Safety Profile of Seven-Day Intra-articular Antibiotic Irrigation for the Treatment of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Randomized Phase II Comparative Study

Systemic intravenous antimicrobials yield poor outcomes during treatment of periprosthetic joint infection due to the inability to obtain minimum biofilm eradication concentrations. This study evaluated the safety of a novel method of optimized local delivery of intra-articular antibiotics (IAAs). T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of arthroplasty 2024-09, Vol.39 (9), p.S229-S235.e1
Hauptverfasser: Springer, Bryan D., Higuera-Rueda, Carlos A., de Beaubien, Brian C., Warner, Kevin D., Glassman, Andrew H., Parvataneni, Hari K., Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S235.e1
container_issue 9
container_start_page S229
container_title The Journal of arthroplasty
container_volume 39
creator Springer, Bryan D.
Higuera-Rueda, Carlos A.
de Beaubien, Brian C.
Warner, Kevin D.
Glassman, Andrew H.
Parvataneni, Hari K.
Piuzzi, Nicolas S.
description Systemic intravenous antimicrobials yield poor outcomes during treatment of periprosthetic joint infection due to the inability to obtain minimum biofilm eradication concentrations. This study evaluated the safety of a novel method of optimized local delivery of intra-articular antibiotics (IAAs). This was a Phase II, multicenter, prospective randomized trial evaluating safety of a rapid (seven-day) two-stage exchange arthroplasty with IAA irrigation compared to standard two-stage exchange. The Experimental Group received irrigation using 80 mg tobramycin daily with a 2-hour soak, followed by hourly irrigation using 125 mg vancomycin with a 30-minute soak via an intramedullary irrigation device. The Control Group received an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer with vancomycin (average 8.4 g) and tobramycin (average 7.1 g, total 16 g antibiotics). Both groups received 12 weeks of systemic antibiotics following Stage 2. Safety measures included adverse events, peak vancomycin/tobramycin serum concentrations (Experimental Group), blood transfusion, and mortality. There were thirty-seven patients randomized to the Experimental Group and 39 to control. There was no difference in baseline demographics or comorbidities. There were no antibiotic medication-related adverse events and 2 serious adverse events related to antibiotic instillation. Of 188 vancomycin peak measurements, 69% had detectable serum level concentrations, with all concentrations well below the maximum acceptable trough threshold of 20 μg/mL. Of the 103 tobramycin peak measurements, 45% had detectable levels, with all below the maximum acceptable peak threshold of 18 to 24 μg/mL. There was no difference in blood transfused per subject (Experimental: 655 mL versus Control: 792 mL; P = .4188). There were two (2) deaths in the Experimental Group and four (4) in the control. The use of IAA is safe with minimal systemic antibiotic exposure. There was no difference in the rates or severity of serious adverse events between groups. Further research is being conducted to examine treatment efficacy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.069
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3038428551</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0883540324003139</els_id><sourcerecordid>3038428551</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-73ef229408e35a6cac4d0334bf587228ad7ba9298882cbe3543d420f06c42fd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-O0zAQxiMEYsvCC3BAPnJJ1rGdxEFcqi5_glaiosvZcpwxdZXYxXYqlcfiCXHoLkdO1mh-3zcz_rLsdYmLEpf1zaGQPu4LggkrMC1w3T7JVmVFSc4Zrp9mK8w5zSuG6VX2IoQDxmVZVex5dkV5jRlp2Cr7vZMa4hltvdNmBOQ02sEJbH4rz6iz0cs8DTFqHqVHaxtNb1wqUee9-SGjcRZp51HcA7r3IOMENi4mm713NnFb8OboXUjAIvviTOp3VoNatO_Qepkcjkt5AvRN2sFN5hcMaLuXAVDXoY2bjtLLv_1dnIfzy-yZlmOAVw_vdfb944f7zef87uunbrO-yxXFTcwbCpqQlmEOtJK1kooNmFLW64o3hHA5NL1sScs5J6pPDKMDI1jjWjGih5ZeZ28vvmn_nzOEKCYTFIyjtODmICimnBFeVWVCyQVV6ZjgQYujN5P0Z1FisWQlDmLJSixZCUxFyiqJ3jz4z_0Ewz_JYzgJeH8BIF15MuBFUAasgsH49GFicOZ__n8A6eyoYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3038428551</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety Profile of Seven-Day Intra-articular Antibiotic Irrigation for the Treatment of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Randomized Phase II Comparative Study</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Springer, Bryan D. ; Higuera-Rueda, Carlos A. ; de Beaubien, Brian C. ; Warner, Kevin D. ; Glassman, Andrew H. ; Parvataneni, Hari K. ; Piuzzi, Nicolas S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Springer, Bryan D. ; Higuera-Rueda, Carlos A. ; de Beaubien, Brian C. ; Warner, Kevin D. ; Glassman, Andrew H. ; Parvataneni, Hari K. ; Piuzzi, Nicolas S.</creatorcontrib><description>Systemic intravenous antimicrobials yield poor outcomes during treatment of periprosthetic joint infection due to the inability to obtain minimum biofilm eradication concentrations. This study evaluated the safety of a novel method of optimized local delivery of intra-articular antibiotics (IAAs). This was a Phase II, multicenter, prospective randomized trial evaluating safety of a rapid (seven-day) two-stage exchange arthroplasty with IAA irrigation compared to standard two-stage exchange. The Experimental Group received irrigation using 80 mg tobramycin daily with a 2-hour soak, followed by hourly irrigation using 125 mg vancomycin with a 30-minute soak via an intramedullary irrigation device. The Control Group received an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer with vancomycin (average 8.4 g) and tobramycin (average 7.1 g, total 16 g antibiotics). Both groups received 12 weeks of systemic antibiotics following Stage 2. Safety measures included adverse events, peak vancomycin/tobramycin serum concentrations (Experimental Group), blood transfusion, and mortality. There were thirty-seven patients randomized to the Experimental Group and 39 to control. There was no difference in baseline demographics or comorbidities. There were no antibiotic medication-related adverse events and 2 serious adverse events related to antibiotic instillation. Of 188 vancomycin peak measurements, 69% had detectable serum level concentrations, with all concentrations well below the maximum acceptable trough threshold of 20 μg/mL. Of the 103 tobramycin peak measurements, 45% had detectable levels, with all below the maximum acceptable peak threshold of 18 to 24 μg/mL. There was no difference in blood transfused per subject (Experimental: 655 mL versus Control: 792 mL; P = .4188). There were two (2) deaths in the Experimental Group and four (4) in the control. The use of IAA is safe with minimal systemic antibiotic exposure. There was no difference in the rates or severity of serious adverse events between groups. Further research is being conducted to examine treatment efficacy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-5403</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.069</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38604274</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>biofilm ; hip PJI ; knee PJI ; periprosthetic joint infection ; revision arthroplasty ; two-stage exchange</subject><ispartof>The Journal of arthroplasty, 2024-09, Vol.39 (9), p.S229-S235.e1</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-73ef229408e35a6cac4d0334bf587228ad7ba9298882cbe3543d420f06c42fd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.069$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38604274$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Springer, Bryan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higuera-Rueda, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Beaubien, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glassman, Andrew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parvataneni, Hari K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piuzzi, Nicolas S.</creatorcontrib><title>Safety Profile of Seven-Day Intra-articular Antibiotic Irrigation for the Treatment of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Randomized Phase II Comparative Study</title><title>The Journal of arthroplasty</title><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><description>Systemic intravenous antimicrobials yield poor outcomes during treatment of periprosthetic joint infection due to the inability to obtain minimum biofilm eradication concentrations. This study evaluated the safety of a novel method of optimized local delivery of intra-articular antibiotics (IAAs). This was a Phase II, multicenter, prospective randomized trial evaluating safety of a rapid (seven-day) two-stage exchange arthroplasty with IAA irrigation compared to standard two-stage exchange. The Experimental Group received irrigation using 80 mg tobramycin daily with a 2-hour soak, followed by hourly irrigation using 125 mg vancomycin with a 30-minute soak via an intramedullary irrigation device. The Control Group received an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer with vancomycin (average 8.4 g) and tobramycin (average 7.1 g, total 16 g antibiotics). Both groups received 12 weeks of systemic antibiotics following Stage 2. Safety measures included adverse events, peak vancomycin/tobramycin serum concentrations (Experimental Group), blood transfusion, and mortality. There were thirty-seven patients randomized to the Experimental Group and 39 to control. There was no difference in baseline demographics or comorbidities. There were no antibiotic medication-related adverse events and 2 serious adverse events related to antibiotic instillation. Of 188 vancomycin peak measurements, 69% had detectable serum level concentrations, with all concentrations well below the maximum acceptable trough threshold of 20 μg/mL. Of the 103 tobramycin peak measurements, 45% had detectable levels, with all below the maximum acceptable peak threshold of 18 to 24 μg/mL. There was no difference in blood transfused per subject (Experimental: 655 mL versus Control: 792 mL; P = .4188). There were two (2) deaths in the Experimental Group and four (4) in the control. The use of IAA is safe with minimal systemic antibiotic exposure. There was no difference in the rates or severity of serious adverse events between groups. Further research is being conducted to examine treatment efficacy.</description><subject>biofilm</subject><subject>hip PJI</subject><subject>knee PJI</subject><subject>periprosthetic joint infection</subject><subject>revision arthroplasty</subject><subject>two-stage exchange</subject><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc-O0zAQxiMEYsvCC3BAPnJJ1rGdxEFcqi5_glaiosvZcpwxdZXYxXYqlcfiCXHoLkdO1mh-3zcz_rLsdYmLEpf1zaGQPu4LggkrMC1w3T7JVmVFSc4Zrp9mK8w5zSuG6VX2IoQDxmVZVex5dkV5jRlp2Cr7vZMa4hltvdNmBOQ02sEJbH4rz6iz0cs8DTFqHqVHaxtNb1wqUee9-SGjcRZp51HcA7r3IOMENi4mm713NnFb8OboXUjAIvviTOp3VoNatO_Qepkcjkt5AvRN2sFN5hcMaLuXAVDXoY2bjtLLv_1dnIfzy-yZlmOAVw_vdfb944f7zef87uunbrO-yxXFTcwbCpqQlmEOtJK1kooNmFLW64o3hHA5NL1sScs5J6pPDKMDI1jjWjGih5ZeZ28vvmn_nzOEKCYTFIyjtODmICimnBFeVWVCyQVV6ZjgQYujN5P0Z1FisWQlDmLJSixZCUxFyiqJ3jz4z_0Ewz_JYzgJeH8BIF15MuBFUAasgsH49GFicOZ__n8A6eyoYw</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Springer, Bryan D.</creator><creator>Higuera-Rueda, Carlos A.</creator><creator>de Beaubien, Brian C.</creator><creator>Warner, Kevin D.</creator><creator>Glassman, Andrew H.</creator><creator>Parvataneni, Hari K.</creator><creator>Piuzzi, Nicolas S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Safety Profile of Seven-Day Intra-articular Antibiotic Irrigation for the Treatment of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Randomized Phase II Comparative Study</title><author>Springer, Bryan D. ; Higuera-Rueda, Carlos A. ; de Beaubien, Brian C. ; Warner, Kevin D. ; Glassman, Andrew H. ; Parvataneni, Hari K. ; Piuzzi, Nicolas S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-73ef229408e35a6cac4d0334bf587228ad7ba9298882cbe3543d420f06c42fd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>biofilm</topic><topic>hip PJI</topic><topic>knee PJI</topic><topic>periprosthetic joint infection</topic><topic>revision arthroplasty</topic><topic>two-stage exchange</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Springer, Bryan D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Higuera-Rueda, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Beaubien, Brian C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warner, Kevin D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glassman, Andrew H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parvataneni, Hari K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piuzzi, Nicolas S.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Springer, Bryan D.</au><au>Higuera-Rueda, Carlos A.</au><au>de Beaubien, Brian C.</au><au>Warner, Kevin D.</au><au>Glassman, Andrew H.</au><au>Parvataneni, Hari K.</au><au>Piuzzi, Nicolas S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety Profile of Seven-Day Intra-articular Antibiotic Irrigation for the Treatment of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Randomized Phase II Comparative Study</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of arthroplasty</jtitle><addtitle>J Arthroplasty</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>S229</spage><epage>S235.e1</epage><pages>S229-S235.e1</pages><issn>0883-5403</issn><issn>1532-8406</issn><eissn>1532-8406</eissn><abstract>Systemic intravenous antimicrobials yield poor outcomes during treatment of periprosthetic joint infection due to the inability to obtain minimum biofilm eradication concentrations. This study evaluated the safety of a novel method of optimized local delivery of intra-articular antibiotics (IAAs). This was a Phase II, multicenter, prospective randomized trial evaluating safety of a rapid (seven-day) two-stage exchange arthroplasty with IAA irrigation compared to standard two-stage exchange. The Experimental Group received irrigation using 80 mg tobramycin daily with a 2-hour soak, followed by hourly irrigation using 125 mg vancomycin with a 30-minute soak via an intramedullary irrigation device. The Control Group received an antibiotic-loaded cement spacer with vancomycin (average 8.4 g) and tobramycin (average 7.1 g, total 16 g antibiotics). Both groups received 12 weeks of systemic antibiotics following Stage 2. Safety measures included adverse events, peak vancomycin/tobramycin serum concentrations (Experimental Group), blood transfusion, and mortality. There were thirty-seven patients randomized to the Experimental Group and 39 to control. There was no difference in baseline demographics or comorbidities. There were no antibiotic medication-related adverse events and 2 serious adverse events related to antibiotic instillation. Of 188 vancomycin peak measurements, 69% had detectable serum level concentrations, with all concentrations well below the maximum acceptable trough threshold of 20 μg/mL. Of the 103 tobramycin peak measurements, 45% had detectable levels, with all below the maximum acceptable peak threshold of 18 to 24 μg/mL. There was no difference in blood transfused per subject (Experimental: 655 mL versus Control: 792 mL; P = .4188). There were two (2) deaths in the Experimental Group and four (4) in the control. The use of IAA is safe with minimal systemic antibiotic exposure. There was no difference in the rates or severity of serious adverse events between groups. Further research is being conducted to examine treatment efficacy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38604274</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.069</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-5403
ispartof The Journal of arthroplasty, 2024-09, Vol.39 (9), p.S229-S235.e1
issn 0883-5403
1532-8406
1532-8406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3038428551
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects biofilm
hip PJI
knee PJI
periprosthetic joint infection
revision arthroplasty
two-stage exchange
title Safety Profile of Seven-Day Intra-articular Antibiotic Irrigation for the Treatment of Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective Randomized Phase II Comparative Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T10%3A39%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20Profile%20of%20Seven-Day%20Intra-articular%20Antibiotic%20Irrigation%20for%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Chronic%20Periprosthetic%20Joint%20Infection:%20A%20Prospective%20Randomized%20Phase%20II%20Comparative%20Study&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20arthroplasty&rft.au=Springer,%20Bryan%20D.&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=S229&rft.epage=S235.e1&rft.pages=S229-S235.e1&rft.issn=0883-5403&rft.eissn=1532-8406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.arth.2024.03.069&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3038428551%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3038428551&rft_id=info:pmid/38604274&rft_els_id=S0883540324003139&rfr_iscdi=true