In Vitro Analysis of Outcome Differences Between Repairing and Replacing Broken Dental Restorations

Objective In light of several advancements and considerations in endodontic dentistry, there still remains a need to comprehensively evaluate the outcome disparities between repairing and replacing broken dental restorations. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of repairing dental restorati...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2024-03, Vol.16 (3), p.e56071-e56071
Hauptverfasser: Sachan, Saraswati, De, Raktim, Balivada, Akshita, Pandey, Soni, Tiwari, Neeraj K, Franklin, Supurna, Ganiga Channaiah, Shivakumar, Siddiqui, Shazia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e56071
container_issue 3
container_start_page e56071
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 16
creator Sachan, Saraswati
De, Raktim
Balivada, Akshita
Pandey, Soni
Tiwari, Neeraj K
Franklin, Supurna
Ganiga Channaiah, Shivakumar
Siddiqui, Shazia
description Objective In light of several advancements and considerations in endodontic dentistry, there still remains a need to comprehensively evaluate the outcome disparities between repairing and replacing broken dental restorations. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of repairing dental restorations versus replacing them, focusing on how each method affects the structural strength and longevity of the restorations. Methods The study included 60 freshly removed human maxillary premolars. Initial processing involved rigorous washing, descaling, and polishing of the teeth. To ensure preservation, the specimens were stored in sterile, distilled water. To occlude the root canals, a self-hardening composite resin was used, and the roots were coated with two coats of clear nail polish to prevent moisture penetration. A 245 carbide bur attached to a high-speed dental handpiece with air and water spray cooling produced standardized Class II cavities on the occluso-proximal surfaces. Each cavity had a buccolingual breadth of 2 mm, an occluso-cervical length of 4 mm, and a gingival boundary that was 1 mm coronal to the cement-enamel junction. Following this preparation, the teeth were randomly separated into three groups (Group A, Group B, and Group C), each containing 20 teeth. Results Our analysis showed that teeth with entirely replaced restorations had a higher average fracture resistance than those with repaired restorations. However, the difference in fracture resistance between the repair and replacement groups for each type of material was not statistically significant. Conclusion Based on the findings, repairing a dental restoration can be a conservative and less invasive alternative to a full replacement without a significant compromise in the restoration's ability to withstand fracture. Therefore, dental professionals might consider full restoration as a viable option, taking into account the need to preserve dental tissue as well as the restoration's durability and structural integrity.
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.56071
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3039233964</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3039233964</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-e6b13ebeb024219c56064634db68687b25e4c84096732af4d50f366c034be83f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM1LwzAUwIMobszdPEvAiwc7kyZN0uPc_BgMBqJeS5q-SmeXzKRF9t_buini6X39eLz3Q-ickomUSXpjWg9tmCSCSHqEhjEVKlJU8eM_-QCNQ1gTQiiRMZHkFA2YElQxRofILCx-rRrv8NTqeheqgF2JV21j3AbwvCpL8GANBHwLzSeAxU-w1ZWv7BvWtuirWpu-uvXuvRvPwTa67vqhcV43lbPhDJ2Uug4wPsQRerm_e549RsvVw2I2XUYm5ryJQOSUQQ45iXlMU9M9JbhgvMiFEkrmcQLcKE5SIVmsS14kpGRCGMJ4DoqVbISu9nu33n203QHZpgoG6lpbcG3IGGFpzFgqeIde_kPXrvWdgZ7iqVSUMNVR13vKeBeChzLb-mqj_S6jJOv9Z3v_2bf_Dr84LG3zDRS_8I9t9gWUgYCM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3049781038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Vitro Analysis of Outcome Differences Between Repairing and Replacing Broken Dental Restorations</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Sachan, Saraswati ; De, Raktim ; Balivada, Akshita ; Pandey, Soni ; Tiwari, Neeraj K ; Franklin, Supurna ; Ganiga Channaiah, Shivakumar ; Siddiqui, Shazia</creator><creatorcontrib>Sachan, Saraswati ; De, Raktim ; Balivada, Akshita ; Pandey, Soni ; Tiwari, Neeraj K ; Franklin, Supurna ; Ganiga Channaiah, Shivakumar ; Siddiqui, Shazia</creatorcontrib><description>Objective In light of several advancements and considerations in endodontic dentistry, there still remains a need to comprehensively evaluate the outcome disparities between repairing and replacing broken dental restorations. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of repairing dental restorations versus replacing them, focusing on how each method affects the structural strength and longevity of the restorations. Methods The study included 60 freshly removed human maxillary premolars. Initial processing involved rigorous washing, descaling, and polishing of the teeth. To ensure preservation, the specimens were stored in sterile, distilled water. To occlude the root canals, a self-hardening composite resin was used, and the roots were coated with two coats of clear nail polish to prevent moisture penetration. A 245 carbide bur attached to a high-speed dental handpiece with air and water spray cooling produced standardized Class II cavities on the occluso-proximal surfaces. Each cavity had a buccolingual breadth of 2 mm, an occluso-cervical length of 4 mm, and a gingival boundary that was 1 mm coronal to the cement-enamel junction. Following this preparation, the teeth were randomly separated into three groups (Group A, Group B, and Group C), each containing 20 teeth. Results Our analysis showed that teeth with entirely replaced restorations had a higher average fracture resistance than those with repaired restorations. However, the difference in fracture resistance between the repair and replacement groups for each type of material was not statistically significant. Conclusion Based on the findings, repairing a dental restoration can be a conservative and less invasive alternative to a full replacement without a significant compromise in the restoration's ability to withstand fracture. Therefore, dental professionals might consider full restoration as a viable option, taking into account the need to preserve dental tissue as well as the restoration's durability and structural integrity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56071</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38618331</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Bond strength ; Composite materials ; Cooling ; Optical properties ; Polymerization ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2024-03, Vol.16 (3), p.e56071-e56071</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024, Sachan et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024, Sachan et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-e6b13ebeb024219c56064634db68687b25e4c84096732af4d50f366c034be83f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38618331$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sachan, Saraswati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De, Raktim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balivada, Akshita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Soni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiwari, Neeraj K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Supurna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganiga Channaiah, Shivakumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Shazia</creatorcontrib><title>In Vitro Analysis of Outcome Differences Between Repairing and Replacing Broken Dental Restorations</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Objective In light of several advancements and considerations in endodontic dentistry, there still remains a need to comprehensively evaluate the outcome disparities between repairing and replacing broken dental restorations. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of repairing dental restorations versus replacing them, focusing on how each method affects the structural strength and longevity of the restorations. Methods The study included 60 freshly removed human maxillary premolars. Initial processing involved rigorous washing, descaling, and polishing of the teeth. To ensure preservation, the specimens were stored in sterile, distilled water. To occlude the root canals, a self-hardening composite resin was used, and the roots were coated with two coats of clear nail polish to prevent moisture penetration. A 245 carbide bur attached to a high-speed dental handpiece with air and water spray cooling produced standardized Class II cavities on the occluso-proximal surfaces. Each cavity had a buccolingual breadth of 2 mm, an occluso-cervical length of 4 mm, and a gingival boundary that was 1 mm coronal to the cement-enamel junction. Following this preparation, the teeth were randomly separated into three groups (Group A, Group B, and Group C), each containing 20 teeth. Results Our analysis showed that teeth with entirely replaced restorations had a higher average fracture resistance than those with repaired restorations. However, the difference in fracture resistance between the repair and replacement groups for each type of material was not statistically significant. Conclusion Based on the findings, repairing a dental restoration can be a conservative and less invasive alternative to a full replacement without a significant compromise in the restoration's ability to withstand fracture. Therefore, dental professionals might consider full restoration as a viable option, taking into account the need to preserve dental tissue as well as the restoration's durability and structural integrity.</description><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Cooling</subject><subject>Optical properties</subject><subject>Polymerization</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM1LwzAUwIMobszdPEvAiwc7kyZN0uPc_BgMBqJeS5q-SmeXzKRF9t_buini6X39eLz3Q-ickomUSXpjWg9tmCSCSHqEhjEVKlJU8eM_-QCNQ1gTQiiRMZHkFA2YElQxRofILCx-rRrv8NTqeheqgF2JV21j3AbwvCpL8GANBHwLzSeAxU-w1ZWv7BvWtuirWpu-uvXuvRvPwTa67vqhcV43lbPhDJ2Uug4wPsQRerm_e549RsvVw2I2XUYm5ryJQOSUQQ45iXlMU9M9JbhgvMiFEkrmcQLcKE5SIVmsS14kpGRCGMJ4DoqVbISu9nu33n203QHZpgoG6lpbcG3IGGFpzFgqeIde_kPXrvWdgZ7iqVSUMNVR13vKeBeChzLb-mqj_S6jJOv9Z3v_2bf_Dr84LG3zDRS_8I9t9gWUgYCM</recordid><startdate>20240313</startdate><enddate>20240313</enddate><creator>Sachan, Saraswati</creator><creator>De, Raktim</creator><creator>Balivada, Akshita</creator><creator>Pandey, Soni</creator><creator>Tiwari, Neeraj K</creator><creator>Franklin, Supurna</creator><creator>Ganiga Channaiah, Shivakumar</creator><creator>Siddiqui, Shazia</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240313</creationdate><title>In Vitro Analysis of Outcome Differences Between Repairing and Replacing Broken Dental Restorations</title><author>Sachan, Saraswati ; De, Raktim ; Balivada, Akshita ; Pandey, Soni ; Tiwari, Neeraj K ; Franklin, Supurna ; Ganiga Channaiah, Shivakumar ; Siddiqui, Shazia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-e6b13ebeb024219c56064634db68687b25e4c84096732af4d50f366c034be83f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Cooling</topic><topic>Optical properties</topic><topic>Polymerization</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sachan, Saraswati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De, Raktim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balivada, Akshita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandey, Soni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tiwari, Neeraj K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franklin, Supurna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganiga Channaiah, Shivakumar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siddiqui, Shazia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sachan, Saraswati</au><au>De, Raktim</au><au>Balivada, Akshita</au><au>Pandey, Soni</au><au>Tiwari, Neeraj K</au><au>Franklin, Supurna</au><au>Ganiga Channaiah, Shivakumar</au><au>Siddiqui, Shazia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Vitro Analysis of Outcome Differences Between Repairing and Replacing Broken Dental Restorations</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2024-03-13</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e56071</spage><epage>e56071</epage><pages>e56071-e56071</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Objective In light of several advancements and considerations in endodontic dentistry, there still remains a need to comprehensively evaluate the outcome disparities between repairing and replacing broken dental restorations. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of repairing dental restorations versus replacing them, focusing on how each method affects the structural strength and longevity of the restorations. Methods The study included 60 freshly removed human maxillary premolars. Initial processing involved rigorous washing, descaling, and polishing of the teeth. To ensure preservation, the specimens were stored in sterile, distilled water. To occlude the root canals, a self-hardening composite resin was used, and the roots were coated with two coats of clear nail polish to prevent moisture penetration. A 245 carbide bur attached to a high-speed dental handpiece with air and water spray cooling produced standardized Class II cavities on the occluso-proximal surfaces. Each cavity had a buccolingual breadth of 2 mm, an occluso-cervical length of 4 mm, and a gingival boundary that was 1 mm coronal to the cement-enamel junction. Following this preparation, the teeth were randomly separated into three groups (Group A, Group B, and Group C), each containing 20 teeth. Results Our analysis showed that teeth with entirely replaced restorations had a higher average fracture resistance than those with repaired restorations. However, the difference in fracture resistance between the repair and replacement groups for each type of material was not statistically significant. Conclusion Based on the findings, repairing a dental restoration can be a conservative and less invasive alternative to a full replacement without a significant compromise in the restoration's ability to withstand fracture. Therefore, dental professionals might consider full restoration as a viable option, taking into account the need to preserve dental tissue as well as the restoration's durability and structural integrity.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>38618331</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.56071</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2024-03, Vol.16 (3), p.e56071-e56071
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3039233964
source PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Bond strength
Composite materials
Cooling
Optical properties
Polymerization
Teeth
title In Vitro Analysis of Outcome Differences Between Repairing and Replacing Broken Dental Restorations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A55%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Vitro%20Analysis%20of%20Outcome%20Differences%20Between%20Repairing%20and%20Replacing%20Broken%20Dental%20Restorations&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Sachan,%20Saraswati&rft.date=2024-03-13&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e56071&rft.epage=e56071&rft.pages=e56071-e56071&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.56071&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3039233964%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3049781038&rft_id=info:pmid/38618331&rfr_iscdi=true