Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy

Nozzle type and droplet size are one of the most important factors that affect spray deposition and the efficacy of herbicides. This study focused on evaluating the performance of spray nozzles and droplet sizes on the deposition of glufosinate and its biological efficacy of two weed species. Treatm...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Crop protection 2024-03, Vol.177, p.106560, Article 106560
Hauptverfasser: Prado, Evandro P., Guerreiro, Júlio C., Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J., do Nascimento, Vagner, Ferrari, Samuel, Galindo, Fernando S., Funichello, Marina, Raetano, Carlos G., Pagliari, Paulo H., Chechetto, Rodolfo G., Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106560
container_title Crop protection
container_volume 177
creator Prado, Evandro P.
Guerreiro, Júlio C.
Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J.
do Nascimento, Vagner
Ferrari, Samuel
Galindo, Fernando S.
Funichello, Marina
Raetano, Carlos G.
Pagliari, Paulo H.
Chechetto, Rodolfo G.
Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D.
description Nozzle type and droplet size are one of the most important factors that affect spray deposition and the efficacy of herbicides. This study focused on evaluating the performance of spray nozzles and droplet sizes on the deposition of glufosinate and its biological efficacy of two weed species. Treatments consisted of spraying glufosinate on Euphorbia heterophylla and Digitaria insularis by five spray nozzles (XR 11002 – fine droplet; TT 11002 – coarse; AIXR 11002 – very coarse; AIXR 110025 – extremely coarse; and TTI 11002 – ultra coarse) assessing the spray deposits and its influence on plant biomass reduction. The spray deposits on E. heterophylla were found to be similar between most of the spray nozzles, except for the TTI 11002 nozzle, which had lower spray deposits. In contrast, for D. insularis, the spray deposits tended to decrease as the droplet size increased. The spray uniformity was lower for the AIXR 11002 nozzle for E. heterophylla and the XR 11002 nozzle for D. insularis. Regarding the efficacy of glufosinate on both weeds, the lower C50 (concentration required for 50% dry weight reduction) were obtained using the XR 11002 nozzle with fine droplets. The TT 11002 nozzle and the AIXR 11002 nozzle showed intermediate C50, making them viable options to reduce spray drift and achieve acceptable weed control. However, the nozzles using extremely coarse (AIXR 110025) and ultra-coarse (TTI 11002) droplet class resulted in higher C50, indicating reduced herbicide efficacy. Our study provided clues on how different spray nozzles and droplet sizes can significantly impact spray deposits and herbicide efficacy on the control of E. heterophylla and D. insularis. Nozzles with fine droplet class generally provided better control, while extremely coarse and ultra-coarse showed reduced efficacy at weed control. •Spray nozzle influences the deposition and control of sourgrass and wild poinsettia.•The spray deposition tended to decrease as the droplet size increased.•Spraying fine droplets, provided better control of sourgrass and wild poinsettia.•Extremely and ultra-coarse droplets reduced the effectiveness of glufosinate.•Coarse and very-coarse droplets may reduce drift and provide acceptable weed control.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040419183</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0261219423003824</els_id><sourcerecordid>3040419183</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-4bcdd643860363ce74448b4f0047851517b31b019da368df5e3f484f9364845b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWD_-gYccvWxNNtls9iJI8QsKetBzyCaTkpJuarJV2l9vynr29A7DMy_Mg9ANJXNKqLhbz02K2xTnNalZWYlGkBM0o7JllegIP0UzUgta1bTj5-gi5zUhhWT1DNl3SC6mjR4M4Ohw3ia9x0M8HAJkrAeLbakOMOLsD4UY8CrsXMx-0CNgC9syjr6sj-gPgMW9jyGuvNEBg3Mlzf4KnTkdMlz_5SX6fHr8WLxUy7fn18XDsjK1lGPFe2Ot4EwKwgQz0HLOZc8dIbyVDW1o2zPaE9pZzYS0rgHmuOSuY6JE07NLdDv1FhdfO8ij2vhsIAQ9QNxlxQgnnHZUsoLyCS3mck7g1Db5jU57RYk6SlVrNUlVR6lqklrO7qczKG98e0gqGw_FnfUJzKhs9P8X_AJRHYKU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3040419183</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Prado, Evandro P. ; Guerreiro, Júlio C. ; Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J. ; do Nascimento, Vagner ; Ferrari, Samuel ; Galindo, Fernando S. ; Funichello, Marina ; Raetano, Carlos G. ; Pagliari, Paulo H. ; Chechetto, Rodolfo G. ; Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Prado, Evandro P. ; Guerreiro, Júlio C. ; Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J. ; do Nascimento, Vagner ; Ferrari, Samuel ; Galindo, Fernando S. ; Funichello, Marina ; Raetano, Carlos G. ; Pagliari, Paulo H. ; Chechetto, Rodolfo G. ; Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D.</creatorcontrib><description>Nozzle type and droplet size are one of the most important factors that affect spray deposition and the efficacy of herbicides. This study focused on evaluating the performance of spray nozzles and droplet sizes on the deposition of glufosinate and its biological efficacy of two weed species. Treatments consisted of spraying glufosinate on Euphorbia heterophylla and Digitaria insularis by five spray nozzles (XR 11002 – fine droplet; TT 11002 – coarse; AIXR 11002 – very coarse; AIXR 110025 – extremely coarse; and TTI 11002 – ultra coarse) assessing the spray deposits and its influence on plant biomass reduction. The spray deposits on E. heterophylla were found to be similar between most of the spray nozzles, except for the TTI 11002 nozzle, which had lower spray deposits. In contrast, for D. insularis, the spray deposits tended to decrease as the droplet size increased. The spray uniformity was lower for the AIXR 11002 nozzle for E. heterophylla and the XR 11002 nozzle for D. insularis. Regarding the efficacy of glufosinate on both weeds, the lower C50 (concentration required for 50% dry weight reduction) were obtained using the XR 11002 nozzle with fine droplets. The TT 11002 nozzle and the AIXR 11002 nozzle showed intermediate C50, making them viable options to reduce spray drift and achieve acceptable weed control. However, the nozzles using extremely coarse (AIXR 110025) and ultra-coarse (TTI 11002) droplet class resulted in higher C50, indicating reduced herbicide efficacy. Our study provided clues on how different spray nozzles and droplet sizes can significantly impact spray deposits and herbicide efficacy on the control of E. heterophylla and D. insularis. Nozzles with fine droplet class generally provided better control, while extremely coarse and ultra-coarse showed reduced efficacy at weed control. •Spray nozzle influences the deposition and control of sourgrass and wild poinsettia.•The spray deposition tended to decrease as the droplet size increased.•Spraying fine droplets, provided better control of sourgrass and wild poinsettia.•Extremely and ultra-coarse droplets reduced the effectiveness of glufosinate.•Coarse and very-coarse droplets may reduce drift and provide acceptable weed control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-2194</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>class ; Digitaria ; droplet size ; droplets ; Euphorbia heterophylla ; glufosinate ; Herbicide dose response ; Pesticide application technology ; phytomass ; plant protection ; species ; spray deposition ; Spray deposits ; spray drift ; Weed control ; weeds ; weight loss</subject><ispartof>Crop protection, 2024-03, Vol.177, p.106560, Article 106560</ispartof><rights>2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-4bcdd643860363ce74448b4f0047851517b31b019da368df5e3f484f9364845b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5037-0531</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219423003824$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prado, Evandro P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerreiro, Júlio C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>do Nascimento, Vagner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrari, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galindo, Fernando S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funichello, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raetano, Carlos G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagliari, Paulo H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chechetto, Rodolfo G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D.</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy</title><title>Crop protection</title><description>Nozzle type and droplet size are one of the most important factors that affect spray deposition and the efficacy of herbicides. This study focused on evaluating the performance of spray nozzles and droplet sizes on the deposition of glufosinate and its biological efficacy of two weed species. Treatments consisted of spraying glufosinate on Euphorbia heterophylla and Digitaria insularis by five spray nozzles (XR 11002 – fine droplet; TT 11002 – coarse; AIXR 11002 – very coarse; AIXR 110025 – extremely coarse; and TTI 11002 – ultra coarse) assessing the spray deposits and its influence on plant biomass reduction. The spray deposits on E. heterophylla were found to be similar between most of the spray nozzles, except for the TTI 11002 nozzle, which had lower spray deposits. In contrast, for D. insularis, the spray deposits tended to decrease as the droplet size increased. The spray uniformity was lower for the AIXR 11002 nozzle for E. heterophylla and the XR 11002 nozzle for D. insularis. Regarding the efficacy of glufosinate on both weeds, the lower C50 (concentration required for 50% dry weight reduction) were obtained using the XR 11002 nozzle with fine droplets. The TT 11002 nozzle and the AIXR 11002 nozzle showed intermediate C50, making them viable options to reduce spray drift and achieve acceptable weed control. However, the nozzles using extremely coarse (AIXR 110025) and ultra-coarse (TTI 11002) droplet class resulted in higher C50, indicating reduced herbicide efficacy. Our study provided clues on how different spray nozzles and droplet sizes can significantly impact spray deposits and herbicide efficacy on the control of E. heterophylla and D. insularis. Nozzles with fine droplet class generally provided better control, while extremely coarse and ultra-coarse showed reduced efficacy at weed control. •Spray nozzle influences the deposition and control of sourgrass and wild poinsettia.•The spray deposition tended to decrease as the droplet size increased.•Spraying fine droplets, provided better control of sourgrass and wild poinsettia.•Extremely and ultra-coarse droplets reduced the effectiveness of glufosinate.•Coarse and very-coarse droplets may reduce drift and provide acceptable weed control.</description><subject>class</subject><subject>Digitaria</subject><subject>droplet size</subject><subject>droplets</subject><subject>Euphorbia heterophylla</subject><subject>glufosinate</subject><subject>Herbicide dose response</subject><subject>Pesticide application technology</subject><subject>phytomass</subject><subject>plant protection</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>spray deposition</subject><subject>Spray deposits</subject><subject>spray drift</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>weeds</subject><subject>weight loss</subject><issn>0261-2194</issn><issn>1873-6904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWD_-gYccvWxNNtls9iJI8QsKetBzyCaTkpJuarJV2l9vynr29A7DMy_Mg9ANJXNKqLhbz02K2xTnNalZWYlGkBM0o7JllegIP0UzUgta1bTj5-gi5zUhhWT1DNl3SC6mjR4M4Ohw3ia9x0M8HAJkrAeLbakOMOLsD4UY8CrsXMx-0CNgC9syjr6sj-gPgMW9jyGuvNEBg3Mlzf4KnTkdMlz_5SX6fHr8WLxUy7fn18XDsjK1lGPFe2Ot4EwKwgQz0HLOZc8dIbyVDW1o2zPaE9pZzYS0rgHmuOSuY6JE07NLdDv1FhdfO8ij2vhsIAQ9QNxlxQgnnHZUsoLyCS3mck7g1Db5jU57RYk6SlVrNUlVR6lqklrO7qczKG98e0gqGw_FnfUJzKhs9P8X_AJRHYKU</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Prado, Evandro P.</creator><creator>Guerreiro, Júlio C.</creator><creator>Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J.</creator><creator>do Nascimento, Vagner</creator><creator>Ferrari, Samuel</creator><creator>Galindo, Fernando S.</creator><creator>Funichello, Marina</creator><creator>Raetano, Carlos G.</creator><creator>Pagliari, Paulo H.</creator><creator>Chechetto, Rodolfo G.</creator><creator>Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5037-0531</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy</title><author>Prado, Evandro P. ; Guerreiro, Júlio C. ; Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J. ; do Nascimento, Vagner ; Ferrari, Samuel ; Galindo, Fernando S. ; Funichello, Marina ; Raetano, Carlos G. ; Pagliari, Paulo H. ; Chechetto, Rodolfo G. ; Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c288t-4bcdd643860363ce74448b4f0047851517b31b019da368df5e3f484f9364845b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>class</topic><topic>Digitaria</topic><topic>droplet size</topic><topic>droplets</topic><topic>Euphorbia heterophylla</topic><topic>glufosinate</topic><topic>Herbicide dose response</topic><topic>Pesticide application technology</topic><topic>phytomass</topic><topic>plant protection</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>spray deposition</topic><topic>Spray deposits</topic><topic>spray drift</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>weeds</topic><topic>weight loss</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prado, Evandro P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerreiro, Júlio C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>do Nascimento, Vagner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrari, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galindo, Fernando S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Funichello, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raetano, Carlos G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pagliari, Paulo H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chechetto, Rodolfo G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prado, Evandro P.</au><au>Guerreiro, Júlio C.</au><au>Ferreira-Filho, Pedro J.</au><au>do Nascimento, Vagner</au><au>Ferrari, Samuel</au><au>Galindo, Fernando S.</au><au>Funichello, Marina</au><au>Raetano, Carlos G.</au><au>Pagliari, Paulo H.</au><au>Chechetto, Rodolfo G.</au><au>Rodrigues Neto, Arthur D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy</atitle><jtitle>Crop protection</jtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>177</volume><spage>106560</spage><pages>106560-</pages><artnum>106560</artnum><issn>0261-2194</issn><eissn>1873-6904</eissn><abstract>Nozzle type and droplet size are one of the most important factors that affect spray deposition and the efficacy of herbicides. This study focused on evaluating the performance of spray nozzles and droplet sizes on the deposition of glufosinate and its biological efficacy of two weed species. Treatments consisted of spraying glufosinate on Euphorbia heterophylla and Digitaria insularis by five spray nozzles (XR 11002 – fine droplet; TT 11002 – coarse; AIXR 11002 – very coarse; AIXR 110025 – extremely coarse; and TTI 11002 – ultra coarse) assessing the spray deposits and its influence on plant biomass reduction. The spray deposits on E. heterophylla were found to be similar between most of the spray nozzles, except for the TTI 11002 nozzle, which had lower spray deposits. In contrast, for D. insularis, the spray deposits tended to decrease as the droplet size increased. The spray uniformity was lower for the AIXR 11002 nozzle for E. heterophylla and the XR 11002 nozzle for D. insularis. Regarding the efficacy of glufosinate on both weeds, the lower C50 (concentration required for 50% dry weight reduction) were obtained using the XR 11002 nozzle with fine droplets. The TT 11002 nozzle and the AIXR 11002 nozzle showed intermediate C50, making them viable options to reduce spray drift and achieve acceptable weed control. However, the nozzles using extremely coarse (AIXR 110025) and ultra-coarse (TTI 11002) droplet class resulted in higher C50, indicating reduced herbicide efficacy. Our study provided clues on how different spray nozzles and droplet sizes can significantly impact spray deposits and herbicide efficacy on the control of E. heterophylla and D. insularis. Nozzles with fine droplet class generally provided better control, while extremely coarse and ultra-coarse showed reduced efficacy at weed control. •Spray nozzle influences the deposition and control of sourgrass and wild poinsettia.•The spray deposition tended to decrease as the droplet size increased.•Spraying fine droplets, provided better control of sourgrass and wild poinsettia.•Extremely and ultra-coarse droplets reduced the effectiveness of glufosinate.•Coarse and very-coarse droplets may reduce drift and provide acceptable weed control.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5037-0531</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-2194
ispartof Crop protection, 2024-03, Vol.177, p.106560, Article 106560
issn 0261-2194
1873-6904
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040419183
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects class
Digitaria
droplet size
droplets
Euphorbia heterophylla
glufosinate
Herbicide dose response
Pesticide application technology
phytomass
plant protection
species
spray deposition
Spray deposits
spray drift
Weed control
weeds
weight loss
title Performance of spray nozzles and droplet size on glufosinate deposition and weed biological efficacy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T01%3A15%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20spray%20nozzles%20and%20droplet%20size%20on%20glufosinate%20deposition%20and%20weed%20biological%20efficacy&rft.jtitle=Crop%20protection&rft.au=Prado,%20Evandro%20P.&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=177&rft.spage=106560&rft.pages=106560-&rft.artnum=106560&rft.issn=0261-2194&rft.eissn=1873-6904&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cropro.2023.106560&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3040419183%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3040419183&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0261219423003824&rfr_iscdi=true