Self-sampling for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening: A scoping review

•The scoping review mapped self-sampling for HPV test in cervical cancer screening.•The results showed the self-sampling can be useful for cervical cancer Screening.•The results showed that self-sampling has a good patient acceptance.•The home-based procedure showed good cost-effectiveness. Cervical...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2024-05, Vol.296, p.20-51
Hauptverfasser: Colonetti, Tamy, Rodrigues Uggioni, Maria Laura, Meller dos Santos, Ana Luiza, Michels Uggioni, Náiade, Uggioni Elibio, Laura, Balbinot, Eduarda Letícia, Grande, Antonio José, Rosa, Maria Inês
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 51
container_issue
container_start_page 20
container_title European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology
container_volume 296
creator Colonetti, Tamy
Rodrigues Uggioni, Maria Laura
Meller dos Santos, Ana Luiza
Michels Uggioni, Náiade
Uggioni Elibio, Laura
Balbinot, Eduarda Letícia
Grande, Antonio José
Rosa, Maria Inês
description •The scoping review mapped self-sampling for HPV test in cervical cancer screening.•The results showed the self-sampling can be useful for cervical cancer Screening.•The results showed that self-sampling has a good patient acceptance.•The home-based procedure showed good cost-effectiveness. Cervical cancer is the third most common gynecological cancer worldwide. Its origin is linked to intraepithelial lesions caused by high-risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types, detected in 99.7% of cases. Early screening is essential to prevent cancer development from these lesions. Molecular methods are more specific and offer the possibility of being performed through a self-collected sample by the patient, thus contributing to increasing screening coverage for this pathology. This study aim was to map the medical-scientific literature on existing protocols for self-sampling for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. A search strategy was developed using the following keywords and their synonyms: “self-sampling,” “professional sampling,” and “HPV”, on the databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Virtual Health Library - BVS, Scopus, National Institute for Health Research NHS EED, Web of Science, and EMBASE. The search strategy was formulated to identify relevant studies and describe their main characteristics, such as patient acceptance of self-sampling, cost differences between the tests used, and the accuracy of self-sampling compared to the gold standard test. A total of 876 studies were found, and 33 of those studies were included in this review. Out of these, 10 studies were domized clinical trials involving 46,751 patients, and 23 observational studies included 142,795 patients. Regarding acceptance, most studies reported a preference for self-sampling. Sensitivity analyses from various studies also showed that the low cost of self-sampling kits generally increased cost-effectiveness. The study concluded that using HPV testing on self-collected samples is a viable strategy for monitoring women with HPV.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.02.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3041229172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301211524000903</els_id><sourcerecordid>3041229172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-3e3481c3cfcda21090a7902a3b4ad7c4d9d40320768424f9e9c45ed73edb91673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gUgvvWnN15bGC2EMdcJAwY_bkCanI6VrZ9JN_PemdHppbk4O5z158z4IXRKcEUxmN1UGVbv2RUYx5RmmGWb0CI1JLmgqZlN-jMaYYZJSQqYjdBZCheNhTJ6iEcuZ5IJMx2j1CnWZBr3Z1q5ZJ2Xrk-XLR9JB6PreNYkBv3dG14nRTbwnwXiAJg5vk3ls2m2v87B38HWOTkpdB7g41Al6f7h_WyzT1fPj02K-Sg0jpEsZMJ4Tw0xprKYES6yFxFSzgmsrDLfS8hgGi1nOKS8lSMOnYAUDW0gyE2yCrod3t7793MWvqo0LBupaN9DugmKYE0olETRK-SA1vg3BQ6m23m20_1YEq56jqtTAUfUcFaYqWse1q4PDrtiA_Vv6BRcFd4MAYs6Y3atgHERA1nkwnbKt-9_hB3n4hJ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3041229172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self-sampling for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening: A scoping review</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Colonetti, Tamy ; Rodrigues Uggioni, Maria Laura ; Meller dos Santos, Ana Luiza ; Michels Uggioni, Náiade ; Uggioni Elibio, Laura ; Balbinot, Eduarda Letícia ; Grande, Antonio José ; Rosa, Maria Inês</creator><creatorcontrib>Colonetti, Tamy ; Rodrigues Uggioni, Maria Laura ; Meller dos Santos, Ana Luiza ; Michels Uggioni, Náiade ; Uggioni Elibio, Laura ; Balbinot, Eduarda Letícia ; Grande, Antonio José ; Rosa, Maria Inês</creatorcontrib><description>•The scoping review mapped self-sampling for HPV test in cervical cancer screening.•The results showed the self-sampling can be useful for cervical cancer Screening.•The results showed that self-sampling has a good patient acceptance.•The home-based procedure showed good cost-effectiveness. Cervical cancer is the third most common gynecological cancer worldwide. Its origin is linked to intraepithelial lesions caused by high-risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types, detected in 99.7% of cases. Early screening is essential to prevent cancer development from these lesions. Molecular methods are more specific and offer the possibility of being performed through a self-collected sample by the patient, thus contributing to increasing screening coverage for this pathology. This study aim was to map the medical-scientific literature on existing protocols for self-sampling for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. A search strategy was developed using the following keywords and their synonyms: “self-sampling,” “professional sampling,” and “HPV”, on the databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Virtual Health Library - BVS, Scopus, National Institute for Health Research NHS EED, Web of Science, and EMBASE. The search strategy was formulated to identify relevant studies and describe their main characteristics, such as patient acceptance of self-sampling, cost differences between the tests used, and the accuracy of self-sampling compared to the gold standard test. A total of 876 studies were found, and 33 of those studies were included in this review. Out of these, 10 studies were domized clinical trials involving 46,751 patients, and 23 observational studies included 142,795 patients. Regarding acceptance, most studies reported a preference for self-sampling. Sensitivity analyses from various studies also showed that the low cost of self-sampling kits generally increased cost-effectiveness. The study concluded that using HPV testing on self-collected samples is a viable strategy for monitoring women with HPV.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.02.032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38394715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Cervical Cancer ; HPV ; Human Papillomavirus ; Molecular Testing ; Self-sampling</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology, 2024-05, Vol.296, p.20-51</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-3e3481c3cfcda21090a7902a3b4ad7c4d9d40320768424f9e9c45ed73edb91673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211524000903$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38394715$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colonetti, Tamy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues Uggioni, Maria Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meller dos Santos, Ana Luiza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michels Uggioni, Náiade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uggioni Elibio, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balbinot, Eduarda Letícia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande, Antonio José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Maria Inês</creatorcontrib><title>Self-sampling for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening: A scoping review</title><title>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>•The scoping review mapped self-sampling for HPV test in cervical cancer screening.•The results showed the self-sampling can be useful for cervical cancer Screening.•The results showed that self-sampling has a good patient acceptance.•The home-based procedure showed good cost-effectiveness. Cervical cancer is the third most common gynecological cancer worldwide. Its origin is linked to intraepithelial lesions caused by high-risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types, detected in 99.7% of cases. Early screening is essential to prevent cancer development from these lesions. Molecular methods are more specific and offer the possibility of being performed through a self-collected sample by the patient, thus contributing to increasing screening coverage for this pathology. This study aim was to map the medical-scientific literature on existing protocols for self-sampling for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. A search strategy was developed using the following keywords and their synonyms: “self-sampling,” “professional sampling,” and “HPV”, on the databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Virtual Health Library - BVS, Scopus, National Institute for Health Research NHS EED, Web of Science, and EMBASE. The search strategy was formulated to identify relevant studies and describe their main characteristics, such as patient acceptance of self-sampling, cost differences between the tests used, and the accuracy of self-sampling compared to the gold standard test. A total of 876 studies were found, and 33 of those studies were included in this review. Out of these, 10 studies were domized clinical trials involving 46,751 patients, and 23 observational studies included 142,795 patients. Regarding acceptance, most studies reported a preference for self-sampling. Sensitivity analyses from various studies also showed that the low cost of self-sampling kits generally increased cost-effectiveness. The study concluded that using HPV testing on self-collected samples is a viable strategy for monitoring women with HPV.</description><subject>Cervical Cancer</subject><subject>HPV</subject><subject>Human Papillomavirus</subject><subject>Molecular Testing</subject><subject>Self-sampling</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk7_gUgvvWnN15bGC2EMdcJAwY_bkCanI6VrZ9JN_PemdHppbk4O5z158z4IXRKcEUxmN1UGVbv2RUYx5RmmGWb0CI1JLmgqZlN-jMaYYZJSQqYjdBZCheNhTJ6iEcuZ5IJMx2j1CnWZBr3Z1q5ZJ2Xrk-XLR9JB6PreNYkBv3dG14nRTbwnwXiAJg5vk3ls2m2v87B38HWOTkpdB7g41Al6f7h_WyzT1fPj02K-Sg0jpEsZMJ4Tw0xprKYES6yFxFSzgmsrDLfS8hgGi1nOKS8lSMOnYAUDW0gyE2yCrod3t7793MWvqo0LBupaN9DugmKYE0olETRK-SA1vg3BQ6m23m20_1YEq56jqtTAUfUcFaYqWse1q4PDrtiA_Vv6BRcFd4MAYs6Y3atgHERA1nkwnbKt-9_hB3n4hJ0</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Colonetti, Tamy</creator><creator>Rodrigues Uggioni, Maria Laura</creator><creator>Meller dos Santos, Ana Luiza</creator><creator>Michels Uggioni, Náiade</creator><creator>Uggioni Elibio, Laura</creator><creator>Balbinot, Eduarda Letícia</creator><creator>Grande, Antonio José</creator><creator>Rosa, Maria Inês</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Self-sampling for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening: A scoping review</title><author>Colonetti, Tamy ; Rodrigues Uggioni, Maria Laura ; Meller dos Santos, Ana Luiza ; Michels Uggioni, Náiade ; Uggioni Elibio, Laura ; Balbinot, Eduarda Letícia ; Grande, Antonio José ; Rosa, Maria Inês</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-3e3481c3cfcda21090a7902a3b4ad7c4d9d40320768424f9e9c45ed73edb91673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cervical Cancer</topic><topic>HPV</topic><topic>Human Papillomavirus</topic><topic>Molecular Testing</topic><topic>Self-sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colonetti, Tamy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues Uggioni, Maria Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meller dos Santos, Ana Luiza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Michels Uggioni, Náiade</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uggioni Elibio, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balbinot, Eduarda Letícia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grande, Antonio José</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosa, Maria Inês</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colonetti, Tamy</au><au>Rodrigues Uggioni, Maria Laura</au><au>Meller dos Santos, Ana Luiza</au><au>Michels Uggioni, Náiade</au><au>Uggioni Elibio, Laura</au><au>Balbinot, Eduarda Letícia</au><au>Grande, Antonio José</au><au>Rosa, Maria Inês</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self-sampling for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening: A scoping review</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>296</volume><spage>20</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>20-51</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><abstract>•The scoping review mapped self-sampling for HPV test in cervical cancer screening.•The results showed the self-sampling can be useful for cervical cancer Screening.•The results showed that self-sampling has a good patient acceptance.•The home-based procedure showed good cost-effectiveness. Cervical cancer is the third most common gynecological cancer worldwide. Its origin is linked to intraepithelial lesions caused by high-risk Human Papillomavirus (HPV) types, detected in 99.7% of cases. Early screening is essential to prevent cancer development from these lesions. Molecular methods are more specific and offer the possibility of being performed through a self-collected sample by the patient, thus contributing to increasing screening coverage for this pathology. This study aim was to map the medical-scientific literature on existing protocols for self-sampling for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening. A search strategy was developed using the following keywords and their synonyms: “self-sampling,” “professional sampling,” and “HPV”, on the databases: MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Virtual Health Library - BVS, Scopus, National Institute for Health Research NHS EED, Web of Science, and EMBASE. The search strategy was formulated to identify relevant studies and describe their main characteristics, such as patient acceptance of self-sampling, cost differences between the tests used, and the accuracy of self-sampling compared to the gold standard test. A total of 876 studies were found, and 33 of those studies were included in this review. Out of these, 10 studies were domized clinical trials involving 46,751 patients, and 23 observational studies included 142,795 patients. Regarding acceptance, most studies reported a preference for self-sampling. Sensitivity analyses from various studies also showed that the low cost of self-sampling kits generally increased cost-effectiveness. The study concluded that using HPV testing on self-collected samples is a viable strategy for monitoring women with HPV.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>38394715</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.02.032</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-2115
ispartof European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2024-05, Vol.296, p.20-51
issn 0301-2115
1872-7654
1872-7654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3041229172
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Cervical Cancer
HPV
Human Papillomavirus
Molecular Testing
Self-sampling
title Self-sampling for HPV testing in cervical cancer screening: A scoping review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T08%3A05%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self-sampling%20for%20HPV%20testing%20in%20cervical%20cancer%20screening:%20A%20scoping%20review&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=Colonetti,%20Tamy&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=296&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=20-51&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.02.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3041229172%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3041229172&rft_id=info:pmid/38394715&rft_els_id=S0301211524000903&rfr_iscdi=true