Dentin hypersensitivity and toothache among patients diagnosed with Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization: A systematic review and meta-analysis
To determine the prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) and toothache in patients with Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH); and evaluate whether patients with MIH have greater likelihood of presenting DH/toothache than controls. Studies evaluating DH/toothache in patients with MIH were includ...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dentistry 2024-06, Vol.145, p.104981-104981, Article 104981 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 104981 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 104981 |
container_title | Journal of dentistry |
container_volume | 145 |
creator | Santos, Pablo Silveira Vitali, Filipe Colombo Fonseca-Souza, Gabriela Maia, Lucianne Cople Cardoso, Mariane Feltrin-Souza, Juliana Fraiz, Fabian Calixto |
description | To determine the prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) and toothache in patients with Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH); and evaluate whether patients with MIH have greater likelihood of presenting DH/toothache than controls.
Studies evaluating DH/toothache in patients with MIH were included. Studies focusing on other enamel defects were excluded.
Eight databases, including grey literature, were searched in January 2024.
The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for Cross-sectional studies. Proportion and association meta-analyses, subgrouped by diagnostic methods, were conducted. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE approach.
Fifteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis and fourteen in the meta-analyses. Two studies fulfilled all items of the methodological quality checklist. The overall prevalence of DH/toothache among patients with MIH was 45 %. Prevalence rates of 30 %, 47 %, and 55 % were estimated based on proxy reports, self-reports, and air stimulation, respectively. The overall prevalence of DH/toothache per tooth was 22 %, ranging from 16 % to 29 % according to the diagnostic method. Patients with MIH demonstrated higher likelihood of presenting proxy reports of DH/toothache compared to those without MIH (OR: 1.51, 95 % CI [1.23–1.85], P < 0.01, I2: 0 %). The certainty of evidence was very low, mainly due to the low methodological quality of included studies and high inconsistency.
The global prevalence of DH/toothache was 22 %, per tooth, and 45 % per patient. Estimates vary according to diagnostic methods. Patients with MIH showed higher likelihood of presenting proxy reports of DH/toothache than controls.
This systematic review contributes valuable information to the dental literature by assessing the prevalence and associated factors of DH/toothache in patients with MIH. The findings can guide future research, inform clinical practices and public policy makers, and ultimately improve the management of oral health of patients with MIH.
PROSPERO CRD42023432805. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104981 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3034246726</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0300571224001519</els_id><sourcerecordid>3034246726</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-5ebe2c35f2c472aa06d4863c0c5b02a4df6584fa9127acda4abd29a645ddbf5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRS0EIkPgC5CQl2x68KtfSCyiBEikIDYgsbOq7eqMR912Y3sSNb_AT-NkAktWfujcuqp7CXnN2ZYz3rzbb_cWfd4KJlT5UX3Hn5AN79q-4m3z4ynZMMlYVbdcnJAXKe0ZY4qJ_jk5kV3dCSWbDfl9UUY4T3frgjGhTy67W5dXCt7SHELegdkhhTn4G7pAdgVP1Dq48SGhpXcu7-iXMEGsrrxxKUR6uS5hdh4jTO5XUQT_np7RtKaMc3kaGvHW4d2Dw4wZKvAwrcmll-TZCFPCV4_nKfn-6eO388vq-uvnq_Oz68rIus9VjQOKch2FUa0AYI1VXSMNM_XABCg7NnWnRui5aMFYUDBY0UOjamuHsTbylLw9zl1i-HnAlPXsksFpAo_hkLRkUgnVtKIpqDyiJoaUIo56iW6GuGrO9H0Leq8fWtD3LehjC0X15tHgMMxo_2n-xl6AD0cAy5oljKiTKckatC6iydoG91-DP1Zbnlc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3034246726</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dentin hypersensitivity and toothache among patients diagnosed with Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Santos, Pablo Silveira ; Vitali, Filipe Colombo ; Fonseca-Souza, Gabriela ; Maia, Lucianne Cople ; Cardoso, Mariane ; Feltrin-Souza, Juliana ; Fraiz, Fabian Calixto</creator><creatorcontrib>Santos, Pablo Silveira ; Vitali, Filipe Colombo ; Fonseca-Souza, Gabriela ; Maia, Lucianne Cople ; Cardoso, Mariane ; Feltrin-Souza, Juliana ; Fraiz, Fabian Calixto</creatorcontrib><description>To determine the prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) and toothache in patients with Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH); and evaluate whether patients with MIH have greater likelihood of presenting DH/toothache than controls.
Studies evaluating DH/toothache in patients with MIH were included. Studies focusing on other enamel defects were excluded.
Eight databases, including grey literature, were searched in January 2024.
The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for Cross-sectional studies. Proportion and association meta-analyses, subgrouped by diagnostic methods, were conducted. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE approach.
Fifteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis and fourteen in the meta-analyses. Two studies fulfilled all items of the methodological quality checklist. The overall prevalence of DH/toothache among patients with MIH was 45 %. Prevalence rates of 30 %, 47 %, and 55 % were estimated based on proxy reports, self-reports, and air stimulation, respectively. The overall prevalence of DH/toothache per tooth was 22 %, ranging from 16 % to 29 % according to the diagnostic method. Patients with MIH demonstrated higher likelihood of presenting proxy reports of DH/toothache compared to those without MIH (OR: 1.51, 95 % CI [1.23–1.85], P < 0.01, I2: 0 %). The certainty of evidence was very low, mainly due to the low methodological quality of included studies and high inconsistency.
The global prevalence of DH/toothache was 22 %, per tooth, and 45 % per patient. Estimates vary according to diagnostic methods. Patients with MIH showed higher likelihood of presenting proxy reports of DH/toothache than controls.
This systematic review contributes valuable information to the dental literature by assessing the prevalence and associated factors of DH/toothache in patients with MIH. The findings can guide future research, inform clinical practices and public policy makers, and ultimately improve the management of oral health of patients with MIH.
PROSPERO CRD42023432805.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104981</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38582436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies ; Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - epidemiology ; Dentin sensitivity ; Dentin Sensitivity - epidemiology ; Humans ; Molar Hypomineralization ; Molar-incisor hypomineralization ; Prevalence ; Systematic Review ; Toothache ; Toothache - epidemiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 2024-06, Vol.145, p.104981-104981, Article 104981</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-5ebe2c35f2c472aa06d4863c0c5b02a4df6584fa9127acda4abd29a645ddbf5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-5ebe2c35f2c472aa06d4863c0c5b02a4df6584fa9127acda4abd29a645ddbf5c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9310-5642 ; 0000-0001-5290-7905 ; 0000-0002-8040-8553 ; 0000-0001-6189-9169 ; 0000-0003-1026-9401</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104981$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38582436$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santos, Pablo Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitali, Filipe Colombo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca-Souza, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, Lucianne Cople</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Mariane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feltrin-Souza, Juliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraiz, Fabian Calixto</creatorcontrib><title>Dentin hypersensitivity and toothache among patients diagnosed with Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><description>To determine the prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) and toothache in patients with Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH); and evaluate whether patients with MIH have greater likelihood of presenting DH/toothache than controls.
Studies evaluating DH/toothache in patients with MIH were included. Studies focusing on other enamel defects were excluded.
Eight databases, including grey literature, were searched in January 2024.
The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for Cross-sectional studies. Proportion and association meta-analyses, subgrouped by diagnostic methods, were conducted. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE approach.
Fifteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis and fourteen in the meta-analyses. Two studies fulfilled all items of the methodological quality checklist. The overall prevalence of DH/toothache among patients with MIH was 45 %. Prevalence rates of 30 %, 47 %, and 55 % were estimated based on proxy reports, self-reports, and air stimulation, respectively. The overall prevalence of DH/toothache per tooth was 22 %, ranging from 16 % to 29 % according to the diagnostic method. Patients with MIH demonstrated higher likelihood of presenting proxy reports of DH/toothache compared to those without MIH (OR: 1.51, 95 % CI [1.23–1.85], P < 0.01, I2: 0 %). The certainty of evidence was very low, mainly due to the low methodological quality of included studies and high inconsistency.
The global prevalence of DH/toothache was 22 %, per tooth, and 45 % per patient. Estimates vary according to diagnostic methods. Patients with MIH showed higher likelihood of presenting proxy reports of DH/toothache than controls.
This systematic review contributes valuable information to the dental literature by assessing the prevalence and associated factors of DH/toothache in patients with MIH. The findings can guide future research, inform clinical practices and public policy makers, and ultimately improve the management of oral health of patients with MIH.
PROSPERO CRD42023432805.</description><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dentin sensitivity</subject><subject>Dentin Sensitivity - epidemiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Molar Hypomineralization</subject><subject>Molar-incisor hypomineralization</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Systematic Review</subject><subject>Toothache</subject><subject>Toothache - epidemiology</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRS0EIkPgC5CQl2x68KtfSCyiBEikIDYgsbOq7eqMR912Y3sSNb_AT-NkAktWfujcuqp7CXnN2ZYz3rzbb_cWfd4KJlT5UX3Hn5AN79q-4m3z4ynZMMlYVbdcnJAXKe0ZY4qJ_jk5kV3dCSWbDfl9UUY4T3frgjGhTy67W5dXCt7SHELegdkhhTn4G7pAdgVP1Dq48SGhpXcu7-iXMEGsrrxxKUR6uS5hdh4jTO5XUQT_np7RtKaMc3kaGvHW4d2Dw4wZKvAwrcmll-TZCFPCV4_nKfn-6eO388vq-uvnq_Oz68rIus9VjQOKch2FUa0AYI1VXSMNM_XABCg7NnWnRui5aMFYUDBY0UOjamuHsTbylLw9zl1i-HnAlPXsksFpAo_hkLRkUgnVtKIpqDyiJoaUIo56iW6GuGrO9H0Leq8fWtD3LehjC0X15tHgMMxo_2n-xl6AD0cAy5oljKiTKckatC6iydoG91-DP1Zbnlc</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Santos, Pablo Silveira</creator><creator>Vitali, Filipe Colombo</creator><creator>Fonseca-Souza, Gabriela</creator><creator>Maia, Lucianne Cople</creator><creator>Cardoso, Mariane</creator><creator>Feltrin-Souza, Juliana</creator><creator>Fraiz, Fabian Calixto</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9310-5642</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5290-7905</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8040-8553</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6189-9169</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-9401</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Dentin hypersensitivity and toothache among patients diagnosed with Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization: A systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Santos, Pablo Silveira ; Vitali, Filipe Colombo ; Fonseca-Souza, Gabriela ; Maia, Lucianne Cople ; Cardoso, Mariane ; Feltrin-Souza, Juliana ; Fraiz, Fabian Calixto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-5ebe2c35f2c472aa06d4863c0c5b02a4df6584fa9127acda4abd29a645ddbf5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dentin sensitivity</topic><topic>Dentin Sensitivity - epidemiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Molar Hypomineralization</topic><topic>Molar-incisor hypomineralization</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Systematic Review</topic><topic>Toothache</topic><topic>Toothache - epidemiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santos, Pablo Silveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vitali, Filipe Colombo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fonseca-Souza, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, Lucianne Cople</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cardoso, Mariane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feltrin-Souza, Juliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fraiz, Fabian Calixto</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santos, Pablo Silveira</au><au>Vitali, Filipe Colombo</au><au>Fonseca-Souza, Gabriela</au><au>Maia, Lucianne Cople</au><au>Cardoso, Mariane</au><au>Feltrin-Souza, Juliana</au><au>Fraiz, Fabian Calixto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dentin hypersensitivity and toothache among patients diagnosed with Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization: A systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>145</volume><spage>104981</spage><epage>104981</epage><pages>104981-104981</pages><artnum>104981</artnum><issn>0300-5712</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><abstract>To determine the prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity (DH) and toothache in patients with Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH); and evaluate whether patients with MIH have greater likelihood of presenting DH/toothache than controls.
Studies evaluating DH/toothache in patients with MIH were included. Studies focusing on other enamel defects were excluded.
Eight databases, including grey literature, were searched in January 2024.
The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for Cross-sectional studies. Proportion and association meta-analyses, subgrouped by diagnostic methods, were conducted. The certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE approach.
Fifteen studies were included in the qualitative analysis and fourteen in the meta-analyses. Two studies fulfilled all items of the methodological quality checklist. The overall prevalence of DH/toothache among patients with MIH was 45 %. Prevalence rates of 30 %, 47 %, and 55 % were estimated based on proxy reports, self-reports, and air stimulation, respectively. The overall prevalence of DH/toothache per tooth was 22 %, ranging from 16 % to 29 % according to the diagnostic method. Patients with MIH demonstrated higher likelihood of presenting proxy reports of DH/toothache compared to those without MIH (OR: 1.51, 95 % CI [1.23–1.85], P < 0.01, I2: 0 %). The certainty of evidence was very low, mainly due to the low methodological quality of included studies and high inconsistency.
The global prevalence of DH/toothache was 22 %, per tooth, and 45 % per patient. Estimates vary according to diagnostic methods. Patients with MIH showed higher likelihood of presenting proxy reports of DH/toothache than controls.
This systematic review contributes valuable information to the dental literature by assessing the prevalence and associated factors of DH/toothache in patients with MIH. The findings can guide future research, inform clinical practices and public policy makers, and ultimately improve the management of oral health of patients with MIH.
PROSPERO CRD42023432805.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38582436</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104981</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9310-5642</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5290-7905</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8040-8553</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6189-9169</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1026-9401</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-5712 |
ispartof | Journal of dentistry, 2024-06, Vol.145, p.104981-104981, Article 104981 |
issn | 0300-5712 1879-176X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3034246726 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Cross-Sectional Studies Dental Enamel Hypoplasia - epidemiology Dentin sensitivity Dentin Sensitivity - epidemiology Humans Molar Hypomineralization Molar-incisor hypomineralization Prevalence Systematic Review Toothache Toothache - epidemiology |
title | Dentin hypersensitivity and toothache among patients diagnosed with Molar-Incisor Hypomineralization: A systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A57%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dentin%20hypersensitivity%20and%20toothache%20among%20patients%20diagnosed%20with%20Molar-Incisor%20Hypomineralization:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Santos,%20Pablo%20Silveira&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=145&rft.spage=104981&rft.epage=104981&rft.pages=104981-104981&rft.artnum=104981&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104981&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3034246726%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3034246726&rft_id=info:pmid/38582436&rft_els_id=S0300571224001519&rfr_iscdi=true |