Preventing Sexual Violence Within the Continuum: Differences in Bystander Intervention Engagement Among College Students

Sexual violence is framed along a continuum that includes (but is not limited to) sexual harassment and sexual assault. While a few studies have evaluated students’ predispositions and orientations around engaging in bystander intervention (BI) to prevent sexual assault, little has been done for pre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of interpersonal violence 2024-12, Vol.39 (23-24), p.4772-4789
Hauptverfasser: Branscum, Paul, Hackman, Christine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4789
container_issue 23-24
container_start_page 4772
container_title Journal of interpersonal violence
container_volume 39
creator Branscum, Paul
Hackman, Christine
description Sexual violence is framed along a continuum that includes (but is not limited to) sexual harassment and sexual assault. While a few studies have evaluated students’ predispositions and orientations around engaging in bystander intervention (BI) to prevent sexual assault, little has been done for preventing sexual harassment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate theory-based differences in college students’ willingness to engage in BI for preventing either sexual assault or sexual harassment. Students were surveyed at two time points. At T1, intentions, attitudes, perceived norms, and perceived behavioral control (PBC) for BI to prevent sexual assault were evaluated, and the same variables were evaluated at T2 for sexual harassment. Independent t-tests evaluated differences between groups. Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate determinants of intentions for BI for both groups. Students’ attitudes toward BI/sexual assault were significantly higher than students’ attitudes toward BI/sexual harassment (p = .019; d = .22). Conversely, students’ PBC toward BI/sexual harassment was significantly higher than students’ PBC for BI/sexual assault (p ≤.001; d = .49). Attitudes (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1177/08862605241243334
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3031659272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_08862605241243334</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3124153459</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-cf7afbbf421c8e70d25f72e35dadc54dac25434a1048b8bb4dd88d3ea64a8a9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoOl4ewI0E3Lip5tpm3Ol4GxAUxsuypM3pWGkTTVrRtzd1vIDiKiTnO98J50dom5J9SrPsgCiVspRIJigTnHOxhEZUSpakkqplNBrqyQCsofUQHgkhVCq1ita4kmmWjvkIvV57eAHb1XaOZ_Da6wbf1a4BWwK-r7uH2uLuAfDEDUjft4f4pK4q8AMQcKwev4VOWwMeT20H_sPlLD61cz2HNt7wUeuifOKaBuaAZ11v4mvYRCuVbgJsfZ4b6Pbs9GZykVxenU8nR5dJyRnpkrLKdFUUlWC0VJARw2SVMeDSaFNKYXTJpOBCUyJUoYpCGKOU4aBToZUeG76B9hbeJ--eewhd3tahhKbRFlwfck44TeWYZSyiu7_QR9d7G3-X87hgKrmQ40jRBVV6F4KHKn_ydav9W05JPsSS_4kl9ux8mvuiBfPd8ZVDBPYXQIhb-xn7v_EdNouWvQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3124153459</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preventing Sexual Violence Within the Continuum: Differences in Bystander Intervention Engagement Among College Students</title><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Journals</source><creator>Branscum, Paul ; Hackman, Christine</creator><creatorcontrib>Branscum, Paul ; Hackman, Christine</creatorcontrib><description>Sexual violence is framed along a continuum that includes (but is not limited to) sexual harassment and sexual assault. While a few studies have evaluated students’ predispositions and orientations around engaging in bystander intervention (BI) to prevent sexual assault, little has been done for preventing sexual harassment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate theory-based differences in college students’ willingness to engage in BI for preventing either sexual assault or sexual harassment. Students were surveyed at two time points. At T1, intentions, attitudes, perceived norms, and perceived behavioral control (PBC) for BI to prevent sexual assault were evaluated, and the same variables were evaluated at T2 for sexual harassment. Independent t-tests evaluated differences between groups. Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate determinants of intentions for BI for both groups. Students’ attitudes toward BI/sexual assault were significantly higher than students’ attitudes toward BI/sexual harassment (p = .019; d = .22). Conversely, students’ PBC toward BI/sexual harassment was significantly higher than students’ PBC for BI/sexual assault (p ≤.001; d = .49). Attitudes (p &lt; .001) and PBC (p &lt; .001) explained 45.9% of the variance of intentions for BI/sexual assault, while perceived norms (p &lt; .001) and attitudes (p &lt; .001) explained 28.4% of the variance of intentions for BI/sexual harassment. Sexual violence, encompassing both sexual assault and sexual harassment, is a pervasive issue on college campuses. More attention should be focused on preventing sexual harassment, as it can create a downstream effect. Furthermore, specific BI practices should be investigated to understand which are more effective at preventing sexual harassment and sexual assault.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-2605</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1552-6518</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-6518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/08862605241243334</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38567693</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Assaults ; Attitudes ; College students ; Intervention ; Locus of control ; Sex crimes ; Sexual Abuse ; Sexual harassment ; Student attitudes ; Violence</subject><ispartof>Journal of interpersonal violence, 2024-12, Vol.39 (23-24), p.4772-4789</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-cf7afbbf421c8e70d25f72e35dadc54dac25434a1048b8bb4dd88d3ea64a8a9d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9410-3099 ; 0000-0002-3335-8282</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/08862605241243334$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/08862605241243334$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21818,27923,27924,33773,43620,43621</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38567693$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Branscum, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackman, Christine</creatorcontrib><title>Preventing Sexual Violence Within the Continuum: Differences in Bystander Intervention Engagement Among College Students</title><title>Journal of interpersonal violence</title><addtitle>J Interpers Violence</addtitle><description>Sexual violence is framed along a continuum that includes (but is not limited to) sexual harassment and sexual assault. While a few studies have evaluated students’ predispositions and orientations around engaging in bystander intervention (BI) to prevent sexual assault, little has been done for preventing sexual harassment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate theory-based differences in college students’ willingness to engage in BI for preventing either sexual assault or sexual harassment. Students were surveyed at two time points. At T1, intentions, attitudes, perceived norms, and perceived behavioral control (PBC) for BI to prevent sexual assault were evaluated, and the same variables were evaluated at T2 for sexual harassment. Independent t-tests evaluated differences between groups. Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate determinants of intentions for BI for both groups. Students’ attitudes toward BI/sexual assault were significantly higher than students’ attitudes toward BI/sexual harassment (p = .019; d = .22). Conversely, students’ PBC toward BI/sexual harassment was significantly higher than students’ PBC for BI/sexual assault (p ≤.001; d = .49). Attitudes (p &lt; .001) and PBC (p &lt; .001) explained 45.9% of the variance of intentions for BI/sexual assault, while perceived norms (p &lt; .001) and attitudes (p &lt; .001) explained 28.4% of the variance of intentions for BI/sexual harassment. Sexual violence, encompassing both sexual assault and sexual harassment, is a pervasive issue on college campuses. More attention should be focused on preventing sexual harassment, as it can create a downstream effect. Furthermore, specific BI practices should be investigated to understand which are more effective at preventing sexual harassment and sexual assault.</description><subject>Assaults</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Locus of control</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sexual Abuse</subject><subject>Sexual harassment</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0886-2605</issn><issn>1552-6518</issn><issn>1552-6518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKxDAUhoMoOl4ewI0E3Lip5tpm3Ol4GxAUxsuypM3pWGkTTVrRtzd1vIDiKiTnO98J50dom5J9SrPsgCiVspRIJigTnHOxhEZUSpakkqplNBrqyQCsofUQHgkhVCq1ita4kmmWjvkIvV57eAHb1XaOZ_Da6wbf1a4BWwK-r7uH2uLuAfDEDUjft4f4pK4q8AMQcKwev4VOWwMeT20H_sPlLD61cz2HNt7wUeuifOKaBuaAZ11v4mvYRCuVbgJsfZ4b6Pbs9GZykVxenU8nR5dJyRnpkrLKdFUUlWC0VJARw2SVMeDSaFNKYXTJpOBCUyJUoYpCGKOU4aBToZUeG76B9hbeJ--eewhd3tahhKbRFlwfck44TeWYZSyiu7_QR9d7G3-X87hgKrmQ40jRBVV6F4KHKn_ydav9W05JPsSS_4kl9ux8mvuiBfPd8ZVDBPYXQIhb-xn7v_EdNouWvQ</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Branscum, Paul</creator><creator>Hackman, Christine</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9410-3099</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3335-8282</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Preventing Sexual Violence Within the Continuum: Differences in Bystander Intervention Engagement Among College Students</title><author>Branscum, Paul ; Hackman, Christine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-cf7afbbf421c8e70d25f72e35dadc54dac25434a1048b8bb4dd88d3ea64a8a9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Assaults</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Locus of control</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sexual Abuse</topic><topic>Sexual harassment</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Branscum, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hackman, Christine</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of interpersonal violence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Branscum, Paul</au><au>Hackman, Christine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preventing Sexual Violence Within the Continuum: Differences in Bystander Intervention Engagement Among College Students</atitle><jtitle>Journal of interpersonal violence</jtitle><addtitle>J Interpers Violence</addtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>23-24</issue><spage>4772</spage><epage>4789</epage><pages>4772-4789</pages><issn>0886-2605</issn><issn>1552-6518</issn><eissn>1552-6518</eissn><abstract>Sexual violence is framed along a continuum that includes (but is not limited to) sexual harassment and sexual assault. While a few studies have evaluated students’ predispositions and orientations around engaging in bystander intervention (BI) to prevent sexual assault, little has been done for preventing sexual harassment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate theory-based differences in college students’ willingness to engage in BI for preventing either sexual assault or sexual harassment. Students were surveyed at two time points. At T1, intentions, attitudes, perceived norms, and perceived behavioral control (PBC) for BI to prevent sexual assault were evaluated, and the same variables were evaluated at T2 for sexual harassment. Independent t-tests evaluated differences between groups. Linear regression analyses were used to evaluate determinants of intentions for BI for both groups. Students’ attitudes toward BI/sexual assault were significantly higher than students’ attitudes toward BI/sexual harassment (p = .019; d = .22). Conversely, students’ PBC toward BI/sexual harassment was significantly higher than students’ PBC for BI/sexual assault (p ≤.001; d = .49). Attitudes (p &lt; .001) and PBC (p &lt; .001) explained 45.9% of the variance of intentions for BI/sexual assault, while perceived norms (p &lt; .001) and attitudes (p &lt; .001) explained 28.4% of the variance of intentions for BI/sexual harassment. Sexual violence, encompassing both sexual assault and sexual harassment, is a pervasive issue on college campuses. More attention should be focused on preventing sexual harassment, as it can create a downstream effect. Furthermore, specific BI practices should be investigated to understand which are more effective at preventing sexual harassment and sexual assault.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>38567693</pmid><doi>10.1177/08862605241243334</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9410-3099</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3335-8282</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-2605
ispartof Journal of interpersonal violence, 2024-12, Vol.39 (23-24), p.4772-4789
issn 0886-2605
1552-6518
1552-6518
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3031659272
source Sociological Abstracts; SAGE Journals
subjects Assaults
Attitudes
College students
Intervention
Locus of control
Sex crimes
Sexual Abuse
Sexual harassment
Student attitudes
Violence
title Preventing Sexual Violence Within the Continuum: Differences in Bystander Intervention Engagement Among College Students
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T17%3A25%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preventing%20Sexual%20Violence%20Within%20the%20Continuum:%20Differences%20in%20Bystander%20Intervention%20Engagement%20Among%20College%20Students&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20interpersonal%20violence&rft.au=Branscum,%20Paul&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=23-24&rft.spage=4772&rft.epage=4789&rft.pages=4772-4789&rft.issn=0886-2605&rft.eissn=1552-6518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/08862605241243334&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3124153459%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3124153459&rft_id=info:pmid/38567693&rft_sage_id=10.1177_08862605241243334&rfr_iscdi=true