Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European multicenter propensity-matched study

The use of robot-assisted and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is increasing, yet large adjusted analyses that can be generalized internationally are lacking. This study aimed to compare outcomes after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in a pan-European co...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgery 2024-06, Vol.175 (6), p.1587-1594
Hauptverfasser: Emmen, Anouk M.L.H., Zwart, Maurice J.W., Khatkov, Igor E., Boggi, Ugo, Groot Koerkamp, Bas, Busch, Olivier R., Saint-Marc, Olivier, Dokmak, Safi, Molenaar, I. Quintus, D’Hondt, Mathieu, Ramera, Marco, Keck, Tobias, Ferrari, Giovanni, Luyer, Misha D.P., Moraldi, Luca, Ielpo, Benedetto, Wittel, Uwe, Souche, Francois-Regis, Hackert, Thilo, Lips, Daan, Can, Mehmet Fatih, Bosscha, Koop, Fara, Regis, Festen, Sebastiaan, van Dieren, Susan, Coratti, Andrea, De Hingh, Ignace, Mazzola, Michele, Wellner, Ulrich, De Meyere, Celine, van Santvoort, Hjalmar C., Aussilhou, Béatrice, Ibenkhayat, Abdallah, de Wilde, Roeland F., Kauffmann, Emanuele F., Tyutyunnik, Pavel, Besselink, Marc G., Abu Hilal, Mohammad, Manzoni, Alberto, Guerra, Martina, Daams, Freek, Kazemier, Geert, Izrailov, Roman, Efanov, Mikhail, Napoli, Niccolò, Ginesini, Michael, Cappelle, Marie, Haen, Roel, Quetel, Romain, Pucci, Marco, Derksen, Wouter, Hagendoorn, Jeroen, Ftériche, Fadhel Samir, Muzzolini, Milena, Vansteenkiste, Franky, Bolm, Louisa, Winkel, Maike ten, Giani, Alessandro, Calcagno, Pietro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1594
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1587
container_title Surgery
container_volume 175
creator Emmen, Anouk M.L.H.
Zwart, Maurice J.W.
Khatkov, Igor E.
Boggi, Ugo
Groot Koerkamp, Bas
Busch, Olivier R.
Saint-Marc, Olivier
Dokmak, Safi
Molenaar, I. Quintus
D’Hondt, Mathieu
Ramera, Marco
Keck, Tobias
Ferrari, Giovanni
Luyer, Misha D.P.
Moraldi, Luca
Ielpo, Benedetto
Wittel, Uwe
Souche, Francois-Regis
Hackert, Thilo
Lips, Daan
Can, Mehmet Fatih
Bosscha, Koop
Fara, Regis
Festen, Sebastiaan
van Dieren, Susan
Coratti, Andrea
De Hingh, Ignace
Mazzola, Michele
Wellner, Ulrich
De Meyere, Celine
van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.
Aussilhou, Béatrice
Ibenkhayat, Abdallah
de Wilde, Roeland F.
Kauffmann, Emanuele F.
Tyutyunnik, Pavel
Besselink, Marc G.
Abu Hilal, Mohammad
Manzoni, Alberto
Guerra, Martina
Daams, Freek
Kazemier, Geert
Izrailov, Roman
Efanov, Mikhail
Napoli, Niccolò
Ginesini, Michael
Cappelle, Marie
Haen, Roel
Quetel, Romain
Pucci, Marco
Derksen, Wouter
Hagendoorn, Jeroen
Ftériche, Fadhel Samir
Muzzolini, Milena
Vansteenkiste, Franky
Bolm, Louisa
Winkel, Maike ten
Giani, Alessandro
Calcagno, Pietro
description The use of robot-assisted and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is increasing, yet large adjusted analyses that can be generalized internationally are lacking. This study aimed to compare outcomes after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in a pan-European cohort. An international multicenter retrospective study including patients after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy from 50 centers in 12 European countries (2009–2020). Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo ≥III). Among 2,082 patients undergoing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy, 1,006 underwent robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and 1,076 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. After matching 812 versus 812 patients, the rates of major morbidity (31.9% vs 29.6%; P = .347) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality (4.3% vs 4.6%; P = .904) did not differ significantly between robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy, respectively. Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower conversion rate (6.7% vs 18.0%; P < .001) and higher lymph node retrieval (16 vs 14; P = .003). Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with shorter operation time (446 minutes versus 400 minutes; P < .001), and lower rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (19.0% vs 11.7%; P < .001), delayed gastric emptying grade B/C (21.4% vs 7.4%; P < .001), and a higher R0-resection rate (73.2% vs 84.4%; P < .001). This European multicenter study found no differences in overall major morbidity and 30-day/in-hospital mortality after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy compared with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Further, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, wound infection, shorter length of stay, and a higher R0 resection rate than robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy. In contrast, robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower conversion rate and a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes as compared with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.surg.2024.02.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3033011039</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0039606024000783</els_id><sourcerecordid>3033011039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-1329d16add26705c05dcdb3eec20dd2b4a5c8fb53acac1c9425b14662f7503013</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVJabZp_0APxcde7I4ky7sbcgkhaQuBQknOQh7NJlpsy9FHYP99ZDbpMaeBmWdeZh7GvnFoOPDu576JOTw0AkTbgGiAqw9sxZUU9Vp2_IStAOS27qCDU_Y5xj0AbFu--cRO5UatQQi1YuM_3_tUmxhdTGSrZwoxx2owswk-op8dVrOZMJBJ3mZvaSJMfjycV2YZ1Nc5-JnMVI15SA5pShSqeelN0aVDPZqEjyU4pmwPX9jHnRkifX2tZ-z-5vru6nd9-_fXn6vL2xql4qnmUmwt74y1oluDQlAWbS-JUEDp9a1RuNn1Sho0yHHbCtXztuvEbq1AApdn7McxtxzylCkmPbqINAxmIp-jliALxouegoojiuXfGGin5-BGEw6ag140671eNOtFswahi-ay9P01P_cj2f8rb14LcHEEqHz57CjoiI4mJOtC8aetd-_lvwCgaZGx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3033011039</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European multicenter propensity-matched study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Emmen, Anouk M.L.H. ; Zwart, Maurice J.W. ; Khatkov, Igor E. ; Boggi, Ugo ; Groot Koerkamp, Bas ; Busch, Olivier R. ; Saint-Marc, Olivier ; Dokmak, Safi ; Molenaar, I. Quintus ; D’Hondt, Mathieu ; Ramera, Marco ; Keck, Tobias ; Ferrari, Giovanni ; Luyer, Misha D.P. ; Moraldi, Luca ; Ielpo, Benedetto ; Wittel, Uwe ; Souche, Francois-Regis ; Hackert, Thilo ; Lips, Daan ; Can, Mehmet Fatih ; Bosscha, Koop ; Fara, Regis ; Festen, Sebastiaan ; van Dieren, Susan ; Coratti, Andrea ; De Hingh, Ignace ; Mazzola, Michele ; Wellner, Ulrich ; De Meyere, Celine ; van Santvoort, Hjalmar C. ; Aussilhou, Béatrice ; Ibenkhayat, Abdallah ; de Wilde, Roeland F. ; Kauffmann, Emanuele F. ; Tyutyunnik, Pavel ; Besselink, Marc G. ; Abu Hilal, Mohammad ; Manzoni, Alberto ; Guerra, Martina ; Daams, Freek ; Kazemier, Geert ; Izrailov, Roman ; Efanov, Mikhail ; Napoli, Niccolò ; Ginesini, Michael ; Cappelle, Marie ; Haen, Roel ; Quetel, Romain ; Pucci, Marco ; Derksen, Wouter ; Hagendoorn, Jeroen ; Ftériche, Fadhel Samir ; Muzzolini, Milena ; Vansteenkiste, Franky ; Bolm, Louisa ; Winkel, Maike ten ; Giani, Alessandro ; Calcagno, Pietro</creator><creatorcontrib>Emmen, Anouk M.L.H. ; Zwart, Maurice J.W. ; Khatkov, Igor E. ; Boggi, Ugo ; Groot Koerkamp, Bas ; Busch, Olivier R. ; Saint-Marc, Olivier ; Dokmak, Safi ; Molenaar, I. Quintus ; D’Hondt, Mathieu ; Ramera, Marco ; Keck, Tobias ; Ferrari, Giovanni ; Luyer, Misha D.P. ; Moraldi, Luca ; Ielpo, Benedetto ; Wittel, Uwe ; Souche, Francois-Regis ; Hackert, Thilo ; Lips, Daan ; Can, Mehmet Fatih ; Bosscha, Koop ; Fara, Regis ; Festen, Sebastiaan ; van Dieren, Susan ; Coratti, Andrea ; De Hingh, Ignace ; Mazzola, Michele ; Wellner, Ulrich ; De Meyere, Celine ; van Santvoort, Hjalmar C. ; Aussilhou, Béatrice ; Ibenkhayat, Abdallah ; de Wilde, Roeland F. ; Kauffmann, Emanuele F. ; Tyutyunnik, Pavel ; Besselink, Marc G. ; Abu Hilal, Mohammad ; Manzoni, Alberto ; Guerra, Martina ; Daams, Freek ; Kazemier, Geert ; Izrailov, Roman ; Efanov, Mikhail ; Napoli, Niccolò ; Ginesini, Michael ; Cappelle, Marie ; Haen, Roel ; Quetel, Romain ; Pucci, Marco ; Derksen, Wouter ; Hagendoorn, Jeroen ; Ftériche, Fadhel Samir ; Muzzolini, Milena ; Vansteenkiste, Franky ; Bolm, Louisa ; Winkel, Maike ten ; Giani, Alessandro ; Calcagno, Pietro ; European consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS)</creatorcontrib><description>The use of robot-assisted and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is increasing, yet large adjusted analyses that can be generalized internationally are lacking. This study aimed to compare outcomes after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in a pan-European cohort. An international multicenter retrospective study including patients after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy from 50 centers in 12 European countries (2009–2020). Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo ≥III). Among 2,082 patients undergoing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy, 1,006 underwent robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and 1,076 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. After matching 812 versus 812 patients, the rates of major morbidity (31.9% vs 29.6%; P = .347) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality (4.3% vs 4.6%; P = .904) did not differ significantly between robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy, respectively. Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower conversion rate (6.7% vs 18.0%; P &lt; .001) and higher lymph node retrieval (16 vs 14; P = .003). Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with shorter operation time (446 minutes versus 400 minutes; P &lt; .001), and lower rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (19.0% vs 11.7%; P &lt; .001), delayed gastric emptying grade B/C (21.4% vs 7.4%; P &lt; .001), and a higher R0-resection rate (73.2% vs 84.4%; P &lt; .001). This European multicenter study found no differences in overall major morbidity and 30-day/in-hospital mortality after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy compared with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Further, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, wound infection, shorter length of stay, and a higher R0 resection rate than robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy. In contrast, robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower conversion rate and a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes as compared with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0039-6060</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7361</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.02.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38570225</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Europe - epidemiology ; Female ; Hospital Mortality ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality ; Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Propensity Score ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Surgery, 2024-06, Vol.175 (6), p.1587-1594</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-1329d16add26705c05dcdb3eec20dd2b4a5c8fb53acac1c9425b14662f7503013</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6481-4172 ; 0000-0001-7515-9276 ; 0000-0002-3084-0495 ; 0000-0002-7961-3314 ; 0000-0002-3546-197X ; 0000-0001-7634-4844 ; 0000-0001-9605-6831 ; 0000-0002-8442-5852 ; 0000-0001-7651-6183 ; 0000-0002-1961-5844</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606024000783$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38570225$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Emmen, Anouk M.L.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwart, Maurice J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khatkov, Igor E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggi, Ugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groot Koerkamp, Bas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busch, Olivier R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saint-Marc, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokmak, Safi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molenaar, I. Quintus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Hondt, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramera, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keck, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrari, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luyer, Misha D.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraldi, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ielpo, Benedetto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittel, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souche, Francois-Regis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackert, Thilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lips, Daan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Can, Mehmet Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosscha, Koop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fara, Regis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Festen, Sebastiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dieren, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coratti, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Hingh, Ignace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzola, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wellner, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Meyere, Celine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aussilhou, Béatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibenkhayat, Abdallah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Wilde, Roeland F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kauffmann, Emanuele F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyutyunnik, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besselink, Marc G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abu Hilal, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manzoni, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daams, Freek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazemier, Geert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izrailov, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Efanov, Mikhail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Napoli, Niccolò</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginesini, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cappelle, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haen, Roel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quetel, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pucci, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derksen, Wouter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagendoorn, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ftériche, Fadhel Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzzolini, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vansteenkiste, Franky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolm, Louisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkel, Maike ten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giani, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calcagno, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>European consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS)</creatorcontrib><title>Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European multicenter propensity-matched study</title><title>Surgery</title><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><description>The use of robot-assisted and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is increasing, yet large adjusted analyses that can be generalized internationally are lacking. This study aimed to compare outcomes after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in a pan-European cohort. An international multicenter retrospective study including patients after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy from 50 centers in 12 European countries (2009–2020). Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo ≥III). Among 2,082 patients undergoing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy, 1,006 underwent robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and 1,076 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. After matching 812 versus 812 patients, the rates of major morbidity (31.9% vs 29.6%; P = .347) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality (4.3% vs 4.6%; P = .904) did not differ significantly between robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy, respectively. Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower conversion rate (6.7% vs 18.0%; P &lt; .001) and higher lymph node retrieval (16 vs 14; P = .003). Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with shorter operation time (446 minutes versus 400 minutes; P &lt; .001), and lower rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (19.0% vs 11.7%; P &lt; .001), delayed gastric emptying grade B/C (21.4% vs 7.4%; P &lt; .001), and a higher R0-resection rate (73.2% vs 84.4%; P &lt; .001). This European multicenter study found no differences in overall major morbidity and 30-day/in-hospital mortality after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy compared with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Further, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, wound infection, shorter length of stay, and a higher R0 resection rate than robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy. In contrast, robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower conversion rate and a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes as compared with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Europe - epidemiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospital Mortality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVJabZp_0APxcde7I4ky7sbcgkhaQuBQknOQh7NJlpsy9FHYP99ZDbpMaeBmWdeZh7GvnFoOPDu576JOTw0AkTbgGiAqw9sxZUU9Vp2_IStAOS27qCDU_Y5xj0AbFu--cRO5UatQQi1YuM_3_tUmxhdTGSrZwoxx2owswk-op8dVrOZMJBJ3mZvaSJMfjycV2YZ1Nc5-JnMVI15SA5pShSqeelN0aVDPZqEjyU4pmwPX9jHnRkifX2tZ-z-5vru6nd9-_fXn6vL2xql4qnmUmwt74y1oluDQlAWbS-JUEDp9a1RuNn1Sho0yHHbCtXztuvEbq1AApdn7McxtxzylCkmPbqINAxmIp-jliALxouegoojiuXfGGin5-BGEw6ag140671eNOtFswahi-ay9P01P_cj2f8rb14LcHEEqHz57CjoiI4mJOtC8aetd-_lvwCgaZGx</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Emmen, Anouk M.L.H.</creator><creator>Zwart, Maurice J.W.</creator><creator>Khatkov, Igor E.</creator><creator>Boggi, Ugo</creator><creator>Groot Koerkamp, Bas</creator><creator>Busch, Olivier R.</creator><creator>Saint-Marc, Olivier</creator><creator>Dokmak, Safi</creator><creator>Molenaar, I. Quintus</creator><creator>D’Hondt, Mathieu</creator><creator>Ramera, Marco</creator><creator>Keck, Tobias</creator><creator>Ferrari, Giovanni</creator><creator>Luyer, Misha D.P.</creator><creator>Moraldi, Luca</creator><creator>Ielpo, Benedetto</creator><creator>Wittel, Uwe</creator><creator>Souche, Francois-Regis</creator><creator>Hackert, Thilo</creator><creator>Lips, Daan</creator><creator>Can, Mehmet Fatih</creator><creator>Bosscha, Koop</creator><creator>Fara, Regis</creator><creator>Festen, Sebastiaan</creator><creator>van Dieren, Susan</creator><creator>Coratti, Andrea</creator><creator>De Hingh, Ignace</creator><creator>Mazzola, Michele</creator><creator>Wellner, Ulrich</creator><creator>De Meyere, Celine</creator><creator>van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.</creator><creator>Aussilhou, Béatrice</creator><creator>Ibenkhayat, Abdallah</creator><creator>de Wilde, Roeland F.</creator><creator>Kauffmann, Emanuele F.</creator><creator>Tyutyunnik, Pavel</creator><creator>Besselink, Marc G.</creator><creator>Abu Hilal, Mohammad</creator><creator>Manzoni, Alberto</creator><creator>Guerra, Martina</creator><creator>Daams, Freek</creator><creator>Kazemier, Geert</creator><creator>Izrailov, Roman</creator><creator>Efanov, Mikhail</creator><creator>Napoli, Niccolò</creator><creator>Ginesini, Michael</creator><creator>Cappelle, Marie</creator><creator>Haen, Roel</creator><creator>Quetel, Romain</creator><creator>Pucci, Marco</creator><creator>Derksen, Wouter</creator><creator>Hagendoorn, Jeroen</creator><creator>Ftériche, Fadhel Samir</creator><creator>Muzzolini, Milena</creator><creator>Vansteenkiste, Franky</creator><creator>Bolm, Louisa</creator><creator>Winkel, Maike ten</creator><creator>Giani, Alessandro</creator><creator>Calcagno, Pietro</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6481-4172</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7515-9276</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3084-0495</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7961-3314</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3546-197X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7634-4844</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9605-6831</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8442-5852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7651-6183</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1961-5844</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European multicenter propensity-matched study</title><author>Emmen, Anouk M.L.H. ; Zwart, Maurice J.W. ; Khatkov, Igor E. ; Boggi, Ugo ; Groot Koerkamp, Bas ; Busch, Olivier R. ; Saint-Marc, Olivier ; Dokmak, Safi ; Molenaar, I. Quintus ; D’Hondt, Mathieu ; Ramera, Marco ; Keck, Tobias ; Ferrari, Giovanni ; Luyer, Misha D.P. ; Moraldi, Luca ; Ielpo, Benedetto ; Wittel, Uwe ; Souche, Francois-Regis ; Hackert, Thilo ; Lips, Daan ; Can, Mehmet Fatih ; Bosscha, Koop ; Fara, Regis ; Festen, Sebastiaan ; van Dieren, Susan ; Coratti, Andrea ; De Hingh, Ignace ; Mazzola, Michele ; Wellner, Ulrich ; De Meyere, Celine ; van Santvoort, Hjalmar C. ; Aussilhou, Béatrice ; Ibenkhayat, Abdallah ; de Wilde, Roeland F. ; Kauffmann, Emanuele F. ; Tyutyunnik, Pavel ; Besselink, Marc G. ; Abu Hilal, Mohammad ; Manzoni, Alberto ; Guerra, Martina ; Daams, Freek ; Kazemier, Geert ; Izrailov, Roman ; Efanov, Mikhail ; Napoli, Niccolò ; Ginesini, Michael ; Cappelle, Marie ; Haen, Roel ; Quetel, Romain ; Pucci, Marco ; Derksen, Wouter ; Hagendoorn, Jeroen ; Ftériche, Fadhel Samir ; Muzzolini, Milena ; Vansteenkiste, Franky ; Bolm, Louisa ; Winkel, Maike ten ; Giani, Alessandro ; Calcagno, Pietro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-1329d16add26705c05dcdb3eec20dd2b4a5c8fb53acac1c9425b14662f7503013</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Europe - epidemiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospital Mortality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Emmen, Anouk M.L.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zwart, Maurice J.W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khatkov, Igor E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boggi, Ugo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groot Koerkamp, Bas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busch, Olivier R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saint-Marc, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokmak, Safi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molenaar, I. Quintus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Hondt, Mathieu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramera, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keck, Tobias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrari, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luyer, Misha D.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moraldi, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ielpo, Benedetto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittel, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souche, Francois-Regis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackert, Thilo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lips, Daan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Can, Mehmet Fatih</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosscha, Koop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fara, Regis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Festen, Sebastiaan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dieren, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coratti, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Hingh, Ignace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mazzola, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wellner, Ulrich</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Meyere, Celine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aussilhou, Béatrice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibenkhayat, Abdallah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Wilde, Roeland F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kauffmann, Emanuele F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyutyunnik, Pavel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Besselink, Marc G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abu Hilal, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manzoni, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guerra, Martina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daams, Freek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazemier, Geert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Izrailov, Roman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Efanov, Mikhail</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Napoli, Niccolò</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginesini, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cappelle, Marie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haen, Roel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quetel, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pucci, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derksen, Wouter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hagendoorn, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ftériche, Fadhel Samir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muzzolini, Milena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vansteenkiste, Franky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolm, Louisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkel, Maike ten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giani, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calcagno, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>European consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS)</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Emmen, Anouk M.L.H.</au><au>Zwart, Maurice J.W.</au><au>Khatkov, Igor E.</au><au>Boggi, Ugo</au><au>Groot Koerkamp, Bas</au><au>Busch, Olivier R.</au><au>Saint-Marc, Olivier</au><au>Dokmak, Safi</au><au>Molenaar, I. Quintus</au><au>D’Hondt, Mathieu</au><au>Ramera, Marco</au><au>Keck, Tobias</au><au>Ferrari, Giovanni</au><au>Luyer, Misha D.P.</au><au>Moraldi, Luca</au><au>Ielpo, Benedetto</au><au>Wittel, Uwe</au><au>Souche, Francois-Regis</au><au>Hackert, Thilo</au><au>Lips, Daan</au><au>Can, Mehmet Fatih</au><au>Bosscha, Koop</au><au>Fara, Regis</au><au>Festen, Sebastiaan</au><au>van Dieren, Susan</au><au>Coratti, Andrea</au><au>De Hingh, Ignace</au><au>Mazzola, Michele</au><au>Wellner, Ulrich</au><au>De Meyere, Celine</au><au>van Santvoort, Hjalmar C.</au><au>Aussilhou, Béatrice</au><au>Ibenkhayat, Abdallah</au><au>de Wilde, Roeland F.</au><au>Kauffmann, Emanuele F.</au><au>Tyutyunnik, Pavel</au><au>Besselink, Marc G.</au><au>Abu Hilal, Mohammad</au><au>Manzoni, Alberto</au><au>Guerra, Martina</au><au>Daams, Freek</au><au>Kazemier, Geert</au><au>Izrailov, Roman</au><au>Efanov, Mikhail</au><au>Napoli, Niccolò</au><au>Ginesini, Michael</au><au>Cappelle, Marie</au><au>Haen, Roel</au><au>Quetel, Romain</au><au>Pucci, Marco</au><au>Derksen, Wouter</au><au>Hagendoorn, Jeroen</au><au>Ftériche, Fadhel Samir</au><au>Muzzolini, Milena</au><au>Vansteenkiste, Franky</au><au>Bolm, Louisa</au><au>Winkel, Maike ten</au><au>Giani, Alessandro</au><au>Calcagno, Pietro</au><aucorp>European consortium on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (E-MIPS)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European multicenter propensity-matched study</atitle><jtitle>Surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Surgery</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>175</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1587</spage><epage>1594</epage><pages>1587-1594</pages><issn>0039-6060</issn><issn>1532-7361</issn><eissn>1532-7361</eissn><abstract>The use of robot-assisted and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is increasing, yet large adjusted analyses that can be generalized internationally are lacking. This study aimed to compare outcomes after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in a pan-European cohort. An international multicenter retrospective study including patients after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy from 50 centers in 12 European countries (2009–2020). Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo ≥III). Among 2,082 patients undergoing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy, 1,006 underwent robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and 1,076 laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. After matching 812 versus 812 patients, the rates of major morbidity (31.9% vs 29.6%; P = .347) and 30-day/in-hospital mortality (4.3% vs 4.6%; P = .904) did not differ significantly between robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy, respectively. Robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower conversion rate (6.7% vs 18.0%; P &lt; .001) and higher lymph node retrieval (16 vs 14; P = .003). Laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with shorter operation time (446 minutes versus 400 minutes; P &lt; .001), and lower rates of postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (19.0% vs 11.7%; P &lt; .001), delayed gastric emptying grade B/C (21.4% vs 7.4%; P &lt; .001), and a higher R0-resection rate (73.2% vs 84.4%; P &lt; .001). This European multicenter study found no differences in overall major morbidity and 30-day/in-hospital mortality after robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy compared with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Further, laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower rate of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, wound infection, shorter length of stay, and a higher R0 resection rate than robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy. In contrast, robot-assisted pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with a lower conversion rate and a higher number of retrieved lymph nodes as compared with laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38570225</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.surg.2024.02.015</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6481-4172</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7515-9276</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3084-0495</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7961-3314</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3546-197X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7634-4844</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9605-6831</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8442-5852</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7651-6183</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1961-5844</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0039-6060
ispartof Surgery, 2024-06, Vol.175 (6), p.1587-1594
issn 0039-6060
1532-7361
1532-7361
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3033011039
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Aged
Europe - epidemiology
Female
Hospital Mortality
Humans
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
Laparoscopy - methods
Male
Middle Aged
Pancreatic Neoplasms - mortality
Pancreatic Neoplasms - surgery
Pancreaticoduodenectomy - adverse effects
Pancreaticoduodenectomy - methods
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Propensity Score
Retrospective Studies
Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects
Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
Treatment Outcome
title Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European multicenter propensity-matched study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T05%3A17%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robot-assisted%20versus%20laparoscopic%20pancreatoduodenectomy:%20a%20pan-European%20multicenter%20propensity-matched%20study&rft.jtitle=Surgery&rft.au=Emmen,%20Anouk%20M.L.H.&rft.aucorp=European%20consortium%20on%20Minimally%20Invasive%20Pancreatic%20Surgery%20(E-MIPS)&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=175&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1587&rft.epage=1594&rft.pages=1587-1594&rft.issn=0039-6060&rft.eissn=1532-7361&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.surg.2024.02.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3033011039%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3033011039&rft_id=info:pmid/38570225&rft_els_id=S0039606024000783&rfr_iscdi=true