Combination of DCE-MRI and NME-DWI via Deep Neural Network for Predicting Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes

To explore whether the combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nonmono-exponential (NME) model-based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) via deep neural network (DNN) can improve the prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes compared to either imaging te...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical breast cancer 2024-07, Vol.24 (5), p.e417-e427
Hauptverfasser: Ba, Zhi-Chang, Zhang, Hong-Xia, Liu, Ao-Yu, Zhou, Xin-Xiang, Liu, Lu, Wang, Xin-Yi, Nanding, Abiyasi, Sang, Xi-Qiao, Kuai, Zi-Xiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e427
container_issue 5
container_start_page e417
container_title Clinical breast cancer
container_volume 24
creator Ba, Zhi-Chang
Zhang, Hong-Xia
Liu, Ao-Yu
Zhou, Xin-Xiang
Liu, Lu
Wang, Xin-Yi
Nanding, Abiyasi
Sang, Xi-Qiao
Kuai, Zi-Xiang
description To explore whether the combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nonmono-exponential (NME) model-based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) via deep neural network (DNN) can improve the prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes compared to either imaging technique used alone. This prospective study examined 480 breast cancers in 475 patients undergoing DCE-MRI and NME-DWI at 3.0 T. Breast cancers were classified as follows: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 enriched (HER2-enriched), luminal A, luminal B (HER2–), luminal B (HER2+), and triple-negative subtypes. A total of 20% cases were withheld as an independent test dataset, and the remaining cases were used to train DNN with an 80% to 20% training-validation split and 5-fold cross-validation. The diagnostic accuracies of DNN in 5-way subtype classification between the DCE-MRI, NME-DWI, and their combined multiparametric-MRI datasets were compared using analysis of variance with least significant difference posthoc test. Areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves were calculated to assess the performances of DNN in binary subtype classification between the 3 datasets. The 5-way classification accuracies of DNN on both DCE-MRI (0.71) and NME-DWI (0.64) were significantly lower (P < .05) than on multiparametric-MRI (0.76), while on DCE-MRI was significantly higher (P < .05) than on NME-DWI. The comparative results of binary classification between the 3 datasets were consistent with the 5-way classification. The combination of DCE-MRI and NME-DWI via DNN achieved a significant improvement in breast cancer molecular subtype prediction compared to either imaging technique used alone. Additionally, DCE-MRI outperformed NME-DWI in differentiating subtypes. This study assessed the performance of the combination of DCE-MRI and NME-DWI via DNN on the prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes. A total of 475 breast cancer patients were prospectively included. The combination of the 2 imaging techniques showed better performance in predicting subtypes than either imaging technique used alone. In addition, DCE-MRI outperformed NME-DWI in subtype prediction.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.03.006
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3022571362</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S152682092400079X</els_id><sourcerecordid>3022571362</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-bc95b9475695925ba5e52e1c4c8129c5e002ab9e99ac646e956ce2e413060fba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1vEzEURS1ERUvhD7BAXrKZ4dkeO7HEBiYBIjUt4kMsLdvzBjlMxsGeKeq_x1FKl129tzj3SvcQ8opBzYCpt7vaD87XHHhTg6gB1BNywbRYVqCUelp-yVW15KDPyfOcdwBcCQbPyLlYSik5lxdk18a9C6OdQhxp7OmqXVfbrxtqx45eb9fV6ueG3gZLV4gHeo1zskM509-YftM-JvolYRf8FMZf9ENCmyfa2tFjots4oJ8Hm-i32U13B8wvyFlvh4wv7-8l-fFx_b39XF3dfNq0768qL2AxVc5r6XSzkEpLzaWzEiVH5hu_ZFx7iWWGdRq1tl41CrVUHjk2TICC3llxSd6ceg8p_pkxT2YfssdhsCPGORsBZfmCCcULyk-oTzHnhL05pLC36c4wMEfHZmeOjs3RsQFhiuMSen3fP7s9dg-R_1IL8O4EYFl5GzCZ7AMWK11I6CfTxfBY_z_IXItx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3022571362</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Combination of DCE-MRI and NME-DWI via Deep Neural Network for Predicting Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Ba, Zhi-Chang ; Zhang, Hong-Xia ; Liu, Ao-Yu ; Zhou, Xin-Xiang ; Liu, Lu ; Wang, Xin-Yi ; Nanding, Abiyasi ; Sang, Xi-Qiao ; Kuai, Zi-Xiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Ba, Zhi-Chang ; Zhang, Hong-Xia ; Liu, Ao-Yu ; Zhou, Xin-Xiang ; Liu, Lu ; Wang, Xin-Yi ; Nanding, Abiyasi ; Sang, Xi-Qiao ; Kuai, Zi-Xiang</creatorcontrib><description>To explore whether the combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nonmono-exponential (NME) model-based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) via deep neural network (DNN) can improve the prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes compared to either imaging technique used alone. This prospective study examined 480 breast cancers in 475 patients undergoing DCE-MRI and NME-DWI at 3.0 T. Breast cancers were classified as follows: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 enriched (HER2-enriched), luminal A, luminal B (HER2–), luminal B (HER2+), and triple-negative subtypes. A total of 20% cases were withheld as an independent test dataset, and the remaining cases were used to train DNN with an 80% to 20% training-validation split and 5-fold cross-validation. The diagnostic accuracies of DNN in 5-way subtype classification between the DCE-MRI, NME-DWI, and their combined multiparametric-MRI datasets were compared using analysis of variance with least significant difference posthoc test. Areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves were calculated to assess the performances of DNN in binary subtype classification between the 3 datasets. The 5-way classification accuracies of DNN on both DCE-MRI (0.71) and NME-DWI (0.64) were significantly lower (P &lt; .05) than on multiparametric-MRI (0.76), while on DCE-MRI was significantly higher (P &lt; .05) than on NME-DWI. The comparative results of binary classification between the 3 datasets were consistent with the 5-way classification. The combination of DCE-MRI and NME-DWI via DNN achieved a significant improvement in breast cancer molecular subtype prediction compared to either imaging technique used alone. Additionally, DCE-MRI outperformed NME-DWI in differentiating subtypes. This study assessed the performance of the combination of DCE-MRI and NME-DWI via DNN on the prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes. A total of 475 breast cancer patients were prospectively included. The combination of the 2 imaging techniques showed better performance in predicting subtypes than either imaging technique used alone. In addition, DCE-MRI outperformed NME-DWI in subtype prediction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-8209</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1938-0666</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-0666</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2024.03.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38555225</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Breast Neoplasms - classification ; Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Contrast Media ; Deep learning ; Diffusioin-weighted imaging ; Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Dynamic contrast-enhanced ; Female ; Humans ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Middle Aged ; Neural Networks, Computer ; Non-mono-exponential model ; Prospective Studies ; Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</subject><ispartof>Clinical breast cancer, 2024-07, Vol.24 (5), p.e417-e427</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-bc95b9475695925ba5e52e1c4c8129c5e002ab9e99ac646e956ce2e413060fba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5024-5474</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.03.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38555225$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ba, Zhi-Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hong-Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ao-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xin-Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin-Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanding, Abiyasi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang, Xi-Qiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuai, Zi-Xiang</creatorcontrib><title>Combination of DCE-MRI and NME-DWI via Deep Neural Network for Predicting Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes</title><title>Clinical breast cancer</title><addtitle>Clin Breast Cancer</addtitle><description>To explore whether the combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nonmono-exponential (NME) model-based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) via deep neural network (DNN) can improve the prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes compared to either imaging technique used alone. This prospective study examined 480 breast cancers in 475 patients undergoing DCE-MRI and NME-DWI at 3.0 T. Breast cancers were classified as follows: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 enriched (HER2-enriched), luminal A, luminal B (HER2–), luminal B (HER2+), and triple-negative subtypes. A total of 20% cases were withheld as an independent test dataset, and the remaining cases were used to train DNN with an 80% to 20% training-validation split and 5-fold cross-validation. The diagnostic accuracies of DNN in 5-way subtype classification between the DCE-MRI, NME-DWI, and their combined multiparametric-MRI datasets were compared using analysis of variance with least significant difference posthoc test. Areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves were calculated to assess the performances of DNN in binary subtype classification between the 3 datasets. The 5-way classification accuracies of DNN on both DCE-MRI (0.71) and NME-DWI (0.64) were significantly lower (P &lt; .05) than on multiparametric-MRI (0.76), while on DCE-MRI was significantly higher (P &lt; .05) than on NME-DWI. The comparative results of binary classification between the 3 datasets were consistent with the 5-way classification. The combination of DCE-MRI and NME-DWI via DNN achieved a significant improvement in breast cancer molecular subtype prediction compared to either imaging technique used alone. Additionally, DCE-MRI outperformed NME-DWI in differentiating subtypes. This study assessed the performance of the combination of DCE-MRI and NME-DWI via DNN on the prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes. A total of 475 breast cancer patients were prospectively included. The combination of the 2 imaging techniques showed better performance in predicting subtypes than either imaging technique used alone. In addition, DCE-MRI outperformed NME-DWI in subtype prediction.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - classification</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Contrast Media</subject><subject>Deep learning</subject><subject>Diffusioin-weighted imaging</subject><subject>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Dynamic contrast-enhanced</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neural Networks, Computer</subject><subject>Non-mono-exponential model</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</subject><issn>1526-8209</issn><issn>1938-0666</issn><issn>1938-0666</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1vEzEURS1ERUvhD7BAXrKZ4dkeO7HEBiYBIjUt4kMsLdvzBjlMxsGeKeq_x1FKl129tzj3SvcQ8opBzYCpt7vaD87XHHhTg6gB1BNywbRYVqCUelp-yVW15KDPyfOcdwBcCQbPyLlYSik5lxdk18a9C6OdQhxp7OmqXVfbrxtqx45eb9fV6ueG3gZLV4gHeo1zskM509-YftM-JvolYRf8FMZf9ENCmyfa2tFjots4oJ8Hm-i32U13B8wvyFlvh4wv7-8l-fFx_b39XF3dfNq0768qL2AxVc5r6XSzkEpLzaWzEiVH5hu_ZFx7iWWGdRq1tl41CrVUHjk2TICC3llxSd6ceg8p_pkxT2YfssdhsCPGORsBZfmCCcULyk-oTzHnhL05pLC36c4wMEfHZmeOjs3RsQFhiuMSen3fP7s9dg-R_1IL8O4EYFl5GzCZ7AMWK11I6CfTxfBY_z_IXItx</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Ba, Zhi-Chang</creator><creator>Zhang, Hong-Xia</creator><creator>Liu, Ao-Yu</creator><creator>Zhou, Xin-Xiang</creator><creator>Liu, Lu</creator><creator>Wang, Xin-Yi</creator><creator>Nanding, Abiyasi</creator><creator>Sang, Xi-Qiao</creator><creator>Kuai, Zi-Xiang</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5024-5474</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Combination of DCE-MRI and NME-DWI via Deep Neural Network for Predicting Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes</title><author>Ba, Zhi-Chang ; Zhang, Hong-Xia ; Liu, Ao-Yu ; Zhou, Xin-Xiang ; Liu, Lu ; Wang, Xin-Yi ; Nanding, Abiyasi ; Sang, Xi-Qiao ; Kuai, Zi-Xiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c307t-bc95b9475695925ba5e52e1c4c8129c5e002ab9e99ac646e956ce2e413060fba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - classification</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Contrast Media</topic><topic>Deep learning</topic><topic>Diffusioin-weighted imaging</topic><topic>Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Dynamic contrast-enhanced</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neural Networks, Computer</topic><topic>Non-mono-exponential model</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ba, Zhi-Chang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Hong-Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Ao-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xin-Xiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Lu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xin-Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nanding, Abiyasi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sang, Xi-Qiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuai, Zi-Xiang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical breast cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ba, Zhi-Chang</au><au>Zhang, Hong-Xia</au><au>Liu, Ao-Yu</au><au>Zhou, Xin-Xiang</au><au>Liu, Lu</au><au>Wang, Xin-Yi</au><au>Nanding, Abiyasi</au><au>Sang, Xi-Qiao</au><au>Kuai, Zi-Xiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Combination of DCE-MRI and NME-DWI via Deep Neural Network for Predicting Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes</atitle><jtitle>Clinical breast cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Breast Cancer</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e417</spage><epage>e427</epage><pages>e417-e427</pages><issn>1526-8209</issn><issn>1938-0666</issn><eissn>1938-0666</eissn><abstract>To explore whether the combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and nonmono-exponential (NME) model-based diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) via deep neural network (DNN) can improve the prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes compared to either imaging technique used alone. This prospective study examined 480 breast cancers in 475 patients undergoing DCE-MRI and NME-DWI at 3.0 T. Breast cancers were classified as follows: human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 enriched (HER2-enriched), luminal A, luminal B (HER2–), luminal B (HER2+), and triple-negative subtypes. A total of 20% cases were withheld as an independent test dataset, and the remaining cases were used to train DNN with an 80% to 20% training-validation split and 5-fold cross-validation. The diagnostic accuracies of DNN in 5-way subtype classification between the DCE-MRI, NME-DWI, and their combined multiparametric-MRI datasets were compared using analysis of variance with least significant difference posthoc test. Areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves were calculated to assess the performances of DNN in binary subtype classification between the 3 datasets. The 5-way classification accuracies of DNN on both DCE-MRI (0.71) and NME-DWI (0.64) were significantly lower (P &lt; .05) than on multiparametric-MRI (0.76), while on DCE-MRI was significantly higher (P &lt; .05) than on NME-DWI. The comparative results of binary classification between the 3 datasets were consistent with the 5-way classification. The combination of DCE-MRI and NME-DWI via DNN achieved a significant improvement in breast cancer molecular subtype prediction compared to either imaging technique used alone. Additionally, DCE-MRI outperformed NME-DWI in differentiating subtypes. This study assessed the performance of the combination of DCE-MRI and NME-DWI via DNN on the prediction of breast cancer molecular subtypes. A total of 475 breast cancer patients were prospectively included. The combination of the 2 imaging techniques showed better performance in predicting subtypes than either imaging technique used alone. In addition, DCE-MRI outperformed NME-DWI in subtype prediction.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38555225</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clbc.2024.03.006</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5024-5474</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-8209
ispartof Clinical breast cancer, 2024-07, Vol.24 (5), p.e417-e427
issn 1526-8209
1938-0666
1938-0666
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3022571362
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Adult
Aged
Breast Neoplasms - classification
Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Contrast Media
Deep learning
Diffusioin-weighted imaging
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Dynamic contrast-enhanced
Female
Humans
Magnetic resonance imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods
Middle Aged
Neural Networks, Computer
Non-mono-exponential model
Prospective Studies
Receptor, ErbB-2 - metabolism
title Combination of DCE-MRI and NME-DWI via Deep Neural Network for Predicting Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T01%3A17%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Combination%20of%20DCE-MRI%20and%20NME-DWI%20via%20Deep%20Neural%20Network%20for%20Predicting%20Breast%20Cancer%20Molecular%20Subtypes&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20breast%20cancer&rft.au=Ba,%20Zhi-Chang&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e417&rft.epage=e427&rft.pages=e417-e427&rft.issn=1526-8209&rft.eissn=1938-0666&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clbc.2024.03.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3022571362%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3022571362&rft_id=info:pmid/38555225&rft_els_id=S152682092400079X&rfr_iscdi=true