Numbers of prenatal cell‐free DNA screens performed: Results of a 2022 CAP exercise

Objective Determine current analytical methods and number of cell‐free (cf) DNA prenatal screening tests performed for common trisomies. Methods The College of American Pathologists 2022‐B Noninvasive Prenatal Testing exercise was distributed in December 2022 to 93 participants in 22 countries. Supp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Prenatal diagnosis 2024-07, Vol.44 (8), p.946-952
Hauptverfasser: Palomaki, Glenn E., Wyatt, Philip, Rowsey, Ross, Cacheris, Phillip Michael, Lepage, Nathalie, Natowicz, Marvin R., Long, Thomas, Moyer, Ann M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 952
container_issue 8
container_start_page 946
container_title Prenatal diagnosis
container_volume 44
creator Palomaki, Glenn E.
Wyatt, Philip
Rowsey, Ross
Cacheris, Phillip Michael
Lepage, Nathalie
Natowicz, Marvin R.
Long, Thomas
Moyer, Ann M.
description Objective Determine current analytical methods and number of cell‐free (cf) DNA prenatal screening tests performed for common trisomies. Methods The College of American Pathologists 2022‐B Noninvasive Prenatal Testing exercise was distributed in December 2022 to 93 participants in 22 countries. Supplemental questions included the number of tests performed in a recent month and the proportion of samples originating outside the United States (US). Results Eighty‐three participants from three continents returned results; 74 (89%) were suitable for the analyses. Nine manufacturer/platform combinations were identified, most commonly Illumina/Nextseq (55%). The most common methodology was whole genome sequencing (76%). Annualized cfDNA tests were 2.80 million, with Asian, European and North American participants representing 10.6%, 6.5% and 82.9% of tests, respectively. When restricted to US in‐country tests, the annualized rate was 2.18 million, with four of 20 participants testing 79.2%. Among 73 respondents, 63 (86%) were for‐profit, eight (11%) were non‐profit academic or government supported and the remaining two included hospital‐based and private non‐profit. Eighteen (25%) supported relevant academic training. Conclusion In 2011, screening for common trisomies was based on serum/ultrasound markers with an estimated 2.96 million US pregnancies screened in 131 laboratories. In 2022, cfDNA‐based screening was offered by 20 laboratories testing 2.18 million US pregnancies. Key points What's already known about this topic? Serum/ultrasound based prenatal screening for common trisomies is being replaced by cell‐free (cf) DNA‐based screening for common trisomies. What does this study add? In 2022, an estimated 59% of all United States (US) pregnancies received cfDNA screening for common trisomies, with four of 20 reporting laboratories performing 79% of these tests.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pd.6574
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3039808215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3075443724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-38e7f45f4311e15f390538b0a14cb9eebc9c82cf42b05606e8062a2ee0ec787f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgiq1VfAMJuFCQ1lwnGXel9QalFrHrYSY9gSkznTHpoN35CD6jT2J60YXgKmfxnT-HH6FTSnqUEHZdz3qRVGIPtSmJVZcwxvdRm9Awcy1pCx15Pw9Qs1gdohbXEWMRl200HTdlBs7jyuLawSJdpgU2UBRfH5_WAeDhuI-9CdPC4xqcrVwJsxv8DL4plpu1FLPwHx70JxjewZncwzE6sGnh4WT3dtD07vZl8NAdPd0_DvqjruFEiXAaKCukFZxSoNLymEiuM5JSYbIYIDOx0cxYwTIiIxKBJhFLGQABo7SyvIMut7m1q14b8MukzP36-nQBVeMTTnisiWZUBnr-h86rxi3CdUEpKQRXTAR1sVXGVd47sEnt8jJ1q4SSZN10Us-SddNBnu3ymiw08ut-qg3gagve8gJW_-Ukk-Em7hvgfYPn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3075443724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Numbers of prenatal cell‐free DNA screens performed: Results of a 2022 CAP exercise</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Palomaki, Glenn E. ; Wyatt, Philip ; Rowsey, Ross ; Cacheris, Phillip Michael ; Lepage, Nathalie ; Natowicz, Marvin R. ; Long, Thomas ; Moyer, Ann M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Palomaki, Glenn E. ; Wyatt, Philip ; Rowsey, Ross ; Cacheris, Phillip Michael ; Lepage, Nathalie ; Natowicz, Marvin R. ; Long, Thomas ; Moyer, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Determine current analytical methods and number of cell‐free (cf) DNA prenatal screening tests performed for common trisomies. Methods The College of American Pathologists 2022‐B Noninvasive Prenatal Testing exercise was distributed in December 2022 to 93 participants in 22 countries. Supplemental questions included the number of tests performed in a recent month and the proportion of samples originating outside the United States (US). Results Eighty‐three participants from three continents returned results; 74 (89%) were suitable for the analyses. Nine manufacturer/platform combinations were identified, most commonly Illumina/Nextseq (55%). The most common methodology was whole genome sequencing (76%). Annualized cfDNA tests were 2.80 million, with Asian, European and North American participants representing 10.6%, 6.5% and 82.9% of tests, respectively. When restricted to US in‐country tests, the annualized rate was 2.18 million, with four of 20 participants testing 79.2%. Among 73 respondents, 63 (86%) were for‐profit, eight (11%) were non‐profit academic or government supported and the remaining two included hospital‐based and private non‐profit. Eighteen (25%) supported relevant academic training. Conclusion In 2011, screening for common trisomies was based on serum/ultrasound markers with an estimated 2.96 million US pregnancies screened in 131 laboratories. In 2022, cfDNA‐based screening was offered by 20 laboratories testing 2.18 million US pregnancies. Key points What's already known about this topic? Serum/ultrasound based prenatal screening for common trisomies is being replaced by cell‐free (cf) DNA‐based screening for common trisomies. What does this study add? In 2022, an estimated 59% of all United States (US) pregnancies received cfDNA screening for common trisomies, with four of 20 reporting laboratories performing 79% of these tests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-3851</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pd.6574</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38622635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - analysis ; Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - blood ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Female ; Gene sequencing ; Genetic screening ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Maternal Serum Screening Tests - methods ; Maternal Serum Screening Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - methods ; Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis - methods ; Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Screening ; Trisomy - diagnosis ; Trisomy - genetics ; Whole genome sequencing</subject><ispartof>Prenatal diagnosis, 2024-07, Vol.44 (8), p.946-952</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-38e7f45f4311e15f390538b0a14cb9eebc9c82cf42b05606e8062a2ee0ec787f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3491-0841 ; 0000-0001-6154-8449</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpd.6574$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpd.6574$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38622635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palomaki, Glenn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyatt, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowsey, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacheris, Phillip Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepage, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natowicz, Marvin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moyer, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><title>Numbers of prenatal cell‐free DNA screens performed: Results of a 2022 CAP exercise</title><title>Prenatal diagnosis</title><addtitle>Prenat Diagn</addtitle><description>Objective Determine current analytical methods and number of cell‐free (cf) DNA prenatal screening tests performed for common trisomies. Methods The College of American Pathologists 2022‐B Noninvasive Prenatal Testing exercise was distributed in December 2022 to 93 participants in 22 countries. Supplemental questions included the number of tests performed in a recent month and the proportion of samples originating outside the United States (US). Results Eighty‐three participants from three continents returned results; 74 (89%) were suitable for the analyses. Nine manufacturer/platform combinations were identified, most commonly Illumina/Nextseq (55%). The most common methodology was whole genome sequencing (76%). Annualized cfDNA tests were 2.80 million, with Asian, European and North American participants representing 10.6%, 6.5% and 82.9% of tests, respectively. When restricted to US in‐country tests, the annualized rate was 2.18 million, with four of 20 participants testing 79.2%. Among 73 respondents, 63 (86%) were for‐profit, eight (11%) were non‐profit academic or government supported and the remaining two included hospital‐based and private non‐profit. Eighteen (25%) supported relevant academic training. Conclusion In 2011, screening for common trisomies was based on serum/ultrasound markers with an estimated 2.96 million US pregnancies screened in 131 laboratories. In 2022, cfDNA‐based screening was offered by 20 laboratories testing 2.18 million US pregnancies. Key points What's already known about this topic? Serum/ultrasound based prenatal screening for common trisomies is being replaced by cell‐free (cf) DNA‐based screening for common trisomies. What does this study add? In 2022, an estimated 59% of all United States (US) pregnancies received cfDNA screening for common trisomies, with four of 20 reporting laboratories performing 79% of these tests.</description><subject>Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - analysis</subject><subject>Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - blood</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Maternal Serum Screening Tests - methods</subject><subject>Maternal Serum Screening Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - methods</subject><subject>Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Trisomy - diagnosis</subject><subject>Trisomy - genetics</subject><subject>Whole genome sequencing</subject><issn>0197-3851</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgiq1VfAMJuFCQ1lwnGXel9QalFrHrYSY9gSkznTHpoN35CD6jT2J60YXgKmfxnT-HH6FTSnqUEHZdz3qRVGIPtSmJVZcwxvdRm9Awcy1pCx15Pw9Qs1gdohbXEWMRl200HTdlBs7jyuLawSJdpgU2UBRfH5_WAeDhuI-9CdPC4xqcrVwJsxv8DL4plpu1FLPwHx70JxjewZncwzE6sGnh4WT3dtD07vZl8NAdPd0_DvqjruFEiXAaKCukFZxSoNLymEiuM5JSYbIYIDOx0cxYwTIiIxKBJhFLGQABo7SyvIMut7m1q14b8MukzP36-nQBVeMTTnisiWZUBnr-h86rxi3CdUEpKQRXTAR1sVXGVd47sEnt8jJ1q4SSZN10Us-SddNBnu3ymiw08ut-qg3gagve8gJW_-Ukk-Em7hvgfYPn</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Palomaki, Glenn E.</creator><creator>Wyatt, Philip</creator><creator>Rowsey, Ross</creator><creator>Cacheris, Phillip Michael</creator><creator>Lepage, Nathalie</creator><creator>Natowicz, Marvin R.</creator><creator>Long, Thomas</creator><creator>Moyer, Ann M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3491-0841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6154-8449</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Numbers of prenatal cell‐free DNA screens performed: Results of a 2022 CAP exercise</title><author>Palomaki, Glenn E. ; Wyatt, Philip ; Rowsey, Ross ; Cacheris, Phillip Michael ; Lepage, Nathalie ; Natowicz, Marvin R. ; Long, Thomas ; Moyer, Ann M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-38e7f45f4311e15f390538b0a14cb9eebc9c82cf42b05606e8062a2ee0ec787f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - analysis</topic><topic>Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - blood</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Maternal Serum Screening Tests - methods</topic><topic>Maternal Serum Screening Tests - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - methods</topic><topic>Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Trisomy - diagnosis</topic><topic>Trisomy - genetics</topic><topic>Whole genome sequencing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palomaki, Glenn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyatt, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowsey, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacheris, Phillip Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepage, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natowicz, Marvin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moyer, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palomaki, Glenn E.</au><au>Wyatt, Philip</au><au>Rowsey, Ross</au><au>Cacheris, Phillip Michael</au><au>Lepage, Nathalie</au><au>Natowicz, Marvin R.</au><au>Long, Thomas</au><au>Moyer, Ann M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Numbers of prenatal cell‐free DNA screens performed: Results of a 2022 CAP exercise</atitle><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle><addtitle>Prenat Diagn</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>946</spage><epage>952</epage><pages>946-952</pages><issn>0197-3851</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><eissn>1097-0223</eissn><abstract>Objective Determine current analytical methods and number of cell‐free (cf) DNA prenatal screening tests performed for common trisomies. Methods The College of American Pathologists 2022‐B Noninvasive Prenatal Testing exercise was distributed in December 2022 to 93 participants in 22 countries. Supplemental questions included the number of tests performed in a recent month and the proportion of samples originating outside the United States (US). Results Eighty‐three participants from three continents returned results; 74 (89%) were suitable for the analyses. Nine manufacturer/platform combinations were identified, most commonly Illumina/Nextseq (55%). The most common methodology was whole genome sequencing (76%). Annualized cfDNA tests were 2.80 million, with Asian, European and North American participants representing 10.6%, 6.5% and 82.9% of tests, respectively. When restricted to US in‐country tests, the annualized rate was 2.18 million, with four of 20 participants testing 79.2%. Among 73 respondents, 63 (86%) were for‐profit, eight (11%) were non‐profit academic or government supported and the remaining two included hospital‐based and private non‐profit. Eighteen (25%) supported relevant academic training. Conclusion In 2011, screening for common trisomies was based on serum/ultrasound markers with an estimated 2.96 million US pregnancies screened in 131 laboratories. In 2022, cfDNA‐based screening was offered by 20 laboratories testing 2.18 million US pregnancies. Key points What's already known about this topic? Serum/ultrasound based prenatal screening for common trisomies is being replaced by cell‐free (cf) DNA‐based screening for common trisomies. What does this study add? In 2022, an estimated 59% of all United States (US) pregnancies received cfDNA screening for common trisomies, with four of 20 reporting laboratories performing 79% of these tests.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38622635</pmid><doi>10.1002/pd.6574</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3491-0841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6154-8449</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0197-3851
ispartof Prenatal diagnosis, 2024-07, Vol.44 (8), p.946-952
issn 0197-3851
1097-0223
1097-0223
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3039808215
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - analysis
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - blood
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
Female
Gene sequencing
Genetic screening
Humans
Laboratories
Maternal Serum Screening Tests - methods
Maternal Serum Screening Tests - statistics & numerical data
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - methods
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - statistics & numerical data
Pregnancy
Prenatal Diagnosis - methods
Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics & numerical data
Screening
Trisomy - diagnosis
Trisomy - genetics
Whole genome sequencing
title Numbers of prenatal cell‐free DNA screens performed: Results of a 2022 CAP exercise
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T11%3A00%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Numbers%20of%20prenatal%20cell%E2%80%90free%20DNA%20screens%20performed:%20Results%20of%20a%202022%20CAP%20exercise&rft.jtitle=Prenatal%20diagnosis&rft.au=Palomaki,%20Glenn%20E.&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=946&rft.epage=952&rft.pages=946-952&rft.issn=0197-3851&rft.eissn=1097-0223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pd.6574&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3075443724%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3075443724&rft_id=info:pmid/38622635&rfr_iscdi=true