Comparative Outcomes for Microvascular Free Flap Monitoring Outside the Intensive Care Unit
Objective There is a trend towards nonintensive care unit (ICU) or specialty ward management of select patients. Here, we examine postoperative outcomes for patients transferred to a general ward following microvascular free flap (FF) reconstruction of the head and neck. Study Design Retrospective q...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery 2024-08, Vol.171 (2), p.381-386 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 386 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 381 |
container_title | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery |
container_volume | 171 |
creator | Stevens, Madelyn N. Prasad, Kavita Sharma, Rahul K. Gallant, Jean‐Nicolas Habib, Daniel R. S. Langerman, Alexander Mannion, Kyle Rosenthal, Eben Topf, Michael C. Rohde, Sarah L. |
description | Objective
There is a trend towards nonintensive care unit (ICU) or specialty ward management of select patients. Here, we examine postoperative outcomes for patients transferred to a general ward following microvascular free flap (FF) reconstruction of the head and neck.
Study Design
Retrospective quality control study.
Setting
Single tertiary care center.
Methods
Consecutive patients who underwent FF of the head and neck before and after a change in protocol from immediate postoperative monitoring in the ICU (“Pre‐protocol”) to the general ward setting (“Post‐protocol”). Outcomes included overall length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, FF compromise, and postoperative complications.
Results
A total of 150 patients were included, 70 in the pre‐protocol group and 80 in the post‐protocol group. There were no significant differences in age, sex, comorbidities, tumor stage, or type of FF. Mean LOS decreased from 8.18 to 7.68 days (P = .4), and mean ICU LOS decreased significantly from 5.2 to 1.7 days (P .9). There was a non‐significant increase in ancillary consults in the post‐protocol group (45% vs 33%, P = .13) and a significant increase in rapid response team calls, a nurse‐driven safety net for abnormal vitals or mental status (19% vs 3%, P = .003).
Conclusion
We show the successful implementation of a protocol shifting care of FF patients from the ICU to a general ward postoperatively, suggesting management on the floor with less frequent flap monitoring is safe and conserves ICU beds. Additional teaching and familiarity with these patients may over time reduce the rapid response calls. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ohn.780 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3047942881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3047942881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3120-e5b4c5565c6870bb1ce26f5a841eb88824bfece0a6ff2c7b0cc23577f7f8f44f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EFLwzAYxvEgiptT_AaSm4J0Jm3apEcpzg02d3EnDyXN3rhI29Sknezb2zL15ik5_PjD-yB0TcmUEhI-2F095YKcoDElKQ8SQfkpGhOasiBOUzFCF95_EEKShPNzNIrE8GHpGL1ltmqkk63ZA153rbIVeKytwyujnN1Lr7pSOjxzAHhWygavbG1a60z9PnhvtoDbHeBF3ULth0omHeBNjy7RmZalh6ufd4I2s6fXbB4s18-L7HEZqIiGJIC4YCqOk1glgpOioArCRMdSMAqFECJkhQYFRCZah4oXRKkwijnXXAvNmI4m6O7YbZz97MC3eWW8grKUNdjO5xFhPGWhELSnt0fa3-a9A503zlTSHXJK8mHJvF8y75fs5c1PtCsq2P653-l6cH8EX6aEw3-dfD1_GXLf6y19WA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3047942881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Outcomes for Microvascular Free Flap Monitoring Outside the Intensive Care Unit</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Stevens, Madelyn N. ; Prasad, Kavita ; Sharma, Rahul K. ; Gallant, Jean‐Nicolas ; Habib, Daniel R. S. ; Langerman, Alexander ; Mannion, Kyle ; Rosenthal, Eben ; Topf, Michael C. ; Rohde, Sarah L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Madelyn N. ; Prasad, Kavita ; Sharma, Rahul K. ; Gallant, Jean‐Nicolas ; Habib, Daniel R. S. ; Langerman, Alexander ; Mannion, Kyle ; Rosenthal, Eben ; Topf, Michael C. ; Rohde, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
There is a trend towards nonintensive care unit (ICU) or specialty ward management of select patients. Here, we examine postoperative outcomes for patients transferred to a general ward following microvascular free flap (FF) reconstruction of the head and neck.
Study Design
Retrospective quality control study.
Setting
Single tertiary care center.
Methods
Consecutive patients who underwent FF of the head and neck before and after a change in protocol from immediate postoperative monitoring in the ICU (“Pre‐protocol”) to the general ward setting (“Post‐protocol”). Outcomes included overall length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, FF compromise, and postoperative complications.
Results
A total of 150 patients were included, 70 in the pre‐protocol group and 80 in the post‐protocol group. There were no significant differences in age, sex, comorbidities, tumor stage, or type of FF. Mean LOS decreased from 8.18 to 7.68 days (P = .4), and mean ICU LOS decreased significantly from 5.2 to 1.7 days (P < .01). There were no significant differences in postoperative or airway‐related complications (P = .6) or FF failure rate (2.9% vs 2.6%, P > .9). There was a non‐significant increase in ancillary consults in the post‐protocol group (45% vs 33%, P = .13) and a significant increase in rapid response team calls, a nurse‐driven safety net for abnormal vitals or mental status (19% vs 3%, P = .003).
Conclusion
We show the successful implementation of a protocol shifting care of FF patients from the ICU to a general ward postoperatively, suggesting management on the floor with less frequent flap monitoring is safe and conserves ICU beds. Additional teaching and familiarity with these patients may over time reduce the rapid response calls.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0194-5998</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6817</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6817</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ohn.780</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38667749</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Female ; free flap monitoring ; Free Tissue Flaps - blood supply ; head and neck ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery ; Humans ; Intensive Care Units ; Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data ; Male ; microvascular free flap ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring, Physiologic - methods ; Plastic Surgery Procedures - methods ; Postoperative Care - methods ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2024-08, Vol.171 (2), p.381-386</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3120-e5b4c5565c6870bb1ce26f5a841eb88824bfece0a6ff2c7b0cc23577f7f8f44f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9315-4866</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fohn.780$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fohn.780$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38667749$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Madelyn N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Kavita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Rahul K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallant, Jean‐Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habib, Daniel R. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langerman, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannion, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenthal, Eben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topf, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Outcomes for Microvascular Free Flap Monitoring Outside the Intensive Care Unit</title><title>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</title><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><description>Objective
There is a trend towards nonintensive care unit (ICU) or specialty ward management of select patients. Here, we examine postoperative outcomes for patients transferred to a general ward following microvascular free flap (FF) reconstruction of the head and neck.
Study Design
Retrospective quality control study.
Setting
Single tertiary care center.
Methods
Consecutive patients who underwent FF of the head and neck before and after a change in protocol from immediate postoperative monitoring in the ICU (“Pre‐protocol”) to the general ward setting (“Post‐protocol”). Outcomes included overall length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, FF compromise, and postoperative complications.
Results
A total of 150 patients were included, 70 in the pre‐protocol group and 80 in the post‐protocol group. There were no significant differences in age, sex, comorbidities, tumor stage, or type of FF. Mean LOS decreased from 8.18 to 7.68 days (P = .4), and mean ICU LOS decreased significantly from 5.2 to 1.7 days (P < .01). There were no significant differences in postoperative or airway‐related complications (P = .6) or FF failure rate (2.9% vs 2.6%, P > .9). There was a non‐significant increase in ancillary consults in the post‐protocol group (45% vs 33%, P = .13) and a significant increase in rapid response team calls, a nurse‐driven safety net for abnormal vitals or mental status (19% vs 3%, P = .003).
Conclusion
We show the successful implementation of a protocol shifting care of FF patients from the ICU to a general ward postoperatively, suggesting management on the floor with less frequent flap monitoring is safe and conserves ICU beds. Additional teaching and familiarity with these patients may over time reduce the rapid response calls.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>free flap monitoring</subject><subject>Free Tissue Flaps - blood supply</subject><subject>head and neck</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>microvascular free flap</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0194-5998</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10EFLwzAYxvEgiptT_AaSm4J0Jm3apEcpzg02d3EnDyXN3rhI29Sknezb2zL15ik5_PjD-yB0TcmUEhI-2F095YKcoDElKQ8SQfkpGhOasiBOUzFCF95_EEKShPNzNIrE8GHpGL1ltmqkk63ZA153rbIVeKytwyujnN1Lr7pSOjxzAHhWygavbG1a60z9PnhvtoDbHeBF3ULth0omHeBNjy7RmZalh6ufd4I2s6fXbB4s18-L7HEZqIiGJIC4YCqOk1glgpOioArCRMdSMAqFECJkhQYFRCZah4oXRKkwijnXXAvNmI4m6O7YbZz97MC3eWW8grKUNdjO5xFhPGWhELSnt0fa3-a9A503zlTSHXJK8mHJvF8y75fs5c1PtCsq2P653-l6cH8EX6aEw3-dfD1_GXLf6y19WA</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Stevens, Madelyn N.</creator><creator>Prasad, Kavita</creator><creator>Sharma, Rahul K.</creator><creator>Gallant, Jean‐Nicolas</creator><creator>Habib, Daniel R. S.</creator><creator>Langerman, Alexander</creator><creator>Mannion, Kyle</creator><creator>Rosenthal, Eben</creator><creator>Topf, Michael C.</creator><creator>Rohde, Sarah L.</creator><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9315-4866</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Comparative Outcomes for Microvascular Free Flap Monitoring Outside the Intensive Care Unit</title><author>Stevens, Madelyn N. ; Prasad, Kavita ; Sharma, Rahul K. ; Gallant, Jean‐Nicolas ; Habib, Daniel R. S. ; Langerman, Alexander ; Mannion, Kyle ; Rosenthal, Eben ; Topf, Michael C. ; Rohde, Sarah L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3120-e5b4c5565c6870bb1ce26f5a841eb88824bfece0a6ff2c7b0cc23577f7f8f44f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>free flap monitoring</topic><topic>Free Tissue Flaps - blood supply</topic><topic>head and neck</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>microvascular free flap</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - methods</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Madelyn N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Kavita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Rahul K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gallant, Jean‐Nicolas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habib, Daniel R. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langerman, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mannion, Kyle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenthal, Eben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Topf, Michael C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rohde, Sarah L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stevens, Madelyn N.</au><au>Prasad, Kavita</au><au>Sharma, Rahul K.</au><au>Gallant, Jean‐Nicolas</au><au>Habib, Daniel R. S.</au><au>Langerman, Alexander</au><au>Mannion, Kyle</au><au>Rosenthal, Eben</au><au>Topf, Michael C.</au><au>Rohde, Sarah L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Outcomes for Microvascular Free Flap Monitoring Outside the Intensive Care Unit</atitle><jtitle>Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>171</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>381</spage><epage>386</epage><pages>381-386</pages><issn>0194-5998</issn><issn>1097-6817</issn><eissn>1097-6817</eissn><abstract>Objective
There is a trend towards nonintensive care unit (ICU) or specialty ward management of select patients. Here, we examine postoperative outcomes for patients transferred to a general ward following microvascular free flap (FF) reconstruction of the head and neck.
Study Design
Retrospective quality control study.
Setting
Single tertiary care center.
Methods
Consecutive patients who underwent FF of the head and neck before and after a change in protocol from immediate postoperative monitoring in the ICU (“Pre‐protocol”) to the general ward setting (“Post‐protocol”). Outcomes included overall length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, FF compromise, and postoperative complications.
Results
A total of 150 patients were included, 70 in the pre‐protocol group and 80 in the post‐protocol group. There were no significant differences in age, sex, comorbidities, tumor stage, or type of FF. Mean LOS decreased from 8.18 to 7.68 days (P = .4), and mean ICU LOS decreased significantly from 5.2 to 1.7 days (P < .01). There were no significant differences in postoperative or airway‐related complications (P = .6) or FF failure rate (2.9% vs 2.6%, P > .9). There was a non‐significant increase in ancillary consults in the post‐protocol group (45% vs 33%, P = .13) and a significant increase in rapid response team calls, a nurse‐driven safety net for abnormal vitals or mental status (19% vs 3%, P = .003).
Conclusion
We show the successful implementation of a protocol shifting care of FF patients from the ICU to a general ward postoperatively, suggesting management on the floor with less frequent flap monitoring is safe and conserves ICU beds. Additional teaching and familiarity with these patients may over time reduce the rapid response calls.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>38667749</pmid><doi>10.1002/ohn.780</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9315-4866</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0194-5998 |
ispartof | Otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, 2024-08, Vol.171 (2), p.381-386 |
issn | 0194-5998 1097-6817 1097-6817 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3047942881 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Female free flap monitoring Free Tissue Flaps - blood supply head and neck Head and Neck Neoplasms - surgery Humans Intensive Care Units Length of Stay - statistics & numerical data Male microvascular free flap Middle Aged Monitoring, Physiologic - methods Plastic Surgery Procedures - methods Postoperative Care - methods Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Retrospective Studies Treatment Outcome |
title | Comparative Outcomes for Microvascular Free Flap Monitoring Outside the Intensive Care Unit |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T12%3A31%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Outcomes%20for%20Microvascular%20Free%20Flap%20Monitoring%20Outside%20the%20Intensive%20Care%20Unit&rft.jtitle=Otolaryngology-head%20and%20neck%20surgery&rft.au=Stevens,%20Madelyn%20N.&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=171&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=386&rft.pages=381-386&rft.issn=0194-5998&rft.eissn=1097-6817&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ohn.780&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3047942881%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3047942881&rft_id=info:pmid/38667749&rfr_iscdi=true |