We know that we don’t know: Children’s understanding of common ignorance in a coordination game

•Common ground is typically defined as what people know together (common knowledge).•It should also include what they do not know together (common ignorance).•We tested children’s ability to use four common knowledge/ignorance states.•4- to 8-year-olds played a novel coordination game with a partner...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental child psychology 2024-07, Vol.243, p.105930-105930, Article 105930
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Hao Lucy, Carpenter, Malinda, Gómez, Juan-Carlos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 105930
container_issue
container_start_page 105930
container_title Journal of experimental child psychology
container_volume 243
creator Liu, Hao Lucy
Carpenter, Malinda
Gómez, Juan-Carlos
description •Common ground is typically defined as what people know together (common knowledge).•It should also include what they do not know together (common ignorance).•We tested children’s ability to use four common knowledge/ignorance states.•4- to 8-year-olds played a novel coordination game with a partner.•The common ignorance states were more difficult than the common knowledge states. Common ground is the knowledge, beliefs, and suppositions shared between partners in an interaction. Previous research has focused extensively on what partners know they know together, that is, “common knowledge.” However, another important aspect of common ground is what partners know they do not know together, that is, “common ignorance.” A new coordination game was designed to investigate children’s use of common ignorance. Without communicating or seeing each other’s decisions, 4- to 8-year-olds needed to make the same decision as their partner about whether to try to retrieve a reward. To retrieve it, at least one of them needed to know a secret code. The knowledge/ignorance of both partners was ostensively manipulated by showing one partner, both partners, or neither partner the secret code in four conditions: common knowledge (both knew the code), common ignorance (neither partner knew the code), common privileged self knowledge (only children knew the code), and common privileged other knowledge (only their partner knew the code). Children’s decisions, latency, and uncertainty were coded. Results showed that the common ignorance states were generally more difficult than the common knowledge states. Unexpectedly, children at all ages had difficulty with coordinating when their partner knew the code but they themselves did not (common privileged other knowledge). This study shows that, along with common knowledge, common ignorance and common privileged self knowledge and other knowledge also play important roles in coordinating with others but may develop differently.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105930
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3043779350</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022096524000705</els_id><sourcerecordid>3043779350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-8dce7083ca272c306d5ada6ab9e68859e5afca7ee6c95c5b34149c6965e9cd563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EouXnAiyQl2xSnDh2EsQGVfxJldiAWFquPWkdGrvYCRU7rsH1OAkuLSxZjebNmye9D6GTlIxSkvLzZtSAWo4ykuVRYBUlO2iYkoonJGfFLhoSkmVJ3NkAHYTQEJKmPKf7aEDLOAtaDJF6Bvxi3Qp3c9nhFWDt7NfHZ_cjXuDx3Cy0h7UUcG81-NBJq42dYVdj5drWWWxm1nlpFWBjsYyq89EhOxNvM9nCEdqr5SLA8XYeoqeb68fxXTJ5uL0fX00SRUnRJaVWUJCSKpkVWZS4ZlJLLqcV8LJkFTBZK1kAcFUxxaY0T_NK8VgPKqUZp4fobJO79O61h9CJ1gQFi4W04PogKImli4oyEq3Zxqq8C8FDLZbetNK_i5SINVzRiDVcsYYrNnDj0-k2v5-2oP9efmlGw-XGALHlmwEvgjIQwWjjQXVCO_Nf_jfZzI2C</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3043779350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>We know that we don’t know: Children’s understanding of common ignorance in a coordination game</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liu, Hao Lucy ; Carpenter, Malinda ; Gómez, Juan-Carlos</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hao Lucy ; Carpenter, Malinda ; Gómez, Juan-Carlos</creatorcontrib><description>•Common ground is typically defined as what people know together (common knowledge).•It should also include what they do not know together (common ignorance).•We tested children’s ability to use four common knowledge/ignorance states.•4- to 8-year-olds played a novel coordination game with a partner.•The common ignorance states were more difficult than the common knowledge states. Common ground is the knowledge, beliefs, and suppositions shared between partners in an interaction. Previous research has focused extensively on what partners know they know together, that is, “common knowledge.” However, another important aspect of common ground is what partners know they do not know together, that is, “common ignorance.” A new coordination game was designed to investigate children’s use of common ignorance. Without communicating or seeing each other’s decisions, 4- to 8-year-olds needed to make the same decision as their partner about whether to try to retrieve a reward. To retrieve it, at least one of them needed to know a secret code. The knowledge/ignorance of both partners was ostensively manipulated by showing one partner, both partners, or neither partner the secret code in four conditions: common knowledge (both knew the code), common ignorance (neither partner knew the code), common privileged self knowledge (only children knew the code), and common privileged other knowledge (only their partner knew the code). Children’s decisions, latency, and uncertainty were coded. Results showed that the common ignorance states were generally more difficult than the common knowledge states. Unexpectedly, children at all ages had difficulty with coordinating when their partner knew the code but they themselves did not (common privileged other knowledge). This study shows that, along with common knowledge, common ignorance and common privileged self knowledge and other knowledge also play important roles in coordinating with others but may develop differently.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0457</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105930</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38643737</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Child ; Child Development - physiology ; Child, Preschool ; Common ground ; Common ignorance ; Common knowledge ; Comprehension ; Coordination game ; Decision Making ; Female ; Games, Experimental ; Humans ; Interpersonal Relations ; Knowledge ; Male</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental child psychology, 2024-07, Vol.243, p.105930-105930, Article 105930</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-8dce7083ca272c306d5ada6ab9e68859e5afca7ee6c95c5b34149c6965e9cd563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524000705$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38643737$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hao Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Malinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, Juan-Carlos</creatorcontrib><title>We know that we don’t know: Children’s understanding of common ignorance in a coordination game</title><title>Journal of experimental child psychology</title><addtitle>J Exp Child Psychol</addtitle><description>•Common ground is typically defined as what people know together (common knowledge).•It should also include what they do not know together (common ignorance).•We tested children’s ability to use four common knowledge/ignorance states.•4- to 8-year-olds played a novel coordination game with a partner.•The common ignorance states were more difficult than the common knowledge states. Common ground is the knowledge, beliefs, and suppositions shared between partners in an interaction. Previous research has focused extensively on what partners know they know together, that is, “common knowledge.” However, another important aspect of common ground is what partners know they do not know together, that is, “common ignorance.” A new coordination game was designed to investigate children’s use of common ignorance. Without communicating or seeing each other’s decisions, 4- to 8-year-olds needed to make the same decision as their partner about whether to try to retrieve a reward. To retrieve it, at least one of them needed to know a secret code. The knowledge/ignorance of both partners was ostensively manipulated by showing one partner, both partners, or neither partner the secret code in four conditions: common knowledge (both knew the code), common ignorance (neither partner knew the code), common privileged self knowledge (only children knew the code), and common privileged other knowledge (only their partner knew the code). Children’s decisions, latency, and uncertainty were coded. Results showed that the common ignorance states were generally more difficult than the common knowledge states. Unexpectedly, children at all ages had difficulty with coordinating when their partner knew the code but they themselves did not (common privileged other knowledge). This study shows that, along with common knowledge, common ignorance and common privileged self knowledge and other knowledge also play important roles in coordinating with others but may develop differently.</description><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Development - physiology</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Common ground</subject><subject>Common ignorance</subject><subject>Common knowledge</subject><subject>Comprehension</subject><subject>Coordination game</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Games, Experimental</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Male</subject><issn>0022-0965</issn><issn>1096-0457</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EouXnAiyQl2xSnDh2EsQGVfxJldiAWFquPWkdGrvYCRU7rsH1OAkuLSxZjebNmye9D6GTlIxSkvLzZtSAWo4ykuVRYBUlO2iYkoonJGfFLhoSkmVJ3NkAHYTQEJKmPKf7aEDLOAtaDJF6Bvxi3Qp3c9nhFWDt7NfHZ_cjXuDx3Cy0h7UUcG81-NBJq42dYVdj5drWWWxm1nlpFWBjsYyq89EhOxNvM9nCEdqr5SLA8XYeoqeb68fxXTJ5uL0fX00SRUnRJaVWUJCSKpkVWZS4ZlJLLqcV8LJkFTBZK1kAcFUxxaY0T_NK8VgPKqUZp4fobJO79O61h9CJ1gQFi4W04PogKImli4oyEq3Zxqq8C8FDLZbetNK_i5SINVzRiDVcsYYrNnDj0-k2v5-2oP9efmlGw-XGALHlmwEvgjIQwWjjQXVCO_Nf_jfZzI2C</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Liu, Hao Lucy</creator><creator>Carpenter, Malinda</creator><creator>Gómez, Juan-Carlos</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>We know that we don’t know: Children’s understanding of common ignorance in a coordination game</title><author>Liu, Hao Lucy ; Carpenter, Malinda ; Gómez, Juan-Carlos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-8dce7083ca272c306d5ada6ab9e68859e5afca7ee6c95c5b34149c6965e9cd563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Development - physiology</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Common ground</topic><topic>Common ignorance</topic><topic>Common knowledge</topic><topic>Comprehension</topic><topic>Coordination game</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Games, Experimental</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Male</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hao Lucy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Malinda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, Juan-Carlos</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental child psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Hao Lucy</au><au>Carpenter, Malinda</au><au>Gómez, Juan-Carlos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>We know that we don’t know: Children’s understanding of common ignorance in a coordination game</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental child psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Child Psychol</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>243</volume><spage>105930</spage><epage>105930</epage><pages>105930-105930</pages><artnum>105930</artnum><issn>0022-0965</issn><eissn>1096-0457</eissn><abstract>•Common ground is typically defined as what people know together (common knowledge).•It should also include what they do not know together (common ignorance).•We tested children’s ability to use four common knowledge/ignorance states.•4- to 8-year-olds played a novel coordination game with a partner.•The common ignorance states were more difficult than the common knowledge states. Common ground is the knowledge, beliefs, and suppositions shared between partners in an interaction. Previous research has focused extensively on what partners know they know together, that is, “common knowledge.” However, another important aspect of common ground is what partners know they do not know together, that is, “common ignorance.” A new coordination game was designed to investigate children’s use of common ignorance. Without communicating or seeing each other’s decisions, 4- to 8-year-olds needed to make the same decision as their partner about whether to try to retrieve a reward. To retrieve it, at least one of them needed to know a secret code. The knowledge/ignorance of both partners was ostensively manipulated by showing one partner, both partners, or neither partner the secret code in four conditions: common knowledge (both knew the code), common ignorance (neither partner knew the code), common privileged self knowledge (only children knew the code), and common privileged other knowledge (only their partner knew the code). Children’s decisions, latency, and uncertainty were coded. Results showed that the common ignorance states were generally more difficult than the common knowledge states. Unexpectedly, children at all ages had difficulty with coordinating when their partner knew the code but they themselves did not (common privileged other knowledge). This study shows that, along with common knowledge, common ignorance and common privileged self knowledge and other knowledge also play important roles in coordinating with others but may develop differently.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38643737</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105930</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0965
ispartof Journal of experimental child psychology, 2024-07, Vol.243, p.105930-105930, Article 105930
issn 0022-0965
1096-0457
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3043779350
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Child
Child Development - physiology
Child, Preschool
Common ground
Common ignorance
Common knowledge
Comprehension
Coordination game
Decision Making
Female
Games, Experimental
Humans
Interpersonal Relations
Knowledge
Male
title We know that we don’t know: Children’s understanding of common ignorance in a coordination game
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A50%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=We%20know%20that%20we%20don%E2%80%99t%20know:%20Children%E2%80%99s%20understanding%20of%20common%20ignorance%20in%20a%20coordination%20game&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20child%20psychology&rft.au=Liu,%20Hao%20Lucy&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=243&rft.spage=105930&rft.epage=105930&rft.pages=105930-105930&rft.artnum=105930&rft.issn=0022-0965&rft.eissn=1096-0457&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105930&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3043779350%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3043779350&rft_id=info:pmid/38643737&rft_els_id=S0022096524000705&rfr_iscdi=true