End-of-day assessment of asymptomatic versus highly symptomatic soft contact lens wearers
To investigate differences in key clinical parameters between asymptomatic and highly symptomatic soft contact lens (CL) wearers after 14 h of wear. In this pilot investigation, Phase 1 identified asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≤ 7) and highly symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≥ 20) subjects after fitting wit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ophthalmic & physiological optics 2024-06, Vol.44 (4), p.704-717 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 717 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 704 |
container_title | Ophthalmic & physiological optics |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Maldonado-Codina, Carole Navascues-Cornago, Maria Smith, Sarah L Read, Michael L Lakkis, Carol Morgan, Philip B |
description | To investigate differences in key clinical parameters between asymptomatic and highly symptomatic soft contact lens (CL) wearers after 14 h of wear.
In this pilot investigation, Phase 1 identified asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≤ 7) and highly symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≥ 20) subjects after fitting with nelfilcon A CLs. Phase 2 investigated the following over a single nelfilcon A CL-wearing day (14 ± 2 h): blinking characteristics, tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), tear film osmolarity and eyelid margin staining. Parameters for the two groups were compared using linear mixed models and post-hoc testing. The relationship between comfort scores and the clinical parameters was also investigated.
Overall, 161 and 42 subjects were enrolled into Phase 1 and 2, respectively. Twenty-five asymptomatic and 17 symptomatic subjects completed Phase 2. Lower eyelid TMH was decreased after 14 h in symptomatic compared with asymptomatic subjects (least square mean [LSM] difference -0.04 mm, 95% CI: -0.07, -0.01). Osmolarity was lower in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects at fitting (LSM difference -9.89, 95% CI: -18.91, -0.86). Upper eyelid margin staining was greater after 14 h in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects (LSM difference 0.53, 95% CI: 0.01, 1.05) and greater after 14 h than baseline in the symptomatic group (LSM difference 0.61, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.07). There was a significant relationship between comfort and upper eyelid margin staining (r = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.63, -0.11) and blink rate (r = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.003).
The potential parameters most effective in differentiating asymptomatic from symptomatic wearers were upper eyelid margin staining and lower TMH. The parameter with the strongest relationship to comfort was upper eyelid margin staining, where higher comfort scores were associated with lower levels of staining. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/opo.13305 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3014010092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3048259455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-c0c77bc322c87e3af22e37e85a9ec6d082919943eb7ebf83e24a66121289029f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLw0AQgBdRbK0e_AMS8KKH1H0luzlKqQ8QvOjBU9hsJjYlydbMRsm_d7VVxLnMDPMxzHyEnDI6ZyGu3MbNmRA02SNTJlUSM8HEPplSHupEUj0hR4hrSqlSSh-SidCJTCVlU_Ky7MrYVXFpxsggAmILnY9cFbqx3XjXGl_b6B16HDBa1a-rZoz-TtBVPrKu88b6qIEOow8wfcCPyUFlGoSTXZ6R55vl0-Iufni8vV9cP8RWUO1jS61ShRWcW61AmIpzEAp0YjKwaUk1z1iWSQGFgqLSArg0aco44zqjPKvEjFxs92569zYA-ryt0ULTmA7cgLmgLHxKacYDev4PXbuh78J1gZKaJ5lMkkBdbinbO8QeqnzT163px5zR_Mt3Hnzn374De7bbOBQtlL_kj2DxCdiuewY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3048259455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>End-of-day assessment of asymptomatic versus highly symptomatic soft contact lens wearers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Maldonado-Codina, Carole ; Navascues-Cornago, Maria ; Smith, Sarah L ; Read, Michael L ; Lakkis, Carol ; Morgan, Philip B</creator><creatorcontrib>Maldonado-Codina, Carole ; Navascues-Cornago, Maria ; Smith, Sarah L ; Read, Michael L ; Lakkis, Carol ; Morgan, Philip B</creatorcontrib><description>To investigate differences in key clinical parameters between asymptomatic and highly symptomatic soft contact lens (CL) wearers after 14 h of wear.
In this pilot investigation, Phase 1 identified asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≤ 7) and highly symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≥ 20) subjects after fitting with nelfilcon A CLs. Phase 2 investigated the following over a single nelfilcon A CL-wearing day (14 ± 2 h): blinking characteristics, tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), tear film osmolarity and eyelid margin staining. Parameters for the two groups were compared using linear mixed models and post-hoc testing. The relationship between comfort scores and the clinical parameters was also investigated.
Overall, 161 and 42 subjects were enrolled into Phase 1 and 2, respectively. Twenty-five asymptomatic and 17 symptomatic subjects completed Phase 2. Lower eyelid TMH was decreased after 14 h in symptomatic compared with asymptomatic subjects (least square mean [LSM] difference -0.04 mm, 95% CI: -0.07, -0.01). Osmolarity was lower in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects at fitting (LSM difference -9.89, 95% CI: -18.91, -0.86). Upper eyelid margin staining was greater after 14 h in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects (LSM difference 0.53, 95% CI: 0.01, 1.05) and greater after 14 h than baseline in the symptomatic group (LSM difference 0.61, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.07). There was a significant relationship between comfort and upper eyelid margin staining (r = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.63, -0.11) and blink rate (r = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.003).
The potential parameters most effective in differentiating asymptomatic from symptomatic wearers were upper eyelid margin staining and lower TMH. The parameter with the strongest relationship to comfort was upper eyelid margin staining, where higher comfort scores were associated with lower levels of staining.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-5408</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-1313</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/opo.13305</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38546401</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Asymptomatic ; Blinking - physiology ; Contact lenses ; Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - adverse effects ; Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis ; Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology ; Dry Eye Syndromes - physiopathology ; Eyelid ; Eyelids ; Female ; Humans ; Investigations ; Male ; Osmolar Concentration ; Osmolarity ; Pilot Projects ; Tears - metabolism ; Tears - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Ophthalmic & physiological optics, 2024-06, Vol.44 (4), p.704-717</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of College of Optometrists.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-c0c77bc322c87e3af22e37e85a9ec6d082919943eb7ebf83e24a66121289029f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5139-3594 ; 0000-0002-9976-8567 ; 0000-0002-2157-0905 ; 0000-0002-8115-1067 ; 0000-0003-0680-8169 ; 0000-0002-4101-376X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38546401$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maldonado-Codina, Carole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navascues-Cornago, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sarah L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakkis, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Philip B</creatorcontrib><title>End-of-day assessment of asymptomatic versus highly symptomatic soft contact lens wearers</title><title>Ophthalmic & physiological optics</title><addtitle>Ophthalmic Physiol Opt</addtitle><description>To investigate differences in key clinical parameters between asymptomatic and highly symptomatic soft contact lens (CL) wearers after 14 h of wear.
In this pilot investigation, Phase 1 identified asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≤ 7) and highly symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≥ 20) subjects after fitting with nelfilcon A CLs. Phase 2 investigated the following over a single nelfilcon A CL-wearing day (14 ± 2 h): blinking characteristics, tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), tear film osmolarity and eyelid margin staining. Parameters for the two groups were compared using linear mixed models and post-hoc testing. The relationship between comfort scores and the clinical parameters was also investigated.
Overall, 161 and 42 subjects were enrolled into Phase 1 and 2, respectively. Twenty-five asymptomatic and 17 symptomatic subjects completed Phase 2. Lower eyelid TMH was decreased after 14 h in symptomatic compared with asymptomatic subjects (least square mean [LSM] difference -0.04 mm, 95% CI: -0.07, -0.01). Osmolarity was lower in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects at fitting (LSM difference -9.89, 95% CI: -18.91, -0.86). Upper eyelid margin staining was greater after 14 h in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects (LSM difference 0.53, 95% CI: 0.01, 1.05) and greater after 14 h than baseline in the symptomatic group (LSM difference 0.61, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.07). There was a significant relationship between comfort and upper eyelid margin staining (r = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.63, -0.11) and blink rate (r = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.003).
The potential parameters most effective in differentiating asymptomatic from symptomatic wearers were upper eyelid margin staining and lower TMH. The parameter with the strongest relationship to comfort was upper eyelid margin staining, where higher comfort scores were associated with lower levels of staining.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Asymptomatic</subject><subject>Blinking - physiology</subject><subject>Contact lenses</subject><subject>Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - adverse effects</subject><subject>Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis</subject><subject>Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology</subject><subject>Dry Eye Syndromes - physiopathology</subject><subject>Eyelid</subject><subject>Eyelids</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Osmolar Concentration</subject><subject>Osmolarity</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Tears - metabolism</subject><subject>Tears - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0275-5408</issn><issn>1475-1313</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkEtLw0AQgBdRbK0e_AMS8KKH1H0luzlKqQ8QvOjBU9hsJjYlydbMRsm_d7VVxLnMDPMxzHyEnDI6ZyGu3MbNmRA02SNTJlUSM8HEPplSHupEUj0hR4hrSqlSSh-SidCJTCVlU_Ky7MrYVXFpxsggAmILnY9cFbqx3XjXGl_b6B16HDBa1a-rZoz-TtBVPrKu88b6qIEOow8wfcCPyUFlGoSTXZ6R55vl0-Iufni8vV9cP8RWUO1jS61ShRWcW61AmIpzEAp0YjKwaUk1z1iWSQGFgqLSArg0aco44zqjPKvEjFxs92569zYA-ryt0ULTmA7cgLmgLHxKacYDev4PXbuh78J1gZKaJ5lMkkBdbinbO8QeqnzT163px5zR_Mt3Hnzn374De7bbOBQtlL_kj2DxCdiuewY</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Maldonado-Codina, Carole</creator><creator>Navascues-Cornago, Maria</creator><creator>Smith, Sarah L</creator><creator>Read, Michael L</creator><creator>Lakkis, Carol</creator><creator>Morgan, Philip B</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5139-3594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9976-8567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2157-0905</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8115-1067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-8169</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4101-376X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>End-of-day assessment of asymptomatic versus highly symptomatic soft contact lens wearers</title><author>Maldonado-Codina, Carole ; Navascues-Cornago, Maria ; Smith, Sarah L ; Read, Michael L ; Lakkis, Carol ; Morgan, Philip B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-c0c77bc322c87e3af22e37e85a9ec6d082919943eb7ebf83e24a66121289029f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Asymptomatic</topic><topic>Blinking - physiology</topic><topic>Contact lenses</topic><topic>Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - adverse effects</topic><topic>Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis</topic><topic>Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology</topic><topic>Dry Eye Syndromes - physiopathology</topic><topic>Eyelid</topic><topic>Eyelids</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Osmolar Concentration</topic><topic>Osmolarity</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Tears - metabolism</topic><topic>Tears - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maldonado-Codina, Carole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navascues-Cornago, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Sarah L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Read, Michael L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakkis, Carol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Philip B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ophthalmic & physiological optics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maldonado-Codina, Carole</au><au>Navascues-Cornago, Maria</au><au>Smith, Sarah L</au><au>Read, Michael L</au><au>Lakkis, Carol</au><au>Morgan, Philip B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>End-of-day assessment of asymptomatic versus highly symptomatic soft contact lens wearers</atitle><jtitle>Ophthalmic & physiological optics</jtitle><addtitle>Ophthalmic Physiol Opt</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>704</spage><epage>717</epage><pages>704-717</pages><issn>0275-5408</issn><eissn>1475-1313</eissn><abstract>To investigate differences in key clinical parameters between asymptomatic and highly symptomatic soft contact lens (CL) wearers after 14 h of wear.
In this pilot investigation, Phase 1 identified asymptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≤ 7) and highly symptomatic (CLDEQ-8 score ≥ 20) subjects after fitting with nelfilcon A CLs. Phase 2 investigated the following over a single nelfilcon A CL-wearing day (14 ± 2 h): blinking characteristics, tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive tear break-up time (NIBUT), tear film osmolarity and eyelid margin staining. Parameters for the two groups were compared using linear mixed models and post-hoc testing. The relationship between comfort scores and the clinical parameters was also investigated.
Overall, 161 and 42 subjects were enrolled into Phase 1 and 2, respectively. Twenty-five asymptomatic and 17 symptomatic subjects completed Phase 2. Lower eyelid TMH was decreased after 14 h in symptomatic compared with asymptomatic subjects (least square mean [LSM] difference -0.04 mm, 95% CI: -0.07, -0.01). Osmolarity was lower in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects at fitting (LSM difference -9.89, 95% CI: -18.91, -0.86). Upper eyelid margin staining was greater after 14 h in symptomatic than in asymptomatic subjects (LSM difference 0.53, 95% CI: 0.01, 1.05) and greater after 14 h than baseline in the symptomatic group (LSM difference 0.61, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.07). There was a significant relationship between comfort and upper eyelid margin staining (r = -0.40, 95% CI: -0.63, -0.11) and blink rate (r = -0.31, 95% CI: -0.57, -0.003).
The potential parameters most effective in differentiating asymptomatic from symptomatic wearers were upper eyelid margin staining and lower TMH. The parameter with the strongest relationship to comfort was upper eyelid margin staining, where higher comfort scores were associated with lower levels of staining.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38546401</pmid><doi>10.1111/opo.13305</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5139-3594</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9976-8567</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2157-0905</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8115-1067</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-8169</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4101-376X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0275-5408 |
ispartof | Ophthalmic & physiological optics, 2024-06, Vol.44 (4), p.704-717 |
issn | 0275-5408 1475-1313 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_3014010092 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Asymptomatic Blinking - physiology Contact lenses Contact Lenses, Hydrophilic - adverse effects Dry Eye Syndromes - diagnosis Dry Eye Syndromes - etiology Dry Eye Syndromes - physiopathology Eyelid Eyelids Female Humans Investigations Male Osmolar Concentration Osmolarity Pilot Projects Tears - metabolism Tears - physiology Young Adult |
title | End-of-day assessment of asymptomatic versus highly symptomatic soft contact lens wearers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T05%3A56%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=End-of-day%20assessment%20of%20asymptomatic%20versus%20highly%20symptomatic%20soft%20contact%20lens%20wearers&rft.jtitle=Ophthalmic%20&%20physiological%20optics&rft.au=Maldonado-Codina,%20Carole&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=704&rft.epage=717&rft.pages=704-717&rft.issn=0275-5408&rft.eissn=1475-1313&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/opo.13305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3048259455%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3048259455&rft_id=info:pmid/38546401&rfr_iscdi=true |