Effect of auxiliary geometric devices on the accuracy of intraoral scans in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: An in vitro study
The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of a novel auxiliary geometric device (AGD) on the accuracy of full-arch scans captured with 3 different intraoral scanners (IOS). An edentulous maxillary model with four internal connection implant replicas was scanned using 3 differe...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of dentistry 2024-06, Vol.145, p.104979-104979, Article 104979 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 104979 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 104979 |
| container_title | Journal of dentistry |
| container_volume | 145 |
| creator | Canullo, Luigi Pesce, Paolo Caponio, Vito Carlo Alberto Iacono, Roberta Luciani, Francesco Saverio Raffone, Carlo Menini, Maria |
| description | The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of a novel auxiliary geometric device (AGD) on the accuracy of full-arch scans captured with 3 different intraoral scanners (IOS).
An edentulous maxillary model with four internal connection implant replicas was scanned using 3 different IOS: iTero Element 5D (ITERO) (Align Technology, Tempe, AZ, USA), Trios 4 (TRIOS) (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark), and Carestream 3700 (CS) (Carestream Dental, Atlanta, USA). Thirty-six scans were taken with each IOS, 18 with the AGD in place, and 18 without the AGD. A digital master model was created using an industrial optical scanner (ATOS compact Scan 5M, GOM GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany). The master and IOS models were aligned using the scan bodies as a reference area. A surface comparison was performed, and deviation labels were exported for each scan body to evaluate the linear and angular deviation. Total body, platform and angular deviations were measured.
The use of AGD resulted in a statistically significant increase of angular deviation: 0.87° (SD=0.21) in the AGD group versus 0.64° (SD=0.46) in the no AGD group (p-value=0.005). The difference between the AGD and no AGD groups was not statistically significant for total body and platform deviation values (p-value=0.051 and 0.302 respectively).
Using AGD, ITERO showed a statistically significant increase in angular deviation (mean difference=-0.46 µm, p-value=0.002) and a decrease in mean platform deviation (mean difference=63.19 µm, p-value |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104979 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3029817034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0300571224001490</els_id><sourcerecordid>3029817034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-19a89ef9795f4d58afe5f5312745e62fd2195e7c32c9ccdd4a56a0aa05ff39c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVpaTZpn6BQdOzFG8mybKuQQwhpEgj00kJvYiKNulpsy5XkJfsKeepqu2mOOQ0avn9G8_-EfOJszRlvz7frrcUpr2tWN6XTqE69ISved6riXfvrLVkxwVglO16fkNOUtoyxhtXqPTkRvZQtV2JFnq6dQ5NpcBSWRz94iHv6G8OIOXpDLe68wUTDRPMGKRizRDD7A-6nHCFEGGgyMKXypm4Zhgqi2VA_zgNMuUrLPIeY0dKIG3go8zNkH6b0lV5OB8nO5xhoyovdfyDvHAwJPz7XM_Lz2_WPq9vq_vvN3dXlfWWEbHLFFfQKXblWusbKHhxKJwWvu0ZiWztbcyWxM6I2yhhrG5AtMAAmnRPKtOKMfDnOnWP4s2DKevTJ4FA-jGFJWhSPet4x0RRUHFETQ0oRnZ6jH4tFmjN9CEFv9b8Q9CEEfQyhqD4_L1geRrQvmv-uF-DiCGA5c-cx6mQ8TgatjyUMbYN_dcFfl_uceA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3029817034</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of auxiliary geometric devices on the accuracy of intraoral scans in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: An in vitro study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Canullo, Luigi ; Pesce, Paolo ; Caponio, Vito Carlo Alberto ; Iacono, Roberta ; Luciani, Francesco Saverio ; Raffone, Carlo ; Menini, Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Canullo, Luigi ; Pesce, Paolo ; Caponio, Vito Carlo Alberto ; Iacono, Roberta ; Luciani, Francesco Saverio ; Raffone, Carlo ; Menini, Maria</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of a novel auxiliary geometric device (AGD) on the accuracy of full-arch scans captured with 3 different intraoral scanners (IOS).
An edentulous maxillary model with four internal connection implant replicas was scanned using 3 different IOS: iTero Element 5D (ITERO) (Align Technology, Tempe, AZ, USA), Trios 4 (TRIOS) (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark), and Carestream 3700 (CS) (Carestream Dental, Atlanta, USA). Thirty-six scans were taken with each IOS, 18 with the AGD in place, and 18 without the AGD. A digital master model was created using an industrial optical scanner (ATOS compact Scan 5M, GOM GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany). The master and IOS models were aligned using the scan bodies as a reference area. A surface comparison was performed, and deviation labels were exported for each scan body to evaluate the linear and angular deviation. Total body, platform and angular deviations were measured.
The use of AGD resulted in a statistically significant increase of angular deviation: 0.87° (SD=0.21) in the AGD group versus 0.64° (SD=0.46) in the no AGD group (p-value=0.005). The difference between the AGD and no AGD groups was not statistically significant for total body and platform deviation values (p-value=0.051 and 0.302 respectively).
Using AGD, ITERO showed a statistically significant increase in angular deviation (mean difference=-0.46 µm, p-value=0.002) and a decrease in mean platform deviation (mean difference=63.19 µm, p-value<0.001). No statistically significant differences were found for the other IOS.
The use of AGD did not add benefit on CS and TRIOS. On ITERO, there was an improvement in platform deviation, that was outweighed by the worsening of the angular deviation.
In vitro data suggest that intraoral scans can be successfully used in full-arch cases. The use of AGD has no additional benefit on CS and TRIOS. On ITERO there was an improvement in platform deviation that was outweighed by the worsening of the angular deviation. Translational application to clinical practice deserves further investigation, taking into account patient-related and anatomical variables.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-5712</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-176X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104979</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38556193</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Computer-Aided Design ; Dental Arch - diagnostic imaging ; Dental Implants ; Dental Prosthesis Design ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported ; digital impression ; full arch ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; In Vitro Techniques ; intraoral scanner ; Jaw, Edentulous - diagnostic imaging ; Jaw, Edentulous - rehabilitation ; Maxilla - diagnostic imaging ; Models, Dental</subject><ispartof>Journal of dentistry, 2024-06, Vol.145, p.104979-104979, Article 104979</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-19a89ef9795f4d58afe5f5312745e62fd2195e7c32c9ccdd4a56a0aa05ff39c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9875-2929 ; 0000-0002-6517-6643</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104979$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27928,27929,45999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38556193$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Canullo, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesce, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caponio, Vito Carlo Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iacono, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luciani, Francesco Saverio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffone, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menini, Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of auxiliary geometric devices on the accuracy of intraoral scans in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: An in vitro study</title><title>Journal of dentistry</title><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><description>The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of a novel auxiliary geometric device (AGD) on the accuracy of full-arch scans captured with 3 different intraoral scanners (IOS).
An edentulous maxillary model with four internal connection implant replicas was scanned using 3 different IOS: iTero Element 5D (ITERO) (Align Technology, Tempe, AZ, USA), Trios 4 (TRIOS) (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark), and Carestream 3700 (CS) (Carestream Dental, Atlanta, USA). Thirty-six scans were taken with each IOS, 18 with the AGD in place, and 18 without the AGD. A digital master model was created using an industrial optical scanner (ATOS compact Scan 5M, GOM GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany). The master and IOS models were aligned using the scan bodies as a reference area. A surface comparison was performed, and deviation labels were exported for each scan body to evaluate the linear and angular deviation. Total body, platform and angular deviations were measured.
The use of AGD resulted in a statistically significant increase of angular deviation: 0.87° (SD=0.21) in the AGD group versus 0.64° (SD=0.46) in the no AGD group (p-value=0.005). The difference between the AGD and no AGD groups was not statistically significant for total body and platform deviation values (p-value=0.051 and 0.302 respectively).
Using AGD, ITERO showed a statistically significant increase in angular deviation (mean difference=-0.46 µm, p-value=0.002) and a decrease in mean platform deviation (mean difference=63.19 µm, p-value<0.001). No statistically significant differences were found for the other IOS.
The use of AGD did not add benefit on CS and TRIOS. On ITERO, there was an improvement in platform deviation, that was outweighed by the worsening of the angular deviation.
In vitro data suggest that intraoral scans can be successfully used in full-arch cases. The use of AGD has no additional benefit on CS and TRIOS. On ITERO there was an improvement in platform deviation that was outweighed by the worsening of the angular deviation. Translational application to clinical practice deserves further investigation, taking into account patient-related and anatomical variables.</description><subject>Computer-Aided Design</subject><subject>Dental Arch - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis Design</subject><subject>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</subject><subject>digital impression</subject><subject>full arch</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>intraoral scanner</subject><subject>Jaw, Edentulous - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Jaw, Edentulous - rehabilitation</subject><subject>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Models, Dental</subject><issn>0300-5712</issn><issn>1879-176X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcFq3DAQhkVpaTZpn6BQdOzFG8mybKuQQwhpEgj00kJvYiKNulpsy5XkJfsKeepqu2mOOQ0avn9G8_-EfOJszRlvz7frrcUpr2tWN6XTqE69ISved6riXfvrLVkxwVglO16fkNOUtoyxhtXqPTkRvZQtV2JFnq6dQ5NpcBSWRz94iHv6G8OIOXpDLe68wUTDRPMGKRizRDD7A-6nHCFEGGgyMKXypm4Zhgqi2VA_zgNMuUrLPIeY0dKIG3go8zNkH6b0lV5OB8nO5xhoyovdfyDvHAwJPz7XM_Lz2_WPq9vq_vvN3dXlfWWEbHLFFfQKXblWusbKHhxKJwWvu0ZiWztbcyWxM6I2yhhrG5AtMAAmnRPKtOKMfDnOnWP4s2DKevTJ4FA-jGFJWhSPet4x0RRUHFETQ0oRnZ6jH4tFmjN9CEFv9b8Q9CEEfQyhqD4_L1geRrQvmv-uF-DiCGA5c-cx6mQ8TgatjyUMbYN_dcFfl_uceA</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Canullo, Luigi</creator><creator>Pesce, Paolo</creator><creator>Caponio, Vito Carlo Alberto</creator><creator>Iacono, Roberta</creator><creator>Luciani, Francesco Saverio</creator><creator>Raffone, Carlo</creator><creator>Menini, Maria</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9875-2929</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6517-6643</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Effect of auxiliary geometric devices on the accuracy of intraoral scans in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: An in vitro study</title><author>Canullo, Luigi ; Pesce, Paolo ; Caponio, Vito Carlo Alberto ; Iacono, Roberta ; Luciani, Francesco Saverio ; Raffone, Carlo ; Menini, Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-19a89ef9795f4d58afe5f5312745e62fd2195e7c32c9ccdd4a56a0aa05ff39c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Computer-Aided Design</topic><topic>Dental Arch - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis Design</topic><topic>Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported</topic><topic>digital impression</topic><topic>full arch</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>intraoral scanner</topic><topic>Jaw, Edentulous - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Jaw, Edentulous - rehabilitation</topic><topic>Maxilla - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Models, Dental</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Canullo, Luigi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pesce, Paolo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caponio, Vito Carlo Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iacono, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luciani, Francesco Saverio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffone, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Menini, Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Canullo, Luigi</au><au>Pesce, Paolo</au><au>Caponio, Vito Carlo Alberto</au><au>Iacono, Roberta</au><au>Luciani, Francesco Saverio</au><au>Raffone, Carlo</au><au>Menini, Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of auxiliary geometric devices on the accuracy of intraoral scans in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: An in vitro study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>J Dent</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>145</volume><spage>104979</spage><epage>104979</epage><pages>104979-104979</pages><artnum>104979</artnum><issn>0300-5712</issn><eissn>1879-176X</eissn><abstract>The aim of the present in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of a novel auxiliary geometric device (AGD) on the accuracy of full-arch scans captured with 3 different intraoral scanners (IOS).
An edentulous maxillary model with four internal connection implant replicas was scanned using 3 different IOS: iTero Element 5D (ITERO) (Align Technology, Tempe, AZ, USA), Trios 4 (TRIOS) (3Shape A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark), and Carestream 3700 (CS) (Carestream Dental, Atlanta, USA). Thirty-six scans were taken with each IOS, 18 with the AGD in place, and 18 without the AGD. A digital master model was created using an industrial optical scanner (ATOS compact Scan 5M, GOM GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany). The master and IOS models were aligned using the scan bodies as a reference area. A surface comparison was performed, and deviation labels were exported for each scan body to evaluate the linear and angular deviation. Total body, platform and angular deviations were measured.
The use of AGD resulted in a statistically significant increase of angular deviation: 0.87° (SD=0.21) in the AGD group versus 0.64° (SD=0.46) in the no AGD group (p-value=0.005). The difference between the AGD and no AGD groups was not statistically significant for total body and platform deviation values (p-value=0.051 and 0.302 respectively).
Using AGD, ITERO showed a statistically significant increase in angular deviation (mean difference=-0.46 µm, p-value=0.002) and a decrease in mean platform deviation (mean difference=63.19 µm, p-value<0.001). No statistically significant differences were found for the other IOS.
The use of AGD did not add benefit on CS and TRIOS. On ITERO, there was an improvement in platform deviation, that was outweighed by the worsening of the angular deviation.
In vitro data suggest that intraoral scans can be successfully used in full-arch cases. The use of AGD has no additional benefit on CS and TRIOS. On ITERO there was an improvement in platform deviation that was outweighed by the worsening of the angular deviation. Translational application to clinical practice deserves further investigation, taking into account patient-related and anatomical variables.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38556193</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104979</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9875-2929</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6517-6643</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0300-5712 |
| ispartof | Journal of dentistry, 2024-06, Vol.145, p.104979-104979, Article 104979 |
| issn | 0300-5712 1879-176X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3029817034 |
| source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Computer-Aided Design Dental Arch - diagnostic imaging Dental Implants Dental Prosthesis Design Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported digital impression full arch Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods In Vitro Techniques intraoral scanner Jaw, Edentulous - diagnostic imaging Jaw, Edentulous - rehabilitation Maxilla - diagnostic imaging Models, Dental |
| title | Effect of auxiliary geometric devices on the accuracy of intraoral scans in full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: An in vitro study |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T20%3A19%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20auxiliary%20geometric%20devices%20on%20the%20accuracy%20of%20intraoral%20scans%20in%20full-arch%20implant-supported%20rehabilitations:%20An%20in%20vitro%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dentistry&rft.au=Canullo,%20Luigi&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=145&rft.spage=104979&rft.epage=104979&rft.pages=104979-104979&rft.artnum=104979&rft.issn=0300-5712&rft.eissn=1879-176X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104979&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3029817034%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3029817034&rft_id=info:pmid/38556193&rft_els_id=S0300571224001490&rfr_iscdi=true |