Applications of the partial-order continual reassessment method in the early development of treatment combinations

Combination therapy is increasingly being explored as a promising approach for improving cancer treatment outcomes. However, identifying effective dose combinations in early oncology drug development is challenging due to limited sample sizes in early-phase clinical trials. This task becomes even mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical trials (London, England) England), 2024-06, Vol.21 (3), p.331-339
Hauptverfasser: Wages, Nolan A, Dillon, Patrick M, Portell, Craig A, Slingluff, Craig L, Petroni, Gina R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 339
container_issue 3
container_start_page 331
container_title Clinical trials (London, England)
container_volume 21
creator Wages, Nolan A
Dillon, Patrick M
Portell, Craig A
Slingluff, Craig L
Petroni, Gina R
description Combination therapy is increasingly being explored as a promising approach for improving cancer treatment outcomes. However, identifying effective dose combinations in early oncology drug development is challenging due to limited sample sizes in early-phase clinical trials. This task becomes even more complex when multiple agents are being escalated simultaneously, potentially leading to a loss of monotonic toxicity order with respect to the dose. Traditional single-agent trial designs are insufficient for this multi-dimensional problem, necessitating the development and implementation of dose-finding methods specifically designed for drug combinations. While, in practice, approaches to this problem have focused on preselecting combinations with a known toxicity order and applying single-agent designs, this limits the number of combinations considered and may miss promising dose combinations. In recent years, several novel designs have been proposed for exploring partially ordered drug combination spaces with the goal of identifying a maximum tolerated dose combination, based on safety, or an optimal dose combination, based on toxicity and efficacy. However, their implementation in clinical practice remains limited. In this article, we describe the application of the partial order continual reassessment method and its extensions for combination therapies in early-phase clinical trials. We present completed trials that use safety endpoints to identify maximum tolerated dose combinations and adaptively use both safety and efficacy endpoints to determine optimal treatment strategies. We discuss the effectiveness of the partial-order continual reassessment method and its extensions in identifying optimal treatment strategies and provide our experience with executing these novel adaptive designs in practice. By utilizing innovative dose-finding methods, researchers and clinicians can more effectively navigate the challenges of combination therapy development, ultimately improving patient outcomes in the treatment of cancer.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/17407745241234634
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3022575298</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_17407745241234634</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3061374753</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-450d33ceef56214db7c87c29cf9c77b85cc5327d73378077d8516e3f6cdf7c5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLxTAQhYMovn-AGym4cVPNs5O7FPEFghtdl9xkqpW2qUkq-O_NfaiguEoy-c6ZYQ4hR4yeMQZwzkBSAKm4ZFzISsgNsruolQBKbH7fpdohezG-Usq10mKb7AitlKRC75JwMY5da01q_RAL3xTpBYvRhNSarvTBYSisH1I7TKYrApoYMcYeh1T0mF68K9phKUETuo_C4Tt2flz-L7yyIC0f1vfzdlh1OSBbjekiHq7PffJ0ffV4eVveP9zcXV7cl1ZwmkqpqBPCIjaq4ky6OVgNls9sM7MAc62sVYKDAyFA5zU4rViFoqmsa8AqFPvkdOU7Bv82YUx130aLXWcG9FOsBeVcgeIzndGTX-irn8KQp8tUxQTIvNBMsRVlg48xYFOPoe1N-KgZrReB1H8CyZrjtfM079F9K74SyMDZCojmGX_a_u_4CUuGlFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3061374753</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Applications of the partial-order continual reassessment method in the early development of treatment combinations</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Wages, Nolan A ; Dillon, Patrick M ; Portell, Craig A ; Slingluff, Craig L ; Petroni, Gina R</creator><creatorcontrib>Wages, Nolan A ; Dillon, Patrick M ; Portell, Craig A ; Slingluff, Craig L ; Petroni, Gina R</creatorcontrib><description>Combination therapy is increasingly being explored as a promising approach for improving cancer treatment outcomes. However, identifying effective dose combinations in early oncology drug development is challenging due to limited sample sizes in early-phase clinical trials. This task becomes even more complex when multiple agents are being escalated simultaneously, potentially leading to a loss of monotonic toxicity order with respect to the dose. Traditional single-agent trial designs are insufficient for this multi-dimensional problem, necessitating the development and implementation of dose-finding methods specifically designed for drug combinations. While, in practice, approaches to this problem have focused on preselecting combinations with a known toxicity order and applying single-agent designs, this limits the number of combinations considered and may miss promising dose combinations. In recent years, several novel designs have been proposed for exploring partially ordered drug combination spaces with the goal of identifying a maximum tolerated dose combination, based on safety, or an optimal dose combination, based on toxicity and efficacy. However, their implementation in clinical practice remains limited. In this article, we describe the application of the partial order continual reassessment method and its extensions for combination therapies in early-phase clinical trials. We present completed trials that use safety endpoints to identify maximum tolerated dose combinations and adaptively use both safety and efficacy endpoints to determine optimal treatment strategies. We discuss the effectiveness of the partial-order continual reassessment method and its extensions in identifying optimal treatment strategies and provide our experience with executing these novel adaptive designs in practice. By utilizing innovative dose-finding methods, researchers and clinicians can more effectively navigate the challenges of combination therapy development, ultimately improving patient outcomes in the treatment of cancer.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1740-7745</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1740-7753</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-7753</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/17407745241234634</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38554038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration &amp; dosage ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Clinical trials ; Clinical Trials as Topic - methods ; Combination therapy ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug development ; Drug Development - methods ; Drug dosages ; Effectiveness ; Humans ; Maximum Tolerated Dose ; Multidimensional methods ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Research Design ; Safety ; Toxicity</subject><ispartof>Clinical trials (London, England), 2024-06, Vol.21 (3), p.331-339</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-450d33ceef56214db7c87c29cf9c77b85cc5327d73378077d8516e3f6cdf7c5e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2190-4864</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/17407745241234634$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17407745241234634$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38554038$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wages, Nolan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dillon, Patrick M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portell, Craig A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slingluff, Craig L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petroni, Gina R</creatorcontrib><title>Applications of the partial-order continual reassessment method in the early development of treatment combinations</title><title>Clinical trials (London, England)</title><addtitle>Clin Trials</addtitle><description>Combination therapy is increasingly being explored as a promising approach for improving cancer treatment outcomes. However, identifying effective dose combinations in early oncology drug development is challenging due to limited sample sizes in early-phase clinical trials. This task becomes even more complex when multiple agents are being escalated simultaneously, potentially leading to a loss of monotonic toxicity order with respect to the dose. Traditional single-agent trial designs are insufficient for this multi-dimensional problem, necessitating the development and implementation of dose-finding methods specifically designed for drug combinations. While, in practice, approaches to this problem have focused on preselecting combinations with a known toxicity order and applying single-agent designs, this limits the number of combinations considered and may miss promising dose combinations. In recent years, several novel designs have been proposed for exploring partially ordered drug combination spaces with the goal of identifying a maximum tolerated dose combination, based on safety, or an optimal dose combination, based on toxicity and efficacy. However, their implementation in clinical practice remains limited. In this article, we describe the application of the partial order continual reassessment method and its extensions for combination therapies in early-phase clinical trials. We present completed trials that use safety endpoints to identify maximum tolerated dose combinations and adaptively use both safety and efficacy endpoints to determine optimal treatment strategies. We discuss the effectiveness of the partial-order continual reassessment method and its extensions in identifying optimal treatment strategies and provide our experience with executing these novel adaptive designs in practice. By utilizing innovative dose-finding methods, researchers and clinicians can more effectively navigate the challenges of combination therapy development, ultimately improving patient outcomes in the treatment of cancer.</description><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</subject><subject>Combination therapy</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Drug Development - methods</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maximum Tolerated Dose</subject><subject>Multidimensional methods</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><issn>1740-7745</issn><issn>1740-7753</issn><issn>1740-7753</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLxTAQhYMovn-AGym4cVPNs5O7FPEFghtdl9xkqpW2qUkq-O_NfaiguEoy-c6ZYQ4hR4yeMQZwzkBSAKm4ZFzISsgNsruolQBKbH7fpdohezG-Usq10mKb7AitlKRC75JwMY5da01q_RAL3xTpBYvRhNSarvTBYSisH1I7TKYrApoYMcYeh1T0mF68K9phKUETuo_C4Tt2flz-L7yyIC0f1vfzdlh1OSBbjekiHq7PffJ0ffV4eVveP9zcXV7cl1ZwmkqpqBPCIjaq4ky6OVgNls9sM7MAc62sVYKDAyFA5zU4rViFoqmsa8AqFPvkdOU7Bv82YUx130aLXWcG9FOsBeVcgeIzndGTX-irn8KQp8tUxQTIvNBMsRVlg48xYFOPoe1N-KgZrReB1H8CyZrjtfM079F9K74SyMDZCojmGX_a_u_4CUuGlFg</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Wages, Nolan A</creator><creator>Dillon, Patrick M</creator><creator>Portell, Craig A</creator><creator>Slingluff, Craig L</creator><creator>Petroni, Gina R</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2190-4864</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Applications of the partial-order continual reassessment method in the early development of treatment combinations</title><author>Wages, Nolan A ; Dillon, Patrick M ; Portell, Craig A ; Slingluff, Craig L ; Petroni, Gina R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-450d33ceef56214db7c87c29cf9c77b85cc5327d73378077d8516e3f6cdf7c5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic - methods</topic><topic>Combination therapy</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Drug Development - methods</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maximum Tolerated Dose</topic><topic>Multidimensional methods</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wages, Nolan A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dillon, Patrick M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portell, Craig A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slingluff, Craig L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petroni, Gina R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical trials (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wages, Nolan A</au><au>Dillon, Patrick M</au><au>Portell, Craig A</au><au>Slingluff, Craig L</au><au>Petroni, Gina R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Applications of the partial-order continual reassessment method in the early development of treatment combinations</atitle><jtitle>Clinical trials (London, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Trials</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>331</spage><epage>339</epage><pages>331-339</pages><issn>1740-7745</issn><issn>1740-7753</issn><eissn>1740-7753</eissn><abstract>Combination therapy is increasingly being explored as a promising approach for improving cancer treatment outcomes. However, identifying effective dose combinations in early oncology drug development is challenging due to limited sample sizes in early-phase clinical trials. This task becomes even more complex when multiple agents are being escalated simultaneously, potentially leading to a loss of monotonic toxicity order with respect to the dose. Traditional single-agent trial designs are insufficient for this multi-dimensional problem, necessitating the development and implementation of dose-finding methods specifically designed for drug combinations. While, in practice, approaches to this problem have focused on preselecting combinations with a known toxicity order and applying single-agent designs, this limits the number of combinations considered and may miss promising dose combinations. In recent years, several novel designs have been proposed for exploring partially ordered drug combination spaces with the goal of identifying a maximum tolerated dose combination, based on safety, or an optimal dose combination, based on toxicity and efficacy. However, their implementation in clinical practice remains limited. In this article, we describe the application of the partial order continual reassessment method and its extensions for combination therapies in early-phase clinical trials. We present completed trials that use safety endpoints to identify maximum tolerated dose combinations and adaptively use both safety and efficacy endpoints to determine optimal treatment strategies. We discuss the effectiveness of the partial-order continual reassessment method and its extensions in identifying optimal treatment strategies and provide our experience with executing these novel adaptive designs in practice. By utilizing innovative dose-finding methods, researchers and clinicians can more effectively navigate the challenges of combination therapy development, ultimately improving patient outcomes in the treatment of cancer.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>38554038</pmid><doi>10.1177/17407745241234634</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2190-4864</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1740-7745
ispartof Clinical trials (London, England), 2024-06, Vol.21 (3), p.331-339
issn 1740-7745
1740-7753
1740-7753
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3022575298
source Access via SAGE; MEDLINE
subjects Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Agents - therapeutic use
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Cancer
Cancer therapies
Clinical trials
Clinical Trials as Topic - methods
Combination therapy
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Drug development
Drug Development - methods
Drug dosages
Effectiveness
Humans
Maximum Tolerated Dose
Multidimensional methods
Neoplasms - drug therapy
Research Design
Safety
Toxicity
title Applications of the partial-order continual reassessment method in the early development of treatment combinations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A31%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Applications%20of%20the%20partial-order%20continual%20reassessment%20method%20in%20the%20early%20development%20of%20treatment%20combinations&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20trials%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Wages,%20Nolan%20A&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=331&rft.epage=339&rft.pages=331-339&rft.issn=1740-7745&rft.eissn=1740-7753&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/17407745241234634&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3061374753%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3061374753&rft_id=info:pmid/38554038&rft_sage_id=10.1177_17407745241234634&rfr_iscdi=true