Is step-cut shortening osteotomy a better choice than transverse osteotomy for total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type III-IV hip dysplasia?

Total hip arthroplasty for developmental hip dysplasia is a challenging surgery due to anatomic abnormalities. Crowe III and Crowe IV hip dysplasia generally necessitates a subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy. Transverse and step-cut osteotomy are the most common procedures for shortening of femur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research surgery & research, 2024-10, Vol.110 (6), p.103883, Article 103883
Hauptverfasser: Turgut, Necmettin, Erdem, Mehmet, Erdem, Ahmet Can, Bayam, Levent, Batar, Suat, Sağlam, Necdet, Gülabi, Deniz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 103883
container_title Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research
container_volume 110
creator Turgut, Necmettin
Erdem, Mehmet
Erdem, Ahmet Can
Bayam, Levent
Batar, Suat
Sağlam, Necdet
Gülabi, Deniz
description Total hip arthroplasty for developmental hip dysplasia is a challenging surgery due to anatomic abnormalities. Crowe III and Crowe IV hip dysplasia generally necessitates a subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy. Transverse and step-cut osteotomy are the most common procedures for shortening of femur although there is still no consensus which one is a superior method. The objective of this study was to demonstrate whether transverse or step-cut osteotomy is superior in hips who undergo arthroplasty for high riding hip dysplasia. Our hypothesis was that higher rates of union would be achieved in patients with Crowe III-IV hip dysplasia when the step-cut osteotomy was performed compared to transverse osteotomies. A total of 99 hips from 90 patients (9 bilateral, 81 unilateral; 79 female, 11 male), each with a minimum follow-up duration of two years, were included in this study. The hips were classified as Crowe III (n=16) or IV (n=83). All hips were implanted cementless. Transverse or step-cut osteotomy was chosen for osteotomy type. The clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), limb length discrepancy (LLD), and limping. The complications and management of these were noted. The union rates were compared between osteotomy types. The mean age at surgery was 48.8 (range, 21–79 years). The follow-up period was 64.3 months in average (range, 24 to 192 months). The mean Harris Hip Score before surgery was 35.6 (range, 18–50), and increased to 88.1 (range, 61–98) points at the most recent follow-up. The preoperative leg length discrepancy (LLD) measured 5.3cm (with a range of 3 to 6.8), while the postoperative LLD reduced to 0.8cm (with a range of 0 to 1.6). There were a total of 38 complications in 35 patients out of 99 cases, resulting in a complication rate of 38.4%. The most frequent complication observed was intraoperative femoral fractures, occurring in 13 cases. Residual limping was seen in 73.7% of all. Step-cut osteotomy was performed in 64 hips (35 CDH stem [Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA], 29 Wagner Cone stem [Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA]) and, transverse in 35 hips (22 CDH, 13 Wagner Cone). Six hips had nonunion problem and all of them were operated with a step-cut osteotomy (z-score: –7.12 and p
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103883
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3034777118</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1877056824001117</els_id><sourcerecordid>3034777118</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-3161d859131743465260a0bb477a58284ec5fced29ee41bfa7fa32818e560103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVp6KabvEAPRcdevJUs29JCIYSlaQyBXJZchSyPay1ey9VoE_YV8tTVxmnJKacZRt__M5qfkC-crTjj1ffdykcMq5zlRRoIpcQHcs6VlBkrK_XxTb8gnxF3jFUVF_knshCqVEKy4pw810gxwpTZQ6TY-xBhdONv6tPQR78_UkMbiBECtb13FmjszUhjMCM-QkB4Q3Y-0OijGWjvJmpC7IOfBoNxftoE_5TkxwloXddZ_fCCtUc8Mc5cXZCzzgwIl691SbY3P7eb2-zu_le9ub7LrGAyZoJXvFXlmgsuC1FUZV4xw5qmkNKUKlcF2LKz0OZrgII3nZGdEbniCsqKpTMtybfZdgr-zwEw6r1DC8NgRvAH1IKJZCU5VwnNZ9QGjxig01NwexOOmjN9ikDv9CkCfYpAzxEk0ddX_0Ozh_a_5N_NE_BjBiB98tFB0GgdjGllF8BG3Xr3nv9fuMKZjw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3034777118</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is step-cut shortening osteotomy a better choice than transverse osteotomy for total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type III-IV hip dysplasia?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Turgut, Necmettin ; Erdem, Mehmet ; Erdem, Ahmet Can ; Bayam, Levent ; Batar, Suat ; Sağlam, Necdet ; Gülabi, Deniz</creator><creatorcontrib>Turgut, Necmettin ; Erdem, Mehmet ; Erdem, Ahmet Can ; Bayam, Levent ; Batar, Suat ; Sağlam, Necdet ; Gülabi, Deniz</creatorcontrib><description>Total hip arthroplasty for developmental hip dysplasia is a challenging surgery due to anatomic abnormalities. Crowe III and Crowe IV hip dysplasia generally necessitates a subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy. Transverse and step-cut osteotomy are the most common procedures for shortening of femur although there is still no consensus which one is a superior method. The objective of this study was to demonstrate whether transverse or step-cut osteotomy is superior in hips who undergo arthroplasty for high riding hip dysplasia. Our hypothesis was that higher rates of union would be achieved in patients with Crowe III-IV hip dysplasia when the step-cut osteotomy was performed compared to transverse osteotomies. A total of 99 hips from 90 patients (9 bilateral, 81 unilateral; 79 female, 11 male), each with a minimum follow-up duration of two years, were included in this study. The hips were classified as Crowe III (n=16) or IV (n=83). All hips were implanted cementless. Transverse or step-cut osteotomy was chosen for osteotomy type. The clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), limb length discrepancy (LLD), and limping. The complications and management of these were noted. The union rates were compared between osteotomy types. The mean age at surgery was 48.8 (range, 21–79 years). The follow-up period was 64.3 months in average (range, 24 to 192 months). The mean Harris Hip Score before surgery was 35.6 (range, 18–50), and increased to 88.1 (range, 61–98) points at the most recent follow-up. The preoperative leg length discrepancy (LLD) measured 5.3cm (with a range of 3 to 6.8), while the postoperative LLD reduced to 0.8cm (with a range of 0 to 1.6). There were a total of 38 complications in 35 patients out of 99 cases, resulting in a complication rate of 38.4%. The most frequent complication observed was intraoperative femoral fractures, occurring in 13 cases. Residual limping was seen in 73.7% of all. Step-cut osteotomy was performed in 64 hips (35 CDH stem [Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA], 29 Wagner Cone stem [Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA]) and, transverse in 35 hips (22 CDH, 13 Wagner Cone). Six hips had nonunion problem and all of them were operated with a step-cut osteotomy (z-score: –7.12 and p&lt;0.00001, Mann-Whitney U Test). Transverse osteotomy may be a better option while performing a shortening subtrochanteric level osteotomy for total hip arthroplasty for Crowe III-IV hips. Level III; observational retrospective cohort study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1877-0568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103883</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38583704</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: Elsevier Masson SAS</publisher><subject>Hip dysplasia ; Step-cut osteotomy ; Subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy ; Total hip arthroplasty ; Transverse osteotomy</subject><ispartof>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research, 2024-10, Vol.110 (6), p.103883, Article 103883</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Masson SAS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-3161d859131743465260a0bb477a58284ec5fced29ee41bfa7fa32818e560103</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4994-5059</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103883$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38583704$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Turgut, Necmettin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdem, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdem, Ahmet Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayam, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batar, Suat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sağlam, Necdet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gülabi, Deniz</creatorcontrib><title>Is step-cut shortening osteotomy a better choice than transverse osteotomy for total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type III-IV hip dysplasia?</title><title>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</title><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><description>Total hip arthroplasty for developmental hip dysplasia is a challenging surgery due to anatomic abnormalities. Crowe III and Crowe IV hip dysplasia generally necessitates a subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy. Transverse and step-cut osteotomy are the most common procedures for shortening of femur although there is still no consensus which one is a superior method. The objective of this study was to demonstrate whether transverse or step-cut osteotomy is superior in hips who undergo arthroplasty for high riding hip dysplasia. Our hypothesis was that higher rates of union would be achieved in patients with Crowe III-IV hip dysplasia when the step-cut osteotomy was performed compared to transverse osteotomies. A total of 99 hips from 90 patients (9 bilateral, 81 unilateral; 79 female, 11 male), each with a minimum follow-up duration of two years, were included in this study. The hips were classified as Crowe III (n=16) or IV (n=83). All hips were implanted cementless. Transverse or step-cut osteotomy was chosen for osteotomy type. The clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), limb length discrepancy (LLD), and limping. The complications and management of these were noted. The union rates were compared between osteotomy types. The mean age at surgery was 48.8 (range, 21–79 years). The follow-up period was 64.3 months in average (range, 24 to 192 months). The mean Harris Hip Score before surgery was 35.6 (range, 18–50), and increased to 88.1 (range, 61–98) points at the most recent follow-up. The preoperative leg length discrepancy (LLD) measured 5.3cm (with a range of 3 to 6.8), while the postoperative LLD reduced to 0.8cm (with a range of 0 to 1.6). There were a total of 38 complications in 35 patients out of 99 cases, resulting in a complication rate of 38.4%. The most frequent complication observed was intraoperative femoral fractures, occurring in 13 cases. Residual limping was seen in 73.7% of all. Step-cut osteotomy was performed in 64 hips (35 CDH stem [Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA], 29 Wagner Cone stem [Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA]) and, transverse in 35 hips (22 CDH, 13 Wagner Cone). Six hips had nonunion problem and all of them were operated with a step-cut osteotomy (z-score: –7.12 and p&lt;0.00001, Mann-Whitney U Test). Transverse osteotomy may be a better option while performing a shortening subtrochanteric level osteotomy for total hip arthroplasty for Crowe III-IV hips. Level III; observational retrospective cohort study.</description><subject>Hip dysplasia</subject><subject>Step-cut osteotomy</subject><subject>Subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy</subject><subject>Total hip arthroplasty</subject><subject>Transverse osteotomy</subject><issn>1877-0568</issn><issn>1877-0568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVp6KabvEAPRcdevJUs29JCIYSlaQyBXJZchSyPay1ey9VoE_YV8tTVxmnJKacZRt__M5qfkC-crTjj1ffdykcMq5zlRRoIpcQHcs6VlBkrK_XxTb8gnxF3jFUVF_knshCqVEKy4pw810gxwpTZQ6TY-xBhdONv6tPQR78_UkMbiBECtb13FmjszUhjMCM-QkB4Q3Y-0OijGWjvJmpC7IOfBoNxftoE_5TkxwloXddZ_fCCtUc8Mc5cXZCzzgwIl691SbY3P7eb2-zu_le9ub7LrGAyZoJXvFXlmgsuC1FUZV4xw5qmkNKUKlcF2LKz0OZrgII3nZGdEbniCsqKpTMtybfZdgr-zwEw6r1DC8NgRvAH1IKJZCU5VwnNZ9QGjxig01NwexOOmjN9ikDv9CkCfYpAzxEk0ddX_0Ozh_a_5N_NE_BjBiB98tFB0GgdjGllF8BG3Xr3nv9fuMKZjw</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Turgut, Necmettin</creator><creator>Erdem, Mehmet</creator><creator>Erdem, Ahmet Can</creator><creator>Bayam, Levent</creator><creator>Batar, Suat</creator><creator>Sağlam, Necdet</creator><creator>Gülabi, Deniz</creator><general>Elsevier Masson SAS</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4994-5059</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Is step-cut shortening osteotomy a better choice than transverse osteotomy for total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type III-IV hip dysplasia?</title><author>Turgut, Necmettin ; Erdem, Mehmet ; Erdem, Ahmet Can ; Bayam, Levent ; Batar, Suat ; Sağlam, Necdet ; Gülabi, Deniz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-3161d859131743465260a0bb477a58284ec5fced29ee41bfa7fa32818e560103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Hip dysplasia</topic><topic>Step-cut osteotomy</topic><topic>Subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy</topic><topic>Total hip arthroplasty</topic><topic>Transverse osteotomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Turgut, Necmettin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdem, Mehmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Erdem, Ahmet Can</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayam, Levent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Batar, Suat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sağlam, Necdet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gülabi, Deniz</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Turgut, Necmettin</au><au>Erdem, Mehmet</au><au>Erdem, Ahmet Can</au><au>Bayam, Levent</au><au>Batar, Suat</au><au>Sağlam, Necdet</au><au>Gülabi, Deniz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is step-cut shortening osteotomy a better choice than transverse osteotomy for total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type III-IV hip dysplasia?</atitle><jtitle>Orthopaedics &amp; traumatology, surgery &amp; research</jtitle><addtitle>Orthop Traumatol Surg Res</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>110</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>103883</spage><pages>103883-</pages><artnum>103883</artnum><issn>1877-0568</issn><eissn>1877-0568</eissn><abstract>Total hip arthroplasty for developmental hip dysplasia is a challenging surgery due to anatomic abnormalities. Crowe III and Crowe IV hip dysplasia generally necessitates a subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy. Transverse and step-cut osteotomy are the most common procedures for shortening of femur although there is still no consensus which one is a superior method. The objective of this study was to demonstrate whether transverse or step-cut osteotomy is superior in hips who undergo arthroplasty for high riding hip dysplasia. Our hypothesis was that higher rates of union would be achieved in patients with Crowe III-IV hip dysplasia when the step-cut osteotomy was performed compared to transverse osteotomies. A total of 99 hips from 90 patients (9 bilateral, 81 unilateral; 79 female, 11 male), each with a minimum follow-up duration of two years, were included in this study. The hips were classified as Crowe III (n=16) or IV (n=83). All hips were implanted cementless. Transverse or step-cut osteotomy was chosen for osteotomy type. The clinical and functional outcomes were assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), limb length discrepancy (LLD), and limping. The complications and management of these were noted. The union rates were compared between osteotomy types. The mean age at surgery was 48.8 (range, 21–79 years). The follow-up period was 64.3 months in average (range, 24 to 192 months). The mean Harris Hip Score before surgery was 35.6 (range, 18–50), and increased to 88.1 (range, 61–98) points at the most recent follow-up. The preoperative leg length discrepancy (LLD) measured 5.3cm (with a range of 3 to 6.8), while the postoperative LLD reduced to 0.8cm (with a range of 0 to 1.6). There were a total of 38 complications in 35 patients out of 99 cases, resulting in a complication rate of 38.4%. The most frequent complication observed was intraoperative femoral fractures, occurring in 13 cases. Residual limping was seen in 73.7% of all. Step-cut osteotomy was performed in 64 hips (35 CDH stem [Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA], 29 Wagner Cone stem [Zimmer Biomet, Warsaw, IN, USA]) and, transverse in 35 hips (22 CDH, 13 Wagner Cone). Six hips had nonunion problem and all of them were operated with a step-cut osteotomy (z-score: –7.12 and p&lt;0.00001, Mann-Whitney U Test). Transverse osteotomy may be a better option while performing a shortening subtrochanteric level osteotomy for total hip arthroplasty for Crowe III-IV hips. Level III; observational retrospective cohort study.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>Elsevier Masson SAS</pub><pmid>38583704</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103883</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4994-5059</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1877-0568
ispartof Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research, 2024-10, Vol.110 (6), p.103883, Article 103883
issn 1877-0568
1877-0568
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3034777118
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Hip dysplasia
Step-cut osteotomy
Subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy
Total hip arthroplasty
Transverse osteotomy
title Is step-cut shortening osteotomy a better choice than transverse osteotomy for total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type III-IV hip dysplasia?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T17%3A26%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20step-cut%20shortening%20osteotomy%20a%20better%20choice%20than%20transverse%20osteotomy%20for%20total%20hip%20arthroplasty%20for%20Crowe%20type%20III-IV%20hip%20dysplasia?&rft.jtitle=Orthopaedics%20&%20traumatology,%20surgery%20&%20research&rft.au=Turgut,%20Necmettin&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=110&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=103883&rft.pages=103883-&rft.artnum=103883&rft.issn=1877-0568&rft.eissn=1877-0568&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103883&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3034777118%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3034777118&rft_id=info:pmid/38583704&rft_els_id=S1877056824001117&rfr_iscdi=true