Amino acid propensities for secondary structures and its variation across protein structures using exhaustive PDB data

Amino acid propensities for protein secondary structures are vital for protein structure prediction, understanding folding, and design, and have been studied using various theoretical and experimental methods. Traditional assessments of average propensities using statistical methods have been done o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Computational biology and chemistry 2024-06, Vol.110, p.108083-108083, Article 108083
Hauptverfasser: Sen, Chandra, Logashree, V., Makde, Ravindra D., Ghosh, Biplab
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 108083
container_issue
container_start_page 108083
container_title Computational biology and chemistry
container_volume 110
creator Sen, Chandra
Logashree, V.
Makde, Ravindra D.
Ghosh, Biplab
description Amino acid propensities for protein secondary structures are vital for protein structure prediction, understanding folding, and design, and have been studied using various theoretical and experimental methods. Traditional assessments of average propensities using statistical methods have been done on relatively smaller dataset for only a few secondary structures. They also involve averaging out the environmental factors and lack insights into consistency of preferences across diverse protein structures. While a few studies have explored variations in propensities across protein structural classes and folds, exploration of such variations across protein structures remains to be carried out. In this work, we have revised the average propensities for all six different secondary structures, namely α-helix, β-strand, 310-helix, π-helix, turn and coil, analyzing the most exhaustive dataset available till date using two robust secondary structure assignment algorithms, DSSP and STRIDE. The propensities evaluated here can serve as a standard reference. Moreover, we present here, for the first time, the propensities within individual protein structures and investigated how the preferences of residues and more interestingly, of their groups formed based on their structural features, vary across different unique structures. We devised a novel approach- the minimal set analysis, based on the propensity distribution of residues, which along with the group propensities led us to the conclusion that a residue's preference for a specific secondary structure is primarily dictated by its side chain's structural features. The findings in this study provide a more insightful picture of residues propensities and can be useful in protein folding and design studies. [Display omitted] •Revised the propensities for six secondary structures using the exhaustive PDB data.•Utilized two robust secondary structure assignment algorithms DSSP and STRIDE.•For the first time, we studied propensities at individual protein structure level.•Novel idea of minimal set analysis and a new concept- the group propensity.•Crucial role of side chain of residues in secondary structure stabilization.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108083
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3050173498</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1476927124000719</els_id><sourcerecordid>3050173498</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-a282c1f39d538a4b4a3fb46bcf340f486b6c1c95397b4c4f2c5fde27f17dd60d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtuFDEQRS0EIg_4BWSxYjODX93tZhcSCEiRYAESO8ttl0mNpu3Bdo_C3-NhQpQlK1uqc12-h5DXnK054_3bzdqleTdh2rpbmNeCCdUGmmn5hJxyNfSrUegfTx_uAz8hZ6VsGBOSse45OZG6H7ke1SnZX8wYE7UOPd3ltINYsCIUGlKmBVyK3ubftNS8uLrkNrDRU6yF7m1GWzHFFs6plEO8AsbH7FIw_qRwd2uXUnEP9OvVe-pttS_Is2C3BV7en-fk-8cP3y4_rW6-XH--vLhZOSlkXVmhheNBjr6T2qpJWRkm1U8uSMWC0v3UO-7GTo7DpJwKwnXBgxgCH7zvmZfn5M3x3fa5XwuUamYsDrZbGyEtxUjWMT5INeqGvjuif9tkCGaXcW7lDWfm4N1szGPv5uDdHL238Kv7Pcs0g3-I_hPdgKsjAK3tHiGb4hCiA48ZXDU-4f_s-QOf7J5y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3050173498</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Amino acid propensities for secondary structures and its variation across protein structures using exhaustive PDB data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Sen, Chandra ; Logashree, V. ; Makde, Ravindra D. ; Ghosh, Biplab</creator><creatorcontrib>Sen, Chandra ; Logashree, V. ; Makde, Ravindra D. ; Ghosh, Biplab</creatorcontrib><description>Amino acid propensities for protein secondary structures are vital for protein structure prediction, understanding folding, and design, and have been studied using various theoretical and experimental methods. Traditional assessments of average propensities using statistical methods have been done on relatively smaller dataset for only a few secondary structures. They also involve averaging out the environmental factors and lack insights into consistency of preferences across diverse protein structures. While a few studies have explored variations in propensities across protein structural classes and folds, exploration of such variations across protein structures remains to be carried out. In this work, we have revised the average propensities for all six different secondary structures, namely α-helix, β-strand, 310-helix, π-helix, turn and coil, analyzing the most exhaustive dataset available till date using two robust secondary structure assignment algorithms, DSSP and STRIDE. The propensities evaluated here can serve as a standard reference. Moreover, we present here, for the first time, the propensities within individual protein structures and investigated how the preferences of residues and more interestingly, of their groups formed based on their structural features, vary across different unique structures. We devised a novel approach- the minimal set analysis, based on the propensity distribution of residues, which along with the group propensities led us to the conclusion that a residue's preference for a specific secondary structure is primarily dictated by its side chain's structural features. The findings in this study provide a more insightful picture of residues propensities and can be useful in protein folding and design studies. [Display omitted] •Revised the propensities for six secondary structures using the exhaustive PDB data.•Utilized two robust secondary structure assignment algorithms DSSP and STRIDE.•For the first time, we studied propensities at individual protein structure level.•Novel idea of minimal set analysis and a new concept- the group propensity.•Crucial role of side chain of residues in secondary structure stabilization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1476-9271</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-928X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108083</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38691894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Amino Acids - chemistry ; Amino acids propensity ; Databases, Protein ; Protein design ; Protein Folding ; Protein Structure, Secondary ; Proteins - chemistry ; Secondary structure</subject><ispartof>Computational biology and chemistry, 2024-06, Vol.110, p.108083-108083, Article 108083</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-a282c1f39d538a4b4a3fb46bcf340f486b6c1c95397b4c4f2c5fde27f17dd60d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2265-5211</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108083$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38691894$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sen, Chandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logashree, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makde, Ravindra D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Biplab</creatorcontrib><title>Amino acid propensities for secondary structures and its variation across protein structures using exhaustive PDB data</title><title>Computational biology and chemistry</title><addtitle>Comput Biol Chem</addtitle><description>Amino acid propensities for protein secondary structures are vital for protein structure prediction, understanding folding, and design, and have been studied using various theoretical and experimental methods. Traditional assessments of average propensities using statistical methods have been done on relatively smaller dataset for only a few secondary structures. They also involve averaging out the environmental factors and lack insights into consistency of preferences across diverse protein structures. While a few studies have explored variations in propensities across protein structural classes and folds, exploration of such variations across protein structures remains to be carried out. In this work, we have revised the average propensities for all six different secondary structures, namely α-helix, β-strand, 310-helix, π-helix, turn and coil, analyzing the most exhaustive dataset available till date using two robust secondary structure assignment algorithms, DSSP and STRIDE. The propensities evaluated here can serve as a standard reference. Moreover, we present here, for the first time, the propensities within individual protein structures and investigated how the preferences of residues and more interestingly, of their groups formed based on their structural features, vary across different unique structures. We devised a novel approach- the minimal set analysis, based on the propensity distribution of residues, which along with the group propensities led us to the conclusion that a residue's preference for a specific secondary structure is primarily dictated by its side chain's structural features. The findings in this study provide a more insightful picture of residues propensities and can be useful in protein folding and design studies. [Display omitted] •Revised the propensities for six secondary structures using the exhaustive PDB data.•Utilized two robust secondary structure assignment algorithms DSSP and STRIDE.•For the first time, we studied propensities at individual protein structure level.•Novel idea of minimal set analysis and a new concept- the group propensity.•Crucial role of side chain of residues in secondary structure stabilization.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Amino Acids - chemistry</subject><subject>Amino acids propensity</subject><subject>Databases, Protein</subject><subject>Protein design</subject><subject>Protein Folding</subject><subject>Protein Structure, Secondary</subject><subject>Proteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Secondary structure</subject><issn>1476-9271</issn><issn>1476-928X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtuFDEQRS0EIg_4BWSxYjODX93tZhcSCEiRYAESO8ttl0mNpu3Bdo_C3-NhQpQlK1uqc12-h5DXnK054_3bzdqleTdh2rpbmNeCCdUGmmn5hJxyNfSrUegfTx_uAz8hZ6VsGBOSse45OZG6H7ke1SnZX8wYE7UOPd3ltINYsCIUGlKmBVyK3ubftNS8uLrkNrDRU6yF7m1GWzHFFs6plEO8AsbH7FIw_qRwd2uXUnEP9OvVe-pttS_Is2C3BV7en-fk-8cP3y4_rW6-XH--vLhZOSlkXVmhheNBjr6T2qpJWRkm1U8uSMWC0v3UO-7GTo7DpJwKwnXBgxgCH7zvmZfn5M3x3fa5XwuUamYsDrZbGyEtxUjWMT5INeqGvjuif9tkCGaXcW7lDWfm4N1szGPv5uDdHL238Kv7Pcs0g3-I_hPdgKsjAK3tHiGb4hCiA48ZXDU-4f_s-QOf7J5y</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Sen, Chandra</creator><creator>Logashree, V.</creator><creator>Makde, Ravindra D.</creator><creator>Ghosh, Biplab</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2265-5211</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Amino acid propensities for secondary structures and its variation across protein structures using exhaustive PDB data</title><author>Sen, Chandra ; Logashree, V. ; Makde, Ravindra D. ; Ghosh, Biplab</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-a282c1f39d538a4b4a3fb46bcf340f486b6c1c95397b4c4f2c5fde27f17dd60d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Amino Acids - chemistry</topic><topic>Amino acids propensity</topic><topic>Databases, Protein</topic><topic>Protein design</topic><topic>Protein Folding</topic><topic>Protein Structure, Secondary</topic><topic>Proteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Secondary structure</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sen, Chandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logashree, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makde, Ravindra D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ghosh, Biplab</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Computational biology and chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sen, Chandra</au><au>Logashree, V.</au><au>Makde, Ravindra D.</au><au>Ghosh, Biplab</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Amino acid propensities for secondary structures and its variation across protein structures using exhaustive PDB data</atitle><jtitle>Computational biology and chemistry</jtitle><addtitle>Comput Biol Chem</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>110</volume><spage>108083</spage><epage>108083</epage><pages>108083-108083</pages><artnum>108083</artnum><issn>1476-9271</issn><eissn>1476-928X</eissn><abstract>Amino acid propensities for protein secondary structures are vital for protein structure prediction, understanding folding, and design, and have been studied using various theoretical and experimental methods. Traditional assessments of average propensities using statistical methods have been done on relatively smaller dataset for only a few secondary structures. They also involve averaging out the environmental factors and lack insights into consistency of preferences across diverse protein structures. While a few studies have explored variations in propensities across protein structural classes and folds, exploration of such variations across protein structures remains to be carried out. In this work, we have revised the average propensities for all six different secondary structures, namely α-helix, β-strand, 310-helix, π-helix, turn and coil, analyzing the most exhaustive dataset available till date using two robust secondary structure assignment algorithms, DSSP and STRIDE. The propensities evaluated here can serve as a standard reference. Moreover, we present here, for the first time, the propensities within individual protein structures and investigated how the preferences of residues and more interestingly, of their groups formed based on their structural features, vary across different unique structures. We devised a novel approach- the minimal set analysis, based on the propensity distribution of residues, which along with the group propensities led us to the conclusion that a residue's preference for a specific secondary structure is primarily dictated by its side chain's structural features. The findings in this study provide a more insightful picture of residues propensities and can be useful in protein folding and design studies. [Display omitted] •Revised the propensities for six secondary structures using the exhaustive PDB data.•Utilized two robust secondary structure assignment algorithms DSSP and STRIDE.•For the first time, we studied propensities at individual protein structure level.•Novel idea of minimal set analysis and a new concept- the group propensity.•Crucial role of side chain of residues in secondary structure stabilization.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38691894</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108083</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2265-5211</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1476-9271
ispartof Computational biology and chemistry, 2024-06, Vol.110, p.108083-108083, Article 108083
issn 1476-9271
1476-928X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3050173498
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Algorithms
Amino Acids - chemistry
Amino acids propensity
Databases, Protein
Protein design
Protein Folding
Protein Structure, Secondary
Proteins - chemistry
Secondary structure
title Amino acid propensities for secondary structures and its variation across protein structures using exhaustive PDB data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T01%3A09%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Amino%20acid%20propensities%20for%20secondary%20structures%20and%20its%20variation%20across%20protein%20structures%20using%20exhaustive%20PDB%20data&rft.jtitle=Computational%20biology%20and%20chemistry&rft.au=Sen,%20Chandra&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=110&rft.spage=108083&rft.epage=108083&rft.pages=108083-108083&rft.artnum=108083&rft.issn=1476-9271&rft.eissn=1476-928X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2024.108083&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3050173498%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3050173498&rft_id=info:pmid/38691894&rft_els_id=S1476927124000719&rfr_iscdi=true