A Scoping Review of Innervated Breast Reconstruction

After breast surgery, patients experience significant alterations to breast sensation, which can diminish quality of life. Nerve coaptation technique, introduced in the 1990s, has gained traction in recent years. We performed a scoping review of the literature to determine the available outcomes in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of plastic surgery 2024-05, Vol.92 (5), p.591-596
Hauptverfasser: Raman, Shreya, Daniele, Edward, Daniele, Karla Annette, Choudhary, Akriti, Purnell, Chad A, Ranzer, Matthew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 596
container_issue 5
container_start_page 591
container_title Annals of plastic surgery
container_volume 92
creator Raman, Shreya
Daniele, Edward
Daniele, Karla Annette
Choudhary, Akriti
Purnell, Chad A
Ranzer, Matthew
description After breast surgery, patients experience significant alterations to breast sensation, which can diminish quality of life. Nerve coaptation technique, introduced in the 1990s, has gained traction in recent years. We performed a scoping review of the literature to determine the available outcomes in sensate breast reconstruction. The review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews statement guidelines. EMBASE and PubMed databases were queried using standardized terminology. Studies were included if they reported original sensory outcomes following innervation techniques during breast reconstruction and were published from January 1, 1990, to April 18, 2022. Data extraction and analyses were performed on Microsoft Excel. From 602 screened articles, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. Innervated autologous reconstructive procedures were described in 24, whereas the remaining 3 (all published after 2019) described direct reinnervation of the nipple-areola complex. Most (88.9%) of the studies comparing innervated versus noninnervated reconstruction reported improved sensory outcomes in at least 1 modality. Two studies investigated patient-reported outcomes using validated questionnaires, both of which reported improvement with innervated reconstruction. Sensate breast reconstruction has the potential to improve outcomes for patients. There is a recent progressive increase in studies involving direct nipple-areolar reinnervation. Larger, prospective studies are needed to better characterize the quality-of-life outcome using validated scales, as well as evaluate sensory and patient-reported outcomes with implant and autologous reconstruction.
doi_str_mv 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003832
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3049718725</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3049718725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-c7683db5a29ec46ea597d10e9fe8aa4a15439685f9cd3db5fa0310ecd08eace33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkMFOwzAQRC0EoqXwBwjlyCXFztqxfSxVgUqVQBTOlutsUFATFzsp4u9J1YIQe9nDzOyOHiGXjI4Z1fJmOXka0z8DCrIjMmQC8hQkVcdkSBlXqaQcBuQsxndKWaZ4fkoGoHIluNZDwifJ0vlN1bwlz7it8DPxZTJvGgxb22KR3Aa0se0155vYhs61lW_OyUlp1xEvDntEXu9mL9OHdPF4P59OFqnLRN6mTuYKipWwmUbHc7RCy4JR1CUqa7llgoPui5TaFTtfaSn0siuoQusQYESu93c3wX90GFtTV9Hhem0b9F00QLmWTMlM9Fa-t7rgYwxYmk2oahu-DKNmx8v0vMx_Xn3s6vChW9VY_IZ-AME3yv5lcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3049718725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Scoping Review of Innervated Breast Reconstruction</title><source>Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Raman, Shreya ; Daniele, Edward ; Daniele, Karla Annette ; Choudhary, Akriti ; Purnell, Chad A ; Ranzer, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Raman, Shreya ; Daniele, Edward ; Daniele, Karla Annette ; Choudhary, Akriti ; Purnell, Chad A ; Ranzer, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>After breast surgery, patients experience significant alterations to breast sensation, which can diminish quality of life. Nerve coaptation technique, introduced in the 1990s, has gained traction in recent years. We performed a scoping review of the literature to determine the available outcomes in sensate breast reconstruction. The review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews statement guidelines. EMBASE and PubMed databases were queried using standardized terminology. Studies were included if they reported original sensory outcomes following innervation techniques during breast reconstruction and were published from January 1, 1990, to April 18, 2022. Data extraction and analyses were performed on Microsoft Excel. From 602 screened articles, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. Innervated autologous reconstructive procedures were described in 24, whereas the remaining 3 (all published after 2019) described direct reinnervation of the nipple-areola complex. Most (88.9%) of the studies comparing innervated versus noninnervated reconstruction reported improved sensory outcomes in at least 1 modality. Two studies investigated patient-reported outcomes using validated questionnaires, both of which reported improvement with innervated reconstruction. Sensate breast reconstruction has the potential to improve outcomes for patients. There is a recent progressive increase in studies involving direct nipple-areolar reinnervation. Larger, prospective studies are needed to better characterize the quality-of-life outcome using validated scales, as well as evaluate sensory and patient-reported outcomes with implant and autologous reconstruction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-7043</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-3708</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000003832</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38685499</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Breast - innervation ; Breast - surgery ; Breast Neoplasms - surgery ; Female ; Humans ; Mammaplasty - methods ; Mastectomy - methods ; Nipples - innervation ; Nipples - surgery ; Quality of Life</subject><ispartof>Annals of plastic surgery, 2024-05, Vol.92 (5), p.591-596</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-c7683db5a29ec46ea597d10e9fe8aa4a15439685f9cd3db5fa0310ecd08eace33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38685499$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raman, Shreya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniele, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniele, Karla Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhary, Akriti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purnell, Chad A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranzer, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>A Scoping Review of Innervated Breast Reconstruction</title><title>Annals of plastic surgery</title><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><description>After breast surgery, patients experience significant alterations to breast sensation, which can diminish quality of life. Nerve coaptation technique, introduced in the 1990s, has gained traction in recent years. We performed a scoping review of the literature to determine the available outcomes in sensate breast reconstruction. The review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews statement guidelines. EMBASE and PubMed databases were queried using standardized terminology. Studies were included if they reported original sensory outcomes following innervation techniques during breast reconstruction and were published from January 1, 1990, to April 18, 2022. Data extraction and analyses were performed on Microsoft Excel. From 602 screened articles, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. Innervated autologous reconstructive procedures were described in 24, whereas the remaining 3 (all published after 2019) described direct reinnervation of the nipple-areola complex. Most (88.9%) of the studies comparing innervated versus noninnervated reconstruction reported improved sensory outcomes in at least 1 modality. Two studies investigated patient-reported outcomes using validated questionnaires, both of which reported improvement with innervated reconstruction. Sensate breast reconstruction has the potential to improve outcomes for patients. There is a recent progressive increase in studies involving direct nipple-areolar reinnervation. Larger, prospective studies are needed to better characterize the quality-of-life outcome using validated scales, as well as evaluate sensory and patient-reported outcomes with implant and autologous reconstruction.</description><subject>Breast - innervation</subject><subject>Breast - surgery</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mammaplasty - methods</subject><subject>Mastectomy - methods</subject><subject>Nipples - innervation</subject><subject>Nipples - surgery</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><issn>0148-7043</issn><issn>1536-3708</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkMFOwzAQRC0EoqXwBwjlyCXFztqxfSxVgUqVQBTOlutsUFATFzsp4u9J1YIQe9nDzOyOHiGXjI4Z1fJmOXka0z8DCrIjMmQC8hQkVcdkSBlXqaQcBuQsxndKWaZ4fkoGoHIluNZDwifJ0vlN1bwlz7it8DPxZTJvGgxb22KR3Aa0se0155vYhs61lW_OyUlp1xEvDntEXu9mL9OHdPF4P59OFqnLRN6mTuYKipWwmUbHc7RCy4JR1CUqa7llgoPui5TaFTtfaSn0siuoQusQYESu93c3wX90GFtTV9Hhem0b9F00QLmWTMlM9Fa-t7rgYwxYmk2oahu-DKNmx8v0vMx_Xn3s6vChW9VY_IZ-AME3yv5lcQ</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Raman, Shreya</creator><creator>Daniele, Edward</creator><creator>Daniele, Karla Annette</creator><creator>Choudhary, Akriti</creator><creator>Purnell, Chad A</creator><creator>Ranzer, Matthew</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>A Scoping Review of Innervated Breast Reconstruction</title><author>Raman, Shreya ; Daniele, Edward ; Daniele, Karla Annette ; Choudhary, Akriti ; Purnell, Chad A ; Ranzer, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-c7683db5a29ec46ea597d10e9fe8aa4a15439685f9cd3db5fa0310ecd08eace33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Breast - innervation</topic><topic>Breast - surgery</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mammaplasty - methods</topic><topic>Mastectomy - methods</topic><topic>Nipples - innervation</topic><topic>Nipples - surgery</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raman, Shreya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniele, Edward</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daniele, Karla Annette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhary, Akriti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purnell, Chad A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranzer, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raman, Shreya</au><au>Daniele, Edward</au><au>Daniele, Karla Annette</au><au>Choudhary, Akriti</au><au>Purnell, Chad A</au><au>Ranzer, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Scoping Review of Innervated Breast Reconstruction</atitle><jtitle>Annals of plastic surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Plast Surg</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>92</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>591</spage><epage>596</epage><pages>591-596</pages><issn>0148-7043</issn><eissn>1536-3708</eissn><abstract>After breast surgery, patients experience significant alterations to breast sensation, which can diminish quality of life. Nerve coaptation technique, introduced in the 1990s, has gained traction in recent years. We performed a scoping review of the literature to determine the available outcomes in sensate breast reconstruction. The review was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews statement guidelines. EMBASE and PubMed databases were queried using standardized terminology. Studies were included if they reported original sensory outcomes following innervation techniques during breast reconstruction and were published from January 1, 1990, to April 18, 2022. Data extraction and analyses were performed on Microsoft Excel. From 602 screened articles, 27 studies met the inclusion criteria. Innervated autologous reconstructive procedures were described in 24, whereas the remaining 3 (all published after 2019) described direct reinnervation of the nipple-areola complex. Most (88.9%) of the studies comparing innervated versus noninnervated reconstruction reported improved sensory outcomes in at least 1 modality. Two studies investigated patient-reported outcomes using validated questionnaires, both of which reported improvement with innervated reconstruction. Sensate breast reconstruction has the potential to improve outcomes for patients. There is a recent progressive increase in studies involving direct nipple-areolar reinnervation. Larger, prospective studies are needed to better characterize the quality-of-life outcome using validated scales, as well as evaluate sensory and patient-reported outcomes with implant and autologous reconstruction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>38685499</pmid><doi>10.1097/SAP.0000000000003832</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-7043
ispartof Annals of plastic surgery, 2024-05, Vol.92 (5), p.591-596
issn 0148-7043
1536-3708
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3049718725
source Journals@Ovid Ovid Autoload; MEDLINE
subjects Breast - innervation
Breast - surgery
Breast Neoplasms - surgery
Female
Humans
Mammaplasty - methods
Mastectomy - methods
Nipples - innervation
Nipples - surgery
Quality of Life
title A Scoping Review of Innervated Breast Reconstruction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A19%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Scoping%20Review%20of%20Innervated%20Breast%20Reconstruction&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20plastic%20surgery&rft.au=Raman,%20Shreya&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=92&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=591&rft.epage=596&rft.pages=591-596&rft.issn=0148-7043&rft.eissn=1536-3708&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/SAP.0000000000003832&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3049718725%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3049718725&rft_id=info:pmid/38685499&rfr_iscdi=true