Accuracy differences in aboveground woody biomass estimation with terrestrial laser scanning for trees in urban and rural forests and different leaf conditions

Key Message Terrestrial laser scanning data can be converted to reliable woody aboveground biomass estimates, but estimation quality is influenced by growing environment, leaf condition, and variation in tree density affecting volume to mass conversion. Both rural and urban forests play an important...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Trees (Berlin, West) West), 2023-06, Vol.37 (3), p.761-779
Hauptverfasser: Arseniou, Georgios, MacFarlane, David W., Calders, Kim, Baker, Matthew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 779
container_issue 3
container_start_page 761
container_title Trees (Berlin, West)
container_volume 37
creator Arseniou, Georgios
MacFarlane, David W.
Calders, Kim
Baker, Matthew
description Key Message Terrestrial laser scanning data can be converted to reliable woody aboveground biomass estimates, but estimation quality is influenced by growing environment, leaf condition, and variation in tree density affecting volume to mass conversion. Both rural and urban forests play an important role in terrestrial carbon cycling. Forest carbon stocks are typically estimated from models predicting the aboveground biomass (AGB) of trees. However, such models are often limited by insufficient data on tree mass, which generally requires felling and weighing parts of trees. In this study, thirty-one trees of both deciduous and evergreen species were destructively sampled in rural and urban forest conditions. Prior to felling, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data were used to estimate tree biomass based on volume estimates from quantitative structure models, combined with tree basic density estimates from disks sampled from stems and branches after scanning and felling trees, but also in combination with published basic density values. Reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass were computed from destructive sampling. Trees were scanned in leaf-off conditions, except evergreen and some deciduous trees, to assess effects of a leaf-separation algorithm on TLS-based woody biomass estimates. We found strong agreement between TLS-based and reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass values, using both measured and published basic densities to convert TLS-based volume to biomass, but use of published densities reduced accuracy. Correlations between TLS-based and reference branch biomass were stronger for urban trees, while correlations with stem mass were stronger for rural trees. TLS-based biomass estimates from leaf-off and leaf-removed point clouds strongly agreed with reference biomass data, showing the utility of the leaf-removal algorithm for enhancing AGB estimation.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00468-022-02382-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040469024</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2811763678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-1a90508988ef75c9533d3cfd6443c38c25495c2812d5f90a60cfc079d4e38b1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uc1qHDEMNqWFbtK-QE-GXnqZRrbnxz6G0CaFQC7J2Xg99tZh1k6lmYZ9mr5qvZmGQA49CIH0_Qh9jH0S8FUADGcE0Pa6ASlrKS0b8YZtRKtkI6Xu3rINGCUaoQ28ZydE9wCgeiE37M-59ws6f-BjijFgyD4QT5m7bfkddliWPPLHUsYD36ayd0Q80Jz2bk4l88c0_-RzQKwzTG7ik6OAnLzLOeUdjwX5jGFVXHDrqm7Vw-o4HZeVRk-TZ_OZT8FF7kse09GBPrB30U0UPv7rp-zu-7fbi6vm-ubyx8X5deNVJ-dGOAMdaKN1iEPnTafUqHwc-7ZVXmkvu9Z0Xmohxy4acD346GEwYxuU3gqnTtmXVfcBy6-l3mX3iXyYJpdDWcgqaOuHDci2Qj-_gt6XBXO9zlYDMfSqH3RFyRXlsRBhiPYB69vwYAXYY2Z2zczWzOxTZlZUklpJVMF5F_BF-j-sv1HQnLU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2811763678</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy differences in aboveground woody biomass estimation with terrestrial laser scanning for trees in urban and rural forests and different leaf conditions</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Arseniou, Georgios ; MacFarlane, David W. ; Calders, Kim ; Baker, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Arseniou, Georgios ; MacFarlane, David W. ; Calders, Kim ; Baker, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>Key Message Terrestrial laser scanning data can be converted to reliable woody aboveground biomass estimates, but estimation quality is influenced by growing environment, leaf condition, and variation in tree density affecting volume to mass conversion. Both rural and urban forests play an important role in terrestrial carbon cycling. Forest carbon stocks are typically estimated from models predicting the aboveground biomass (AGB) of trees. However, such models are often limited by insufficient data on tree mass, which generally requires felling and weighing parts of trees. In this study, thirty-one trees of both deciduous and evergreen species were destructively sampled in rural and urban forest conditions. Prior to felling, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data were used to estimate tree biomass based on volume estimates from quantitative structure models, combined with tree basic density estimates from disks sampled from stems and branches after scanning and felling trees, but also in combination with published basic density values. Reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass were computed from destructive sampling. Trees were scanned in leaf-off conditions, except evergreen and some deciduous trees, to assess effects of a leaf-separation algorithm on TLS-based woody biomass estimates. We found strong agreement between TLS-based and reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass values, using both measured and published basic densities to convert TLS-based volume to biomass, but use of published densities reduced accuracy. Correlations between TLS-based and reference branch biomass were stronger for urban trees, while correlations with stem mass were stronger for rural trees. TLS-based biomass estimates from leaf-off and leaf-removed point clouds strongly agreed with reference biomass data, showing the utility of the leaf-removal algorithm for enhancing AGB estimation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0931-1890</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00468-022-02382-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>aboveground biomass ; Accuracy ; Agriculture ; Algorithms ; Basic converters ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Branches ; carbon ; Carbon cycle ; Deciduous trees ; Density ; Disks ; Estimates ; Evergreen trees ; Forestry ; Forests ; Laser applications ; Lasers ; Leaves ; Life Sciences ; Original Article ; Plant Anatomy/Development ; Plant Pathology ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Scanning ; Stems ; Terrestrial environments ; Trees ; Urban forests ; Urban Trees ; woody biomass</subject><ispartof>Trees (Berlin, West), 2023-06, Vol.37 (3), p.761-779</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-1a90508988ef75c9533d3cfd6443c38c25495c2812d5f90a60cfc079d4e38b1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-1a90508988ef75c9533d3cfd6443c38c25495c2812d5f90a60cfc079d4e38b1a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7781-3390</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00468-022-02382-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00468-022-02382-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arseniou, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacFarlane, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calders, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy differences in aboveground woody biomass estimation with terrestrial laser scanning for trees in urban and rural forests and different leaf conditions</title><title>Trees (Berlin, West)</title><addtitle>Trees</addtitle><description>Key Message Terrestrial laser scanning data can be converted to reliable woody aboveground biomass estimates, but estimation quality is influenced by growing environment, leaf condition, and variation in tree density affecting volume to mass conversion. Both rural and urban forests play an important role in terrestrial carbon cycling. Forest carbon stocks are typically estimated from models predicting the aboveground biomass (AGB) of trees. However, such models are often limited by insufficient data on tree mass, which generally requires felling and weighing parts of trees. In this study, thirty-one trees of both deciduous and evergreen species were destructively sampled in rural and urban forest conditions. Prior to felling, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data were used to estimate tree biomass based on volume estimates from quantitative structure models, combined with tree basic density estimates from disks sampled from stems and branches after scanning and felling trees, but also in combination with published basic density values. Reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass were computed from destructive sampling. Trees were scanned in leaf-off conditions, except evergreen and some deciduous trees, to assess effects of a leaf-separation algorithm on TLS-based woody biomass estimates. We found strong agreement between TLS-based and reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass values, using both measured and published basic densities to convert TLS-based volume to biomass, but use of published densities reduced accuracy. Correlations between TLS-based and reference branch biomass were stronger for urban trees, while correlations with stem mass were stronger for rural trees. TLS-based biomass estimates from leaf-off and leaf-removed point clouds strongly agreed with reference biomass data, showing the utility of the leaf-removal algorithm for enhancing AGB estimation.</description><subject>aboveground biomass</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Basic converters</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Branches</subject><subject>carbon</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Deciduous trees</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Disks</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Evergreen trees</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Laser applications</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Plant Anatomy/Development</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Scanning</subject><subject>Stems</subject><subject>Terrestrial environments</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Urban forests</subject><subject>Urban Trees</subject><subject>woody biomass</subject><issn>0931-1890</issn><issn>1432-2285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uc1qHDEMNqWFbtK-QE-GXnqZRrbnxz6G0CaFQC7J2Xg99tZh1k6lmYZ9mr5qvZmGQA49CIH0_Qh9jH0S8FUADGcE0Pa6ASlrKS0b8YZtRKtkI6Xu3rINGCUaoQ28ZydE9wCgeiE37M-59ws6f-BjijFgyD4QT5m7bfkddliWPPLHUsYD36ayd0Q80Jz2bk4l88c0_-RzQKwzTG7ik6OAnLzLOeUdjwX5jGFVXHDrqm7Vw-o4HZeVRk-TZ_OZT8FF7kse09GBPrB30U0UPv7rp-zu-7fbi6vm-ubyx8X5deNVJ-dGOAMdaKN1iEPnTafUqHwc-7ZVXmkvu9Z0Xmohxy4acD346GEwYxuU3gqnTtmXVfcBy6-l3mX3iXyYJpdDWcgqaOuHDci2Qj-_gt6XBXO9zlYDMfSqH3RFyRXlsRBhiPYB69vwYAXYY2Z2zczWzOxTZlZUklpJVMF5F_BF-j-sv1HQnLU</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Arseniou, Georgios</creator><creator>MacFarlane, David W.</creator><creator>Calders, Kim</creator><creator>Baker, Matthew</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7781-3390</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Accuracy differences in aboveground woody biomass estimation with terrestrial laser scanning for trees in urban and rural forests and different leaf conditions</title><author>Arseniou, Georgios ; MacFarlane, David W. ; Calders, Kim ; Baker, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-1a90508988ef75c9533d3cfd6443c38c25495c2812d5f90a60cfc079d4e38b1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>aboveground biomass</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Basic converters</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Branches</topic><topic>carbon</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Deciduous trees</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Disks</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Evergreen trees</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Laser applications</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Plant Anatomy/Development</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Scanning</topic><topic>Stems</topic><topic>Terrestrial environments</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Urban forests</topic><topic>Urban Trees</topic><topic>woody biomass</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arseniou, Georgios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacFarlane, David W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calders, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baker, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Trees (Berlin, West)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arseniou, Georgios</au><au>MacFarlane, David W.</au><au>Calders, Kim</au><au>Baker, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy differences in aboveground woody biomass estimation with terrestrial laser scanning for trees in urban and rural forests and different leaf conditions</atitle><jtitle>Trees (Berlin, West)</jtitle><stitle>Trees</stitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>761</spage><epage>779</epage><pages>761-779</pages><issn>0931-1890</issn><eissn>1432-2285</eissn><abstract>Key Message Terrestrial laser scanning data can be converted to reliable woody aboveground biomass estimates, but estimation quality is influenced by growing environment, leaf condition, and variation in tree density affecting volume to mass conversion. Both rural and urban forests play an important role in terrestrial carbon cycling. Forest carbon stocks are typically estimated from models predicting the aboveground biomass (AGB) of trees. However, such models are often limited by insufficient data on tree mass, which generally requires felling and weighing parts of trees. In this study, thirty-one trees of both deciduous and evergreen species were destructively sampled in rural and urban forest conditions. Prior to felling, terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) data were used to estimate tree biomass based on volume estimates from quantitative structure models, combined with tree basic density estimates from disks sampled from stems and branches after scanning and felling trees, but also in combination with published basic density values. Reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass were computed from destructive sampling. Trees were scanned in leaf-off conditions, except evergreen and some deciduous trees, to assess effects of a leaf-separation algorithm on TLS-based woody biomass estimates. We found strong agreement between TLS-based and reference woody AGB, main stem, and branch biomass values, using both measured and published basic densities to convert TLS-based volume to biomass, but use of published densities reduced accuracy. Correlations between TLS-based and reference branch biomass were stronger for urban trees, while correlations with stem mass were stronger for rural trees. TLS-based biomass estimates from leaf-off and leaf-removed point clouds strongly agreed with reference biomass data, showing the utility of the leaf-removal algorithm for enhancing AGB estimation.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00468-022-02382-1</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7781-3390</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0931-1890
ispartof Trees (Berlin, West), 2023-06, Vol.37 (3), p.761-779
issn 0931-1890
1432-2285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040469024
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects aboveground biomass
Accuracy
Agriculture
Algorithms
Basic converters
Biomass
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Branches
carbon
Carbon cycle
Deciduous trees
Density
Disks
Estimates
Evergreen trees
Forestry
Forests
Laser applications
Lasers
Leaves
Life Sciences
Original Article
Plant Anatomy/Development
Plant Pathology
Plant Physiology
Plant Sciences
Scanning
Stems
Terrestrial environments
Trees
Urban forests
Urban Trees
woody biomass
title Accuracy differences in aboveground woody biomass estimation with terrestrial laser scanning for trees in urban and rural forests and different leaf conditions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T20%3A13%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20differences%20in%20aboveground%20woody%20biomass%20estimation%20with%20terrestrial%20laser%20scanning%20for%20trees%20in%20urban%20and%20rural%20forests%20and%20different%20leaf%20conditions&rft.jtitle=Trees%20(Berlin,%20West)&rft.au=Arseniou,%20Georgios&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=761&rft.epage=779&rft.pages=761-779&rft.issn=0931-1890&rft.eissn=1432-2285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00468-022-02382-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2811763678%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2811763678&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true