The Utility of Prevena Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Groin Incisions for Critical Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Single Institution Experience

Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) is an adjunctive treatment that uses constant negative pressure suction to facilitate healing. The utility of this treatment modality on vascular operations for critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) has yet to be elucidated. This study compares...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of plastic surgery 2024-05, Vol.92 (5S Suppl 3), p.S331-S335
Hauptverfasser: Yin, Raymond, Gursky, Alexis, Falade, Israel, Knox, Jacquelyn, Gomez-Sanchez, Clara, Soroudi, Daniel, Piper, Merisa, Hoffman, William, Hansen, Scott L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S335
container_issue 5S Suppl 3
container_start_page S331
container_title Annals of plastic surgery
container_volume 92
creator Yin, Raymond
Gursky, Alexis
Falade, Israel
Knox, Jacquelyn
Gomez-Sanchez, Clara
Soroudi, Daniel
Piper, Merisa
Hoffman, William
Hansen, Scott L
description Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) is an adjunctive treatment that uses constant negative pressure suction to facilitate healing. The utility of this treatment modality on vascular operations for critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) has yet to be elucidated. This study compares the incidence of postoperative wound complications between the Prevena Incision Management System, a type of iNPWT, and standard wound dressings for vascular patients who also underwent plastic surgery closure of groin incisions for CLTI. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 40 patients with CLTI who underwent 53 open vascular surgeries with subsequent sartorius muscle flap closure. Patient demographics, intraoperative details, and wound complications were measured from 2015 to 2018 at the University of California San Francisco. Two cohorts were generated based on the modality of postoperative wound management and compared on wound healing outcomes. Of the 53 groin incisions, 29 were managed with standard dressings, and 24 received iNPWT. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Patients who received iNPWT had a significantly lower rate of infection (8.33% vs 31.0%, P = 0.04) and dehiscence (0% vs 41.3%, P < 0.01). Furthermore, the iNPWT group had a significantly lower rate of reoperation (0% vs 17.2%, P = 0.03) for wound complications within 30 days compared with the control group and a moderately reduced rate of readmission (4.17% vs 20.7%, P = 0.08). Rates of infection, reoperation, and dehiscence were significantly reduced in patients whose groin incisions were managed with iNPWT compared with standard wound care. Readmission rates were also decreased, but this difference was not statistically significant. Our results suggest that implementing iNPWT for the management of groin incisions, particularly in patients undergoing vascular operations for CLTI, may significantly improve clinical outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003802
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3049720842</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3049720842</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-8abe3b3a200e7c78f166b053a81c36802d682e79435dbaa314dd5e54b483d6173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkV9LwzAUxYMobv75BiJ59KWaNGma-TaGzsFQwYmPJU1vt0ibziQV9zH8xmZMRbwvFw6_cy-cg9AZJZeUjPKrp_HjJfkzTJJ0Dw1pxkTCciL30ZBQLpOccDZAR96_EkJTycUhGjAp5IhTPkSfixXg52AaEza4q_Gjg3ewCt_DUgXzDlvB-94Bful6W-GIO7WOqMVT1xmLZ1Ybbzrrcd05PHEmGK0aPDdtmSxWDlQAa-wSz7xeQWvUNR7jpyg0EK0-mNCH6MY3H2twBqyGE3RQq8bD6fc-Rs-3N4vJXTJ_mM4m43mi00yERKoSWMlUSgjkOpc1FaIkGVOSaiZiFpWQKeQjzrKqVIpRXlUZZLzkklWC5uwYXezurl331oMPRWu8hqZRFrreF4zwUZ4SydOI8h2qXee9g7pYO9MqtykoKbZlFLGM4n8Z0Xb-_aEvW6h-TT_psy_jv4Yr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3049720842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Utility of Prevena Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Groin Incisions for Critical Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Single Institution Experience</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Yin, Raymond ; Gursky, Alexis ; Falade, Israel ; Knox, Jacquelyn ; Gomez-Sanchez, Clara ; Soroudi, Daniel ; Piper, Merisa ; Hoffman, William ; Hansen, Scott L</creator><creatorcontrib>Yin, Raymond ; Gursky, Alexis ; Falade, Israel ; Knox, Jacquelyn ; Gomez-Sanchez, Clara ; Soroudi, Daniel ; Piper, Merisa ; Hoffman, William ; Hansen, Scott L</creatorcontrib><description>Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) is an adjunctive treatment that uses constant negative pressure suction to facilitate healing. The utility of this treatment modality on vascular operations for critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) has yet to be elucidated. This study compares the incidence of postoperative wound complications between the Prevena Incision Management System, a type of iNPWT, and standard wound dressings for vascular patients who also underwent plastic surgery closure of groin incisions for CLTI. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 40 patients with CLTI who underwent 53 open vascular surgeries with subsequent sartorius muscle flap closure. Patient demographics, intraoperative details, and wound complications were measured from 2015 to 2018 at the University of California San Francisco. Two cohorts were generated based on the modality of postoperative wound management and compared on wound healing outcomes. Of the 53 groin incisions, 29 were managed with standard dressings, and 24 received iNPWT. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Patients who received iNPWT had a significantly lower rate of infection (8.33% vs 31.0%, P = 0.04) and dehiscence (0% vs 41.3%, P &lt; 0.01). Furthermore, the iNPWT group had a significantly lower rate of reoperation (0% vs 17.2%, P = 0.03) for wound complications within 30 days compared with the control group and a moderately reduced rate of readmission (4.17% vs 20.7%, P = 0.08). Rates of infection, reoperation, and dehiscence were significantly reduced in patients whose groin incisions were managed with iNPWT compared with standard wound care. Readmission rates were also decreased, but this difference was not statistically significant. Our results suggest that implementing iNPWT for the management of groin incisions, particularly in patients undergoing vascular operations for CLTI, may significantly improve clinical outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003802</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38689414</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Groin - surgery ; Humans ; Ischemia - etiology ; Ischemia - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy - methods ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods ; Wound Healing</subject><ispartof>Annals of plastic surgery, 2024-05, Vol.92 (5S Suppl 3), p.S331-S335</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-8abe3b3a200e7c78f166b053a81c36802d682e79435dbaa314dd5e54b483d6173</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38689414$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yin, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gursky, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falade, Israel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knox, Jacquelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez-Sanchez, Clara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soroudi, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piper, Merisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Scott L</creatorcontrib><title>The Utility of Prevena Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Groin Incisions for Critical Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Single Institution Experience</title><title>Annals of plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><description>Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) is an adjunctive treatment that uses constant negative pressure suction to facilitate healing. The utility of this treatment modality on vascular operations for critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) has yet to be elucidated. This study compares the incidence of postoperative wound complications between the Prevena Incision Management System, a type of iNPWT, and standard wound dressings for vascular patients who also underwent plastic surgery closure of groin incisions for CLTI. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 40 patients with CLTI who underwent 53 open vascular surgeries with subsequent sartorius muscle flap closure. Patient demographics, intraoperative details, and wound complications were measured from 2015 to 2018 at the University of California San Francisco. Two cohorts were generated based on the modality of postoperative wound management and compared on wound healing outcomes. Of the 53 groin incisions, 29 were managed with standard dressings, and 24 received iNPWT. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Patients who received iNPWT had a significantly lower rate of infection (8.33% vs 31.0%, P = 0.04) and dehiscence (0% vs 41.3%, P &lt; 0.01). Furthermore, the iNPWT group had a significantly lower rate of reoperation (0% vs 17.2%, P = 0.03) for wound complications within 30 days compared with the control group and a moderately reduced rate of readmission (4.17% vs 20.7%, P = 0.08). Rates of infection, reoperation, and dehiscence were significantly reduced in patients whose groin incisions were managed with iNPWT compared with standard wound care. Readmission rates were also decreased, but this difference was not statistically significant. Our results suggest that implementing iNPWT for the management of groin incisions, particularly in patients undergoing vascular operations for CLTI, may significantly improve clinical outcomes.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Groin - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ischemia - etiology</subject><subject>Ischemia - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Wound Healing</subject><issn>0148-7043</issn><issn>1536-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkV9LwzAUxYMobv75BiJ59KWaNGma-TaGzsFQwYmPJU1vt0ibziQV9zH8xmZMRbwvFw6_cy-cg9AZJZeUjPKrp_HjJfkzTJJ0Dw1pxkTCciL30ZBQLpOccDZAR96_EkJTycUhGjAp5IhTPkSfixXg52AaEza4q_Gjg3ewCt_DUgXzDlvB-94Bful6W-GIO7WOqMVT1xmLZ1Ybbzrrcd05PHEmGK0aPDdtmSxWDlQAa-wSz7xeQWvUNR7jpyg0EK0-mNCH6MY3H2twBqyGE3RQq8bD6fc-Rs-3N4vJXTJ_mM4m43mi00yERKoSWMlUSgjkOpc1FaIkGVOSaiZiFpWQKeQjzrKqVIpRXlUZZLzkklWC5uwYXezurl331oMPRWu8hqZRFrreF4zwUZ4SydOI8h2qXee9g7pYO9MqtykoKbZlFLGM4n8Z0Xb-_aEvW6h-TT_psy_jv4Yr</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Yin, Raymond</creator><creator>Gursky, Alexis</creator><creator>Falade, Israel</creator><creator>Knox, Jacquelyn</creator><creator>Gomez-Sanchez, Clara</creator><creator>Soroudi, Daniel</creator><creator>Piper, Merisa</creator><creator>Hoffman, William</creator><creator>Hansen, Scott L</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>The Utility of Prevena Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Groin Incisions for Critical Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Single Institution Experience</title><author>Yin, Raymond ; Gursky, Alexis ; Falade, Israel ; Knox, Jacquelyn ; Gomez-Sanchez, Clara ; Soroudi, Daniel ; Piper, Merisa ; Hoffman, William ; Hansen, Scott L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-8abe3b3a200e7c78f166b053a81c36802d682e79435dbaa314dd5e54b483d6173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Groin - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ischemia - etiology</topic><topic>Ischemia - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Wound Healing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yin, Raymond</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gursky, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falade, Israel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knox, Jacquelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez-Sanchez, Clara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soroudi, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piper, Merisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoffman, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hansen, Scott L</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yin, Raymond</au><au>Gursky, Alexis</au><au>Falade, Israel</au><au>Knox, Jacquelyn</au><au>Gomez-Sanchez, Clara</au><au>Soroudi, Daniel</au><au>Piper, Merisa</au><au>Hoffman, William</au><au>Hansen, Scott L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Utility of Prevena Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Groin Incisions for Critical Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Single Institution Experience</atitle><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>5S Suppl 3</issue><spage>S331</spage><epage>S335</epage><pages>S331-S335</pages><issn>0148-7043</issn><eissn>1536-3708</eissn><abstract>Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) is an adjunctive treatment that uses constant negative pressure suction to facilitate healing. The utility of this treatment modality on vascular operations for critical limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) has yet to be elucidated. This study compares the incidence of postoperative wound complications between the Prevena Incision Management System, a type of iNPWT, and standard wound dressings for vascular patients who also underwent plastic surgery closure of groin incisions for CLTI. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 40 patients with CLTI who underwent 53 open vascular surgeries with subsequent sartorius muscle flap closure. Patient demographics, intraoperative details, and wound complications were measured from 2015 to 2018 at the University of California San Francisco. Two cohorts were generated based on the modality of postoperative wound management and compared on wound healing outcomes. Of the 53 groin incisions, 29 were managed with standard dressings, and 24 received iNPWT. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. Patients who received iNPWT had a significantly lower rate of infection (8.33% vs 31.0%, P = 0.04) and dehiscence (0% vs 41.3%, P &lt; 0.01). Furthermore, the iNPWT group had a significantly lower rate of reoperation (0% vs 17.2%, P = 0.03) for wound complications within 30 days compared with the control group and a moderately reduced rate of readmission (4.17% vs 20.7%, P = 0.08). Rates of infection, reoperation, and dehiscence were significantly reduced in patients whose groin incisions were managed with iNPWT compared with standard wound care. Readmission rates were also decreased, but this difference was not statistically significant. Our results suggest that implementing iNPWT for the management of groin incisions, particularly in patients undergoing vascular operations for CLTI, may significantly improve clinical outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>38689414</pmid><doi>10.1097/SAP.0000000000003802</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-7043
ispartof Annals of plastic surgery, 2024-05, Vol.92 (5S Suppl 3), p.S331-S335
issn 0148-7043
1536-3708
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3049720842
source MEDLINE; Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Aged
Cohort Studies
Female
Groin - surgery
Humans
Ischemia - etiology
Ischemia - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy - methods
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Retrospective Studies
Vascular Surgical Procedures - methods
Wound Healing
title The Utility of Prevena Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Groin Incisions for Critical Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Single Institution Experience
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T12%3A13%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Utility%20of%20Prevena%20Negative%20Pressure%20Wound%20Therapy%20on%20Groin%20Incisions%20for%20Critical%20Limb-Threatening%20Ischemia:%20A%20Single%20Institution%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Yin,%20Raymond&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=5S%20Suppl%203&rft.spage=S331&rft.epage=S335&rft.pages=S331-S335&rft.issn=0148-7043&rft.eissn=1536-3708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SAP.0000000000003802&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3049720842%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3049720842&rft_id=info:pmid/38689414&rfr_iscdi=true