Patients' experiences of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and thematic synthesis
Aim To obtain a deeper understanding of peoples' experiences of cancer treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Background ICIs are transforming survival outcomes for many with certain advanced cancers. Given the possibility of unique immune‐related adverse events (irAEs), understan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical nursing 2024-08, Vol.33 (8), p.2885-2904 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2904 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 2885 |
container_title | Journal of clinical nursing |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Watts, Tessa Roche, Dominic Csontos, Judit |
description | Aim
To obtain a deeper understanding of peoples' experiences of cancer treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
Background
ICIs are transforming survival outcomes for many with certain advanced cancers. Given the possibility of unique immune‐related adverse events (irAEs), understanding treatment experiences is crucial to identify support needs and provide safe and effective person‐centred care.
Design
A systematic review of qualitative research and thematic synthesis. To report this review, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Analysis and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) checklist and Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) guidance have been used.
Data Sources
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science databases were searched in January 2022 for eligible studies published in English from database inception.
Review Methods
Two reviewers independently screened records, identified papers for inclusion and appraised methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Themes were developed using thematic synthesis.
Results
Eighteen papers were included and three analytical themes developed: immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment decision‐making; the experience and impact of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments; and appraising and responding to irAEs.
Conclusion
The synthesis renders visible individuals' unmet information, psychological and practical support needs. It identifies shortcomings in immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment decision‐making processes and highlights the need for healthcare professionals to recognise and sensitively handle individuals' treatment expectations. Individuals' understandings of and responses to irAEs are also illustrated, and attention drawn to patients' concerns about healthcare professionals' checkpoint inhibitor and irAEs knowledge.
Implications for Patient Care
To sensitively manage treatment expectations and uncertainties, and optimise health outcomes, there are distinct points in treatment trajectories where care and support might require adapting and enhancing.
Impact
This review addresses people's experiences of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments. The core findings reveal unmet information, psychological and practical support needs. Insights derived from this review will enhance individuals' experiences and outcomes and healthcare professionals' practice.
Patient or Public Contribution
No patient or public involvement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jocn.17154 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3035077668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3076481542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-61e2ead0f4a3153eaa4e47d930a2a1e3bf5bb2494c2ac1d84208af013c88d16b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhoMoOl42PoAEXChCNbfe3MngFVEXui5pespknCY1aR2LL2-06sKF2eTn8PGRkx-hXUqOaTgnc6vMMU1pLFbQhPIkjlhK2CqakDxhESVJuoE2vZ8TQjljfB1t8CzO8jxnE_T-IDsNpvMHGN5acCEr8NjWWMmQHNZN0xvbzcDJdsBL3c3GEWA1A_XcWm06rM1Ml7qzzp_iM-wH30ETvAo7eNWwxNJUOCjGmR9MyF77bbRWy4WHne97Cz1dnD9Or6Lb-8vr6dltpHjMRJRQYCArUgvJacxBSgEirXJOJJMUeFnHZclELhSTilaZYCSTddhVZVlFk5JvocPR2zr70oPvikZ7BYuFNGB7X3DCY5KmSZIFdP8POre9M-F1gUoTkYVPZoE6GinlrPcO6qJ1upFuKCgpPispPispvioJ8N63si8bqH7Rnw4CQEdgqRcw_KMqbu6nd6P0A11emM4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3076481542</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patients' experiences of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and thematic synthesis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Watts, Tessa ; Roche, Dominic ; Csontos, Judit</creator><creatorcontrib>Watts, Tessa ; Roche, Dominic ; Csontos, Judit</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
To obtain a deeper understanding of peoples' experiences of cancer treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
Background
ICIs are transforming survival outcomes for many with certain advanced cancers. Given the possibility of unique immune‐related adverse events (irAEs), understanding treatment experiences is crucial to identify support needs and provide safe and effective person‐centred care.
Design
A systematic review of qualitative research and thematic synthesis. To report this review, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Analysis and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) checklist and Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) guidance have been used.
Data Sources
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science databases were searched in January 2022 for eligible studies published in English from database inception.
Review Methods
Two reviewers independently screened records, identified papers for inclusion and appraised methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Themes were developed using thematic synthesis.
Results
Eighteen papers were included and three analytical themes developed: immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment decision‐making; the experience and impact of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments; and appraising and responding to irAEs.
Conclusion
The synthesis renders visible individuals' unmet information, psychological and practical support needs. It identifies shortcomings in immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment decision‐making processes and highlights the need for healthcare professionals to recognise and sensitively handle individuals' treatment expectations. Individuals' understandings of and responses to irAEs are also illustrated, and attention drawn to patients' concerns about healthcare professionals' checkpoint inhibitor and irAEs knowledge.
Implications for Patient Care
To sensitively manage treatment expectations and uncertainties, and optimise health outcomes, there are distinct points in treatment trajectories where care and support might require adapting and enhancing.
Impact
This review addresses people's experiences of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments. The core findings reveal unmet information, psychological and practical support needs. Insights derived from this review will enhance individuals' experiences and outcomes and healthcare professionals' practice.
Patient or Public Contribution
No patient or public involvement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0962-1067</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2702</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2702</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jocn.17154</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38589992</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Clinical decision making ; Female ; Humans ; immune checkpoint inhibitors ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - pharmacology ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Immunotherapy ; Immunotherapy - methods ; Inhibitor drugs ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Neoplasms - psychology ; patient experience ; Patient satisfaction ; Qualitative Research ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical nursing, 2024-08, Vol.33 (8), p.2885-2904</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Nursing published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-61e2ead0f4a3153eaa4e47d930a2a1e3bf5bb2494c2ac1d84208af013c88d16b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1201-5192 ; 0000-0003-1180-6563</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjocn.17154$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjocn.17154$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38589992$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watts, Tessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csontos, Judit</creatorcontrib><title>Patients' experiences of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and thematic synthesis</title><title>Journal of clinical nursing</title><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><description>Aim
To obtain a deeper understanding of peoples' experiences of cancer treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
Background
ICIs are transforming survival outcomes for many with certain advanced cancers. Given the possibility of unique immune‐related adverse events (irAEs), understanding treatment experiences is crucial to identify support needs and provide safe and effective person‐centred care.
Design
A systematic review of qualitative research and thematic synthesis. To report this review, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Analysis and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) checklist and Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) guidance have been used.
Data Sources
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science databases were searched in January 2022 for eligible studies published in English from database inception.
Review Methods
Two reviewers independently screened records, identified papers for inclusion and appraised methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Themes were developed using thematic synthesis.
Results
Eighteen papers were included and three analytical themes developed: immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment decision‐making; the experience and impact of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments; and appraising and responding to irAEs.
Conclusion
The synthesis renders visible individuals' unmet information, psychological and practical support needs. It identifies shortcomings in immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment decision‐making processes and highlights the need for healthcare professionals to recognise and sensitively handle individuals' treatment expectations. Individuals' understandings of and responses to irAEs are also illustrated, and attention drawn to patients' concerns about healthcare professionals' checkpoint inhibitor and irAEs knowledge.
Implications for Patient Care
To sensitively manage treatment expectations and uncertainties, and optimise health outcomes, there are distinct points in treatment trajectories where care and support might require adapting and enhancing.
Impact
This review addresses people's experiences of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments. The core findings reveal unmet information, psychological and practical support needs. Insights derived from this review will enhance individuals' experiences and outcomes and healthcare professionals' practice.
Patient or Public Contribution
No patient or public involvement.</description><subject>cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>immune checkpoint inhibitors</subject><subject>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - pharmacology</subject><subject>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Immunotherapy</subject><subject>Immunotherapy - methods</subject><subject>Inhibitor drugs</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>patient experience</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0962-1067</issn><issn>1365-2702</issn><issn>1365-2702</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctKxDAUhoMoOl42PoAEXChCNbfe3MngFVEXui5pespknCY1aR2LL2-06sKF2eTn8PGRkx-hXUqOaTgnc6vMMU1pLFbQhPIkjlhK2CqakDxhESVJuoE2vZ8TQjljfB1t8CzO8jxnE_T-IDsNpvMHGN5acCEr8NjWWMmQHNZN0xvbzcDJdsBL3c3GEWA1A_XcWm06rM1Ml7qzzp_iM-wH30ETvAo7eNWwxNJUOCjGmR9MyF77bbRWy4WHne97Cz1dnD9Or6Lb-8vr6dltpHjMRJRQYCArUgvJacxBSgEirXJOJJMUeFnHZclELhSTilaZYCSTddhVZVlFk5JvocPR2zr70oPvikZ7BYuFNGB7X3DCY5KmSZIFdP8POre9M-F1gUoTkYVPZoE6GinlrPcO6qJ1upFuKCgpPispPispvioJ8N63si8bqH7Rnw4CQEdgqRcw_KMqbu6nd6P0A11emM4</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Watts, Tessa</creator><creator>Roche, Dominic</creator><creator>Csontos, Judit</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1201-5192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1180-6563</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Patients' experiences of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and thematic synthesis</title><author>Watts, Tessa ; Roche, Dominic ; Csontos, Judit</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3524-61e2ead0f4a3153eaa4e47d930a2a1e3bf5bb2494c2ac1d84208af013c88d16b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>immune checkpoint inhibitors</topic><topic>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - pharmacology</topic><topic>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Immunotherapy</topic><topic>Immunotherapy - methods</topic><topic>Inhibitor drugs</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>patient experience</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watts, Tessa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roche, Dominic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csontos, Judit</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watts, Tessa</au><au>Roche, Dominic</au><au>Csontos, Judit</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patients' experiences of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and thematic synthesis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical nursing</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Nurs</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>2885</spage><epage>2904</epage><pages>2885-2904</pages><issn>0962-1067</issn><issn>1365-2702</issn><eissn>1365-2702</eissn><abstract>Aim
To obtain a deeper understanding of peoples' experiences of cancer treatments with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
Background
ICIs are transforming survival outcomes for many with certain advanced cancers. Given the possibility of unique immune‐related adverse events (irAEs), understanding treatment experiences is crucial to identify support needs and provide safe and effective person‐centred care.
Design
A systematic review of qualitative research and thematic synthesis. To report this review, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Analysis and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) checklist and Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ) guidance have been used.
Data Sources
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science databases were searched in January 2022 for eligible studies published in English from database inception.
Review Methods
Two reviewers independently screened records, identified papers for inclusion and appraised methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Themes were developed using thematic synthesis.
Results
Eighteen papers were included and three analytical themes developed: immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment decision‐making; the experience and impact of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments; and appraising and responding to irAEs.
Conclusion
The synthesis renders visible individuals' unmet information, psychological and practical support needs. It identifies shortcomings in immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment decision‐making processes and highlights the need for healthcare professionals to recognise and sensitively handle individuals' treatment expectations. Individuals' understandings of and responses to irAEs are also illustrated, and attention drawn to patients' concerns about healthcare professionals' checkpoint inhibitor and irAEs knowledge.
Implications for Patient Care
To sensitively manage treatment expectations and uncertainties, and optimise health outcomes, there are distinct points in treatment trajectories where care and support might require adapting and enhancing.
Impact
This review addresses people's experiences of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatments. The core findings reveal unmet information, psychological and practical support needs. Insights derived from this review will enhance individuals' experiences and outcomes and healthcare professionals' practice.
Patient or Public Contribution
No patient or public involvement.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38589992</pmid><doi>10.1111/jocn.17154</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1201-5192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1180-6563</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0962-1067 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical nursing, 2024-08, Vol.33 (8), p.2885-2904 |
issn | 0962-1067 1365-2702 1365-2702 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3035077668 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | cancer Cancer therapies Clinical decision making Female Humans immune checkpoint inhibitors Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - pharmacology Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use Immunotherapy Immunotherapy - methods Inhibitor drugs Male Medical personnel Neoplasms - drug therapy Neoplasms - psychology patient experience Patient satisfaction Qualitative Research Systematic review |
title | Patients' experiences of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and thematic synthesis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T15%3A12%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patients'%20experiences%20of%20cancer%20immunotherapy%20with%20immune%20checkpoint%20inhibitors:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20thematic%20synthesis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20nursing&rft.au=Watts,%20Tessa&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=2885&rft.epage=2904&rft.pages=2885-2904&rft.issn=0962-1067&rft.eissn=1365-2702&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jocn.17154&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3076481542%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3076481542&rft_id=info:pmid/38589992&rfr_iscdi=true |