End-of-day assessment of asymptomatic versus highly symptomatic soft contact lens wearers

To investigate differences in key clinical parameters between asymptomatic and highly symptomatic soft contact lens (CL) wearers after 14 h of wear. In this pilot investigation, Phase 1 identified asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≤ 7) and highly symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≥ 20) subjects after fitting wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ophthalmic & physiological optics 2024-06, Vol.44 (4), p.704-717
Hauptverfasser: Maldonado-Codina, Carole, Navascues-Cornago, Maria, Smith, Sarah L, Read, Michael L, Lakkis, Carol, Morgan, Philip B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 717
container_issue 4
container_start_page 704
container_title Ophthalmic & physiological optics
container_volume 44
creator Maldonado-Codina, Carole
Navascues-Cornago, Maria
Smith, Sarah L
Read, Michael L
Lakkis, Carol
Morgan, Philip B
description To investigate differences in key clinical parameters between asymptomatic and highly symptomatic soft contact lens (CL) wearers after 14 h of wear. In this pilot investigation, Phase 1 identified asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≤ 7) and highly symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≥ 20) subjects after fitting with nelfilcon A CLs. Phase 2 investigated the following over a single nelfilcon A CL-wearing day (14 ± 2 h): blinking characteristics, tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), tear film osmolarity and eyelid margin staining. Parameters for the two groups were compared using linear mixed models and post-hoc testing. The relationship between comfort scores and the clinical parameters was also investigated. Overall, 161 and 42 subjects were enrolled into Phase 1 and 2, respectively. Twenty-five asymptomatic and 17 symptomatic subjects completed Phase 2. Lower eyelid TMH was decreased after 14 h in symptomatic compared with asymptomatic subjects (least square mean [LSM] difference -0.04 mm, 95% CI: -0.07, -0.01). Osmolarity was lower in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects at fitting (LSM difference -9.89, 95% CI: -18.91, -0.86). Upper eyelid margin staining was greater after 14 h in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects (LSM difference 0.53, 95% CI: 0.01, 1.05) and greater after 14 h than baseline in the symptomatic group (LSM difference 0.61, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.07). There was a significant relationship between comfort and upper eyelid margin staining (r = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.63, -0.11) and blink rate (r = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.003). The potential parameters most effective in differentiating asymptomatic from symptomatic wearers were upper eyelid margin staining and lower TMH. The parameter with the strongest relationship to comfort was upper eyelid margin staining, where higher comfort scores were associated with lower levels of staining.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/opo.13305
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3014010092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3048259455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-c0c77bc322c87e3af22e37e85a9ec6d082919943eb7ebf83e24a66121289029f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLw0AQgBdRbK0e_AMS8KKH1H0luzlKqQ8QvOjBU9hsJjYlydbMRsm_d7VVxLnMDPMxzHyEnDI6ZyGu3MbNmRA02SNTJlUSM8HEPplSHupEUj0hR4hrSqlSSh-SidCJTCVlU_Ky7MrYVXFpxsggAmILnY9cFbqx3XjXGl_b6B16HDBa1a-rZoz-TtBVPrKu88b6qIEOow8wfcCPyUFlGoSTXZ6R55vl0-Iufni8vV9cP8RWUO1jS61ShRWcW61AmIpzEAp0YjKwaUk1z1iWSQGFgqLSArg0aco44zqjPKvEjFxs92569zYA-ryt0ULTmA7cgLmgLHxKacYDev4PXbuh78J1gZKaJ5lMkkBdbinbO8QeqnzT163px5zR_Mt3Hnzn374De7bbOBQtlL_kj2DxCdiuewY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3048259455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>End-of-day assessment of asymptomatic versus highly symptomatic soft contact lens wearers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Maldonado-Codina, Carole ; Navascues-Cornago, Maria ; Smith, Sarah L ; Read, Michael L ; Lakkis, Carol ; Morgan, Philip B</creator><creatorcontrib>Maldonado-Codina, Carole ; Navascues-Cornago, Maria ; Smith, Sarah L ; Read, Michael L ; Lakkis, Carol ; Morgan, Philip B</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate differences in key clinical parameters between asymptomatic and highly symptomatic soft contact lens (CL) wearers after 14 h of wear. In this pilot investigation, Phase 1 identified asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≤ 7) and highly symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≥ 20) subjects after fitting with nelfilcon A CLs. Phase 2 investigated the following over a single nelfilcon A CL-wearing day (14 ± 2 h): blinking characteristics, tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), tear film osmolarity and eyelid margin staining. Parameters for the two groups were compared using linear mixed models and post-hoc testing. The relationship between comfort scores and the clinical parameters was also investigated. Overall, 161 and 42 subjects were enrolled into Phase 1 and 2, respectively. Twenty-five asymptomatic and 17 symptomatic subjects completed Phase 2. Lower eyelid TMH was decreased after 14 h in symptomatic compared with asymptomatic subjects (least square mean [LSM] difference -0.04 mm, 95% CI: -0.07, -0.01). Osmolarity was lower in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects at fitting (LSM difference -9.89, 95% CI: -18.91, -0.86). Upper eyelid margin staining was greater after 14 h in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects (LSM difference 0.53, 95% CI: 0.01, 1.05) and greater after 14 h than baseline in the symptomatic group (LSM difference 0.61, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.07). There was a significant relationship between comfort and upper eyelid margin staining (r = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.63, -0.11) and blink rate (r = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.003). The potential parameters most effective in differentiating asymptomatic from symptomatic wearers were upper eyelid margin staining and lower TMH. The parameter with the strongest relationship to comfort was upper eyelid margin staining, where higher comfort scores were associated with lower levels of staining.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-5408</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-1313</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/opo.13305</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38546401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Asymptomatic ; Blinking - physiology ; Contact lenses ; Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - adverse effects ; Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis ; Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology ; Dry Eye Syndromes - physiopathology ; Eyelid ; Eyelids ; Female ; Humans ; Investigations ; Male ; Osmolar Concentration ; Osmolarity ; Pilot Projects ; Tears - metabolism ; Tears - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmic &amp; physiological optics, 2024-06, Vol.44 (4), p.704-717</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-c0c77bc322c87e3af22e37e85a9ec6d082919943eb7ebf83e24a66121289029f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5139-3594 ; 0000-0002-9976-8567 ; 0000-0002-2157-0905 ; 0000-0002-8115-1067 ; 0000-0003-0680-8169 ; 0000-0002-4101-376X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38546401$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maldonado-Codina, Carole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navascues-Cornago, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sarah L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakkis, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Philip B</creatorcontrib><title>End-of-day assessment of asymptomatic versus highly symptomatic soft contact lens wearers</title><title>Ophthalmic &amp; physiological optics</title><addtitle>Ophthalmic Physiol Opt</addtitle><description>To investigate differences in key clinical parameters between asymptomatic and highly symptomatic soft contact lens (CL) wearers after 14 h of wear. In this pilot investigation, Phase 1 identified asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≤ 7) and highly symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≥ 20) subjects after fitting with nelfilcon A CLs. Phase 2 investigated the following over a single nelfilcon A CL-wearing day (14 ± 2 h): blinking characteristics, tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), tear film osmolarity and eyelid margin staining. Parameters for the two groups were compared using linear mixed models and post-hoc testing. The relationship between comfort scores and the clinical parameters was also investigated. Overall, 161 and 42 subjects were enrolled into Phase 1 and 2, respectively. Twenty-five asymptomatic and 17 symptomatic subjects completed Phase 2. Lower eyelid TMH was decreased after 14 h in symptomatic compared with asymptomatic subjects (least square mean [LSM] difference -0.04 mm, 95% CI: -0.07, -0.01). Osmolarity was lower in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects at fitting (LSM difference -9.89, 95% CI: -18.91, -0.86). Upper eyelid margin staining was greater after 14 h in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects (LSM difference 0.53, 95% CI: 0.01, 1.05) and greater after 14 h than baseline in the symptomatic group (LSM difference 0.61, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.07). There was a significant relationship between comfort and upper eyelid margin staining (r = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.63, -0.11) and blink rate (r = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.003). The potential parameters most effective in differentiating asymptomatic from symptomatic wearers were upper eyelid margin staining and lower TMH. The parameter with the strongest relationship to comfort was upper eyelid margin staining, where higher comfort scores were associated with lower levels of staining.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Blinking - physiology</subject><subject>Contact lenses</subject><subject>Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology</subject><subject>Dry Eye Syndromes - physiopathology</subject><subject>Eyelid</subject><subject>Eyelids</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Osmolar Concentration</subject><subject>Osmolarity</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Tears - metabolism</subject><subject>Tears - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0275-5408</issn><issn>1475-1313</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLw0AQgBdRbK0e_AMS8KKH1H0luzlKqQ8QvOjBU9hsJjYlydbMRsm_d7VVxLnMDPMxzHyEnDI6ZyGu3MbNmRA02SNTJlUSM8HEPplSHupEUj0hR4hrSqlSSh-SidCJTCVlU_Ky7MrYVXFpxsggAmILnY9cFbqx3XjXGl_b6B16HDBa1a-rZoz-TtBVPrKu88b6qIEOow8wfcCPyUFlGoSTXZ6R55vl0-Iufni8vV9cP8RWUO1jS61ShRWcW61AmIpzEAp0YjKwaUk1z1iWSQGFgqLSArg0aco44zqjPKvEjFxs92569zYA-ryt0ULTmA7cgLmgLHxKacYDev4PXbuh78J1gZKaJ5lMkkBdbinbO8QeqnzT163px5zR_Mt3Hnzn374De7bbOBQtlL_kj2DxCdiuewY</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Maldonado-Codina, Carole</creator><creator>Navascues-Cornago, Maria</creator><creator>Smith, Sarah L</creator><creator>Read, Michael L</creator><creator>Lakkis, Carol</creator><creator>Morgan, Philip B</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5139-3594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9976-8567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2157-0905</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8115-1067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-8169</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4101-376X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>End-of-day assessment of asymptomatic versus highly symptomatic soft contact lens wearers</title><author>Maldonado-Codina, Carole ; Navascues-Cornago, Maria ; Smith, Sarah L ; Read, Michael L ; Lakkis, Carol ; Morgan, Philip B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-c0c77bc322c87e3af22e37e85a9ec6d082919943eb7ebf83e24a66121289029f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Blinking - physiology</topic><topic>Contact lenses</topic><topic>Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology</topic><topic>Dry Eye Syndromes - physiopathology</topic><topic>Eyelid</topic><topic>Eyelids</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Osmolar Concentration</topic><topic>Osmolarity</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Tears - metabolism</topic><topic>Tears - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maldonado-Codina, Carole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navascues-Cornago, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sarah L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakkis, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Philip B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmic &amp; physiological optics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maldonado-Codina, Carole</au><au>Navascues-Cornago, Maria</au><au>Smith, Sarah L</au><au>Read, Michael L</au><au>Lakkis, Carol</au><au>Morgan, Philip B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>End-of-day assessment of asymptomatic versus highly symptomatic soft contact lens wearers</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmic &amp; physiological optics</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmic Physiol Opt</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>704</spage><epage>717</epage><pages>704-717</pages><issn>0275-5408</issn><eissn>1475-1313</eissn><abstract>To investigate differences in key clinical parameters between asymptomatic and highly symptomatic soft contact lens (CL) wearers after 14 h of wear. In this pilot investigation, Phase 1 identified asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≤ 7) and highly symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≥ 20) subjects after fitting with nelfilcon A CLs. Phase 2 investigated the following over a single nelfilcon A CL-wearing day (14 ± 2 h): blinking characteristics, tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), tear film osmolarity and eyelid margin staining. Parameters for the two groups were compared using linear mixed models and post-hoc testing. The relationship between comfort scores and the clinical parameters was also investigated. Overall, 161 and 42 subjects were enrolled into Phase 1 and 2, respectively. Twenty-five asymptomatic and 17 symptomatic subjects completed Phase 2. Lower eyelid TMH was decreased after 14 h in symptomatic compared with asymptomatic subjects (least square mean [LSM] difference -0.04 mm, 95% CI: -0.07, -0.01). Osmolarity was lower in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects at fitting (LSM difference -9.89, 95% CI: -18.91, -0.86). Upper eyelid margin staining was greater after 14 h in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects (LSM difference 0.53, 95% CI: 0.01, 1.05) and greater after 14 h than baseline in the symptomatic group (LSM difference 0.61, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.07). There was a significant relationship between comfort and upper eyelid margin staining (r = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.63, -0.11) and blink rate (r = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.003). The potential parameters most effective in differentiating asymptomatic from symptomatic wearers were upper eyelid margin staining and lower TMH. The parameter with the strongest relationship to comfort was upper eyelid margin staining, where higher comfort scores were associated with lower levels of staining.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38546401</pmid><doi>10.1111/opo.13305</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5139-3594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9976-8567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2157-0905</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8115-1067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-8169</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4101-376X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0275-5408
ispartof Ophthalmic & physiological optics, 2024-06, Vol.44 (4), p.704-717
issn 0275-5408
1475-1313
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3014010092
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Asymptomatic
Blinking - physiology
Contact lenses
Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - adverse effects
Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis
Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology
Dry Eye Syndromes - physiopathology
Eyelid
Eyelids
Female
Humans
Investigations
Male
Osmolar Concentration
Osmolarity
Pilot Projects
Tears - metabolism
Tears - physiology
Young Adult
title End-of-day assessment of asymptomatic versus highly symptomatic soft contact lens wearers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T05%3A56%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=End-of-day%20assessment%20of%20asymptomatic%20versus%20highly%20symptomatic%20soft%20contact%20lens%20wearers&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmic%20&%20physiological%20optics&rft.au=Maldonado-Codina,%20Carole&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=704&rft.epage=717&rft.pages=704-717&rft.issn=0275-5408&rft.eissn=1475-1313&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/opo.13305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3048259455%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3048259455&rft_id=info:pmid/38546401&rfr_iscdi=true