Effectiveness of Conventional Periodontal Treatment With Tetracycline Fiber Versus Minocycline Gel Application Subgingivally in Periodontitis Patients
Locally delivered antibiotics are adjunctive therapies for the selective removal or inhibition of pathogenic microbes in combination with scaling and root planing (SRP) for the management of periodontitis. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tetracycline fibers a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2024-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e55167-e55167 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e55167 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | e55167 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Zainuddin, Siti Lailatul Akmar Latib, Norjehan Taib, Haslina Ahmad, Basaruddin Sabarudin, Muhammad Annurdin Wan Mohamad, Wan Majdiah |
description | Locally delivered antibiotics are adjunctive therapies for the selective removal or inhibition of pathogenic microbes in combination with scaling and root planing (SRP) for the management of periodontitis.
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tetracycline fibers against minocycline gel when used as local drug delivery in conjunction with SRP for treating periodontitis.
This is a pilot randomized open single, blinded trial study comparing three treatment modalities: SRP with topical tetracycline fibers (SRP+T), SRP with topical minocycline HCL 2% gel (SRP+M), and SRP only as a control group. Probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), and bleeding on probing (BOP) percentages were recorded at baseline, one month, and at the end of three months. The data were subjected to analysis using IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare the clinical outcomes between the three treatment groups, accounting for the repeated measurements at baseline, one month, and three months. A p-value less than 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval was deemed statistically significant.
There were statistically significant changes within the groups in all the clinical parameters, including pocket depth, clinical attachment loss, and bleeding on probing score, at different time intervals, with the greatest mean pocket depth changes seen in the tetracycline group after one month (mean changes = 1.4 mm, P < 0.001) and over three months (mean changes = 1.79 mm, p < 0.001). For clinical attachment loss, after one month, the highest improvement in clinical level was seen in the minocycline group (mean changes = 0.7mm, p < 0.05), and the overall improvement was seen in the control group (mean changes = 1.1mm, p < 0.05). The minocycline group showed greater mean changes in bleeding on probing percentage, with the greatest changes after one month (mean changes = 19.34%, p < 0.001) and over three months (mean changes = 26.42%, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.55167 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3031133351</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3020791989</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-f49926928d808a3c7ed5bf3cf22fbf858ed2f2c700513b57ac07d417407c58063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU1PGzEQhi1UVFDg1jOy1EsPDfhjHXuPKOJLAoFEaI8rr3dMjRw7tb1I-SP9vTgE2orTzGieeV9pXoS-UHIspWhPzJhgzMdC0JncQfuMztRUUdV8-q_fQ4c5PxFCKJGMSPIZ7XElhJJNs4_-nFkLprhnCJAzjhbPY6hDcTFoj-8guTjEUGq_SKDLsq7wT1d-4QWUpM3aeBcAn7seEv4BKY8Z37gQ3xcX4PHpauWd0RtJfD_2jy48umft_Rq78M_BFZfxXaWqQz5Au1b7DIdvdYIezs8W88vp9e3F1fz0empY05SpbdqWzVqmBkWU5kbCIHrLjWXM9lYJBQOzzEhCBOW9kNoQOTRUNkQaociMT9C3re4qxd8j5NItXTbgvQ4Qx9xxwinlnNfzCfr6AX2KY6pP2lD1ry1tVVup71vKpJhzAtutklvqtO4o6TaRddvIutfIKn70Jjr2Sxj-wu8B8RcuIZWv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3020791989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Conventional Periodontal Treatment With Tetracycline Fiber Versus Minocycline Gel Application Subgingivally in Periodontitis Patients</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Zainuddin, Siti Lailatul Akmar ; Latib, Norjehan ; Taib, Haslina ; Ahmad, Basaruddin ; Sabarudin, Muhammad Annurdin ; Wan Mohamad, Wan Majdiah</creator><creatorcontrib>Zainuddin, Siti Lailatul Akmar ; Latib, Norjehan ; Taib, Haslina ; Ahmad, Basaruddin ; Sabarudin, Muhammad Annurdin ; Wan Mohamad, Wan Majdiah</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Locally delivered antibiotics are adjunctive therapies for the selective removal or inhibition of pathogenic microbes in combination with scaling and root planing (SRP) for the management of periodontitis.
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tetracycline fibers against minocycline gel when used as local drug delivery in conjunction with SRP for treating periodontitis.
This is a pilot randomized open single, blinded trial study comparing three treatment modalities: SRP with topical tetracycline fibers (SRP+T), SRP with topical minocycline HCL 2% gel (SRP+M), and SRP only as a control group. Probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), and bleeding on probing (BOP) percentages were recorded at baseline, one month, and at the end of three months. The data were subjected to analysis using IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare the clinical outcomes between the three treatment groups, accounting for the repeated measurements at baseline, one month, and three months. A p-value less than 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval was deemed statistically significant.
There were statistically significant changes within the groups in all the clinical parameters, including pocket depth, clinical attachment loss, and bleeding on probing score, at different time intervals, with the greatest mean pocket depth changes seen in the tetracycline group after one month (mean changes = 1.4 mm, P < 0.001) and over three months (mean changes = 1.79 mm, p < 0.001). For clinical attachment loss, after one month, the highest improvement in clinical level was seen in the minocycline group (mean changes = 0.7mm, p < 0.05), and the overall improvement was seen in the control group (mean changes = 1.1mm, p < 0.05). The minocycline group showed greater mean changes in bleeding on probing percentage, with the greatest changes after one month (mean changes = 19.34%, p < 0.001) and over three months (mean changes = 26.42%, p <0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the groups.
Locally delivered tetracycline and minocycline gel are effective as adjuncts to SRP and may improve the healing outcome in the management of periodontitis.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.55167</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38558744</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Antibiotics ; Bacteria ; Debridement ; Gum disease ; Microorganisms ; Patients ; Reproducibility</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2024-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e55167-e55167</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024, Zainuddin et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024, Zainuddin et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-f49926928d808a3c7ed5bf3cf22fbf858ed2f2c700513b57ac07d417407c58063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38558744$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zainuddin, Siti Lailatul Akmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latib, Norjehan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taib, Haslina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Basaruddin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabarudin, Muhammad Annurdin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan Mohamad, Wan Majdiah</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Conventional Periodontal Treatment With Tetracycline Fiber Versus Minocycline Gel Application Subgingivally in Periodontitis Patients</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Locally delivered antibiotics are adjunctive therapies for the selective removal or inhibition of pathogenic microbes in combination with scaling and root planing (SRP) for the management of periodontitis.
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tetracycline fibers against minocycline gel when used as local drug delivery in conjunction with SRP for treating periodontitis.
This is a pilot randomized open single, blinded trial study comparing three treatment modalities: SRP with topical tetracycline fibers (SRP+T), SRP with topical minocycline HCL 2% gel (SRP+M), and SRP only as a control group. Probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), and bleeding on probing (BOP) percentages were recorded at baseline, one month, and at the end of three months. The data were subjected to analysis using IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare the clinical outcomes between the three treatment groups, accounting for the repeated measurements at baseline, one month, and three months. A p-value less than 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval was deemed statistically significant.
There were statistically significant changes within the groups in all the clinical parameters, including pocket depth, clinical attachment loss, and bleeding on probing score, at different time intervals, with the greatest mean pocket depth changes seen in the tetracycline group after one month (mean changes = 1.4 mm, P < 0.001) and over three months (mean changes = 1.79 mm, p < 0.001). For clinical attachment loss, after one month, the highest improvement in clinical level was seen in the minocycline group (mean changes = 0.7mm, p < 0.05), and the overall improvement was seen in the control group (mean changes = 1.1mm, p < 0.05). The minocycline group showed greater mean changes in bleeding on probing percentage, with the greatest changes after one month (mean changes = 19.34%, p < 0.001) and over three months (mean changes = 26.42%, p <0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the groups.
Locally delivered tetracycline and minocycline gel are effective as adjuncts to SRP and may improve the healing outcome in the management of periodontitis.]]></description><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Debridement</subject><subject>Gum disease</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU1PGzEQhi1UVFDg1jOy1EsPDfhjHXuPKOJLAoFEaI8rr3dMjRw7tb1I-SP9vTgE2orTzGieeV9pXoS-UHIspWhPzJhgzMdC0JncQfuMztRUUdV8-q_fQ4c5PxFCKJGMSPIZ7XElhJJNs4_-nFkLprhnCJAzjhbPY6hDcTFoj-8guTjEUGq_SKDLsq7wT1d-4QWUpM3aeBcAn7seEv4BKY8Z37gQ3xcX4PHpauWd0RtJfD_2jy48umft_Rq78M_BFZfxXaWqQz5Au1b7DIdvdYIezs8W88vp9e3F1fz0empY05SpbdqWzVqmBkWU5kbCIHrLjWXM9lYJBQOzzEhCBOW9kNoQOTRUNkQaociMT9C3re4qxd8j5NItXTbgvQ4Qx9xxwinlnNfzCfr6AX2KY6pP2lD1ry1tVVup71vKpJhzAtutklvqtO4o6TaRddvIutfIKn70Jjr2Sxj-wu8B8RcuIZWv</recordid><startdate>20240228</startdate><enddate>20240228</enddate><creator>Zainuddin, Siti Lailatul Akmar</creator><creator>Latib, Norjehan</creator><creator>Taib, Haslina</creator><creator>Ahmad, Basaruddin</creator><creator>Sabarudin, Muhammad Annurdin</creator><creator>Wan Mohamad, Wan Majdiah</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240228</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Conventional Periodontal Treatment With Tetracycline Fiber Versus Minocycline Gel Application Subgingivally in Periodontitis Patients</title><author>Zainuddin, Siti Lailatul Akmar ; Latib, Norjehan ; Taib, Haslina ; Ahmad, Basaruddin ; Sabarudin, Muhammad Annurdin ; Wan Mohamad, Wan Majdiah</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-f49926928d808a3c7ed5bf3cf22fbf858ed2f2c700513b57ac07d417407c58063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Debridement</topic><topic>Gum disease</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zainuddin, Siti Lailatul Akmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latib, Norjehan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taib, Haslina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Basaruddin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabarudin, Muhammad Annurdin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan Mohamad, Wan Majdiah</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zainuddin, Siti Lailatul Akmar</au><au>Latib, Norjehan</au><au>Taib, Haslina</au><au>Ahmad, Basaruddin</au><au>Sabarudin, Muhammad Annurdin</au><au>Wan Mohamad, Wan Majdiah</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of Conventional Periodontal Treatment With Tetracycline Fiber Versus Minocycline Gel Application Subgingivally in Periodontitis Patients</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2024-02-28</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e55167</spage><epage>e55167</epage><pages>e55167-e55167</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Locally delivered antibiotics are adjunctive therapies for the selective removal or inhibition of pathogenic microbes in combination with scaling and root planing (SRP) for the management of periodontitis.
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of tetracycline fibers against minocycline gel when used as local drug delivery in conjunction with SRP for treating periodontitis.
This is a pilot randomized open single, blinded trial study comparing three treatment modalities: SRP with topical tetracycline fibers (SRP+T), SRP with topical minocycline HCL 2% gel (SRP+M), and SRP only as a control group. Probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment loss (CAL), and bleeding on probing (BOP) percentages were recorded at baseline, one month, and at the end of three months. The data were subjected to analysis using IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to compare the clinical outcomes between the three treatment groups, accounting for the repeated measurements at baseline, one month, and three months. A p-value less than 0.05 at a 95% confidence interval was deemed statistically significant.
There were statistically significant changes within the groups in all the clinical parameters, including pocket depth, clinical attachment loss, and bleeding on probing score, at different time intervals, with the greatest mean pocket depth changes seen in the tetracycline group after one month (mean changes = 1.4 mm, P < 0.001) and over three months (mean changes = 1.79 mm, p < 0.001). For clinical attachment loss, after one month, the highest improvement in clinical level was seen in the minocycline group (mean changes = 0.7mm, p < 0.05), and the overall improvement was seen in the control group (mean changes = 1.1mm, p < 0.05). The minocycline group showed greater mean changes in bleeding on probing percentage, with the greatest changes after one month (mean changes = 19.34%, p < 0.001) and over three months (mean changes = 26.42%, p <0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the groups.
Locally delivered tetracycline and minocycline gel are effective as adjuncts to SRP and may improve the healing outcome in the management of periodontitis.]]></abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>38558744</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.55167</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2024-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e55167-e55167 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3031133351 |
source | PubMed Central Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Antibiotics Bacteria Debridement Gum disease Microorganisms Patients Reproducibility |
title | Effectiveness of Conventional Periodontal Treatment With Tetracycline Fiber Versus Minocycline Gel Application Subgingivally in Periodontitis Patients |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T16%3A08%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Conventional%20Periodontal%20Treatment%20With%20Tetracycline%20Fiber%20Versus%20Minocycline%20Gel%20Application%20Subgingivally%20in%20Periodontitis%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Zainuddin,%20Siti%20Lailatul%20Akmar&rft.date=2024-02-28&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e55167&rft.epage=e55167&rft.pages=e55167-e55167&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.55167&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3020791989%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3020791989&rft_id=info:pmid/38558744&rfr_iscdi=true |