Exploring unmet concerns in home hospice cancer care: Perspectives of patients, informal caregivers, palliative care providers, and family physicians

The study examines perspectives of patients in home hospice care; their informal caregivers; palliative health-care providers (HCPs); and family physicians, all regarding patients' unmet needs and quality of life (QoL)-related concerns. Participants from all 4 groups were approached within 2 mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Palliative & supportive care 2024-04, Vol.22 (5), p.1301-1309
Hauptverfasser: Ben-Arye, Eran, Samuels, Noah, Keshet, Yael, Golan, Miri, Baruch, Erez, Dagash, Jamal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1309
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1301
container_title Palliative & supportive care
container_volume 22
creator Ben-Arye, Eran
Samuels, Noah
Keshet, Yael
Golan, Miri
Baruch, Erez
Dagash, Jamal
description The study examines perspectives of patients in home hospice care; their informal caregivers; palliative health-care providers (HCPs); and family physicians, all regarding patients' unmet needs and quality of life (QoL)-related concerns. Participants from all 4 groups were approached within 2 months after the patient's admission to the home hospice care unit. Participants completed Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCAW) questionnaires, for patient's QoL-related concerns. Qualitative analysis of short narratives was conducted using ATLAS.ti software for systematic coding. In total, 78 participants completed the study questionnaires: 24 patients, 22 informal caregivers, 22 palliative HCPs, and 11 family physicians. Informal caregivers gave higher scores (i.e., greater severity) than patients for fatigue on ESAS ( = 0.009); and family physicians lower scores than patients for ESAS drowsiness ( = 0.046). Compared with patients, palliative HCPs gave higher scores for patient emotional-spiritual concerns (77.2% vs. 41.7%, = 0.02); lower scores for gastrointestinal concerns ( = 0.048); and higher scores for overall function ( = 0.049). Qualitative assessment identified a gap between how patients/informal caregivers vs. palliative HCPs/family physicians regard emotional-spiritual themes, including discussing issues related to death and dying. The findings of the present study suggest that exploring a multifaceted cohort of home hospice patients, informal caregivers, palliative HCPs, and family physicians may provide insight on how to reduce communication gaps and address unmet needs of patients, particularly regarding emotional and spiritual concerns. While the 4 groups were similar in their scoring of patient QoL-related concerns, there were discrepancies for some concerns (e.g., patient fatigue) and expectations regarding the need to discuss emotional and spiritual concerns, including on death and dying. Educational initiatives with programs providing training to all 4 groups may help bridge this gap, creating a more open and collaborative hospice care environment.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1478951524000567
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3034776494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1478951524000567</cupid><sourcerecordid>3034776494</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-6fb84114a8b71860dae4e2bca4c1d7c9ff38ba1d3bf441743621f7b594c999503</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EoqXwAGyQJTYsuNQT23HMDlXlR6pEJWAdOc741lViBzupuA_C-9a5vbQSiI3HmvnOmZEOIS-BvQMG6vQbCNVoCbISjDFZq0fkeG1ttKz44_s_yCPyLOdrxqqKM_WUHPFGNooJdkx-n_-ahph82NIljDhTG4PFFDL1gV7FEcuTJ2-RWrMOSkn4nl5iyhPa2d9gptHRycwew5zfFpmLaTTDHtyWeSrNyQyDNyu9b9MpxRvf70cm9NSZ0Q87Ol3tsrfehPycPHFmyPjiUE_Ij4_n388-by6-fvpy9uFiY3kl503tukYACNN0Cpqa9QYFVp01wkKvrHaON52BnndOCFCC1xU41UktrNZaMn5C3tz5loN-LpjndvTZ4jCYgHHJLWdcKFULLQr6-i_0Oi4plOtaDpxrqUCsFNxRNsWcE7p2Sn40adcCa9fM2n8yK5pXB-elG7G_V_wJqQD8YGrGLvl-iw-7_297C8UKovA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3133957144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring unmet concerns in home hospice cancer care: Perspectives of patients, informal caregivers, palliative care providers, and family physicians</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Ben-Arye, Eran ; Samuels, Noah ; Keshet, Yael ; Golan, Miri ; Baruch, Erez ; Dagash, Jamal</creator><creatorcontrib>Ben-Arye, Eran ; Samuels, Noah ; Keshet, Yael ; Golan, Miri ; Baruch, Erez ; Dagash, Jamal</creatorcontrib><description>The study examines perspectives of patients in home hospice care; their informal caregivers; palliative health-care providers (HCPs); and family physicians, all regarding patients' unmet needs and quality of life (QoL)-related concerns. Participants from all 4 groups were approached within 2 months after the patient's admission to the home hospice care unit. Participants completed Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCAW) questionnaires, for patient's QoL-related concerns. Qualitative analysis of short narratives was conducted using ATLAS.ti software for systematic coding. In total, 78 participants completed the study questionnaires: 24 patients, 22 informal caregivers, 22 palliative HCPs, and 11 family physicians. Informal caregivers gave higher scores (i.e., greater severity) than patients for fatigue on ESAS ( = 0.009); and family physicians lower scores than patients for ESAS drowsiness ( = 0.046). Compared with patients, palliative HCPs gave higher scores for patient emotional-spiritual concerns (77.2% vs. 41.7%, = 0.02); lower scores for gastrointestinal concerns ( = 0.048); and higher scores for overall function ( = 0.049). Qualitative assessment identified a gap between how patients/informal caregivers vs. palliative HCPs/family physicians regard emotional-spiritual themes, including discussing issues related to death and dying. The findings of the present study suggest that exploring a multifaceted cohort of home hospice patients, informal caregivers, palliative HCPs, and family physicians may provide insight on how to reduce communication gaps and address unmet needs of patients, particularly regarding emotional and spiritual concerns. While the 4 groups were similar in their scoring of patient QoL-related concerns, there were discrepancies for some concerns (e.g., patient fatigue) and expectations regarding the need to discuss emotional and spiritual concerns, including on death and dying. Educational initiatives with programs providing training to all 4 groups may help bridge this gap, creating a more open and collaborative hospice care environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-9515</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-9523</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1478951524000567</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38587040</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Caregivers ; Communication ; Hospice care ; Nurses ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Palliative care ; Patients ; Physicians ; Qualitative research ; Questionnaires ; Research methodology</subject><ispartof>Palliative &amp; supportive care, 2024-04, Vol.22 (5), p.1301-1309</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press.</rights><rights>The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-6fb84114a8b71860dae4e2bca4c1d7c9ff38ba1d3bf441743621f7b594c999503</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4058-3672</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1478951524000567/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38587040$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ben-Arye, Eran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuels, Noah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keshet, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golan, Miri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baruch, Erez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagash, Jamal</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring unmet concerns in home hospice cancer care: Perspectives of patients, informal caregivers, palliative care providers, and family physicians</title><title>Palliative &amp; supportive care</title><addtitle>Pall Supp Care</addtitle><description>The study examines perspectives of patients in home hospice care; their informal caregivers; palliative health-care providers (HCPs); and family physicians, all regarding patients' unmet needs and quality of life (QoL)-related concerns. Participants from all 4 groups were approached within 2 months after the patient's admission to the home hospice care unit. Participants completed Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCAW) questionnaires, for patient's QoL-related concerns. Qualitative analysis of short narratives was conducted using ATLAS.ti software for systematic coding. In total, 78 participants completed the study questionnaires: 24 patients, 22 informal caregivers, 22 palliative HCPs, and 11 family physicians. Informal caregivers gave higher scores (i.e., greater severity) than patients for fatigue on ESAS ( = 0.009); and family physicians lower scores than patients for ESAS drowsiness ( = 0.046). Compared with patients, palliative HCPs gave higher scores for patient emotional-spiritual concerns (77.2% vs. 41.7%, = 0.02); lower scores for gastrointestinal concerns ( = 0.048); and higher scores for overall function ( = 0.049). Qualitative assessment identified a gap between how patients/informal caregivers vs. palliative HCPs/family physicians regard emotional-spiritual themes, including discussing issues related to death and dying. The findings of the present study suggest that exploring a multifaceted cohort of home hospice patients, informal caregivers, palliative HCPs, and family physicians may provide insight on how to reduce communication gaps and address unmet needs of patients, particularly regarding emotional and spiritual concerns. While the 4 groups were similar in their scoring of patient QoL-related concerns, there were discrepancies for some concerns (e.g., patient fatigue) and expectations regarding the need to discuss emotional and spiritual concerns, including on death and dying. Educational initiatives with programs providing training to all 4 groups may help bridge this gap, creating a more open and collaborative hospice care environment.</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Hospice care</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><issn>1478-9515</issn><issn>1478-9523</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>IKXGN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1u1TAQhS0EoqXwAGyQJTYsuNQT23HMDlXlR6pEJWAdOc741lViBzupuA_C-9a5vbQSiI3HmvnOmZEOIS-BvQMG6vQbCNVoCbISjDFZq0fkeG1ttKz44_s_yCPyLOdrxqqKM_WUHPFGNooJdkx-n_-ahph82NIljDhTG4PFFDL1gV7FEcuTJ2-RWrMOSkn4nl5iyhPa2d9gptHRycwew5zfFpmLaTTDHtyWeSrNyQyDNyu9b9MpxRvf70cm9NSZ0Q87Ol3tsrfehPycPHFmyPjiUE_Ij4_n388-by6-fvpy9uFiY3kl503tukYACNN0Cpqa9QYFVp01wkKvrHaON52BnndOCFCC1xU41UktrNZaMn5C3tz5loN-LpjndvTZ4jCYgHHJLWdcKFULLQr6-i_0Oi4plOtaDpxrqUCsFNxRNsWcE7p2Sn40adcCa9fM2n8yK5pXB-elG7G_V_wJqQD8YGrGLvl-iw-7_297C8UKovA</recordid><startdate>20240408</startdate><enddate>20240408</enddate><creator>Ben-Arye, Eran</creator><creator>Samuels, Noah</creator><creator>Keshet, Yael</creator><creator>Golan, Miri</creator><creator>Baruch, Erez</creator><creator>Dagash, Jamal</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>IKXGN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4058-3672</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240408</creationdate><title>Exploring unmet concerns in home hospice cancer care: Perspectives of patients, informal caregivers, palliative care providers, and family physicians</title><author>Ben-Arye, Eran ; Samuels, Noah ; Keshet, Yael ; Golan, Miri ; Baruch, Erez ; Dagash, Jamal</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c325t-6fb84114a8b71860dae4e2bca4c1d7c9ff38ba1d3bf441743621f7b594c999503</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Hospice care</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ben-Arye, Eran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samuels, Noah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keshet, Yael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golan, Miri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baruch, Erez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagash, Jamal</creatorcontrib><collection>Cambridge Journals Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Palliative &amp; supportive care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ben-Arye, Eran</au><au>Samuels, Noah</au><au>Keshet, Yael</au><au>Golan, Miri</au><au>Baruch, Erez</au><au>Dagash, Jamal</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring unmet concerns in home hospice cancer care: Perspectives of patients, informal caregivers, palliative care providers, and family physicians</atitle><jtitle>Palliative &amp; supportive care</jtitle><addtitle>Pall Supp Care</addtitle><date>2024-04-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1301</spage><epage>1309</epage><pages>1301-1309</pages><issn>1478-9515</issn><eissn>1478-9523</eissn><abstract>The study examines perspectives of patients in home hospice care; their informal caregivers; palliative health-care providers (HCPs); and family physicians, all regarding patients' unmet needs and quality of life (QoL)-related concerns. Participants from all 4 groups were approached within 2 months after the patient's admission to the home hospice care unit. Participants completed Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) and Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing (MYCAW) questionnaires, for patient's QoL-related concerns. Qualitative analysis of short narratives was conducted using ATLAS.ti software for systematic coding. In total, 78 participants completed the study questionnaires: 24 patients, 22 informal caregivers, 22 palliative HCPs, and 11 family physicians. Informal caregivers gave higher scores (i.e., greater severity) than patients for fatigue on ESAS ( = 0.009); and family physicians lower scores than patients for ESAS drowsiness ( = 0.046). Compared with patients, palliative HCPs gave higher scores for patient emotional-spiritual concerns (77.2% vs. 41.7%, = 0.02); lower scores for gastrointestinal concerns ( = 0.048); and higher scores for overall function ( = 0.049). Qualitative assessment identified a gap between how patients/informal caregivers vs. palliative HCPs/family physicians regard emotional-spiritual themes, including discussing issues related to death and dying. The findings of the present study suggest that exploring a multifaceted cohort of home hospice patients, informal caregivers, palliative HCPs, and family physicians may provide insight on how to reduce communication gaps and address unmet needs of patients, particularly regarding emotional and spiritual concerns. While the 4 groups were similar in their scoring of patient QoL-related concerns, there were discrepancies for some concerns (e.g., patient fatigue) and expectations regarding the need to discuss emotional and spiritual concerns, including on death and dying. Educational initiatives with programs providing training to all 4 groups may help bridge this gap, creating a more open and collaborative hospice care environment.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><pmid>38587040</pmid><doi>10.1017/S1478951524000567</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4058-3672</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1478-9515
ispartof Palliative & supportive care, 2024-04, Vol.22 (5), p.1301-1309
issn 1478-9515
1478-9523
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3034776494
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Cancer
Caregivers
Communication
Hospice care
Nurses
Oncology
Original Article
Palliative care
Patients
Physicians
Qualitative research
Questionnaires
Research methodology
title Exploring unmet concerns in home hospice cancer care: Perspectives of patients, informal caregivers, palliative care providers, and family physicians
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A11%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20unmet%20concerns%20in%20home%20hospice%20cancer%20care:%20Perspectives%20of%20patients,%20informal%20caregivers,%20palliative%20care%20providers,%20and%20family%20physicians&rft.jtitle=Palliative%20&%20supportive%20care&rft.au=Ben-Arye,%20Eran&rft.date=2024-04-08&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1301&rft.epage=1309&rft.pages=1301-1309&rft.issn=1478-9515&rft.eissn=1478-9523&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1478951524000567&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3034776494%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3133957144&rft_id=info:pmid/38587040&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1478951524000567&rfr_iscdi=true