Long-Term Ultrasound Twinkling Detectability and Safety of a Polymethyl Methacrylate Soft Tissue Marker Compared to Conventional Breast Biopsy Markers—A Preclinical Study in a Porcine Model

We have studied the use of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) as an alternative biopsy marker that is readily detectable with ultrasound Doppler twinkling in cases of in vitro, ex vivo, or limited duration in vivo settings. This study investigates the long-term safety and ultrasound Doppler twinkling de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ultrasound in medicine & biology 2024-07, Vol.50 (7), p.1001-1009
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Christine U., Urban, Matthew W., Hesley, Gina K., Wood, Benjamin G., Meier, Thomas R., Chen, Beiyun, Kassmeyer, Blake A., Larson, Nicholas B., Lee Miller, A., Herrick, James L., Jakub, James W., Piltin, Mara A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1009
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1001
container_title Ultrasound in medicine & biology
container_volume 50
creator Lee, Christine U.
Urban, Matthew W.
Hesley, Gina K.
Wood, Benjamin G.
Meier, Thomas R.
Chen, Beiyun
Kassmeyer, Blake A.
Larson, Nicholas B.
Lee Miller, A.
Herrick, James L.
Jakub, James W.
Piltin, Mara A.
description We have studied the use of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) as an alternative biopsy marker that is readily detectable with ultrasound Doppler twinkling in cases of in vitro, ex vivo, or limited duration in vivo settings. This study investigates the long-term safety and ultrasound Doppler twinkling detectability of a PMMA breast biopsy marker following local perturbations and different dwell times in a 6-mo animal experiment. This study, which was approved by our Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, involved three pigs and utilized various markers, including PMMA (Zimmer Biomet), 3D-printed, and Tumark Q markers. Markers were implanted at different times for each pig. Mesh material or ethanol was used to induce a local inflammatory reaction near certain markers. A semiquantitative twinkling score assessed twinkling for actionable localization during monthly ultrasounds. At the primary endpoint, ultrasound-guided localization of lymph nodes with detectable markers was performed. Following surgical resection of the localized nodes, histomorphometric analysis was conducted to evaluate for tissue ingrowth and the formation of a tissue rind around the markers. No adverse events occurred. Twinkling scores of all markers for all three pigs decreased gradually over time. The Q marker exhibited the highest mean twinkling score followed by the PMMA marker, PMMA with mesh, and Q with ethanol. The 3D-printed marker with mesh and PMMA with ethanol had the lowest scores. All wire-localized lymph nodes were successfully resected. Despite varying percentages of tissue rind around the markers and a significant reduction in overall twinkling (p < 0.001) over time, mean PMMA twinkling scores remained clinically actionable at 6 and 5 mo using a General Electric C1-6 probe and 9L-probe, respectively. In this porcine model, the PMMA marker demonstrates an acceptable safety profile. Clinically actionable twinkling aids PMMA marker detection even after 6 mo of dwell time in porcine lymph nodes. The Q marker maintained the greatest twinkling over time compared to all the other markers studied.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.03.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3034245317</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301562924001376</els_id><sourcerecordid>3034245317</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-263679fe711653f20a91d974e2ced93fbeac59acedce9937e50d7a078f8f3ba43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxi0EokvhFZDFiUtSO07ihFu75Z-0FZV2K3GzHGdSvHXsre0U5cZD8D68C09St7sgjpxmrPnNfDP-EHpDSU4JrU-2-WSil2GEvtMuL0hR5oTlhDRP0II2vM2Kln59ihaEEZpVddEeoRchbAkhvGb8OTpiTcWrktYL9Gvl7HW2AT_iq8ehbrI93nzX9sZoe43PIYKKstNGxxnLVFvLAVLqBizxpTPzCPHbbPBFClL52cgIeO2GiDc6hAnwhfQ34PHSjTvpocfRpdzegY3aWWnwmQcZIj7TbhfmAx1-__h5ii89qLSEVolax6mfsbaPol5pmwa7HsxL9GyQJsCrQzxGVx_eb5afstWXj5-Xp6tMMV7FrKhZzdsBOKV1xYaCyJb2LS-hUNC3bOhAqqqV6aGgbRmHivRcEt4MzcA6WbJj9HY_d-fd7QQhilEHBcZIC24KghFWFmXFKE_ouz2qvAvBwyB2Xo_Sz4IS8WCg2Ip_DRQPBgrCRDIwNb8-6ExdKv9t_eNYAs73AKRr7zR4EZQGmzbX6bui6J3-H517yFa5fQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3034245317</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-Term Ultrasound Twinkling Detectability and Safety of a Polymethyl Methacrylate Soft Tissue Marker Compared to Conventional Breast Biopsy Markers—A Preclinical Study in a Porcine Model</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Lee, Christine U. ; Urban, Matthew W. ; Hesley, Gina K. ; Wood, Benjamin G. ; Meier, Thomas R. ; Chen, Beiyun ; Kassmeyer, Blake A. ; Larson, Nicholas B. ; Lee Miller, A. ; Herrick, James L. ; Jakub, James W. ; Piltin, Mara A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Christine U. ; Urban, Matthew W. ; Hesley, Gina K. ; Wood, Benjamin G. ; Meier, Thomas R. ; Chen, Beiyun ; Kassmeyer, Blake A. ; Larson, Nicholas B. ; Lee Miller, A. ; Herrick, James L. ; Jakub, James W. ; Piltin, Mara A.</creatorcontrib><description>We have studied the use of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) as an alternative biopsy marker that is readily detectable with ultrasound Doppler twinkling in cases of in vitro, ex vivo, or limited duration in vivo settings. This study investigates the long-term safety and ultrasound Doppler twinkling detectability of a PMMA breast biopsy marker following local perturbations and different dwell times in a 6-mo animal experiment. This study, which was approved by our Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, involved three pigs and utilized various markers, including PMMA (Zimmer Biomet), 3D-printed, and Tumark Q markers. Markers were implanted at different times for each pig. Mesh material or ethanol was used to induce a local inflammatory reaction near certain markers. A semiquantitative twinkling score assessed twinkling for actionable localization during monthly ultrasounds. At the primary endpoint, ultrasound-guided localization of lymph nodes with detectable markers was performed. Following surgical resection of the localized nodes, histomorphometric analysis was conducted to evaluate for tissue ingrowth and the formation of a tissue rind around the markers. No adverse events occurred. Twinkling scores of all markers for all three pigs decreased gradually over time. The Q marker exhibited the highest mean twinkling score followed by the PMMA marker, PMMA with mesh, and Q with ethanol. The 3D-printed marker with mesh and PMMA with ethanol had the lowest scores. All wire-localized lymph nodes were successfully resected. Despite varying percentages of tissue rind around the markers and a significant reduction in overall twinkling (p &lt; 0.001) over time, mean PMMA twinkling scores remained clinically actionable at 6 and 5 mo using a General Electric C1-6 probe and 9L-probe, respectively. In this porcine model, the PMMA marker demonstrates an acceptable safety profile. Clinically actionable twinkling aids PMMA marker detection even after 6 mo of dwell time in porcine lymph nodes. The Q marker maintained the greatest twinkling over time compared to all the other markers studied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-5629</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1879-291X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-291X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.03.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38575416</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Bone cement ; Breast biopsy marker ; Breast cancer ; Localization ; Neoadjuvant therapy ; PMMA ; Polymethyl methacrylate ; Twinkling ; Ultrasound ; Ultrasound color Doppler</subject><ispartof>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology, 2024-07, Vol.50 (7), p.1001-1009</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-263679fe711653f20a91d974e2ced93fbeac59acedce9937e50d7a078f8f3ba43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5298-6949</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301562924001376$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65534</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38575416$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Christine U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urban, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hesley, Gina K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Benjamin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Beiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassmeyer, Blake A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Nicholas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee Miller, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrick, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakub, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piltin, Mara A.</creatorcontrib><title>Long-Term Ultrasound Twinkling Detectability and Safety of a Polymethyl Methacrylate Soft Tissue Marker Compared to Conventional Breast Biopsy Markers—A Preclinical Study in a Porcine Model</title><title>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology</title><addtitle>Ultrasound Med Biol</addtitle><description>We have studied the use of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) as an alternative biopsy marker that is readily detectable with ultrasound Doppler twinkling in cases of in vitro, ex vivo, or limited duration in vivo settings. This study investigates the long-term safety and ultrasound Doppler twinkling detectability of a PMMA breast biopsy marker following local perturbations and different dwell times in a 6-mo animal experiment. This study, which was approved by our Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, involved three pigs and utilized various markers, including PMMA (Zimmer Biomet), 3D-printed, and Tumark Q markers. Markers were implanted at different times for each pig. Mesh material or ethanol was used to induce a local inflammatory reaction near certain markers. A semiquantitative twinkling score assessed twinkling for actionable localization during monthly ultrasounds. At the primary endpoint, ultrasound-guided localization of lymph nodes with detectable markers was performed. Following surgical resection of the localized nodes, histomorphometric analysis was conducted to evaluate for tissue ingrowth and the formation of a tissue rind around the markers. No adverse events occurred. Twinkling scores of all markers for all three pigs decreased gradually over time. The Q marker exhibited the highest mean twinkling score followed by the PMMA marker, PMMA with mesh, and Q with ethanol. The 3D-printed marker with mesh and PMMA with ethanol had the lowest scores. All wire-localized lymph nodes were successfully resected. Despite varying percentages of tissue rind around the markers and a significant reduction in overall twinkling (p &lt; 0.001) over time, mean PMMA twinkling scores remained clinically actionable at 6 and 5 mo using a General Electric C1-6 probe and 9L-probe, respectively. In this porcine model, the PMMA marker demonstrates an acceptable safety profile. Clinically actionable twinkling aids PMMA marker detection even after 6 mo of dwell time in porcine lymph nodes. The Q marker maintained the greatest twinkling over time compared to all the other markers studied.</description><subject>Bone cement</subject><subject>Breast biopsy marker</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant therapy</subject><subject>PMMA</subject><subject>Polymethyl methacrylate</subject><subject>Twinkling</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><subject>Ultrasound color Doppler</subject><issn>0301-5629</issn><issn>1879-291X</issn><issn>1879-291X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc9u1DAQxi0EokvhFZDFiUtSO07ihFu75Z-0FZV2K3GzHGdSvHXsre0U5cZD8D68C09St7sgjpxmrPnNfDP-EHpDSU4JrU-2-WSil2GEvtMuL0hR5oTlhDRP0II2vM2Kln59ihaEEZpVddEeoRchbAkhvGb8OTpiTcWrktYL9Gvl7HW2AT_iq8ehbrI93nzX9sZoe43PIYKKstNGxxnLVFvLAVLqBizxpTPzCPHbbPBFClL52cgIeO2GiDc6hAnwhfQ34PHSjTvpocfRpdzegY3aWWnwmQcZIj7TbhfmAx1-__h5ii89qLSEVolax6mfsbaPol5pmwa7HsxL9GyQJsCrQzxGVx_eb5afstWXj5-Xp6tMMV7FrKhZzdsBOKV1xYaCyJb2LS-hUNC3bOhAqqqV6aGgbRmHivRcEt4MzcA6WbJj9HY_d-fd7QQhilEHBcZIC24KghFWFmXFKE_ouz2qvAvBwyB2Xo_Sz4IS8WCg2Ip_DRQPBgrCRDIwNb8-6ExdKv9t_eNYAs73AKRr7zR4EZQGmzbX6bui6J3-H517yFa5fQ</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Lee, Christine U.</creator><creator>Urban, Matthew W.</creator><creator>Hesley, Gina K.</creator><creator>Wood, Benjamin G.</creator><creator>Meier, Thomas R.</creator><creator>Chen, Beiyun</creator><creator>Kassmeyer, Blake A.</creator><creator>Larson, Nicholas B.</creator><creator>Lee Miller, A.</creator><creator>Herrick, James L.</creator><creator>Jakub, James W.</creator><creator>Piltin, Mara A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5298-6949</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Long-Term Ultrasound Twinkling Detectability and Safety of a Polymethyl Methacrylate Soft Tissue Marker Compared to Conventional Breast Biopsy Markers—A Preclinical Study in a Porcine Model</title><author>Lee, Christine U. ; Urban, Matthew W. ; Hesley, Gina K. ; Wood, Benjamin G. ; Meier, Thomas R. ; Chen, Beiyun ; Kassmeyer, Blake A. ; Larson, Nicholas B. ; Lee Miller, A. ; Herrick, James L. ; Jakub, James W. ; Piltin, Mara A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-263679fe711653f20a91d974e2ced93fbeac59acedce9937e50d7a078f8f3ba43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bone cement</topic><topic>Breast biopsy marker</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant therapy</topic><topic>PMMA</topic><topic>Polymethyl methacrylate</topic><topic>Twinkling</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><topic>Ultrasound color Doppler</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Christine U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urban, Matthew W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hesley, Gina K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wood, Benjamin G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meier, Thomas R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Beiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kassmeyer, Blake A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larson, Nicholas B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee Miller, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herrick, James L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jakub, James W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piltin, Mara A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Christine U.</au><au>Urban, Matthew W.</au><au>Hesley, Gina K.</au><au>Wood, Benjamin G.</au><au>Meier, Thomas R.</au><au>Chen, Beiyun</au><au>Kassmeyer, Blake A.</au><au>Larson, Nicholas B.</au><au>Lee Miller, A.</au><au>Herrick, James L.</au><au>Jakub, James W.</au><au>Piltin, Mara A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-Term Ultrasound Twinkling Detectability and Safety of a Polymethyl Methacrylate Soft Tissue Marker Compared to Conventional Breast Biopsy Markers—A Preclinical Study in a Porcine Model</atitle><jtitle>Ultrasound in medicine &amp; biology</jtitle><addtitle>Ultrasound Med Biol</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1001</spage><epage>1009</epage><pages>1001-1009</pages><issn>0301-5629</issn><issn>1879-291X</issn><eissn>1879-291X</eissn><abstract>We have studied the use of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) as an alternative biopsy marker that is readily detectable with ultrasound Doppler twinkling in cases of in vitro, ex vivo, or limited duration in vivo settings. This study investigates the long-term safety and ultrasound Doppler twinkling detectability of a PMMA breast biopsy marker following local perturbations and different dwell times in a 6-mo animal experiment. This study, which was approved by our Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, involved three pigs and utilized various markers, including PMMA (Zimmer Biomet), 3D-printed, and Tumark Q markers. Markers were implanted at different times for each pig. Mesh material or ethanol was used to induce a local inflammatory reaction near certain markers. A semiquantitative twinkling score assessed twinkling for actionable localization during monthly ultrasounds. At the primary endpoint, ultrasound-guided localization of lymph nodes with detectable markers was performed. Following surgical resection of the localized nodes, histomorphometric analysis was conducted to evaluate for tissue ingrowth and the formation of a tissue rind around the markers. No adverse events occurred. Twinkling scores of all markers for all three pigs decreased gradually over time. The Q marker exhibited the highest mean twinkling score followed by the PMMA marker, PMMA with mesh, and Q with ethanol. The 3D-printed marker with mesh and PMMA with ethanol had the lowest scores. All wire-localized lymph nodes were successfully resected. Despite varying percentages of tissue rind around the markers and a significant reduction in overall twinkling (p &lt; 0.001) over time, mean PMMA twinkling scores remained clinically actionable at 6 and 5 mo using a General Electric C1-6 probe and 9L-probe, respectively. In this porcine model, the PMMA marker demonstrates an acceptable safety profile. Clinically actionable twinkling aids PMMA marker detection even after 6 mo of dwell time in porcine lymph nodes. The Q marker maintained the greatest twinkling over time compared to all the other markers studied.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38575416</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.03.008</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5298-6949</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-5629
ispartof Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2024-07, Vol.50 (7), p.1001-1009
issn 0301-5629
1879-291X
1879-291X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3034245317
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Bone cement
Breast biopsy marker
Breast cancer
Localization
Neoadjuvant therapy
PMMA
Polymethyl methacrylate
Twinkling
Ultrasound
Ultrasound color Doppler
title Long-Term Ultrasound Twinkling Detectability and Safety of a Polymethyl Methacrylate Soft Tissue Marker Compared to Conventional Breast Biopsy Markers—A Preclinical Study in a Porcine Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T04%3A49%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-Term%20Ultrasound%20Twinkling%20Detectability%20and%20Safety%20of%20a%20Polymethyl%20Methacrylate%20Soft%20Tissue%20Marker%20Compared%20to%20Conventional%20Breast%20Biopsy%20Markers%E2%80%94A%20Preclinical%20Study%20in%20a%20Porcine%20Model&rft.jtitle=Ultrasound%20in%20medicine%20&%20biology&rft.au=Lee,%20Christine%20U.&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1001&rft.epage=1009&rft.pages=1001-1009&rft.issn=0301-5629&rft.eissn=1879-291X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2024.03.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3034245317%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3034245317&rft_id=info:pmid/38575416&rft_els_id=S0301562924001376&rfr_iscdi=true