Exertional Heatstroke Survivors' Knowledge and Beliefs About Exertional Heatstroke Diagnosis, Treatment, and Return to Play

Little information exists regarding what exertional heatstroke (EHS) survivors know and believe about EHS best practices. Understanding this would help clinicians focus educational efforts to ensure survival and safe return-to-play following EHS. We sought to better understand what EHS survivors kne...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of athletic training 2024-11, Vol.59 (11), p.1063-1069
Hauptverfasser: Miller, Kevin C, Amaria, Noshir Y, Casa, Douglas J, Jardine, John F, Stearns, Rebecca L, O'Connor, Paul, Scarneo-Miller, Samantha E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1069
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1063
container_title Journal of athletic training
container_volume 59
creator Miller, Kevin C
Amaria, Noshir Y
Casa, Douglas J
Jardine, John F
Stearns, Rebecca L
O'Connor, Paul
Scarneo-Miller, Samantha E
description Little information exists regarding what exertional heatstroke (EHS) survivors know and believe about EHS best practices. Understanding this would help clinicians focus educational efforts to ensure survival and safe return-to-play following EHS. We sought to better understand what EHS survivors knew about EHS seriousness (eg, lethality and short- and long-term effects), diagnosis and treatment procedures, and recovery. Multiyear cross-sectional descriptive design. An 11.3-km road race located in the Northeastern United States in August 2022 and 2023. Forty-two of 62 runners with EHS (15 women and 27 men; age = 33 ± 15 years; pretreatment rectal temperature [TREC] = 41.5°C ± 0.9°C). Medical professionals evaluated runners requiring medical attention at the finish line. If they observed a TREC of ≥40°C with concomitant central nervous system dysfunction, EHS was diagnosed, and patients were immersed in a 189.3-L tub filled with ice water. Before medical discharge, we asked EHS survivors 15 questions about their experience and knowledge of select EHS best practices. Survey items were piloted and validated by experts and laypersons a priori (content validity index of ≥0.88 for items and scale). Survey responses. Sixty-seven percent (28/42) of patients identified EHS as potentially fatal, and 76% (32/42) indicated that it negatively affected health. Seventy-nine percent (33/42) correctly identified TREC as the best temperature site to diagnose EHS. Most patients (74%, 31/42) anticipated returning to normal exercise within 1 week after EHS; 69% (29/42) stated that EHS would not impact future race participation. Patients (69%, 29/42) indicated that it was important to tell their primary care physician about their EHS. Our patients were knowledgeable on the potential seriousness and adverse health effects of EHS and the necessity of TREC for diagnosis. However, educational efforts should be directed toward helping patients understand safe recovery and return-to-play timelines following EHS.
doi_str_mv 10.4085/1062-6050-0677.23
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3041233879</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3132514832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-60aa038ec10340864d9b40a3b9c248af0a5d52076f62548632bad36cb0f98b733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1OxCAUhYnRODr6AG4MiQtd2BG4LaVLHX-jiUbHxB2hLTXVTlGgo8aXlzqjC-MKAt-5OecehLYoGcVEJAeUcBZxkpCI8DQdMVhCazQDEVHOHpbD_ed_gNadeyKEsiTjq2gAggMTQNfQ58m7tr42rWrwuVbeeWueNb7r7KyeGet28WVr3hpdPmqs2hIf6abWlcOHuek8_l98XKvH1rja7eOJDc9T3fr9b_Wt9p1tsTf4plEfG2ilUo3Tm4tziO5PTybj8-jq-uxifHgVFSyJfQigFAGhC0ogxOZxmeUxUZBnBYuFqohKyoSRlFc88H2yXJXAi5xUmchTgCHam899sea1087Lae0K3TSq1aZzEkhMGYBIs4Du_EGfTHAc3EmgwBIaC2CBonOqsMY5qyv5Yuupsh-SEtk3I_vNy37zsm9Gst7E9mJyl091-av4qQK-AE5DiKQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3132514832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exertional Heatstroke Survivors' Knowledge and Beliefs About Exertional Heatstroke Diagnosis, Treatment, and Return to Play</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Miller, Kevin C ; Amaria, Noshir Y ; Casa, Douglas J ; Jardine, John F ; Stearns, Rebecca L ; O'Connor, Paul ; Scarneo-Miller, Samantha E</creator><creatorcontrib>Miller, Kevin C ; Amaria, Noshir Y ; Casa, Douglas J ; Jardine, John F ; Stearns, Rebecca L ; O'Connor, Paul ; Scarneo-Miller, Samantha E</creatorcontrib><description>Little information exists regarding what exertional heatstroke (EHS) survivors know and believe about EHS best practices. Understanding this would help clinicians focus educational efforts to ensure survival and safe return-to-play following EHS. We sought to better understand what EHS survivors knew about EHS seriousness (eg, lethality and short- and long-term effects), diagnosis and treatment procedures, and recovery. Multiyear cross-sectional descriptive design. An 11.3-km road race located in the Northeastern United States in August 2022 and 2023. Forty-two of 62 runners with EHS (15 women and 27 men; age = 33 ± 15 years; pretreatment rectal temperature [TREC] = 41.5°C ± 0.9°C). Medical professionals evaluated runners requiring medical attention at the finish line. If they observed a TREC of ≥40°C with concomitant central nervous system dysfunction, EHS was diagnosed, and patients were immersed in a 189.3-L tub filled with ice water. Before medical discharge, we asked EHS survivors 15 questions about their experience and knowledge of select EHS best practices. Survey items were piloted and validated by experts and laypersons a priori (content validity index of ≥0.88 for items and scale). Survey responses. Sixty-seven percent (28/42) of patients identified EHS as potentially fatal, and 76% (32/42) indicated that it negatively affected health. Seventy-nine percent (33/42) correctly identified TREC as the best temperature site to diagnose EHS. Most patients (74%, 31/42) anticipated returning to normal exercise within 1 week after EHS; 69% (29/42) stated that EHS would not impact future race participation. Patients (69%, 29/42) indicated that it was important to tell their primary care physician about their EHS. Our patients were knowledgeable on the potential seriousness and adverse health effects of EHS and the necessity of TREC for diagnosis. However, educational efforts should be directed toward helping patients understand safe recovery and return-to-play timelines following EHS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-6050</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1938-162X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-162X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0677.23</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38632831</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: National Athletic Trainers Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anatomy ; Best Practices ; Content Validity ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Female ; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ; Heat Stroke - diagnosis ; Heat Stroke - therapy ; Heatstroke ; Humans ; Male ; Medical diagnosis ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Physical Exertion ; Return to Sport ; Running ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Survivors - psychology ; Validity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of athletic training, 2024-11, Vol.59 (11), p.1063-1069</ispartof><rights>by the National Athletic Trainers' Association, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright National Athletic Trainers Association Nov 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-60aa038ec10340864d9b40a3b9c248af0a5d52076f62548632bad36cb0f98b733</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38632831$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miller, Kevin C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaria, Noshir Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casa, Douglas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardine, John F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stearns, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarneo-Miller, Samantha E</creatorcontrib><title>Exertional Heatstroke Survivors' Knowledge and Beliefs About Exertional Heatstroke Diagnosis, Treatment, and Return to Play</title><title>Journal of athletic training</title><addtitle>J Athl Train</addtitle><description>Little information exists regarding what exertional heatstroke (EHS) survivors know and believe about EHS best practices. Understanding this would help clinicians focus educational efforts to ensure survival and safe return-to-play following EHS. We sought to better understand what EHS survivors knew about EHS seriousness (eg, lethality and short- and long-term effects), diagnosis and treatment procedures, and recovery. Multiyear cross-sectional descriptive design. An 11.3-km road race located in the Northeastern United States in August 2022 and 2023. Forty-two of 62 runners with EHS (15 women and 27 men; age = 33 ± 15 years; pretreatment rectal temperature [TREC] = 41.5°C ± 0.9°C). Medical professionals evaluated runners requiring medical attention at the finish line. If they observed a TREC of ≥40°C with concomitant central nervous system dysfunction, EHS was diagnosed, and patients were immersed in a 189.3-L tub filled with ice water. Before medical discharge, we asked EHS survivors 15 questions about their experience and knowledge of select EHS best practices. Survey items were piloted and validated by experts and laypersons a priori (content validity index of ≥0.88 for items and scale). Survey responses. Sixty-seven percent (28/42) of patients identified EHS as potentially fatal, and 76% (32/42) indicated that it negatively affected health. Seventy-nine percent (33/42) correctly identified TREC as the best temperature site to diagnose EHS. Most patients (74%, 31/42) anticipated returning to normal exercise within 1 week after EHS; 69% (29/42) stated that EHS would not impact future race participation. Patients (69%, 29/42) indicated that it was important to tell their primary care physician about their EHS. Our patients were knowledgeable on the potential seriousness and adverse health effects of EHS and the necessity of TREC for diagnosis. However, educational efforts should be directed toward helping patients understand safe recovery and return-to-play timelines following EHS.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anatomy</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Content Validity</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</subject><subject>Heat Stroke - diagnosis</subject><subject>Heat Stroke - therapy</subject><subject>Heatstroke</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physical Exertion</subject><subject>Return to Sport</subject><subject>Running</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Survivors - psychology</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1062-6050</issn><issn>1938-162X</issn><issn>1938-162X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1OxCAUhYnRODr6AG4MiQtd2BG4LaVLHX-jiUbHxB2hLTXVTlGgo8aXlzqjC-MKAt-5OecehLYoGcVEJAeUcBZxkpCI8DQdMVhCazQDEVHOHpbD_ed_gNadeyKEsiTjq2gAggMTQNfQ58m7tr42rWrwuVbeeWueNb7r7KyeGet28WVr3hpdPmqs2hIf6abWlcOHuek8_l98XKvH1rja7eOJDc9T3fr9b_Wt9p1tsTf4plEfG2ilUo3Tm4tziO5PTybj8-jq-uxifHgVFSyJfQigFAGhC0ogxOZxmeUxUZBnBYuFqohKyoSRlFc88H2yXJXAi5xUmchTgCHam899sea1087Lae0K3TSq1aZzEkhMGYBIs4Du_EGfTHAc3EmgwBIaC2CBonOqsMY5qyv5Yuupsh-SEtk3I_vNy37zsm9Gst7E9mJyl091-av4qQK-AE5DiKQ</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Miller, Kevin C</creator><creator>Amaria, Noshir Y</creator><creator>Casa, Douglas J</creator><creator>Jardine, John F</creator><creator>Stearns, Rebecca L</creator><creator>O'Connor, Paul</creator><creator>Scarneo-Miller, Samantha E</creator><general>National Athletic Trainers Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Exertional Heatstroke Survivors' Knowledge and Beliefs About Exertional Heatstroke Diagnosis, Treatment, and Return to Play</title><author>Miller, Kevin C ; Amaria, Noshir Y ; Casa, Douglas J ; Jardine, John F ; Stearns, Rebecca L ; O'Connor, Paul ; Scarneo-Miller, Samantha E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c254t-60aa038ec10340864d9b40a3b9c248af0a5d52076f62548632bad36cb0f98b733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anatomy</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Content Validity</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice</topic><topic>Heat Stroke - diagnosis</topic><topic>Heat Stroke - therapy</topic><topic>Heatstroke</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physical Exertion</topic><topic>Return to Sport</topic><topic>Running</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Survivors - psychology</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miller, Kevin C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amaria, Noshir Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casa, Douglas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardine, John F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stearns, Rebecca L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scarneo-Miller, Samantha E</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of athletic training</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miller, Kevin C</au><au>Amaria, Noshir Y</au><au>Casa, Douglas J</au><au>Jardine, John F</au><au>Stearns, Rebecca L</au><au>O'Connor, Paul</au><au>Scarneo-Miller, Samantha E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exertional Heatstroke Survivors' Knowledge and Beliefs About Exertional Heatstroke Diagnosis, Treatment, and Return to Play</atitle><jtitle>Journal of athletic training</jtitle><addtitle>J Athl Train</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1063</spage><epage>1069</epage><pages>1063-1069</pages><issn>1062-6050</issn><issn>1938-162X</issn><eissn>1938-162X</eissn><abstract>Little information exists regarding what exertional heatstroke (EHS) survivors know and believe about EHS best practices. Understanding this would help clinicians focus educational efforts to ensure survival and safe return-to-play following EHS. We sought to better understand what EHS survivors knew about EHS seriousness (eg, lethality and short- and long-term effects), diagnosis and treatment procedures, and recovery. Multiyear cross-sectional descriptive design. An 11.3-km road race located in the Northeastern United States in August 2022 and 2023. Forty-two of 62 runners with EHS (15 women and 27 men; age = 33 ± 15 years; pretreatment rectal temperature [TREC] = 41.5°C ± 0.9°C). Medical professionals evaluated runners requiring medical attention at the finish line. If they observed a TREC of ≥40°C with concomitant central nervous system dysfunction, EHS was diagnosed, and patients were immersed in a 189.3-L tub filled with ice water. Before medical discharge, we asked EHS survivors 15 questions about their experience and knowledge of select EHS best practices. Survey items were piloted and validated by experts and laypersons a priori (content validity index of ≥0.88 for items and scale). Survey responses. Sixty-seven percent (28/42) of patients identified EHS as potentially fatal, and 76% (32/42) indicated that it negatively affected health. Seventy-nine percent (33/42) correctly identified TREC as the best temperature site to diagnose EHS. Most patients (74%, 31/42) anticipated returning to normal exercise within 1 week after EHS; 69% (29/42) stated that EHS would not impact future race participation. Patients (69%, 29/42) indicated that it was important to tell their primary care physician about their EHS. Our patients were knowledgeable on the potential seriousness and adverse health effects of EHS and the necessity of TREC for diagnosis. However, educational efforts should be directed toward helping patients understand safe recovery and return-to-play timelines following EHS.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>National Athletic Trainers Association</pub><pmid>38632831</pmid><doi>10.4085/1062-6050-0677.23</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1062-6050
ispartof Journal of athletic training, 2024-11, Vol.59 (11), p.1063-1069
issn 1062-6050
1938-162X
1938-162X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3041233879
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; Free E- Journals
subjects Adult
Anatomy
Best Practices
Content Validity
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Heat Stroke - diagnosis
Heat Stroke - therapy
Heatstroke
Humans
Male
Medical diagnosis
Middle Aged
Patients
Physical Exertion
Return to Sport
Running
Surveys and Questionnaires
Survivors - psychology
Validity
Young Adult
title Exertional Heatstroke Survivors' Knowledge and Beliefs About Exertional Heatstroke Diagnosis, Treatment, and Return to Play
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T18%3A05%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exertional%20Heatstroke%20Survivors'%20Knowledge%20and%20Beliefs%20About%20Exertional%20Heatstroke%20Diagnosis,%20Treatment,%20and%20Return%20to%20Play&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20athletic%20training&rft.au=Miller,%20Kevin%20C&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1063&rft.epage=1069&rft.pages=1063-1069&rft.issn=1062-6050&rft.eissn=1938-162X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4085/1062-6050-0677.23&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3132514832%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3132514832&rft_id=info:pmid/38632831&rfr_iscdi=true