Lay Health Worker Interventions in Rheumatology: A Scoping Review

Objective To determine next steps for lay health worker (LHW) intervention research, specifically in patients with rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), there is a need to establish what strategies have been effective for chronic disease management thus far. The goal of this scoping review is t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arthritis care & research (2010) 2024-08, Vol.76 (8), p.1109-1115
Hauptverfasser: Creasman, Megan W., Hargrove, Mackenzie B., Domínguez Páez, Yuliana, Demetres, Michelle, Lieber, Sarah B., Kasturi, Shanthini, Safford, Monika M., Navarro‐Millán, Iris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1115
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1109
container_title Arthritis care & research (2010)
container_volume 76
creator Creasman, Megan W.
Hargrove, Mackenzie B.
Domínguez Páez, Yuliana
Demetres, Michelle
Lieber, Sarah B.
Kasturi, Shanthini
Safford, Monika M.
Navarro‐Millán, Iris
description Objective To determine next steps for lay health worker (LHW) intervention research, specifically in patients with rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), there is a need to establish what strategies have been effective for chronic disease management thus far. The goal of this scoping review is to collate the literature of LHW interventions for adults with RMDs to inform next steps for LHW research. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed in the following databases from inception to September 2021: Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and The Cochrane Library. Studies retrieved were then screened for eligibility against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Twenty‐two articles were eligible and included in this review. The most common RMDs studied, not mutually exclusive, were osteoarthritis (n = 13), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 9), and unspecified or other RMD (n = 14). Most studies had a homogenous patient population, enrolling White, non‐Hispanic, or Latina women over the age of 60 (n = 13). Eight studies observed statistically significant results in the intervention arm compared with the control. Only one of these studies exhibited sustained treatment effects past one year. Conclusion There are not enough data to conclude if LHW interventions have a positive, null, or negative effect on patients with RMDs. Future LHW interventions should specify a priori hypotheses, be powered to detect statistical significance for primary outcomes, employ a theoretical framework, include an active control, describe training protocols for LHWs, and increase minority representation to establish the effectiveness of LHWs for patients with RMDs.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acr.25341
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3033010505</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3085848596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3131-f3ccc761e6a46bff382ebe5588355a9f37cb772c5af109b859334ab54ce016853</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLwzAUgIMobswd_ANS8KKHbknTtKm3MtQNBsJU9FbS-Lp1ts1M2o3-ezM7dxB8l_cOHx-PD6FLgkcEY28spB55jPrkBPU9wojrB4yfHm__vYeGxqyxHepxTqNz1KOchTiiXh_Fc9E6UxBFvXLelP4E7cyqGvQWqjpXlXHyylmsoClFrQq1bO-c2HmWapNXS2cB2xx2F-gsE4WB4WEP0OvD_ctk6s6fHmeTeO5KSihxMyqlDAMCgfCDNMso9yAFxuxHjIkoo6FMw9CTTGQERylnEaW-SJkvAZOAMzpAN513o9VXA6ZOytxIKApRgWpMQjGlmGCG9-j1H3StGl3Z7yzFGfetPbDUbUdJrYzRkCUbnZdCtwnByT5tYtMmP2kte3UwNmkJH0fyN6QFxh2wywto_zcl8WTRKb8BBZ6AHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3085848596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lay Health Worker Interventions in Rheumatology: A Scoping Review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Creasman, Megan W. ; Hargrove, Mackenzie B. ; Domínguez Páez, Yuliana ; Demetres, Michelle ; Lieber, Sarah B. ; Kasturi, Shanthini ; Safford, Monika M. ; Navarro‐Millán, Iris</creator><creatorcontrib>Creasman, Megan W. ; Hargrove, Mackenzie B. ; Domínguez Páez, Yuliana ; Demetres, Michelle ; Lieber, Sarah B. ; Kasturi, Shanthini ; Safford, Monika M. ; Navarro‐Millán, Iris</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To determine next steps for lay health worker (LHW) intervention research, specifically in patients with rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), there is a need to establish what strategies have been effective for chronic disease management thus far. The goal of this scoping review is to collate the literature of LHW interventions for adults with RMDs to inform next steps for LHW research. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed in the following databases from inception to September 2021: Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and The Cochrane Library. Studies retrieved were then screened for eligibility against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Twenty‐two articles were eligible and included in this review. The most common RMDs studied, not mutually exclusive, were osteoarthritis (n = 13), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 9), and unspecified or other RMD (n = 14). Most studies had a homogenous patient population, enrolling White, non‐Hispanic, or Latina women over the age of 60 (n = 13). Eight studies observed statistically significant results in the intervention arm compared with the control. Only one of these studies exhibited sustained treatment effects past one year. Conclusion There are not enough data to conclude if LHW interventions have a positive, null, or negative effect on patients with RMDs. Future LHW interventions should specify a priori hypotheses, be powered to detect statistical significance for primary outcomes, employ a theoretical framework, include an active control, describe training protocols for LHWs, and increase minority representation to establish the effectiveness of LHWs for patients with RMDs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2151-464X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2151-4658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2151-4658</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acr.25341</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38570932</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Arthritis ; Community Health Workers ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Middle Aged ; Musculoskeletal diseases ; Osteoarthritis ; Population studies ; Rheumatic Diseases - therapy ; Rheumatoid arthritis ; Rheumatology ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010), 2024-08, Vol.76 (8), p.1109-1115</ispartof><rights>2024 American College of Rheumatology</rights><rights>2024 American College of Rheumatology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3131-f3ccc761e6a46bff382ebe5588355a9f37cb772c5af109b859334ab54ce016853</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9540-6614 ; 0000-0002-6176-9740 ; 0000-0002-9291-6678</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Facr.25341$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Facr.25341$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38570932$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Creasman, Megan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargrove, Mackenzie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domínguez Páez, Yuliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demetres, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lieber, Sarah B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasturi, Shanthini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safford, Monika M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro‐Millán, Iris</creatorcontrib><title>Lay Health Worker Interventions in Rheumatology: A Scoping Review</title><title>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</title><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><description>Objective To determine next steps for lay health worker (LHW) intervention research, specifically in patients with rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), there is a need to establish what strategies have been effective for chronic disease management thus far. The goal of this scoping review is to collate the literature of LHW interventions for adults with RMDs to inform next steps for LHW research. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed in the following databases from inception to September 2021: Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and The Cochrane Library. Studies retrieved were then screened for eligibility against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Twenty‐two articles were eligible and included in this review. The most common RMDs studied, not mutually exclusive, were osteoarthritis (n = 13), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 9), and unspecified or other RMD (n = 14). Most studies had a homogenous patient population, enrolling White, non‐Hispanic, or Latina women over the age of 60 (n = 13). Eight studies observed statistically significant results in the intervention arm compared with the control. Only one of these studies exhibited sustained treatment effects past one year. Conclusion There are not enough data to conclude if LHW interventions have a positive, null, or negative effect on patients with RMDs. Future LHW interventions should specify a priori hypotheses, be powered to detect statistical significance for primary outcomes, employ a theoretical framework, include an active control, describe training protocols for LHWs, and increase minority representation to establish the effectiveness of LHWs for patients with RMDs.</description><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Community Health Workers</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Musculoskeletal diseases</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Rheumatic Diseases - therapy</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>2151-464X</issn><issn>2151-4658</issn><issn>2151-4658</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFLwzAUgIMobswd_ANS8KKHbknTtKm3MtQNBsJU9FbS-Lp1ts1M2o3-ezM7dxB8l_cOHx-PD6FLgkcEY28spB55jPrkBPU9wojrB4yfHm__vYeGxqyxHepxTqNz1KOchTiiXh_Fc9E6UxBFvXLelP4E7cyqGvQWqjpXlXHyylmsoClFrQq1bO-c2HmWapNXS2cB2xx2F-gsE4WB4WEP0OvD_ctk6s6fHmeTeO5KSihxMyqlDAMCgfCDNMso9yAFxuxHjIkoo6FMw9CTTGQERylnEaW-SJkvAZOAMzpAN513o9VXA6ZOytxIKApRgWpMQjGlmGCG9-j1H3StGl3Z7yzFGfetPbDUbUdJrYzRkCUbnZdCtwnByT5tYtMmP2kte3UwNmkJH0fyN6QFxh2wywto_zcl8WTRKb8BBZ6AHA</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Creasman, Megan W.</creator><creator>Hargrove, Mackenzie B.</creator><creator>Domínguez Páez, Yuliana</creator><creator>Demetres, Michelle</creator><creator>Lieber, Sarah B.</creator><creator>Kasturi, Shanthini</creator><creator>Safford, Monika M.</creator><creator>Navarro‐Millán, Iris</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9540-6614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6176-9740</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9291-6678</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Lay Health Worker Interventions in Rheumatology: A Scoping Review</title><author>Creasman, Megan W. ; Hargrove, Mackenzie B. ; Domínguez Páez, Yuliana ; Demetres, Michelle ; Lieber, Sarah B. ; Kasturi, Shanthini ; Safford, Monika M. ; Navarro‐Millán, Iris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3131-f3ccc761e6a46bff382ebe5588355a9f37cb772c5af109b859334ab54ce016853</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Community Health Workers</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Musculoskeletal diseases</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Rheumatic Diseases - therapy</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Creasman, Megan W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hargrove, Mackenzie B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Domínguez Páez, Yuliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demetres, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lieber, Sarah B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasturi, Shanthini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Safford, Monika M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro‐Millán, Iris</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Creasman, Megan W.</au><au>Hargrove, Mackenzie B.</au><au>Domínguez Páez, Yuliana</au><au>Demetres, Michelle</au><au>Lieber, Sarah B.</au><au>Kasturi, Shanthini</au><au>Safford, Monika M.</au><au>Navarro‐Millán, Iris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lay Health Worker Interventions in Rheumatology: A Scoping Review</atitle><jtitle>Arthritis care &amp; research (2010)</jtitle><addtitle>Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1109</spage><epage>1115</epage><pages>1109-1115</pages><issn>2151-464X</issn><issn>2151-4658</issn><eissn>2151-4658</eissn><abstract>Objective To determine next steps for lay health worker (LHW) intervention research, specifically in patients with rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs), there is a need to establish what strategies have been effective for chronic disease management thus far. The goal of this scoping review is to collate the literature of LHW interventions for adults with RMDs to inform next steps for LHW research. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed in the following databases from inception to September 2021: Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and The Cochrane Library. Studies retrieved were then screened for eligibility against predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results Twenty‐two articles were eligible and included in this review. The most common RMDs studied, not mutually exclusive, were osteoarthritis (n = 13), rheumatoid arthritis (n = 9), and unspecified or other RMD (n = 14). Most studies had a homogenous patient population, enrolling White, non‐Hispanic, or Latina women over the age of 60 (n = 13). Eight studies observed statistically significant results in the intervention arm compared with the control. Only one of these studies exhibited sustained treatment effects past one year. Conclusion There are not enough data to conclude if LHW interventions have a positive, null, or negative effect on patients with RMDs. Future LHW interventions should specify a priori hypotheses, be powered to detect statistical significance for primary outcomes, employ a theoretical framework, include an active control, describe training protocols for LHWs, and increase minority representation to establish the effectiveness of LHWs for patients with RMDs.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><pmid>38570932</pmid><doi>10.1002/acr.25341</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9540-6614</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6176-9740</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9291-6678</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2151-464X
ispartof Arthritis care & research (2010), 2024-08, Vol.76 (8), p.1109-1115
issn 2151-464X
2151-4658
2151-4658
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3033010505
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Arthritis
Community Health Workers
Female
Humans
Male
Medical personnel
Middle Aged
Musculoskeletal diseases
Osteoarthritis
Population studies
Rheumatic Diseases - therapy
Rheumatoid arthritis
Rheumatology
Statistical analysis
title Lay Health Worker Interventions in Rheumatology: A Scoping Review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T05%3A45%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lay%20Health%20Worker%20Interventions%20in%20Rheumatology:%20A%20Scoping%20Review&rft.jtitle=Arthritis%20care%20&%20research%20(2010)&rft.au=Creasman,%20Megan%20W.&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1109&rft.epage=1115&rft.pages=1109-1115&rft.issn=2151-464X&rft.eissn=2151-4658&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acr.25341&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3085848596%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3085848596&rft_id=info:pmid/38570932&rfr_iscdi=true