The effects of standing foot-transmitted vibration on self-reported discomfort ratings

BACKGROUND: Occupational foot-transmitted vibration (FTV) exposure is common in industries like mining, construction, and agriculture, often leading to acute and chronic injuries. Vibration assessments require technical expertise and equipment which can be costly for employers to perform. Alternativ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Work (Reading, Mass.) Mass.), 2024-05, Vol.78 (1), p.153-165
Hauptverfasser: Goggins, Katie A., Thompson, Taryn J., Lessel, Courtney E., Kelly, Elizabeth A., O’Hara, Dawson E.L., Eger, Tammy R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 165
container_issue 1
container_start_page 153
container_title Work (Reading, Mass.)
container_volume 78
creator Goggins, Katie A.
Thompson, Taryn J.
Lessel, Courtney E.
Kelly, Elizabeth A.
O’Hara, Dawson E.L.
Eger, Tammy R.
description BACKGROUND: Occupational foot-transmitted vibration (FTV) exposure is common in industries like mining, construction, and agriculture, often leading to acute and chronic injuries. Vibration assessments require technical expertise and equipment which can be costly for employers to perform. Alternatively, researchers have observed that self-reported discomfort can be used as an effective indicator of injury risk. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of standing FTV exposure on self-reported ratings of discomfort, and whether these subjective ratings differed by body area and exposure frequency. METHODS: Participants (n = 30) were randomly exposed to standing FTV at six frequencies (25, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 Hz) for 20–45 seconds. Following each exposure, participants rated discomfort on a scale of 0–9 in four body areas: head and neck (HN), upper body (UB), lower body (LB), and total body. RESULTS: Results indicated that participants experienced the most discomfort in the LB at higher frequencies (p  0.0167). The UB discomfort remained relatively low across all frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests a potential connection between resonant frequencies and discomfort, potentially indicating injury risk. Although self-reported discomfort is insufficient for directly assessing injury risk from FTV, it provides a simple method for monitoring potential musculoskeletal risks related to vibration exposure at resonant frequencies. While professional vibration assessment remains necessary, self-reported discomfort may act as an early indicated of vibration-induced injuries, aiding in implementing mitigation strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.3233/WOR-230491
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3043077789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.3233_WOR-230491</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3043077789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-5b534954a27c84a84cf2d89fb2d899799cccff9abf1082724273de88cae7a2690</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkF1LwzAUhoMoTqc3_gApeKEI0Xw0S3Ipwy8YDGTqZUnTZHaszUxSwX9vSqeCCOEk4Ty85_AAcILRFSWUXr_OnyChKJd4BxxgwRmUhKPd9EYMQykwG4HDEFYIIUKQ3AcjKiY5woIdgJfFm8mMtUbHkDmbhajaqm6XmXUuwuhVG5o6RlNlH3XpVaxdm6UTzNpCbzbO962qDto1Nn2yHmmX4QjsWbUO5nh7j8Hz3e1i-gBn8_vH6c0MaoomEbKS0VyyXBGuRa5Eri2phLRlXyWXUmttrVSlxUgQTnLCaWWE0MpwRSYSjcHFkLvx7r0zIRZN2sWs16o1rgtFskIR51z06NkfdOU636btEsWY5IIInKjLgdLeheCNLTa-bpT_LDAqettFsl0MthN8uo3sysZUP-i33gScD0BQS_M775-oL67mhmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3055978281</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effects of standing foot-transmitted vibration on self-reported discomfort ratings</title><creator>Goggins, Katie A. ; Thompson, Taryn J. ; Lessel, Courtney E. ; Kelly, Elizabeth A. ; O’Hara, Dawson E.L. ; Eger, Tammy R.</creator><contributor>Jacobs, Karen ; Soer, Remko</contributor><creatorcontrib>Goggins, Katie A. ; Thompson, Taryn J. ; Lessel, Courtney E. ; Kelly, Elizabeth A. ; O’Hara, Dawson E.L. ; Eger, Tammy R. ; Jacobs, Karen ; Soer, Remko</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Occupational foot-transmitted vibration (FTV) exposure is common in industries like mining, construction, and agriculture, often leading to acute and chronic injuries. Vibration assessments require technical expertise and equipment which can be costly for employers to perform. Alternatively, researchers have observed that self-reported discomfort can be used as an effective indicator of injury risk. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of standing FTV exposure on self-reported ratings of discomfort, and whether these subjective ratings differed by body area and exposure frequency. METHODS: Participants (n = 30) were randomly exposed to standing FTV at six frequencies (25, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 Hz) for 20–45 seconds. Following each exposure, participants rated discomfort on a scale of 0–9 in four body areas: head and neck (HN), upper body (UB), lower body (LB), and total body. RESULTS: Results indicated that participants experienced the most discomfort in the LB at higher frequencies (p &lt; 0.001), consistent with the resonance of foot structures. The HN discomfort tended to decrease as the exposure frequency increased, although not statistically significant (p &gt; 0.0167). The UB discomfort remained relatively low across all frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests a potential connection between resonant frequencies and discomfort, potentially indicating injury risk. Although self-reported discomfort is insufficient for directly assessing injury risk from FTV, it provides a simple method for monitoring potential musculoskeletal risks related to vibration exposure at resonant frequencies. While professional vibration assessment remains necessary, self-reported discomfort may act as an early indicated of vibration-induced injuries, aiding in implementing mitigation strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-9815</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1875-9270</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3233/WOR-230491</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38640185</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Discomfort ; Exposure ; Feet ; Health risks ; Injuries ; Monitoring methods ; Occupational exposure ; Ratings ; Resonant frequencies ; Risk ; Self report ; Statistical analysis ; Vibration ; Vibration monitoring</subject><ispartof>Work (Reading, Mass.), 2024-05, Vol.78 (1), p.153-165</ispartof><rights>2024 – IOS Press. All rights reserved</rights><rights>Copyright IOS Press BV 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-5b534954a27c84a84cf2d89fb2d899799cccff9abf1082724273de88cae7a2690</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>776</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38640185$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Jacobs, Karen</contributor><contributor>Soer, Remko</contributor><creatorcontrib>Goggins, Katie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Taryn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lessel, Courtney E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Hara, Dawson E.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eger, Tammy R.</creatorcontrib><title>The effects of standing foot-transmitted vibration on self-reported discomfort ratings</title><title>Work (Reading, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Work</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: Occupational foot-transmitted vibration (FTV) exposure is common in industries like mining, construction, and agriculture, often leading to acute and chronic injuries. Vibration assessments require technical expertise and equipment which can be costly for employers to perform. Alternatively, researchers have observed that self-reported discomfort can be used as an effective indicator of injury risk. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of standing FTV exposure on self-reported ratings of discomfort, and whether these subjective ratings differed by body area and exposure frequency. METHODS: Participants (n = 30) were randomly exposed to standing FTV at six frequencies (25, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 Hz) for 20–45 seconds. Following each exposure, participants rated discomfort on a scale of 0–9 in four body areas: head and neck (HN), upper body (UB), lower body (LB), and total body. RESULTS: Results indicated that participants experienced the most discomfort in the LB at higher frequencies (p &lt; 0.001), consistent with the resonance of foot structures. The HN discomfort tended to decrease as the exposure frequency increased, although not statistically significant (p &gt; 0.0167). The UB discomfort remained relatively low across all frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests a potential connection between resonant frequencies and discomfort, potentially indicating injury risk. Although self-reported discomfort is insufficient for directly assessing injury risk from FTV, it provides a simple method for monitoring potential musculoskeletal risks related to vibration exposure at resonant frequencies. While professional vibration assessment remains necessary, self-reported discomfort may act as an early indicated of vibration-induced injuries, aiding in implementing mitigation strategies.</description><subject>Discomfort</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Feet</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Injuries</subject><subject>Monitoring methods</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Ratings</subject><subject>Resonant frequencies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Self report</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><subject>Vibration monitoring</subject><issn>1051-9815</issn><issn>1875-9270</issn><fulltext>false</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkF1LwzAUhoMoTqc3_gApeKEI0Xw0S3Ipwy8YDGTqZUnTZHaszUxSwX9vSqeCCOEk4Ty85_AAcILRFSWUXr_OnyChKJd4BxxgwRmUhKPd9EYMQykwG4HDEFYIIUKQ3AcjKiY5woIdgJfFm8mMtUbHkDmbhajaqm6XmXUuwuhVG5o6RlNlH3XpVaxdm6UTzNpCbzbO962qDto1Nn2yHmmX4QjsWbUO5nh7j8Hz3e1i-gBn8_vH6c0MaoomEbKS0VyyXBGuRa5Eri2phLRlXyWXUmttrVSlxUgQTnLCaWWE0MpwRSYSjcHFkLvx7r0zIRZN2sWs16o1rgtFskIR51z06NkfdOU636btEsWY5IIInKjLgdLeheCNLTa-bpT_LDAqettFsl0MthN8uo3sysZUP-i33gScD0BQS_M775-oL67mhmQ</recordid><startdate>20240513</startdate><enddate>20240513</enddate><creator>Goggins, Katie A.</creator><creator>Thompson, Taryn J.</creator><creator>Lessel, Courtney E.</creator><creator>Kelly, Elizabeth A.</creator><creator>O’Hara, Dawson E.L.</creator><creator>Eger, Tammy R.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>IOS Press BV</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240513</creationdate><title>The effects of standing foot-transmitted vibration on self-reported discomfort ratings</title><author>Goggins, Katie A. ; Thompson, Taryn J. ; Lessel, Courtney E. ; Kelly, Elizabeth A. ; O’Hara, Dawson E.L. ; Eger, Tammy R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c306t-5b534954a27c84a84cf2d89fb2d899799cccff9abf1082724273de88cae7a2690</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Discomfort</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Feet</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Injuries</topic><topic>Monitoring methods</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Ratings</topic><topic>Resonant frequencies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Self report</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><topic>Vibration monitoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goggins, Katie A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Taryn J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lessel, Courtney E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Elizabeth A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Hara, Dawson E.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eger, Tammy R.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Work (Reading, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>no_fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goggins, Katie A.</au><au>Thompson, Taryn J.</au><au>Lessel, Courtney E.</au><au>Kelly, Elizabeth A.</au><au>O’Hara, Dawson E.L.</au><au>Eger, Tammy R.</au><au>Jacobs, Karen</au><au>Soer, Remko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effects of standing foot-transmitted vibration on self-reported discomfort ratings</atitle><jtitle>Work (Reading, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Work</addtitle><date>2024-05-13</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>153</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>153-165</pages><issn>1051-9815</issn><eissn>1875-9270</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND: Occupational foot-transmitted vibration (FTV) exposure is common in industries like mining, construction, and agriculture, often leading to acute and chronic injuries. Vibration assessments require technical expertise and equipment which can be costly for employers to perform. Alternatively, researchers have observed that self-reported discomfort can be used as an effective indicator of injury risk. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effect of standing FTV exposure on self-reported ratings of discomfort, and whether these subjective ratings differed by body area and exposure frequency. METHODS: Participants (n = 30) were randomly exposed to standing FTV at six frequencies (25, 30, 35, 40, 45, and 50 Hz) for 20–45 seconds. Following each exposure, participants rated discomfort on a scale of 0–9 in four body areas: head and neck (HN), upper body (UB), lower body (LB), and total body. RESULTS: Results indicated that participants experienced the most discomfort in the LB at higher frequencies (p &lt; 0.001), consistent with the resonance of foot structures. The HN discomfort tended to decrease as the exposure frequency increased, although not statistically significant (p &gt; 0.0167). The UB discomfort remained relatively low across all frequencies. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests a potential connection between resonant frequencies and discomfort, potentially indicating injury risk. Although self-reported discomfort is insufficient for directly assessing injury risk from FTV, it provides a simple method for monitoring potential musculoskeletal risks related to vibration exposure at resonant frequencies. While professional vibration assessment remains necessary, self-reported discomfort may act as an early indicated of vibration-induced injuries, aiding in implementing mitigation strategies.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>38640185</pmid><doi>10.3233/WOR-230491</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext no_fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1051-9815
ispartof Work (Reading, Mass.), 2024-05, Vol.78 (1), p.153-165
issn 1051-9815
1875-9270
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3043077789
source
subjects Discomfort
Exposure
Feet
Health risks
Injuries
Monitoring methods
Occupational exposure
Ratings
Resonant frequencies
Risk
Self report
Statistical analysis
Vibration
Vibration monitoring
title The effects of standing foot-transmitted vibration on self-reported discomfort ratings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A01%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effects%20of%20standing%20foot-transmitted%20vibration%20on%20self-reported%20discomfort%20ratings&rft.jtitle=Work%20(Reading,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Goggins,%20Katie%20A.&rft.date=2024-05-13&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=153&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=153-165&rft.issn=1051-9815&rft.eissn=1875-9270&rft_id=info:doi/10.3233/WOR-230491&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3043077789%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3055978281&rft_id=info:pmid/38640185&rft_sage_id=10.3233_WOR-230491&rfr_iscdi=true