Comparison of diclofenac with tramadol, tizanidine or placebo in the treatment of acute low back pain and sciatica: multi-center randomized controlled trial

Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide and has posed numerous health and socioeconomic challenges. This study compared whether nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in combination with tramadol, tizanidine or placebo would be the best treatment regime to improve the R...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Postgraduate medical journal 2024-09, Vol.100 (1188), p.741-750
Hauptverfasser: Hung, Kevin K C, Lam, Rex P K, Lee, Herman K H, Choi, Yu Fai, Tenney, Justin, Zuo, Zhong, Chong, Marc K C, Hui, Theresa S I, Wong, Tak Kan, Yiu, Tsz Ying, Chan, Suet Yi, Mok, Catherine P Y, Leung, Ling Yan, Mak, Wai Kit, Sun, David T F, Cheng, Chi Hung, Graham, Colin A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 750
container_issue 1188
container_start_page 741
container_title Postgraduate medical journal
container_volume 100
creator Hung, Kevin K C
Lam, Rex P K
Lee, Herman K H
Choi, Yu Fai
Tenney, Justin
Zuo, Zhong
Chong, Marc K C
Hui, Theresa S I
Wong, Tak Kan
Yiu, Tsz Ying
Chan, Suet Yi
Mok, Catherine P Y
Leung, Ling Yan
Mak, Wai Kit
Sun, David T F
Cheng, Chi Hung
Graham, Colin A
description Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide and has posed numerous health and socioeconomic challenges. This study compared whether nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in combination with tramadol, tizanidine or placebo would be the best treatment regime to improve the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) scores at 1 week. This was a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial including adult patients with acute LBP and sciatica in three emergency departments in Hong Kong. Patients were randomized to the receive tramadol 50 mg, tizanidine 2 mg, or placebo every 6 hours for 2 weeks in a 1:1:1 ratio. The RMDQ and other secondary outcomes were measured at baseline, Day 2, 7, 14, 21, and 28. Data were analyzed on an intention to treat basis. Crude and adjusted mean differences in the changes of RMDQ and NRS scores from baseline to Day 7 between tizanidine/tramadol and placebo were determined with 95% confidence intervals. Two hundred and ninety-one patients were analyzed with the mean age of 47.4 years and 57.7% were male. The primary outcome of mean difference in RMDQs on Day 7 (compared with baseline) was non-significant for tizanidine compared with placebo (adjusted mean difference - 0.56, 95% CI -2.48 to 1.37) and tramadol compared with placebo (adjusted mean difference - 0.85, 95% CI -2.80 to 1.10). Only 23.7% were fully compliant to the treatment allocated. Complier Average Causal Effect analysis also showed no difference in the primary outcome for the tizanidine and tramadol versus placebo. Among patients with acute LBP and sciatica presenting to the ED, adding tramadol or tizanidine to diclofenac did not improve functional recovery.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/postmj/qgae052
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3048493647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3048493647</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c180t-42c216769c0b33666a2f88a6511d0898b6a6f5a19852d2c07e622ba870f255953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kU1v1DAQhi0EosvClSPykUPT-iN2HG5oRQGpEhd6jibOhLr4I7UdVfS39MeSahdOM9I873uYh5D3nF1w1svLJZUa7i7vfwEyJV6QHW9137BO6Zdkx5gUjWo7eUbelHLHGJddy1-TM2l01xtmduTpkMIC2ZUUaZrp5KxPM0aw9MHVW1ozBJiSP6fVPUJ0k4tIU6aLB4tjoi7SeosbhlADxvrcAXatSH16oCPY33SBDYI40WIdVGfhEw2rr66xG4-Z5u2WgnvEidoUa07eb2vNDvxb8moGX_Ddae7JzdWXn4dvzfWPr98Pn68byw2rTSus4LrTvWWjlFprELMxoBXnEzO9GTXoWQHvjRKTsKxDLcQIpmOzUKpXck8-HnuXnO5XLHUIrlj0HiKmtQyStabtpd4-uScXR9TmVErGeViyC5D_DJwNz0aGo5HhZGQLfDh1r2PA6T_-T4H8C6Qyi-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3048493647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of diclofenac with tramadol, tizanidine or placebo in the treatment of acute low back pain and sciatica: multi-center randomized controlled trial</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Hung, Kevin K C ; Lam, Rex P K ; Lee, Herman K H ; Choi, Yu Fai ; Tenney, Justin ; Zuo, Zhong ; Chong, Marc K C ; Hui, Theresa S I ; Wong, Tak Kan ; Yiu, Tsz Ying ; Chan, Suet Yi ; Mok, Catherine P Y ; Leung, Ling Yan ; Mak, Wai Kit ; Sun, David T F ; Cheng, Chi Hung ; Graham, Colin A</creator><creatorcontrib>Hung, Kevin K C ; Lam, Rex P K ; Lee, Herman K H ; Choi, Yu Fai ; Tenney, Justin ; Zuo, Zhong ; Chong, Marc K C ; Hui, Theresa S I ; Wong, Tak Kan ; Yiu, Tsz Ying ; Chan, Suet Yi ; Mok, Catherine P Y ; Leung, Ling Yan ; Mak, Wai Kit ; Sun, David T F ; Cheng, Chi Hung ; Graham, Colin A</creatorcontrib><description>Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide and has posed numerous health and socioeconomic challenges. This study compared whether nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in combination with tramadol, tizanidine or placebo would be the best treatment regime to improve the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) scores at 1 week. This was a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial including adult patients with acute LBP and sciatica in three emergency departments in Hong Kong. Patients were randomized to the receive tramadol 50 mg, tizanidine 2 mg, or placebo every 6 hours for 2 weeks in a 1:1:1 ratio. The RMDQ and other secondary outcomes were measured at baseline, Day 2, 7, 14, 21, and 28. Data were analyzed on an intention to treat basis. Crude and adjusted mean differences in the changes of RMDQ and NRS scores from baseline to Day 7 between tizanidine/tramadol and placebo were determined with 95% confidence intervals. Two hundred and ninety-one patients were analyzed with the mean age of 47.4 years and 57.7% were male. The primary outcome of mean difference in RMDQs on Day 7 (compared with baseline) was non-significant for tizanidine compared with placebo (adjusted mean difference - 0.56, 95% CI -2.48 to 1.37) and tramadol compared with placebo (adjusted mean difference - 0.85, 95% CI -2.80 to 1.10). Only 23.7% were fully compliant to the treatment allocated. Complier Average Causal Effect analysis also showed no difference in the primary outcome for the tizanidine and tramadol versus placebo. Among patients with acute LBP and sciatica presenting to the ED, adding tramadol or tizanidine to diclofenac did not improve functional recovery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-5473</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1469-0756</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-0756</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/postmj/qgae052</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38679808</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>Postgraduate medical journal, 2024-09, Vol.100 (1188), p.741-750</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c180t-42c216769c0b33666a2f88a6511d0898b6a6f5a19852d2c07e622ba870f255953</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38679808$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hung, Kevin K C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Rex P K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Herman K H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yu Fai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tenney, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuo, Zhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Marc K C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Theresa S I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Tak Kan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiu, Tsz Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Suet Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mok, Catherine P Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Ling Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mak, Wai Kit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, David T F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Chi Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Colin A</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of diclofenac with tramadol, tizanidine or placebo in the treatment of acute low back pain and sciatica: multi-center randomized controlled trial</title><title>Postgraduate medical journal</title><addtitle>Postgrad Med J</addtitle><description>Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide and has posed numerous health and socioeconomic challenges. This study compared whether nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in combination with tramadol, tizanidine or placebo would be the best treatment regime to improve the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) scores at 1 week. This was a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial including adult patients with acute LBP and sciatica in three emergency departments in Hong Kong. Patients were randomized to the receive tramadol 50 mg, tizanidine 2 mg, or placebo every 6 hours for 2 weeks in a 1:1:1 ratio. The RMDQ and other secondary outcomes were measured at baseline, Day 2, 7, 14, 21, and 28. Data were analyzed on an intention to treat basis. Crude and adjusted mean differences in the changes of RMDQ and NRS scores from baseline to Day 7 between tizanidine/tramadol and placebo were determined with 95% confidence intervals. Two hundred and ninety-one patients were analyzed with the mean age of 47.4 years and 57.7% were male. The primary outcome of mean difference in RMDQs on Day 7 (compared with baseline) was non-significant for tizanidine compared with placebo (adjusted mean difference - 0.56, 95% CI -2.48 to 1.37) and tramadol compared with placebo (adjusted mean difference - 0.85, 95% CI -2.80 to 1.10). Only 23.7% were fully compliant to the treatment allocated. Complier Average Causal Effect analysis also showed no difference in the primary outcome for the tizanidine and tramadol versus placebo. Among patients with acute LBP and sciatica presenting to the ED, adding tramadol or tizanidine to diclofenac did not improve functional recovery.</description><issn>0032-5473</issn><issn>1469-0756</issn><issn>1469-0756</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kU1v1DAQhi0EosvClSPykUPT-iN2HG5oRQGpEhd6jibOhLr4I7UdVfS39MeSahdOM9I873uYh5D3nF1w1svLJZUa7i7vfwEyJV6QHW9137BO6Zdkx5gUjWo7eUbelHLHGJddy1-TM2l01xtmduTpkMIC2ZUUaZrp5KxPM0aw9MHVW1ozBJiSP6fVPUJ0k4tIU6aLB4tjoi7SeosbhlADxvrcAXatSH16oCPY33SBDYI40WIdVGfhEw2rr66xG4-Z5u2WgnvEidoUa07eb2vNDvxb8moGX_Ddae7JzdWXn4dvzfWPr98Pn68byw2rTSus4LrTvWWjlFprELMxoBXnEzO9GTXoWQHvjRKTsKxDLcQIpmOzUKpXck8-HnuXnO5XLHUIrlj0HiKmtQyStabtpd4-uScXR9TmVErGeViyC5D_DJwNz0aGo5HhZGQLfDh1r2PA6T_-T4H8C6Qyi-w</recordid><startdate>20240922</startdate><enddate>20240922</enddate><creator>Hung, Kevin K C</creator><creator>Lam, Rex P K</creator><creator>Lee, Herman K H</creator><creator>Choi, Yu Fai</creator><creator>Tenney, Justin</creator><creator>Zuo, Zhong</creator><creator>Chong, Marc K C</creator><creator>Hui, Theresa S I</creator><creator>Wong, Tak Kan</creator><creator>Yiu, Tsz Ying</creator><creator>Chan, Suet Yi</creator><creator>Mok, Catherine P Y</creator><creator>Leung, Ling Yan</creator><creator>Mak, Wai Kit</creator><creator>Sun, David T F</creator><creator>Cheng, Chi Hung</creator><creator>Graham, Colin A</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240922</creationdate><title>Comparison of diclofenac with tramadol, tizanidine or placebo in the treatment of acute low back pain and sciatica: multi-center randomized controlled trial</title><author>Hung, Kevin K C ; Lam, Rex P K ; Lee, Herman K H ; Choi, Yu Fai ; Tenney, Justin ; Zuo, Zhong ; Chong, Marc K C ; Hui, Theresa S I ; Wong, Tak Kan ; Yiu, Tsz Ying ; Chan, Suet Yi ; Mok, Catherine P Y ; Leung, Ling Yan ; Mak, Wai Kit ; Sun, David T F ; Cheng, Chi Hung ; Graham, Colin A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c180t-42c216769c0b33666a2f88a6511d0898b6a6f5a19852d2c07e622ba870f255953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hung, Kevin K C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Rex P K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Herman K H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choi, Yu Fai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tenney, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuo, Zhong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Marc K C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hui, Theresa S I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Tak Kan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yiu, Tsz Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Suet Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mok, Catherine P Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leung, Ling Yan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mak, Wai Kit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, David T F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Chi Hung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Colin A</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Postgraduate medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hung, Kevin K C</au><au>Lam, Rex P K</au><au>Lee, Herman K H</au><au>Choi, Yu Fai</au><au>Tenney, Justin</au><au>Zuo, Zhong</au><au>Chong, Marc K C</au><au>Hui, Theresa S I</au><au>Wong, Tak Kan</au><au>Yiu, Tsz Ying</au><au>Chan, Suet Yi</au><au>Mok, Catherine P Y</au><au>Leung, Ling Yan</au><au>Mak, Wai Kit</au><au>Sun, David T F</au><au>Cheng, Chi Hung</au><au>Graham, Colin A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of diclofenac with tramadol, tizanidine or placebo in the treatment of acute low back pain and sciatica: multi-center randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Postgraduate medical journal</jtitle><addtitle>Postgrad Med J</addtitle><date>2024-09-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>1188</issue><spage>741</spage><epage>750</epage><pages>741-750</pages><issn>0032-5473</issn><issn>1469-0756</issn><eissn>1469-0756</eissn><abstract>Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide and has posed numerous health and socioeconomic challenges. This study compared whether nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in combination with tramadol, tizanidine or placebo would be the best treatment regime to improve the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) scores at 1 week. This was a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled trial including adult patients with acute LBP and sciatica in three emergency departments in Hong Kong. Patients were randomized to the receive tramadol 50 mg, tizanidine 2 mg, or placebo every 6 hours for 2 weeks in a 1:1:1 ratio. The RMDQ and other secondary outcomes were measured at baseline, Day 2, 7, 14, 21, and 28. Data were analyzed on an intention to treat basis. Crude and adjusted mean differences in the changes of RMDQ and NRS scores from baseline to Day 7 between tizanidine/tramadol and placebo were determined with 95% confidence intervals. Two hundred and ninety-one patients were analyzed with the mean age of 47.4 years and 57.7% were male. The primary outcome of mean difference in RMDQs on Day 7 (compared with baseline) was non-significant for tizanidine compared with placebo (adjusted mean difference - 0.56, 95% CI -2.48 to 1.37) and tramadol compared with placebo (adjusted mean difference - 0.85, 95% CI -2.80 to 1.10). Only 23.7% were fully compliant to the treatment allocated. Complier Average Causal Effect analysis also showed no difference in the primary outcome for the tizanidine and tramadol versus placebo. Among patients with acute LBP and sciatica presenting to the ED, adding tramadol or tizanidine to diclofenac did not improve functional recovery.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>38679808</pmid><doi>10.1093/postmj/qgae052</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-5473
ispartof Postgraduate medical journal, 2024-09, Vol.100 (1188), p.741-750
issn 0032-5473
1469-0756
1469-0756
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3048493647
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
title Comparison of diclofenac with tramadol, tizanidine or placebo in the treatment of acute low back pain and sciatica: multi-center randomized controlled trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A21%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20diclofenac%20with%20tramadol,%20tizanidine%20or%20placebo%20in%20the%20treatment%20of%20acute%20low%20back%20pain%20and%20sciatica:%20multi-center%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Postgraduate%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Hung,%20Kevin%20K%20C&rft.date=2024-09-22&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=1188&rft.spage=741&rft.epage=750&rft.pages=741-750&rft.issn=0032-5473&rft.eissn=1469-0756&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/postmj/qgae052&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3048493647%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3048493647&rft_id=info:pmid/38679808&rfr_iscdi=true