Is invertebrate conservation in Great Britain best achieved by policies that increase species protection?
We discuss proposals to extend the list of protected insect species in Great Britain and question whether existing species protection measures are appropriate for insects whose ecology is substantially unknown. We highlight the practicalities of applying such measures to very poorly known taxa, whos...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of insect conservation 2023-08, Vol.27 (4), p.527-531 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 531 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 527 |
container_title | Journal of insect conservation |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Morris, Roger K. A. Welch, Mark D. |
description | We discuss proposals to extend the list of protected insect species in Great Britain and question whether existing species protection measures are appropriate for insects whose ecology is substantially unknown. We highlight the practicalities of applying such measures to very poorly known taxa, whose identification depends upon highly experienced specialists and a tiny pool of relevant expertise. We propose a seven-point plan that would strengthen invertebrate conservation in Great Britain. Our proposals could be applied to other countries with a protected sites network and a desire to improve habitat-based insect conservation measures.
Implications for insect conservation
Our analysis suggests that insect conservation will not be improved by legislation that restricts the potential for adhoc surveillance that currently provides almost all the data used to monitor rare and threatened insects. We highlight the need for Improvements in the understanding of insect micro-habitat requirements amongst conservation managers. Our proposed seven-point plan provides a structured approach to insect conservation that should improve identification of important insect sites, site management and landscape-scale conservation measures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10841-023-00485-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040485354</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3040485354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d3dcd5be8517966bbba5d7fc688720fac34856d488ef7ad0f777f1695d9d05613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhQdRsD7-gKuAGzejyWTymJVo0VoouFFwFzLJHZsynalJWui_N9MRBBeuktx859x7T5ZdEXxLMBZ3gWBZkhwXNMe4lCyvjrIJYaLIK8HocbpTznNO5cdpdhbCCmNcSSYnmZsH5Lod-Ai11xGQ6bsAfqej67v0g2YedESP3kWdXjWEiLRZOtiBRfUebfrWGQcBxWXCXGcSHgCFDRyqG99HMIPX_UV20ug2wOXPeZ69Pz-9TV_yxetsPn1Y5IZWPOaWWmNZDZIRUXFe17VmVjSGSykK3GhD03rcllJCI7TFjRCiIbxitrKYcULPs5vRN_X-2qZ51doFA22rO-i3QVFcDglRVib0-g-66re-S9OpIvXHTFBZJaoYKeP7EDw0auPdWvu9IlgN6asxfZXSV4f01SCioygkuPsE_2v9j-obT1GI-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2851057389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is invertebrate conservation in Great Britain best achieved by policies that increase species protection?</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Morris, Roger K. A. ; Welch, Mark D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Morris, Roger K. A. ; Welch, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><description>We discuss proposals to extend the list of protected insect species in Great Britain and question whether existing species protection measures are appropriate for insects whose ecology is substantially unknown. We highlight the practicalities of applying such measures to very poorly known taxa, whose identification depends upon highly experienced specialists and a tiny pool of relevant expertise. We propose a seven-point plan that would strengthen invertebrate conservation in Great Britain. Our proposals could be applied to other countries with a protected sites network and a desire to improve habitat-based insect conservation measures.
Implications for insect conservation
Our analysis suggests that insect conservation will not be improved by legislation that restricts the potential for adhoc surveillance that currently provides almost all the data used to monitor rare and threatened insects. We highlight the need for Improvements in the understanding of insect micro-habitat requirements amongst conservation managers. Our proposed seven-point plan provides a structured approach to insect conservation that should improve identification of important insect sites, site management and landscape-scale conservation measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1366-638X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10841-023-00485-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Animal Ecology ; Arthropods ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Conservation ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Endangered & extinct species ; Entomology ; Environmental protection ; Great Britain ; Habitat improvement ; Habitats ; Insect ecology ; Insects ; Invertebrates ; Landscape preservation ; laws and regulations ; Legislation ; Life Sciences ; Microhabitats ; monitoring ; Museums ; Proposals ; Protected species ; Review Paper ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Journal of insect conservation, 2023-08, Vol.27 (4), p.527-531</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. corrected publication 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. corrected publication 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d3dcd5be8517966bbba5d7fc688720fac34856d488ef7ad0f777f1695d9d05613</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d3dcd5be8517966bbba5d7fc688720fac34856d488ef7ad0f777f1695d9d05613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10841-023-00485-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10841-023-00485-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morris, Roger K. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><title>Is invertebrate conservation in Great Britain best achieved by policies that increase species protection?</title><title>Journal of insect conservation</title><addtitle>J Insect Conserv</addtitle><description>We discuss proposals to extend the list of protected insect species in Great Britain and question whether existing species protection measures are appropriate for insects whose ecology is substantially unknown. We highlight the practicalities of applying such measures to very poorly known taxa, whose identification depends upon highly experienced specialists and a tiny pool of relevant expertise. We propose a seven-point plan that would strengthen invertebrate conservation in Great Britain. Our proposals could be applied to other countries with a protected sites network and a desire to improve habitat-based insect conservation measures.
Implications for insect conservation
Our analysis suggests that insect conservation will not be improved by legislation that restricts the potential for adhoc surveillance that currently provides almost all the data used to monitor rare and threatened insects. We highlight the need for Improvements in the understanding of insect micro-habitat requirements amongst conservation managers. Our proposed seven-point plan provides a structured approach to insect conservation that should improve identification of important insect sites, site management and landscape-scale conservation measures.</description><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Arthropods</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Endangered & extinct species</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Great Britain</subject><subject>Habitat improvement</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Insect ecology</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Invertebrates</subject><subject>Landscape preservation</subject><subject>laws and regulations</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Microhabitats</subject><subject>monitoring</subject><subject>Museums</subject><subject>Proposals</subject><subject>Protected species</subject><subject>Review Paper</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>1366-638X</issn><issn>1572-9753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhQdRsD7-gKuAGzejyWTymJVo0VoouFFwFzLJHZsynalJWui_N9MRBBeuktx859x7T5ZdEXxLMBZ3gWBZkhwXNMe4lCyvjrIJYaLIK8HocbpTznNO5cdpdhbCCmNcSSYnmZsH5Lod-Ai11xGQ6bsAfqej67v0g2YedESP3kWdXjWEiLRZOtiBRfUebfrWGQcBxWXCXGcSHgCFDRyqG99HMIPX_UV20ug2wOXPeZ69Pz-9TV_yxetsPn1Y5IZWPOaWWmNZDZIRUXFe17VmVjSGSykK3GhD03rcllJCI7TFjRCiIbxitrKYcULPs5vRN_X-2qZ51doFA22rO-i3QVFcDglRVib0-g-66re-S9OpIvXHTFBZJaoYKeP7EDw0auPdWvu9IlgN6asxfZXSV4f01SCioygkuPsE_2v9j-obT1GI-Q</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Morris, Roger K. A.</creator><creator>Welch, Mark D.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Is invertebrate conservation in Great Britain best achieved by policies that increase species protection?</title><author>Morris, Roger K. A. ; Welch, Mark D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d3dcd5be8517966bbba5d7fc688720fac34856d488ef7ad0f777f1695d9d05613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Arthropods</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Endangered & extinct species</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Great Britain</topic><topic>Habitat improvement</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Insect ecology</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Invertebrates</topic><topic>Landscape preservation</topic><topic>laws and regulations</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Microhabitats</topic><topic>monitoring</topic><topic>Museums</topic><topic>Proposals</topic><topic>Protected species</topic><topic>Review Paper</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morris, Roger K. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welch, Mark D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of insect conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morris, Roger K. A.</au><au>Welch, Mark D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is invertebrate conservation in Great Britain best achieved by policies that increase species protection?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of insect conservation</jtitle><stitle>J Insect Conserv</stitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>527</spage><epage>531</epage><pages>527-531</pages><issn>1366-638X</issn><eissn>1572-9753</eissn><abstract>We discuss proposals to extend the list of protected insect species in Great Britain and question whether existing species protection measures are appropriate for insects whose ecology is substantially unknown. We highlight the practicalities of applying such measures to very poorly known taxa, whose identification depends upon highly experienced specialists and a tiny pool of relevant expertise. We propose a seven-point plan that would strengthen invertebrate conservation in Great Britain. Our proposals could be applied to other countries with a protected sites network and a desire to improve habitat-based insect conservation measures.
Implications for insect conservation
Our analysis suggests that insect conservation will not be improved by legislation that restricts the potential for adhoc surveillance that currently provides almost all the data used to monitor rare and threatened insects. We highlight the need for Improvements in the understanding of insect micro-habitat requirements amongst conservation managers. Our proposed seven-point plan provides a structured approach to insect conservation that should improve identification of important insect sites, site management and landscape-scale conservation measures.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10841-023-00485-9</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1366-638X |
ispartof | Journal of insect conservation, 2023-08, Vol.27 (4), p.527-531 |
issn | 1366-638X 1572-9753 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040485354 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Animal Ecology Arthropods Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences Conservation Conservation Biology/Ecology Endangered & extinct species Entomology Environmental protection Great Britain Habitat improvement Habitats Insect ecology Insects Invertebrates Landscape preservation laws and regulations Legislation Life Sciences Microhabitats monitoring Museums Proposals Protected species Review Paper Wildlife conservation |
title | Is invertebrate conservation in Great Britain best achieved by policies that increase species protection? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T18%3A01%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20invertebrate%20conservation%20in%20Great%20Britain%20best%20achieved%20by%20policies%20that%20increase%20species%20protection?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20insect%20conservation&rft.au=Morris,%20Roger%20K.%20A.&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=527&rft.epage=531&rft.pages=527-531&rft.issn=1366-638X&rft.eissn=1572-9753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10841-023-00485-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3040485354%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2851057389&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |