Efficacy of species distribution models (SDMs) for ecological realms to ascertain biological conservation and practices
SDMs are not new to conservation, but their popularity has increased dramatically in recent years. This step-by-step review provides an overview of the efficacy of SDMs in guiding restoration and conservation strategies across a wide range of ecological realms. Numerous studies have demonstrated the...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Biodiversity and conservation 2023-08, Vol.32 (10), p.3053-3087 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 3087 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 3053 |
| container_title | Biodiversity and conservation |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Rathore, Mahima Kanwar Sharma, Laxmi Kant |
| description | SDMs are not new to conservation, but their popularity has increased dramatically in recent years. This step-by-step review provides an overview of the efficacy of SDMs in guiding restoration and conservation strategies across a wide range of ecological realms. Numerous studies have demonstrated the applicability of SDMs to various fields; however, their effectiveness has not been evaluated for a variety of ecosystems. Therefore, a survey and analysis of published work on the use of SDM in ecological rejuvenation and conservation from 2002 to 2023 (May) is conducted. The analysis found a total of 739 papers and the number of papers increased after 2016. The United States of America (135) had the most SDM implementations in conservation planning, followed by China (59), Australia (40), and other nations, according to the classification of the research area by country. In the model, Maxent (341) and in the areas, Forest (252) outperformed contenders for the number of papers published. This review will create a framework to aid in the following: (1) information about taxa and realms in need of protection, (2) selection of the best SDM approach according to study aim, focused species, and study area, and (3) supplemental techniques useful for better SDM output. In addition, it will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various fundamental SDM algorithms in the context of ecological conservation.
Graphical Abstract |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10531-023-02648-1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040443197</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3040443197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-db45ab28931422a066d006b40f18734ced30edd9303a51b739051b39857c303f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKBDEQRYMoOD5-wFXAjS5aq_Lox1J8g-JCXYd0Oi2Rns6Y6lH8e6MjCi5chILUOZeCy9gewhECVMeEoCUWIGR-paoLXGMz1JUomgphnc2gKaGQiHqTbRE9Q5Z0iTP2dt73wVn3zmPPaeFd8MS7QFMK7XIKceTz2PmB-MH92S0d8j4m7l0c4lO2Bp68HebEp8gtOZ8mG0behp-1iyP59Gq_guzY8UWybgrO0w7b6O1Afvd7brPHi_OH06vi5u7y-vTkpnBSi6noWqVtK-pGohLCQll2AGWroMe6ksr5ToLvukaCtBrbSjaQh2xqXbn818ttdrDKXaT4svQ0mXnIlw6DHX1ckpGgQCmJTZXR_T_oc1ymMV9nRK1QgC4VZEqsKJciUfK9WaQwt-ndIJjPLsyqC5O7MF9dGMySXEmU4fHJp9_of6wP-zKMEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2841205640</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy of species distribution models (SDMs) for ecological realms to ascertain biological conservation and practices</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Rathore, Mahima Kanwar ; Sharma, Laxmi Kant</creator><creatorcontrib>Rathore, Mahima Kanwar ; Sharma, Laxmi Kant</creatorcontrib><description>SDMs are not new to conservation, but their popularity has increased dramatically in recent years. This step-by-step review provides an overview of the efficacy of SDMs in guiding restoration and conservation strategies across a wide range of ecological realms. Numerous studies have demonstrated the applicability of SDMs to various fields; however, their effectiveness has not been evaluated for a variety of ecosystems. Therefore, a survey and analysis of published work on the use of SDM in ecological rejuvenation and conservation from 2002 to 2023 (May) is conducted. The analysis found a total of 739 papers and the number of papers increased after 2016. The United States of America (135) had the most SDM implementations in conservation planning, followed by China (59), Australia (40), and other nations, according to the classification of the research area by country. In the model, Maxent (341) and in the areas, Forest (252) outperformed contenders for the number of papers published. This review will create a framework to aid in the following: (1) information about taxa and realms in need of protection, (2) selection of the best SDM approach according to study aim, focused species, and study area, and (3) supplemental techniques useful for better SDM output. In addition, it will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various fundamental SDM algorithms in the context of ecological conservation.
Graphical Abstract</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9710</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10531-023-02648-1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Australia ; Bibliometrics ; Biodiversity ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; China ; Climate change ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Conservation ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Ecology ; Ecosystems ; Effectiveness ; forests ; Geographical distribution ; Habitats ; Life Sciences ; Planning ; Restoration ; Review Paper ; surveys ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Biodiversity and conservation, 2023-08, Vol.32 (10), p.3053-3087</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-db45ab28931422a066d006b40f18734ced30edd9303a51b739051b39857c303f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-db45ab28931422a066d006b40f18734ced30edd9303a51b739051b39857c303f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2911-2893</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10531-023-02648-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10531-023-02648-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rathore, Mahima Kanwar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Laxmi Kant</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy of species distribution models (SDMs) for ecological realms to ascertain biological conservation and practices</title><title>Biodiversity and conservation</title><addtitle>Biodivers Conserv</addtitle><description>SDMs are not new to conservation, but their popularity has increased dramatically in recent years. This step-by-step review provides an overview of the efficacy of SDMs in guiding restoration and conservation strategies across a wide range of ecological realms. Numerous studies have demonstrated the applicability of SDMs to various fields; however, their effectiveness has not been evaluated for a variety of ecosystems. Therefore, a survey and analysis of published work on the use of SDM in ecological rejuvenation and conservation from 2002 to 2023 (May) is conducted. The analysis found a total of 739 papers and the number of papers increased after 2016. The United States of America (135) had the most SDM implementations in conservation planning, followed by China (59), Australia (40), and other nations, according to the classification of the research area by country. In the model, Maxent (341) and in the areas, Forest (252) outperformed contenders for the number of papers published. This review will create a framework to aid in the following: (1) information about taxa and realms in need of protection, (2) selection of the best SDM approach according to study aim, focused species, and study area, and (3) supplemental techniques useful for better SDM output. In addition, it will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various fundamental SDM algorithms in the context of ecological conservation.
Graphical Abstract</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>forests</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Restoration</subject><subject>Review Paper</subject><subject>surveys</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0960-3115</issn><issn>1572-9710</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctKBDEQRYMoOD5-wFXAjS5aq_Lox1J8g-JCXYd0Oi2Rns6Y6lH8e6MjCi5chILUOZeCy9gewhECVMeEoCUWIGR-paoLXGMz1JUomgphnc2gKaGQiHqTbRE9Q5Z0iTP2dt73wVn3zmPPaeFd8MS7QFMK7XIKceTz2PmB-MH92S0d8j4m7l0c4lO2Bp68HebEp8gtOZ8mG0behp-1iyP59Gq_guzY8UWybgrO0w7b6O1Afvd7brPHi_OH06vi5u7y-vTkpnBSi6noWqVtK-pGohLCQll2AGWroMe6ksr5ToLvukaCtBrbSjaQh2xqXbn818ttdrDKXaT4svQ0mXnIlw6DHX1ckpGgQCmJTZXR_T_oc1ymMV9nRK1QgC4VZEqsKJciUfK9WaQwt-ndIJjPLsyqC5O7MF9dGMySXEmU4fHJp9_of6wP-zKMEw</recordid><startdate>20230801</startdate><enddate>20230801</enddate><creator>Rathore, Mahima Kanwar</creator><creator>Sharma, Laxmi Kant</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2911-2893</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230801</creationdate><title>Efficacy of species distribution models (SDMs) for ecological realms to ascertain biological conservation and practices</title><author>Rathore, Mahima Kanwar ; Sharma, Laxmi Kant</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-db45ab28931422a066d006b40f18734ced30edd9303a51b739051b39857c303f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>forests</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Restoration</topic><topic>Review Paper</topic><topic>surveys</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rathore, Mahima Kanwar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Laxmi Kant</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rathore, Mahima Kanwar</au><au>Sharma, Laxmi Kant</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy of species distribution models (SDMs) for ecological realms to ascertain biological conservation and practices</atitle><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle><stitle>Biodivers Conserv</stitle><date>2023-08-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3053</spage><epage>3087</epage><pages>3053-3087</pages><issn>0960-3115</issn><eissn>1572-9710</eissn><abstract>SDMs are not new to conservation, but their popularity has increased dramatically in recent years. This step-by-step review provides an overview of the efficacy of SDMs in guiding restoration and conservation strategies across a wide range of ecological realms. Numerous studies have demonstrated the applicability of SDMs to various fields; however, their effectiveness has not been evaluated for a variety of ecosystems. Therefore, a survey and analysis of published work on the use of SDM in ecological rejuvenation and conservation from 2002 to 2023 (May) is conducted. The analysis found a total of 739 papers and the number of papers increased after 2016. The United States of America (135) had the most SDM implementations in conservation planning, followed by China (59), Australia (40), and other nations, according to the classification of the research area by country. In the model, Maxent (341) and in the areas, Forest (252) outperformed contenders for the number of papers published. This review will create a framework to aid in the following: (1) information about taxa and realms in need of protection, (2) selection of the best SDM approach according to study aim, focused species, and study area, and (3) supplemental techniques useful for better SDM output. In addition, it will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of various fundamental SDM algorithms in the context of ecological conservation.
Graphical Abstract</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10531-023-02648-1</doi><tpages>35</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2911-2893</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0960-3115 |
| ispartof | Biodiversity and conservation, 2023-08, Vol.32 (10), p.3053-3087 |
| issn | 0960-3115 1572-9710 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040443197 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Algorithms Australia Bibliometrics Biodiversity Biomedical and Life Sciences China Climate change Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Conservation Conservation Biology/Ecology Ecology Ecosystems Effectiveness forests Geographical distribution Habitats Life Sciences Planning Restoration Review Paper surveys Wildlife conservation |
| title | Efficacy of species distribution models (SDMs) for ecological realms to ascertain biological conservation and practices |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T00%3A33%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20of%20species%20distribution%20models%20(SDMs)%20for%20ecological%20realms%20to%20ascertain%20biological%20conservation%20and%20practices&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Rathore,%20Mahima%20Kanwar&rft.date=2023-08-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3053&rft.epage=3087&rft.pages=3053-3087&rft.issn=0960-3115&rft.eissn=1572-9710&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10531-023-02648-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3040443197%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2841205640&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |