPJuQ67137ezngL6XXeM1tm243A5eBm9QFMBoQOke1c5677CWa9d0ym0lBbkLTy5lCE_uwpMQCljYuTroh6pD87fxm1YA7vYAhk9uGnTS6wZXGk3jUPfS2OYf_Q9bcH2j</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3050176041</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dorsal calcaneal wedge removal in zadek osteotomy: A cadaveric study</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kaplan, Jonathan R.M. ; Hall, SarahRose ; Kumar, Padam ; DiTommaso, Rita M. ; Giles, Stephanie S. ; Gonzalez, Tyler A. ; Haupt, Edward</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Jonathan R.M. ; Hall, SarahRose ; Kumar, Padam ; DiTommaso, Rita M. ; Giles, Stephanie S. ; Gonzalez, Tyler A. ; Haupt, Edward</creatorcontrib><description>Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) is a common pathology with multiple surgical interventions available for treatment. The Zadek, dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy (ZO) has been demonstrated to be effective treatment of IAT. There have been various recommendations in the literature as to what measurement of wedge removal should be considered ideal to produce greatest postoperative range of motion (ROM), thus postoperative biomechanical potential. Accordingly, the purpose of this cadaveric study was to assess the range of motion achieved after various measurements of wedge removal by ZO. The ZO was performed on six cadaveric specimens. A 7.5 mm and 15 mm wedge osteotomy was marked and sequentially completed on each specimen. Lateral fluoroscopic imaging was utilized to take preoperative and postoperative ROM measurements for each osteotomy. Dorsiflexion (DF) and plantarflexion (PF) ROM arcs were measured for each wedge size and compared by t-test. Effect sizes were calculated by Cohen’s d analysis. Maximal DF was 110.87 ± 12.97 deg in the pre-osteotomy state. Removal of a 7.5 mm wedge improved DF by 8 deg to a mean 102.93 ± 13.81 deg (p = 0.08). Removal of a 15 mm wedge improved DF by 16 deg to a mean 95.96 ± 11.41 deg (p = 0.003). Cohen’s d and effect size calculation demonstrated a 7.5 mm wedge to have a small effect on DF, while a 15 mm wedge had a medium effect (0.29, 0.52 respectively). Maximal PF did not change significantly amongst the pre-osteotomy, 7.5 mm wedge, or 15 mm wedge positions. ICC was 0.96. Based on the results presented in this study, removal of a 15 mm wedge with ZO yields significant and greater improvement in ROM than a 7.5 mm wedge. We hope the current study will better inform preoperative planning for ZO. Prospective Cadaver Study. V.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1268-7731</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1460-9584</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-9584</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2024.04.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38692981</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cadaver ; Dorsal calcaneal wedge osteotomy ; Haglund's deformity ; Haglund's syndrome ; Insertional achilles tendinopathy ; Wedge measurement ; Zadek osteotomy</subject><ispartof>Foot and ankle surgery, 2024-08, Vol.30 (6), p.516-519</ispartof><rights>2024 European Foot and Ankle Society</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 European Foot and Ankle Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-89d3f875830559ddb1e14fc338124868e01744b85712c8f99ab16a918ca076f83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4026-3118</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2024.04.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3549,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38692981$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Jonathan R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, SarahRose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Padam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiTommaso, Rita M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles, Stephanie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Tyler A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haupt, Edward</creatorcontrib><title>Dorsal calcaneal wedge removal in zadek osteotomy: A cadaveric study</title><title>Foot and ankle surgery</title><addtitle>Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><description>Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) is a common pathology with multiple surgical interventions available for treatment. The Zadek, dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy (ZO) has been demonstrated to be effective treatment of IAT. There have been various recommendations in the literature as to what measurement of wedge removal should be considered ideal to produce greatest postoperative range of motion (ROM), thus postoperative biomechanical potential. Accordingly, the purpose of this cadaveric study was to assess the range of motion achieved after various measurements of wedge removal by ZO. The ZO was performed on six cadaveric specimens. A 7.5 mm and 15 mm wedge osteotomy was marked and sequentially completed on each specimen. Lateral fluoroscopic imaging was utilized to take preoperative and postoperative ROM measurements for each osteotomy. Dorsiflexion (DF) and plantarflexion (PF) ROM arcs were measured for each wedge size and compared by t-test. Effect sizes were calculated by Cohen’s d analysis. Maximal DF was 110.87 ± 12.97 deg in the pre-osteotomy state. Removal of a 7.5 mm wedge improved DF by 8 deg to a mean 102.93 ± 13.81 deg (p = 0.08). Removal of a 15 mm wedge improved DF by 16 deg to a mean 95.96 ± 11.41 deg (p = 0.003). Cohen’s d and effect size calculation demonstrated a 7.5 mm wedge to have a small effect on DF, while a 15 mm wedge had a medium effect (0.29, 0.52 respectively). Maximal PF did not change significantly amongst the pre-osteotomy, 7.5 mm wedge, or 15 mm wedge positions. ICC was 0.96. Based on the results presented in this study, removal of a 15 mm wedge with ZO yields significant and greater improvement in ROM than a 7.5 mm wedge. We hope the current study will better inform preoperative planning for ZO. Prospective Cadaver Study. V.</description><subject>Cadaver</subject><subject>Dorsal calcaneal wedge osteotomy</subject><subject>Haglund's deformity</subject><subject>Haglund's syndrome</subject><subject>Insertional achilles tendinopathy</subject><subject>Wedge measurement</subject><subject>Zadek osteotomy</subject><issn>1268-7731</issn><issn>1460-9584</issn><issn>1460-9584</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwzAMhiMEYmPwA7igHrm0OG3aJnCaNr6kSVzgHKWJizraZSTt0Pj1ZNrgiGQptvT4kfMSckkhoUCLm2VSK5-kkLIEQgE7ImPKCohFztlx6NOCx2WZ0RE5834JAKWA7JSMMl6IVHA6JvO5dV61kVatVisM3Read4wcdnYTpmYVfSuDH5H1PdredtvbaBpoozboGh35fjDbc3JSq9bjxeGdkLeH-9fZU7x4eXyeTRexziDvYy5MVvMy52HKhTEVRcpqnWWcpowXHIGWjFU8L2mqeS2EqmihBOVaQVnUPJuQ67137ezngL6XXeM1tm243A5eBm9QFMBoQOke1c5677CWa9d0ym0lBbkLTy5lCE_uwpMQCljYuTroh6pD87fxm1YA7vYAhk9uGnTS6wZXGk3jUPfS2OYf_Q9bcH2j</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Kaplan, Jonathan R.M.</creator><creator>Hall, SarahRose</creator><creator>Kumar, Padam</creator><creator>DiTommaso, Rita M.</creator><creator>Giles, Stephanie S.</creator><creator>Gonzalez, Tyler A.</creator><creator>Haupt, Edward</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4026-3118</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Dorsal calcaneal wedge removal in zadek osteotomy: A cadaveric study</title><author>Kaplan, Jonathan R.M. ; Hall, SarahRose ; Kumar, Padam ; DiTommaso, Rita M. ; Giles, Stephanie S. ; Gonzalez, Tyler A. ; Haupt, Edward</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c305t-89d3f875830559ddb1e14fc338124868e01744b85712c8f99ab16a918ca076f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cadaver</topic><topic>Dorsal calcaneal wedge osteotomy</topic><topic>Haglund's deformity</topic><topic>Haglund's syndrome</topic><topic>Insertional achilles tendinopathy</topic><topic>Wedge measurement</topic><topic>Zadek osteotomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, Jonathan R.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, SarahRose</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Padam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiTommaso, Rita M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giles, Stephanie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Tyler A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haupt, Edward</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Foot and ankle surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaplan, Jonathan R.M.</au><au>Hall, SarahRose</au><au>Kumar, Padam</au><au>DiTommaso, Rita M.</au><au>Giles, Stephanie S.</au><au>Gonzalez, Tyler A.</au><au>Haupt, Edward</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dorsal calcaneal wedge removal in zadek osteotomy: A cadaveric study</atitle><jtitle>Foot and ankle surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Foot Ankle Surg</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>516</spage><epage>519</epage><pages>516-519</pages><issn>1268-7731</issn><issn>1460-9584</issn><eissn>1460-9584</eissn><abstract>Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) is a common pathology with multiple surgical interventions available for treatment. The Zadek, dorsal closing wedge calcaneal osteotomy (ZO) has been demonstrated to be effective treatment of IAT. There have been various recommendations in the literature as to what measurement of wedge removal should be considered ideal to produce greatest postoperative range of motion (ROM), thus postoperative biomechanical potential. Accordingly, the purpose of this cadaveric study was to assess the range of motion achieved after various measurements of wedge removal by ZO. The ZO was performed on six cadaveric specimens. A 7.5 mm and 15 mm wedge osteotomy was marked and sequentially completed on each specimen. Lateral fluoroscopic imaging was utilized to take preoperative and postoperative ROM measurements for each osteotomy. Dorsiflexion (DF) and plantarflexion (PF) ROM arcs were measured for each wedge size and compared by t-test. Effect sizes were calculated by Cohen’s d analysis. Maximal DF was 110.87 ± 12.97 deg in the pre-osteotomy state. Removal of a 7.5 mm wedge improved DF by 8 deg to a mean 102.93 ± 13.81 deg (p = 0.08). Removal of a 15 mm wedge improved DF by 16 deg to a mean 95.96 ± 11.41 deg (p = 0.003). Cohen’s d and effect size calculation demonstrated a 7.5 mm wedge to have a small effect on DF, while a 15 mm wedge had a medium effect (0.29, 0.52 respectively). Maximal PF did not change significantly amongst the pre-osteotomy, 7.5 mm wedge, or 15 mm wedge positions. ICC was 0.96. Based on the results presented in this study, removal of a 15 mm wedge with ZO yields significant and greater improvement in ROM than a 7.5 mm wedge. We hope the current study will better inform preoperative planning for ZO. Prospective Cadaver Study. V.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38692981</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fas.2024.04.004</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4026-3118</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1268-7731
ispartof Foot and ankle surgery, 2024-08, Vol.30 (6), p.516-519
issn 1268-7731
1460-9584
1460-9584
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3050176041
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Cadaver
Dorsal calcaneal wedge osteotomy
Haglund's deformity
Haglund's syndrome
Insertional achilles tendinopathy
Wedge measurement
Zadek osteotomy
title Dorsal calcaneal wedge removal in zadek osteotomy: A cadaveric study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T23%3A10%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dorsal%20calcaneal%20wedge%20removal%20in%20zadek%20osteotomy:%20A%20cadaveric%20study&rft.jtitle=Foot%20and%20ankle%20surgery&rft.au=Kaplan,%20Jonathan%20R.M.&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=516&rft.epage=519&rft.pages=516-519&rft.issn=1268-7731&rft.eissn=1460-9584&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fas.2024.04.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3050176041%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3050176041&rft_id=info:pmid/38692981&rft_els_id=S126877312400078X&rfr_iscdi=true