Numbers of prenatal cell‐free DNA screens performed: Results of a 2022 CAP exercise
Objective Determine current analytical methods and number of cell‐free (cf) DNA prenatal screening tests performed for common trisomies. Methods The College of American Pathologists 2022‐B Noninvasive Prenatal Testing exercise was distributed in December 2022 to 93 participants in 22 countries. Supp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Prenatal diagnosis 2024-07, Vol.44 (8), p.946-952 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 952 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 946 |
container_title | Prenatal diagnosis |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Palomaki, Glenn E. Wyatt, Philip Rowsey, Ross Cacheris, Phillip Michael Lepage, Nathalie Natowicz, Marvin R. Long, Thomas Moyer, Ann M. |
description | Objective
Determine current analytical methods and number of cell‐free (cf) DNA prenatal screening tests performed for common trisomies.
Methods
The College of American Pathologists 2022‐B Noninvasive Prenatal Testing exercise was distributed in December 2022 to 93 participants in 22 countries. Supplemental questions included the number of tests performed in a recent month and the proportion of samples originating outside the United States (US).
Results
Eighty‐three participants from three continents returned results; 74 (89%) were suitable for the analyses. Nine manufacturer/platform combinations were identified, most commonly Illumina/Nextseq (55%). The most common methodology was whole genome sequencing (76%). Annualized cfDNA tests were 2.80 million, with Asian, European and North American participants representing 10.6%, 6.5% and 82.9% of tests, respectively. When restricted to US in‐country tests, the annualized rate was 2.18 million, with four of 20 participants testing 79.2%. Among 73 respondents, 63 (86%) were for‐profit, eight (11%) were non‐profit academic or government supported and the remaining two included hospital‐based and private non‐profit. Eighteen (25%) supported relevant academic training.
Conclusion
In 2011, screening for common trisomies was based on serum/ultrasound markers with an estimated 2.96 million US pregnancies screened in 131 laboratories. In 2022, cfDNA‐based screening was offered by 20 laboratories testing 2.18 million US pregnancies.
Key points
What's already known about this topic?
Serum/ultrasound based prenatal screening for common trisomies is being replaced by cell‐free (cf) DNA‐based screening for common trisomies.
What does this study add?
In 2022, an estimated 59% of all United States (US) pregnancies received cfDNA screening for common trisomies, with four of 20 reporting laboratories performing 79% of these tests. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pd.6574 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3039808215</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3075443724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-38e7f45f4311e15f390538b0a14cb9eebc9c82cf42b05606e8062a2ee0ec787f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgiq1VfAMJuFCQ1lwnGXel9QalFrHrYSY9gSkznTHpoN35CD6jT2J60YXgKmfxnT-HH6FTSnqUEHZdz3qRVGIPtSmJVZcwxvdRm9Awcy1pCx15Pw9Qs1gdohbXEWMRl200HTdlBs7jyuLawSJdpgU2UBRfH5_WAeDhuI-9CdPC4xqcrVwJsxv8DL4plpu1FLPwHx70JxjewZncwzE6sGnh4WT3dtD07vZl8NAdPd0_DvqjruFEiXAaKCukFZxSoNLymEiuM5JSYbIYIDOx0cxYwTIiIxKBJhFLGQABo7SyvIMut7m1q14b8MukzP36-nQBVeMTTnisiWZUBnr-h86rxi3CdUEpKQRXTAR1sVXGVd47sEnt8jJ1q4SSZN10Us-SddNBnu3ymiw08ut-qg3gagve8gJW_-Ukk-Em7hvgfYPn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3075443724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Numbers of prenatal cell‐free DNA screens performed: Results of a 2022 CAP exercise</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Palomaki, Glenn E. ; Wyatt, Philip ; Rowsey, Ross ; Cacheris, Phillip Michael ; Lepage, Nathalie ; Natowicz, Marvin R. ; Long, Thomas ; Moyer, Ann M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Palomaki, Glenn E. ; Wyatt, Philip ; Rowsey, Ross ; Cacheris, Phillip Michael ; Lepage, Nathalie ; Natowicz, Marvin R. ; Long, Thomas ; Moyer, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
Determine current analytical methods and number of cell‐free (cf) DNA prenatal screening tests performed for common trisomies.
Methods
The College of American Pathologists 2022‐B Noninvasive Prenatal Testing exercise was distributed in December 2022 to 93 participants in 22 countries. Supplemental questions included the number of tests performed in a recent month and the proportion of samples originating outside the United States (US).
Results
Eighty‐three participants from three continents returned results; 74 (89%) were suitable for the analyses. Nine manufacturer/platform combinations were identified, most commonly Illumina/Nextseq (55%). The most common methodology was whole genome sequencing (76%). Annualized cfDNA tests were 2.80 million, with Asian, European and North American participants representing 10.6%, 6.5% and 82.9% of tests, respectively. When restricted to US in‐country tests, the annualized rate was 2.18 million, with four of 20 participants testing 79.2%. Among 73 respondents, 63 (86%) were for‐profit, eight (11%) were non‐profit academic or government supported and the remaining two included hospital‐based and private non‐profit. Eighteen (25%) supported relevant academic training.
Conclusion
In 2011, screening for common trisomies was based on serum/ultrasound markers with an estimated 2.96 million US pregnancies screened in 131 laboratories. In 2022, cfDNA‐based screening was offered by 20 laboratories testing 2.18 million US pregnancies.
Key points
What's already known about this topic?
Serum/ultrasound based prenatal screening for common trisomies is being replaced by cell‐free (cf) DNA‐based screening for common trisomies.
What does this study add?
In 2022, an estimated 59% of all United States (US) pregnancies received cfDNA screening for common trisomies, with four of 20 reporting laboratories performing 79% of these tests.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-3851</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pd.6574</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38622635</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - analysis ; Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - blood ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Female ; Gene sequencing ; Genetic screening ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Maternal Serum Screening Tests - methods ; Maternal Serum Screening Tests - statistics & numerical data ; Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - methods ; Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - statistics & numerical data ; Pregnancy ; Prenatal Diagnosis - methods ; Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics & numerical data ; Screening ; Trisomy - diagnosis ; Trisomy - genetics ; Whole genome sequencing</subject><ispartof>Prenatal diagnosis, 2024-07, Vol.44 (8), p.946-952</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-38e7f45f4311e15f390538b0a14cb9eebc9c82cf42b05606e8062a2ee0ec787f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3491-0841 ; 0000-0001-6154-8449</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fpd.6574$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fpd.6574$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38622635$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Palomaki, Glenn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyatt, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowsey, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacheris, Phillip Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepage, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natowicz, Marvin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moyer, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><title>Numbers of prenatal cell‐free DNA screens performed: Results of a 2022 CAP exercise</title><title>Prenatal diagnosis</title><addtitle>Prenat Diagn</addtitle><description>Objective
Determine current analytical methods and number of cell‐free (cf) DNA prenatal screening tests performed for common trisomies.
Methods
The College of American Pathologists 2022‐B Noninvasive Prenatal Testing exercise was distributed in December 2022 to 93 participants in 22 countries. Supplemental questions included the number of tests performed in a recent month and the proportion of samples originating outside the United States (US).
Results
Eighty‐three participants from three continents returned results; 74 (89%) were suitable for the analyses. Nine manufacturer/platform combinations were identified, most commonly Illumina/Nextseq (55%). The most common methodology was whole genome sequencing (76%). Annualized cfDNA tests were 2.80 million, with Asian, European and North American participants representing 10.6%, 6.5% and 82.9% of tests, respectively. When restricted to US in‐country tests, the annualized rate was 2.18 million, with four of 20 participants testing 79.2%. Among 73 respondents, 63 (86%) were for‐profit, eight (11%) were non‐profit academic or government supported and the remaining two included hospital‐based and private non‐profit. Eighteen (25%) supported relevant academic training.
Conclusion
In 2011, screening for common trisomies was based on serum/ultrasound markers with an estimated 2.96 million US pregnancies screened in 131 laboratories. In 2022, cfDNA‐based screening was offered by 20 laboratories testing 2.18 million US pregnancies.
Key points
What's already known about this topic?
Serum/ultrasound based prenatal screening for common trisomies is being replaced by cell‐free (cf) DNA‐based screening for common trisomies.
What does this study add?
In 2022, an estimated 59% of all United States (US) pregnancies received cfDNA screening for common trisomies, with four of 20 reporting laboratories performing 79% of these tests.</description><subject>Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - analysis</subject><subject>Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - blood</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Genetic screening</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Maternal Serum Screening Tests - methods</subject><subject>Maternal Serum Screening Tests - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - methods</subject><subject>Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Trisomy - diagnosis</subject><subject>Trisomy - genetics</subject><subject>Whole genome sequencing</subject><issn>0197-3851</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKAzEUBuAgiq1VfAMJuFCQ1lwnGXel9QalFrHrYSY9gSkznTHpoN35CD6jT2J60YXgKmfxnT-HH6FTSnqUEHZdz3qRVGIPtSmJVZcwxvdRm9Awcy1pCx15Pw9Qs1gdohbXEWMRl200HTdlBs7jyuLawSJdpgU2UBRfH5_WAeDhuI-9CdPC4xqcrVwJsxv8DL4plpu1FLPwHx70JxjewZncwzE6sGnh4WT3dtD07vZl8NAdPd0_DvqjruFEiXAaKCukFZxSoNLymEiuM5JSYbIYIDOx0cxYwTIiIxKBJhFLGQABo7SyvIMut7m1q14b8MukzP36-nQBVeMTTnisiWZUBnr-h86rxi3CdUEpKQRXTAR1sVXGVd47sEnt8jJ1q4SSZN10Us-SddNBnu3ymiw08ut-qg3gagve8gJW_-Ukk-Em7hvgfYPn</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Palomaki, Glenn E.</creator><creator>Wyatt, Philip</creator><creator>Rowsey, Ross</creator><creator>Cacheris, Phillip Michael</creator><creator>Lepage, Nathalie</creator><creator>Natowicz, Marvin R.</creator><creator>Long, Thomas</creator><creator>Moyer, Ann M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3491-0841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6154-8449</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Numbers of prenatal cell‐free DNA screens performed: Results of a 2022 CAP exercise</title><author>Palomaki, Glenn E. ; Wyatt, Philip ; Rowsey, Ross ; Cacheris, Phillip Michael ; Lepage, Nathalie ; Natowicz, Marvin R. ; Long, Thomas ; Moyer, Ann M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3074-38e7f45f4311e15f390538b0a14cb9eebc9c82cf42b05606e8062a2ee0ec787f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - analysis</topic><topic>Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - blood</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Genetic screening</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Maternal Serum Screening Tests - methods</topic><topic>Maternal Serum Screening Tests - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - methods</topic><topic>Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - methods</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Trisomy - diagnosis</topic><topic>Trisomy - genetics</topic><topic>Whole genome sequencing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Palomaki, Glenn E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wyatt, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowsey, Ross</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cacheris, Phillip Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lepage, Nathalie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natowicz, Marvin R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moyer, Ann M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Palomaki, Glenn E.</au><au>Wyatt, Philip</au><au>Rowsey, Ross</au><au>Cacheris, Phillip Michael</au><au>Lepage, Nathalie</au><au>Natowicz, Marvin R.</au><au>Long, Thomas</au><au>Moyer, Ann M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Numbers of prenatal cell‐free DNA screens performed: Results of a 2022 CAP exercise</atitle><jtitle>Prenatal diagnosis</jtitle><addtitle>Prenat Diagn</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>946</spage><epage>952</epage><pages>946-952</pages><issn>0197-3851</issn><issn>1097-0223</issn><eissn>1097-0223</eissn><abstract>Objective
Determine current analytical methods and number of cell‐free (cf) DNA prenatal screening tests performed for common trisomies.
Methods
The College of American Pathologists 2022‐B Noninvasive Prenatal Testing exercise was distributed in December 2022 to 93 participants in 22 countries. Supplemental questions included the number of tests performed in a recent month and the proportion of samples originating outside the United States (US).
Results
Eighty‐three participants from three continents returned results; 74 (89%) were suitable for the analyses. Nine manufacturer/platform combinations were identified, most commonly Illumina/Nextseq (55%). The most common methodology was whole genome sequencing (76%). Annualized cfDNA tests were 2.80 million, with Asian, European and North American participants representing 10.6%, 6.5% and 82.9% of tests, respectively. When restricted to US in‐country tests, the annualized rate was 2.18 million, with four of 20 participants testing 79.2%. Among 73 respondents, 63 (86%) were for‐profit, eight (11%) were non‐profit academic or government supported and the remaining two included hospital‐based and private non‐profit. Eighteen (25%) supported relevant academic training.
Conclusion
In 2011, screening for common trisomies was based on serum/ultrasound markers with an estimated 2.96 million US pregnancies screened in 131 laboratories. In 2022, cfDNA‐based screening was offered by 20 laboratories testing 2.18 million US pregnancies.
Key points
What's already known about this topic?
Serum/ultrasound based prenatal screening for common trisomies is being replaced by cell‐free (cf) DNA‐based screening for common trisomies.
What does this study add?
In 2022, an estimated 59% of all United States (US) pregnancies received cfDNA screening for common trisomies, with four of 20 reporting laboratories performing 79% of these tests.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38622635</pmid><doi>10.1002/pd.6574</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3491-0841</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6154-8449</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0197-3851 |
ispartof | Prenatal diagnosis, 2024-07, Vol.44 (8), p.946-952 |
issn | 0197-3851 1097-0223 1097-0223 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3039808215 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - analysis Cell-Free Nucleic Acids - blood Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA Female Gene sequencing Genetic screening Humans Laboratories Maternal Serum Screening Tests - methods Maternal Serum Screening Tests - statistics & numerical data Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - methods Noninvasive Prenatal Testing - statistics & numerical data Pregnancy Prenatal Diagnosis - methods Prenatal Diagnosis - statistics & numerical data Screening Trisomy - diagnosis Trisomy - genetics Whole genome sequencing |
title | Numbers of prenatal cell‐free DNA screens performed: Results of a 2022 CAP exercise |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T11%3A00%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Numbers%20of%20prenatal%20cell%E2%80%90free%20DNA%20screens%20performed:%20Results%20of%20a%202022%20CAP%20exercise&rft.jtitle=Prenatal%20diagnosis&rft.au=Palomaki,%20Glenn%20E.&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=946&rft.epage=952&rft.pages=946-952&rft.issn=0197-3851&rft.eissn=1097-0223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pd.6574&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3075443724%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3075443724&rft_id=info:pmid/38622635&rfr_iscdi=true |