Role of nuclear energy in carbon mitigation to achieve United Nations net zero carbon emission: evidence from Fourier bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto
In this communication, the time series data of three major countries USA, France, and Japan from 1965 to 2020 for CO 2 emission, GDP, and nuclear energy (NE) are evaluated. It also analyzed and validated the EKC hypothesis while using nuclear energy for electricity generation. Fourier ARDL is used t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science and pollution research international 2023-04, Vol.30 (16), p.46185-46203 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 46203 |
---|---|
container_issue | 16 |
container_start_page | 46185 |
container_title | Environmental science and pollution research international |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Singh, Akanksha Lal, Shiv Kumar, Nand Yadav, Rajan Kumari, Shweta |
description | In this communication, the time series data of three major countries USA, France, and Japan from 1965 to 2020 for CO
2
emission, GDP, and nuclear energy (NE) are evaluated. It also analyzed and validated the EKC hypothesis while using nuclear energy for electricity generation. Fourier ARDL is used to investigate the hypothesis criteria, and the Fourier bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto (FBTY) causality test is used for causal linkage between the variables as well as the wavelet coherence; it is also presented the time and frequency dependency of the variables. The CO
2
mitigation by using the NE is also assessed for all three countries and assessed that the France, Japan, and USA mitigated the CO
2
per year is 0.0463 million metric ton (MMT), 0.0239 and 0.0728 MMT per year respectively. Similar to that the SO
2
is reduced by using the NE is 24.322, 43.527, and 132.592 MMT/year, and NO
x
is reduced by approximately 0.2847, 0.147, and 0.4478 MMT/year by France, Japan, and USA respectively by applying the NE for power generation. The evidence of the EKC, Fourier bootstrap and Toda-Yamamoto clarifies the important role of nuclear energy in terms of carbon mitigation to achieve UN net zero carbon emission by 2050. Hence, in order to meet the UN target of net zero carbon emission by 2050, the USA and Japan should increase the production of nuclear energy as France meets its 74.1% energy demand through NE by validating the EKC hypothesis; on the other hand, all the three countries should increase the production of tidal energy due to their geographical location as tides are much more predictable than wind and sun keeping in consideration to the expenses incurred and a full proof plan for disposing NE residuals in a safe place as NE residuals are highly radioactive and contains traces of thorium and uranium. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11356-023-25572-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040377180</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2771089117</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8f2dbd6f51c0f80631669cb045e38d58fca77e393ac089543bb052c93571e2753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc9qFjEUxYMo9o--gAsJuHEzepNMJhN3UqwVioK0C1chk7nzmTKTfCaZ0voOvrNpv1bFha5y4fzOubkcQp4xeMUA1OvMmJBdA1w0XErFm6sHZJ91rG1Uq_XDP-Y9cpDzBQAHzdVjsic6xaTSep_8-BxnpHGiYXUz2kQxYNpcUx-os2mIgS6--I0tvo4lUuu-erxEeh58wZF-vBUyDVjod0zx3oSLz7kqbyhe-hGDQzqluNDjuCaPiQ4xllyS3dKzONrmi13sEkt8Qh5Nds749O49JOfH786OTprTT-8_HL09bVwLfWn6iY_D2E2SOZh66ATrOu0GaCWKfpT95KxSKLSwDnotWzEMILnTQiqGXElxSF7ucrcpflsxF1P_63CebcC4ZiOgBaEU6-G_KK9YXcKYquiLv9CLem6ohxjeg9Kd6PhNIN9RLsWcE05mm_xi07VhYG56NbteTe3V3PZqrqrp-V30Oiw4_rLcF1kBsQNylcIG0-_d_4j9CWRIrx4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2807963620</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Role of nuclear energy in carbon mitigation to achieve United Nations net zero carbon emission: evidence from Fourier bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Singh, Akanksha ; Lal, Shiv ; Kumar, Nand ; Yadav, Rajan ; Kumari, Shweta</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Akanksha ; Lal, Shiv ; Kumar, Nand ; Yadav, Rajan ; Kumari, Shweta</creatorcontrib><description>In this communication, the time series data of three major countries USA, France, and Japan from 1965 to 2020 for CO
2
emission, GDP, and nuclear energy (NE) are evaluated. It also analyzed and validated the EKC hypothesis while using nuclear energy for electricity generation. Fourier ARDL is used to investigate the hypothesis criteria, and the Fourier bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto (FBTY) causality test is used for causal linkage between the variables as well as the wavelet coherence; it is also presented the time and frequency dependency of the variables. The CO
2
mitigation by using the NE is also assessed for all three countries and assessed that the France, Japan, and USA mitigated the CO
2
per year is 0.0463 million metric ton (MMT), 0.0239 and 0.0728 MMT per year respectively. Similar to that the SO
2
is reduced by using the NE is 24.322, 43.527, and 132.592 MMT/year, and NO
x
is reduced by approximately 0.2847, 0.147, and 0.4478 MMT/year by France, Japan, and USA respectively by applying the NE for power generation. The evidence of the EKC, Fourier bootstrap and Toda-Yamamoto clarifies the important role of nuclear energy in terms of carbon mitigation to achieve UN net zero carbon emission by 2050. Hence, in order to meet the UN target of net zero carbon emission by 2050, the USA and Japan should increase the production of nuclear energy as France meets its 74.1% energy demand through NE by validating the EKC hypothesis; on the other hand, all the three countries should increase the production of tidal energy due to their geographical location as tides are much more predictable than wind and sun keeping in consideration to the expenses incurred and a full proof plan for disposing NE residuals in a safe place as NE residuals are highly radioactive and contains traces of thorium and uranium.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-25572-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36715799</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Carbon ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon Dioxide - analysis ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Economic Development ; Ecotoxicology ; electricity generation ; Emission analysis ; Energy demand ; Environment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental science ; France ; Geographical distribution ; Geographical locations ; Hypotheses ; Japan ; MMT ; Net zero ; Nuclear electric power generation ; Nuclear Energy ; nuclear power ; Nuclear reactor components ; Nuclear reactors ; power generation ; Research Article ; Sulfur dioxide ; Thorium ; Tidal energy ; Tidal power ; time series analysis ; Uranium ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; water power ; wavelet ; Wind</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2023-04, Vol.30 (16), p.46185-46203</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8f2dbd6f51c0f80631669cb045e38d58fca77e393ac089543bb052c93571e2753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8f2dbd6f51c0f80631669cb045e38d58fca77e393ac089543bb052c93571e2753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2938-2407</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-023-25572-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-023-25572-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36715799$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Akanksha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lal, Shiv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Nand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Rajan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumari, Shweta</creatorcontrib><title>Role of nuclear energy in carbon mitigation to achieve United Nations net zero carbon emission: evidence from Fourier bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><description>In this communication, the time series data of three major countries USA, France, and Japan from 1965 to 2020 for CO
2
emission, GDP, and nuclear energy (NE) are evaluated. It also analyzed and validated the EKC hypothesis while using nuclear energy for electricity generation. Fourier ARDL is used to investigate the hypothesis criteria, and the Fourier bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto (FBTY) causality test is used for causal linkage between the variables as well as the wavelet coherence; it is also presented the time and frequency dependency of the variables. The CO
2
mitigation by using the NE is also assessed for all three countries and assessed that the France, Japan, and USA mitigated the CO
2
per year is 0.0463 million metric ton (MMT), 0.0239 and 0.0728 MMT per year respectively. Similar to that the SO
2
is reduced by using the NE is 24.322, 43.527, and 132.592 MMT/year, and NO
x
is reduced by approximately 0.2847, 0.147, and 0.4478 MMT/year by France, Japan, and USA respectively by applying the NE for power generation. The evidence of the EKC, Fourier bootstrap and Toda-Yamamoto clarifies the important role of nuclear energy in terms of carbon mitigation to achieve UN net zero carbon emission by 2050. Hence, in order to meet the UN target of net zero carbon emission by 2050, the USA and Japan should increase the production of nuclear energy as France meets its 74.1% energy demand through NE by validating the EKC hypothesis; on the other hand, all the three countries should increase the production of tidal energy due to their geographical location as tides are much more predictable than wind and sun keeping in consideration to the expenses incurred and a full proof plan for disposing NE residuals in a safe place as NE residuals are highly radioactive and contains traces of thorium and uranium.</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Economic Development</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>electricity generation</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Energy demand</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>France</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Geographical locations</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>MMT</subject><subject>Net zero</subject><subject>Nuclear electric power generation</subject><subject>Nuclear Energy</subject><subject>nuclear power</subject><subject>Nuclear reactor components</subject><subject>Nuclear reactors</subject><subject>power generation</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Sulfur dioxide</subject><subject>Thorium</subject><subject>Tidal energy</subject><subject>Tidal power</subject><subject>time series analysis</subject><subject>Uranium</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>water power</subject><subject>wavelet</subject><subject>Wind</subject><issn>1614-7499</issn><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc9qFjEUxYMo9o--gAsJuHEzepNMJhN3UqwVioK0C1chk7nzmTKTfCaZ0voOvrNpv1bFha5y4fzOubkcQp4xeMUA1OvMmJBdA1w0XErFm6sHZJ91rG1Uq_XDP-Y9cpDzBQAHzdVjsic6xaTSep_8-BxnpHGiYXUz2kQxYNpcUx-os2mIgS6--I0tvo4lUuu-erxEeh58wZF-vBUyDVjod0zx3oSLz7kqbyhe-hGDQzqluNDjuCaPiQ4xllyS3dKzONrmi13sEkt8Qh5Nds749O49JOfH786OTprTT-8_HL09bVwLfWn6iY_D2E2SOZh66ATrOu0GaCWKfpT95KxSKLSwDnotWzEMILnTQiqGXElxSF7ucrcpflsxF1P_63CebcC4ZiOgBaEU6-G_KK9YXcKYquiLv9CLem6ohxjeg9Kd6PhNIN9RLsWcE05mm_xi07VhYG56NbteTe3V3PZqrqrp-V30Oiw4_rLcF1kBsQNylcIG0-_d_4j9CWRIrx4</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Singh, Akanksha</creator><creator>Lal, Shiv</creator><creator>Kumar, Nand</creator><creator>Yadav, Rajan</creator><creator>Kumari, Shweta</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2938-2407</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Role of nuclear energy in carbon mitigation to achieve United Nations net zero carbon emission: evidence from Fourier bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto</title><author>Singh, Akanksha ; Lal, Shiv ; Kumar, Nand ; Yadav, Rajan ; Kumari, Shweta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8f2dbd6f51c0f80631669cb045e38d58fca77e393ac089543bb052c93571e2753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Economic Development</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>electricity generation</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Energy demand</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>France</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Geographical locations</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>MMT</topic><topic>Net zero</topic><topic>Nuclear electric power generation</topic><topic>Nuclear Energy</topic><topic>nuclear power</topic><topic>Nuclear reactor components</topic><topic>Nuclear reactors</topic><topic>power generation</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Sulfur dioxide</topic><topic>Thorium</topic><topic>Tidal energy</topic><topic>Tidal power</topic><topic>time series analysis</topic><topic>Uranium</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>water power</topic><topic>wavelet</topic><topic>Wind</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Akanksha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lal, Shiv</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Nand</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadav, Rajan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumari, Shweta</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health & Nursing</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Akanksha</au><au>Lal, Shiv</au><au>Kumar, Nand</au><au>Yadav, Rajan</au><au>Kumari, Shweta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Role of nuclear energy in carbon mitigation to achieve United Nations net zero carbon emission: evidence from Fourier bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res Int</addtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>46185</spage><epage>46203</epage><pages>46185-46203</pages><issn>1614-7499</issn><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>In this communication, the time series data of three major countries USA, France, and Japan from 1965 to 2020 for CO
2
emission, GDP, and nuclear energy (NE) are evaluated. It also analyzed and validated the EKC hypothesis while using nuclear energy for electricity generation. Fourier ARDL is used to investigate the hypothesis criteria, and the Fourier bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto (FBTY) causality test is used for causal linkage between the variables as well as the wavelet coherence; it is also presented the time and frequency dependency of the variables. The CO
2
mitigation by using the NE is also assessed for all three countries and assessed that the France, Japan, and USA mitigated the CO
2
per year is 0.0463 million metric ton (MMT), 0.0239 and 0.0728 MMT per year respectively. Similar to that the SO
2
is reduced by using the NE is 24.322, 43.527, and 132.592 MMT/year, and NO
x
is reduced by approximately 0.2847, 0.147, and 0.4478 MMT/year by France, Japan, and USA respectively by applying the NE for power generation. The evidence of the EKC, Fourier bootstrap and Toda-Yamamoto clarifies the important role of nuclear energy in terms of carbon mitigation to achieve UN net zero carbon emission by 2050. Hence, in order to meet the UN target of net zero carbon emission by 2050, the USA and Japan should increase the production of nuclear energy as France meets its 74.1% energy demand through NE by validating the EKC hypothesis; on the other hand, all the three countries should increase the production of tidal energy due to their geographical location as tides are much more predictable than wind and sun keeping in consideration to the expenses incurred and a full proof plan for disposing NE residuals in a safe place as NE residuals are highly radioactive and contains traces of thorium and uranium.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>36715799</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11356-023-25572-x</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2938-2407</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1614-7499 |
ispartof | Environmental science and pollution research international, 2023-04, Vol.30 (16), p.46185-46203 |
issn | 1614-7499 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3040377180 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Aquatic Pollution Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Carbon Carbon dioxide Carbon Dioxide - analysis Carbon dioxide emissions Earth and Environmental Science Economic Development Ecotoxicology electricity generation Emission analysis Energy demand Environment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Environmental science France Geographical distribution Geographical locations Hypotheses Japan MMT Net zero Nuclear electric power generation Nuclear Energy nuclear power Nuclear reactor components Nuclear reactors power generation Research Article Sulfur dioxide Thorium Tidal energy Tidal power time series analysis Uranium Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Pollution Control water power wavelet Wind |
title | Role of nuclear energy in carbon mitigation to achieve United Nations net zero carbon emission: evidence from Fourier bootstrap Toda-Yamamoto |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T13%3A03%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Role%20of%20nuclear%20energy%20in%20carbon%20mitigation%20to%20achieve%20United%20Nations%20net%20zero%20carbon%20emission:%20evidence%20from%20Fourier%20bootstrap%20Toda-Yamamoto&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Singh,%20Akanksha&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=46185&rft.epage=46203&rft.pages=46185-46203&rft.issn=1614-7499&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-023-25572-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2771089117%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2807963620&rft_id=info:pmid/36715799&rfr_iscdi=true |