Accuracy differences in aboveground woody biomass estimation with terrestrial laser scanning for trees in urban and rural forests and different leaf conditions
Key Message Terrestrial laser scanning data can be converted to reliable woody aboveground biomass estimates, but estimation quality is influenced by growing environment, leaf condition, and variation in tree density affecting volume to mass conversion. Both rural and urban forests play an important...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Trees (Berlin, West) West), 2023-06, Vol.37 (3), p.761-779 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 779 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 761 |
container_title | Trees (Berlin, West) |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Arseniou, Georgios MacFarlane, David W. Calders, Kim Baker, Matthew |
description | Key Message
Terrestrial laser scanning data can be converted to reliable woody aboveground biomass estimates, but estimation quality is influenced by growing environment, leaf condition, and variation in tree density affecting volume to mass conversion.
Both rural and urban forests play an important role in terrestrial carbon cycling. Forest carbon stocks are typically estimated from models predicting the aboveground biomass (AGB) of trees. However, such models are often limited by insufficient data on tree mass, which generally requires felling and weighing parts of trees. In this study, thirty-one trees of both deciduous and evergreen species were destructively sampled in rural and urban forest conditions. Prior to felling, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data were used to estimate tree biomass based on volume estimates from quantitative structure models, combined with tree basic density estimates from disks sampled from stems and branches after scanning and felling trees, but also in combination with published basic density values. Reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass were computed from destructive sampling. Trees were scanned in leaf-off conditions, except evergreen and some deciduous trees, to assess effects of a leaf-separation algorithm on TLS-based woody biomass estimates. We found strong agreement between TLS-based and reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass values, using both measured and published basic densities to convert TLS-based volume to biomass, but use of published densities reduced accuracy. Correlations between TLS-based and reference branch biomass were stronger for urban trees, while correlations with stem mass were stronger for rural trees. TLS-based biomass estimates from leaf-off and leaf-removed point clouds strongly agreed with reference biomass data, showing the utility of the leaf-removal algorithm for enhancing AGB estimation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00468-022-02382-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040469024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2811763678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-1a90508988ef75c9533d3cfd6443c38c25495c2812d5f90a60cfc079d4e38b1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uc1qHDEMNqWFbtK-QE-GXnqZRrbnxz6G0CaFQC7J2Xg99tZh1k6lmYZ9mr5qvZmGQA49CIH0_Qh9jH0S8FUADGcE0Pa6ASlrKS0b8YZtRKtkI6Xu3rINGCUaoQ28ZydE9wCgeiE37M-59ws6f-BjijFgyD4QT5m7bfkddliWPPLHUsYD36ayd0Q80Jz2bk4l88c0_-RzQKwzTG7ik6OAnLzLOeUdjwX5jGFVXHDrqm7Vw-o4HZeVRk-TZ_OZT8FF7kse09GBPrB30U0UPv7rp-zu-7fbi6vm-ubyx8X5deNVJ-dGOAMdaKN1iEPnTafUqHwc-7ZVXmkvu9Z0Xmohxy4acD346GEwYxuU3gqnTtmXVfcBy6-l3mX3iXyYJpdDWcgqaOuHDci2Qj-_gt6XBXO9zlYDMfSqH3RFyRXlsRBhiPYB69vwYAXYY2Z2zczWzOxTZlZUklpJVMF5F_BF-j-sv1HQnLU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2811763678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy differences in aboveground woody biomass estimation with terrestrial laser scanning for trees in urban and rural forests and different leaf conditions</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Arseniou, Georgios ; MacFarlane, David W. ; Calders, Kim ; Baker, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Arseniou, Georgios ; MacFarlane, David W. ; Calders, Kim ; Baker, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>Key Message
Terrestrial laser scanning data can be converted to reliable woody aboveground biomass estimates, but estimation quality is influenced by growing environment, leaf condition, and variation in tree density affecting volume to mass conversion.
Both rural and urban forests play an important role in terrestrial carbon cycling. Forest carbon stocks are typically estimated from models predicting the aboveground biomass (AGB) of trees. However, such models are often limited by insufficient data on tree mass, which generally requires felling and weighing parts of trees. In this study, thirty-one trees of both deciduous and evergreen species were destructively sampled in rural and urban forest conditions. Prior to felling, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data were used to estimate tree biomass based on volume estimates from quantitative structure models, combined with tree basic density estimates from disks sampled from stems and branches after scanning and felling trees, but also in combination with published basic density values. Reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass were computed from destructive sampling. Trees were scanned in leaf-off conditions, except evergreen and some deciduous trees, to assess effects of a leaf-separation algorithm on TLS-based woody biomass estimates. We found strong agreement between TLS-based and reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass values, using both measured and published basic densities to convert TLS-based volume to biomass, but use of published densities reduced accuracy. Correlations between TLS-based and reference branch biomass were stronger for urban trees, while correlations with stem mass were stronger for rural trees. TLS-based biomass estimates from leaf-off and leaf-removed point clouds strongly agreed with reference biomass data, showing the utility of the leaf-removal algorithm for enhancing AGB estimation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-1890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00468-022-02382-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>aboveground biomass ; Accuracy ; Agriculture ; Algorithms ; Basic converters ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Branches ; carbon ; Carbon cycle ; Deciduous trees ; Density ; Disks ; Estimates ; Evergreen trees ; Forestry ; Forests ; Laser applications ; Lasers ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Original Article ; Plant Anatomy/Development ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Scanning ; Stems ; Terrestrial environments ; Trees ; Urban forests ; Urban Trees ; woody biomass</subject><ispartof>Trees (Berlin, West), 2023-06, Vol.37 (3), p.761-779</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-1a90508988ef75c9533d3cfd6443c38c25495c2812d5f90a60cfc079d4e38b1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-1a90508988ef75c9533d3cfd6443c38c25495c2812d5f90a60cfc079d4e38b1a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7781-3390</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00468-022-02382-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00468-022-02382-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arseniou, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacFarlane, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calders, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy differences in aboveground woody biomass estimation with terrestrial laser scanning for trees in urban and rural forests and different leaf conditions</title><title>Trees (Berlin, West)</title><addtitle>Trees</addtitle><description>Key Message
Terrestrial laser scanning data can be converted to reliable woody aboveground biomass estimates, but estimation quality is influenced by growing environment, leaf condition, and variation in tree density affecting volume to mass conversion.
Both rural and urban forests play an important role in terrestrial carbon cycling. Forest carbon stocks are typically estimated from models predicting the aboveground biomass (AGB) of trees. However, such models are often limited by insufficient data on tree mass, which generally requires felling and weighing parts of trees. In this study, thirty-one trees of both deciduous and evergreen species were destructively sampled in rural and urban forest conditions. Prior to felling, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data were used to estimate tree biomass based on volume estimates from quantitative structure models, combined with tree basic density estimates from disks sampled from stems and branches after scanning and felling trees, but also in combination with published basic density values. Reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass were computed from destructive sampling. Trees were scanned in leaf-off conditions, except evergreen and some deciduous trees, to assess effects of a leaf-separation algorithm on TLS-based woody biomass estimates. We found strong agreement between TLS-based and reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass values, using both measured and published basic densities to convert TLS-based volume to biomass, but use of published densities reduced accuracy. Correlations between TLS-based and reference branch biomass were stronger for urban trees, while correlations with stem mass were stronger for rural trees. TLS-based biomass estimates from leaf-off and leaf-removed point clouds strongly agreed with reference biomass data, showing the utility of the leaf-removal algorithm for enhancing AGB estimation.</description><subject>aboveground biomass</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Basic converters</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Branches</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Deciduous trees</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Disks</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Evergreen trees</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Laser applications</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Plant Anatomy/Development</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Scanning</subject><subject>Stems</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Urban forests</subject><subject>Urban Trees</subject><subject>woody biomass</subject><issn>0931-1890</issn><issn>1432-2285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uc1qHDEMNqWFbtK-QE-GXnqZRrbnxz6G0CaFQC7J2Xg99tZh1k6lmYZ9mr5qvZmGQA49CIH0_Qh9jH0S8FUADGcE0Pa6ASlrKS0b8YZtRKtkI6Xu3rINGCUaoQ28ZydE9wCgeiE37M-59ws6f-BjijFgyD4QT5m7bfkddliWPPLHUsYD36ayd0Q80Jz2bk4l88c0_-RzQKwzTG7ik6OAnLzLOeUdjwX5jGFVXHDrqm7Vw-o4HZeVRk-TZ_OZT8FF7kse09GBPrB30U0UPv7rp-zu-7fbi6vm-ubyx8X5deNVJ-dGOAMdaKN1iEPnTafUqHwc-7ZVXmkvu9Z0Xmohxy4acD346GEwYxuU3gqnTtmXVfcBy6-l3mX3iXyYJpdDWcgqaOuHDci2Qj-_gt6XBXO9zlYDMfSqH3RFyRXlsRBhiPYB69vwYAXYY2Z2zczWzOxTZlZUklpJVMF5F_BF-j-sv1HQnLU</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Arseniou, Georgios</creator><creator>MacFarlane, David W.</creator><creator>Calders, Kim</creator><creator>Baker, Matthew</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7781-3390</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Accuracy differences in aboveground woody biomass estimation with terrestrial laser scanning for trees in urban and rural forests and different leaf conditions</title><author>Arseniou, Georgios ; MacFarlane, David W. ; Calders, Kim ; Baker, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-1a90508988ef75c9533d3cfd6443c38c25495c2812d5f90a60cfc079d4e38b1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>aboveground biomass</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Basic converters</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Branches</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Deciduous trees</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Disks</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Evergreen trees</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Laser applications</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Plant Anatomy/Development</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Scanning</topic><topic>Stems</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Urban forests</topic><topic>Urban Trees</topic><topic>woody biomass</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arseniou, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacFarlane, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calders, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trees (Berlin, West)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arseniou, Georgios</au><au>MacFarlane, David W.</au><au>Calders, Kim</au><au>Baker, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy differences in aboveground woody biomass estimation with terrestrial laser scanning for trees in urban and rural forests and different leaf conditions</atitle><jtitle>Trees (Berlin, West)</jtitle><stitle>Trees</stitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>761</spage><epage>779</epage><pages>761-779</pages><issn>0931-1890</issn><eissn>1432-2285</eissn><abstract>Key Message
Terrestrial laser scanning data can be converted to reliable woody aboveground biomass estimates, but estimation quality is influenced by growing environment, leaf condition, and variation in tree density affecting volume to mass conversion.
Both rural and urban forests play an important role in terrestrial carbon cycling. Forest carbon stocks are typically estimated from models predicting the aboveground biomass (AGB) of trees. However, such models are often limited by insufficient data on tree mass, which generally requires felling and weighing parts of trees. In this study, thirty-one trees of both deciduous and evergreen species were destructively sampled in rural and urban forest conditions. Prior to felling, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data were used to estimate tree biomass based on volume estimates from quantitative structure models, combined with tree basic density estimates from disks sampled from stems and branches after scanning and felling trees, but also in combination with published basic density values. Reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass were computed from destructive sampling. Trees were scanned in leaf-off conditions, except evergreen and some deciduous trees, to assess effects of a leaf-separation algorithm on TLS-based woody biomass estimates. We found strong agreement between TLS-based and reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass values, using both measured and published basic densities to convert TLS-based volume to biomass, but use of published densities reduced accuracy. Correlations between TLS-based and reference branch biomass were stronger for urban trees, while correlations with stem mass were stronger for rural trees. TLS-based biomass estimates from leaf-off and leaf-removed point clouds strongly agreed with reference biomass data, showing the utility of the leaf-removal algorithm for enhancing AGB estimation.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00468-022-02382-1</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7781-3390</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0931-1890 |
ispartof | Trees (Berlin, West), 2023-06, Vol.37 (3), p.761-779 |
issn | 0931-1890 1432-2285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040469024 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | aboveground biomass Accuracy Agriculture Algorithms Basic converters Biomass Biomedical and Life Sciences Branches carbon Carbon cycle Deciduous trees Density Disks Estimates Evergreen trees Forestry Forests Laser applications Lasers Leaves Life Sciences Original Article Plant Anatomy/Development Plant Pathology Plant Physiology Plant Sciences Scanning Stems Terrestrial environments Trees Urban forests Urban Trees woody biomass |
title | Accuracy differences in aboveground woody biomass estimation with terrestrial laser scanning for trees in urban and rural forests and different leaf conditions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A13%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20differences%20in%20aboveground%20woody%20biomass%20estimation%20with%20terrestrial%20laser%20scanning%20for%20trees%20in%20urban%20and%20rural%20forests%20and%20different%20leaf%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Trees%20(Berlin,%20West)&rft.au=Arseniou,%20Georgios&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=761&rft.epage=779&rft.pages=761-779&rft.issn=0931-1890&rft.eissn=1432-2285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00468-022-02382-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2811763678%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2811763678&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |